• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
    • NFL Week 1
      NFL Week 1
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Odds
      • Anytime TD Picks
      • Anytime Touchdown Grades
      • NFL ATS Picks
      • NFL Moneyline Picks
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | College Basketball

    🤢🥴_ Fubah's 2023 Hoops Thread _😲🥵

    «First Previous 505152 ... 99100101 Next Last»
    fubah2
    KellyM_1964
    witswits
    Participants:
    Search model icon
    Views: 73623
    Posts: 2502
    «First Previous 505152 ... 99100101 Next Last»
     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 52895
    Posted: Mar. 26, 2023 - 6:56 PM ET #1226

    For the Miami +8.5  vs LSU -8.5  game

    I figure it's too close to call on the spread and too much chalk at -500 LSU for the modest edge they have

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    For the Miami +8.5  vs LSU -8.5  game

    I figure it's too close to call on the spread and too much chalk at -500 LSU for the modest edge they have

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 52895
    Posted: Mar. 26, 2023 - 7:03 PM ET #1227

    MENS LIVE ACTION bet:   72 - 68   Longhornies -350

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    MENS LIVE ACTION bet:   72 - 68   Longhornies -350

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 52895
    Posted: Mar. 26, 2023 - 7:07 PM ET #1228

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    MENS LIVE ACTION bet:   72 - 68   Longhornies -350

     

    Sure enough....right after I post my bet, Miami scores 5 real quick to take the lead

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    MENS LIVE ACTION bet:   72 - 68   Longhornies -350

     

    Sure enough....right after I post my bet, Miami scores 5 real quick to take the lead

     
    KellyM_1964
    KellyM_1964
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2009
    Posts: 16734
    Posted: Mar. 26, 2023 - 7:10 PM ET #1229

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: MENS LIVE ACTION bet:   72 - 68   Longhornies -350   Sure enough....right after I post my bet, Miami scores 5 real quick to take the lead

     

    always happens   

    but i believe texas will squeak it out  in the final minute

     

     

     

    "I'm the MOST HONEST human being that GOD EVER created!" - Donald "the felon" Trump
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: MENS LIVE ACTION bet:   72 - 68   Longhornies -350   Sure enough....right after I post my bet, Miami scores 5 real quick to take the lead

     

    always happens   

    but i believe texas will squeak it out  in the final minute

     

     

     

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 52895
    Posted: Mar. 26, 2023 - 7:26 PM ET #1230

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: MENS LIVE ACTION bet:   72 - 68   Longhornies -350   Sure enough....right after I post my bet, Miami scores 5 real quick to take the lead

    And that's a LOSS

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: MENS LIVE ACTION bet:   72 - 68   Longhornies -350   Sure enough....right after I post my bet, Miami scores 5 real quick to take the lead

    And that's a LOSS

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 52895
    Posted: Mar. 26, 2023 - 7:40 PM ET #1231

    [Quote: Originally Posted by fubah2]

     

    an_light  A review of my posted "heavy chalk" results
          to date in MEN's NCAA:

     

      1 - 0 ......lines of -600 and up  (Winner was -650)
      0 - 1 ......lines of -500 to -599  (loser was -575)*
      8 - 0 ......lines of -400 to -499
    16 - 2 ..... lines of -300 to -399  (loser was -325 and -350)

    =======
    = 25 - 3     an_2drinks  

     

    If profiting off heavy chalk bets was easy (as some critics suggest) then everyone would be doing it!!

    Reply
    Quote Post
    1
    Report User

    [Quote: Originally Posted by fubah2]

     

    an_light  A review of my posted "heavy chalk" results
          to date in MEN's NCAA:

     

      1 - 0 ......lines of -600 and up  (Winner was -650)
      0 - 1 ......lines of -500 to -599  (loser was -575)*
      8 - 0 ......lines of -400 to -499
    16 - 2 ..... lines of -300 to -399  (loser was -325 and -350)

    =======
    = 25 - 3     an_2drinks  

     

    If profiting off heavy chalk bets was easy (as some critics suggest) then everyone would be doing it!!

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 52895
    Posted: Mar. 26, 2023 - 9:06 PM ET #1232

                WOMENS Elite 8

    5 seed Louisville +5 vs. 2 seed Iowa -5 (in Seattle)

    My rankings: #15 Louisville vs. #6 Iowa

    an_light9:20  ET tipoff

     

    Louisville 14 - 7 in very tough ACC
    Iowa 18 - 3 in tough but not quite as tough BigTEN

    Louisville 3 - 5 in conf against teams similar to a very good Hawkeye team, PLUS 2 decisive wins against very good teams in the tournament.

    Iowa was 6 - 3 in conf against teams similar to a very good Louisville team, PLUS 1 decisive win against very good Colorado in the tournament.

    Iowa depends entirely on one player, the ALL-EVERYTHING & fabulous Kaitlyn "downtown" Clark. (like Gonzaga depends on Drew Timme) Arguably the BEST player in NCAA women's hoops this season!! Watch her, she's terrific!! (kind of like a white female Kobe Bryant) As a 6'0" guard she leads the team in rebound avg, leads the team with an AWESOME 8.5 assists avg, oh yeah, and 27 ppg!!! If Clark is on, they win (and cover -5) easily. But...if she is OFF her game, gets in fouls, or injured, then they likely lose - even if Louisville just plays an average game. She means EVERYTHING to IOWA's chances.

    As a team IOWA averages 37% from the arc and an AWESOME 51% from the floor!
    This compares with Louisville's 35% and 45%

    Louisville's conf losses to very good teams comparable to IOWA, twice to V.Tech, twice to Notre Dame were nailbiter losses....but their recent tourny wins over good teams were decisive.

    DOWN THE STRETCH?
    Louisvilles last 2 outings were impressive, but the 5 games before were not, with 2 losses and a nailbiter over a mediocre opponent.

    IOWA has been on a mission since being routed by 28 pts at Maryland. Clark had an off game with more turnovers than assists! IOWA then beat 3 consecutive quality teams, each higher ranked than Louisville, in conference, before upending a tough Georgia squad by 8 and then an even tougher Colorado team by 10 last outing.


    an_lightThe outcome depends on IOWA's Clark, so I am holding off either way until I see how well she plays...

    Reply
    Quote Post
    1
    Report User

                WOMENS Elite 8

    5 seed Louisville +5 vs. 2 seed Iowa -5 (in Seattle)

    My rankings: #15 Louisville vs. #6 Iowa

    an_light9:20  ET tipoff

     

    Louisville 14 - 7 in very tough ACC
    Iowa 18 - 3 in tough but not quite as tough BigTEN

    Louisville 3 - 5 in conf against teams similar to a very good Hawkeye team, PLUS 2 decisive wins against very good teams in the tournament.

    Iowa was 6 - 3 in conf against teams similar to a very good Louisville team, PLUS 1 decisive win against very good Colorado in the tournament.

    Iowa depends entirely on one player, the ALL-EVERYTHING & fabulous Kaitlyn "downtown" Clark. (like Gonzaga depends on Drew Timme) Arguably the BEST player in NCAA women's hoops this season!! Watch her, she's terrific!! (kind of like a white female Kobe Bryant) As a 6'0" guard she leads the team in rebound avg, leads the team with an AWESOME 8.5 assists avg, oh yeah, and 27 ppg!!! If Clark is on, they win (and cover -5) easily. But...if she is OFF her game, gets in fouls, or injured, then they likely lose - even if Louisville just plays an average game. She means EVERYTHING to IOWA's chances.

    As a team IOWA averages 37% from the arc and an AWESOME 51% from the floor!
    This compares with Louisville's 35% and 45%

    Louisville's conf losses to very good teams comparable to IOWA, twice to V.Tech, twice to Notre Dame were nailbiter losses....but their recent tourny wins over good teams were decisive.

    DOWN THE STRETCH?
    Louisvilles last 2 outings were impressive, but the 5 games before were not, with 2 losses and a nailbiter over a mediocre opponent.

    IOWA has been on a mission since being routed by 28 pts at Maryland. Clark had an off game with more turnovers than assists! IOWA then beat 3 consecutive quality teams, each higher ranked than Louisville, in conference, before upending a tough Georgia squad by 8 and then an even tougher Colorado team by 10 last outing.


    an_lightThe outcome depends on IOWA's Clark, so I am holding off either way until I see how well she plays...

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 52895
    Posted: Mar. 26, 2023 - 9:38 PM ET #1233

    So I've seen enough with under 4 mins left 1Q.....Hawkeyes down  12 - 15.....but CLARK playing very well....

    IOWA -150  *Best Bet

    Reply
    Quote Post
    1
    Report User

    So I've seen enough with under 4 mins left 1Q.....Hawkeyes down  12 - 15.....but CLARK playing very well....

    IOWA -150  *Best Bet

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 52895
    Posted: Mar. 26, 2023 - 10:16 PM ET #1234

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    So I've seen enough with under 4 mins left 1Q.....Hawkeyes down  12 - 15.....but CLARK playing very well.... IOWA -150  *Best Bet

    Since Louisville began on an initial 8 - 0 run to start the game, Caitlin & supporting cast went 48 - 35 to go to HT up 5

    Clark's season avg is 27 pts and 7 assists per game. 

    She already has 22 pts and 8 assists in just one half!

    Reply
    Quote Post
    1
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    So I've seen enough with under 4 mins left 1Q.....Hawkeyes down  12 - 15.....but CLARK playing very well.... IOWA -150  *Best Bet

    Since Louisville began on an initial 8 - 0 run to start the game, Caitlin & supporting cast went 48 - 35 to go to HT up 5

    Clark's season avg is 27 pts and 7 assists per game. 

    She already has 22 pts and 8 assists in just one half!

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 52895
    Posted: Mar. 26, 2023 - 10:27 PM ET #1235

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: So I've seen enough with under 4 mins left 1Q.....Hawkeyes down  12 - 15.....but CLARK playing very well.... IOWA -150  *Best Bet Since Louisville began on an initial 8 - 0 run to start the game, Caitlin & supporting cast went 48 - 35 to go to HT up 5 Clark's season avg is 27 pts and 7 assists per game.  She already has 22 pts and 8 assists in just one half!

    The line on IOWA now at HT is up to -375 but I don't advise it because now there is an issue.......Clark picked up a silly foul at the end of the 1H.  She now has 2.  Personally, I believe, that if longtime veteran coach Lisa Bluder does not sit her for the first several minutes of the 3Q, the refs will be looking for the tiniest little touch and give her a 3rd foul.....then she will have to sit for quite awhile and Louisville will storm back and probably take the lead before Clark gets back in.   THEY SHOULD SIT HER NOW AND hold down the fort WITHOUT HER early 3Q....*EXPECT* the refs to issue a 3rd foul on her this coming 3rdQ.....I just know they want to....

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: So I've seen enough with under 4 mins left 1Q.....Hawkeyes down  12 - 15.....but CLARK playing very well.... IOWA -150  *Best Bet Since Louisville began on an initial 8 - 0 run to start the game, Caitlin & supporting cast went 48 - 35 to go to HT up 5 Clark's season avg is 27 pts and 7 assists per game.  She already has 22 pts and 8 assists in just one half!

    The line on IOWA now at HT is up to -375 but I don't advise it because now there is an issue.......Clark picked up a silly foul at the end of the 1H.  She now has 2.  Personally, I believe, that if longtime veteran coach Lisa Bluder does not sit her for the first several minutes of the 3Q, the refs will be looking for the tiniest little touch and give her a 3rd foul.....then she will have to sit for quite awhile and Louisville will storm back and probably take the lead before Clark gets back in.   THEY SHOULD SIT HER NOW AND hold down the fort WITHOUT HER early 3Q....*EXPECT* the refs to issue a 3rd foul on her this coming 3rdQ.....I just know they want to....

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 52895
    Posted: Mar. 26, 2023 - 11:11 PM ET #1236

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: So I've seen enough with under 4 mins left 1Q.....Hawkeyes down  12 - 15.....but CLARK playing very well.... IOWA -150  *Best Bet Since Louisville began on an initial 8 - 0 run to start the game, Caitlin & supporting cast went 48 - 35 to go to HT up 5 Clark's season avg is 27 pts and 7 assists per game.  She already has 22 pts and 8 assists in just one half! The line on IOWA now at HT is up to -375 but I don't advise it because now there is an issue.......Clark picked up a silly foul at the end of the 1H.  She now has 2.  Personally, I believe, that if longtime veteran coach Lisa Bluder does not sit her for the first several minutes of the 3Q, the refs will be looking for the tiniest little touch and give her a 3rd foul.....then she will have to sit for quite awhile and Louisville will storm back and probably take the lead before Clark gets back in.   THEY SHOULD SIT HER NOW AND hold down the fort WITHOUT HER early 3Q....*EXPECT* the refs to issue a 3rd foul on her this coming 3rdQ.....I just know they want to....

    Well......she escaped the 3rdQ .....GOOD!

    Mid 4th she already has 36 pts and 11 assists!!!

     

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: So I've seen enough with under 4 mins left 1Q.....Hawkeyes down  12 - 15.....but CLARK playing very well.... IOWA -150  *Best Bet Since Louisville began on an initial 8 - 0 run to start the game, Caitlin & supporting cast went 48 - 35 to go to HT up 5 Clark's season avg is 27 pts and 7 assists per game.  She already has 22 pts and 8 assists in just one half! The line on IOWA now at HT is up to -375 but I don't advise it because now there is an issue.......Clark picked up a silly foul at the end of the 1H.  She now has 2.  Personally, I believe, that if longtime veteran coach Lisa Bluder does not sit her for the first several minutes of the 3Q, the refs will be looking for the tiniest little touch and give her a 3rd foul.....then she will have to sit for quite awhile and Louisville will storm back and probably take the lead before Clark gets back in.   THEY SHOULD SIT HER NOW AND hold down the fort WITHOUT HER early 3Q....*EXPECT* the refs to issue a 3rd foul on her this coming 3rdQ.....I just know they want to....

    Well......she escaped the 3rdQ .....GOOD!

    Mid 4th she already has 36 pts and 11 assists!!!

     

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 52895
    Posted: Mar. 26, 2023 - 11:55 PM ET #1237

    [Quote: Originally Posted by fubah2]Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: NIT PICKING WOMEN My rankings: #46 Oregon   @ #51 WASHINGTON Oregon was 8 - 12 in conf, but only 2 - 7 OTRThey escaped with a narrow 2 pt win over Washington, on neutral court, in conf playoffs, 2 weeks after losing AT WASHINGTON by 8 Washington 7 - 12 in conf, but 5 - 4 on homecourt In game #1 Oregon won at home by 7In game #2 Washington won at home by 8In game #3 played in Las Vegas, Oregon won a nailbiterTonight's game is a home game in Washington! These two teams are EVEN strength! But home team edge to HUSKIES.All players on both teams are expected to be available tonight, but the line, if accurate, is curious since WASHINGTON has a fair edge due to the home venue.

    W  LADY HUSKIES +11.5-120  *Best Bet an_2drinks

     

    Reply
    Quote Post
    1
    Report User

    [Quote: Originally Posted by fubah2]Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: NIT PICKING WOMEN My rankings: #46 Oregon   @ #51 WASHINGTON Oregon was 8 - 12 in conf, but only 2 - 7 OTRThey escaped with a narrow 2 pt win over Washington, on neutral court, in conf playoffs, 2 weeks after losing AT WASHINGTON by 8 Washington 7 - 12 in conf, but 5 - 4 on homecourt In game #1 Oregon won at home by 7In game #2 Washington won at home by 8In game #3 played in Las Vegas, Oregon won a nailbiterTonight's game is a home game in Washington! These two teams are EVEN strength! But home team edge to HUSKIES.All players on both teams are expected to be available tonight, but the line, if accurate, is curious since WASHINGTON has a fair edge due to the home venue.

    W  LADY HUSKIES +11.5-120  *Best Bet an_2drinks

     

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 52895
    Posted: Mar. 27, 2023 - 12:17 AM ET #1238

    [Quote: Originally Posted by fubah2]So I've seen enough with under 4 mins left 1Q.....

    Hawkeyes down  12 - 15.....but CLARK playing very well....

    W IOWA -150  *Best Bet   an_2drinks

    Reply
    Quote Post
    1
    Report User

    [Quote: Originally Posted by fubah2]So I've seen enough with under 4 mins left 1Q.....

    Hawkeyes down  12 - 15.....but CLARK playing very well....

    W IOWA -150  *Best Bet   an_2drinks

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 52895
    Posted: Mar. 27, 2023 - 8:50 AM ET #1239

    Two *BEST BET winners in Women's hoops on Sunday!

    W  LADY HUSKIES +11.5-120 *Best Bet
    W  IOWA -150 (live; early 1stQ) *Best Bet

     

    Those wins bring my Women's *Best Bets to:  29 - 13  an_2drinks

     

    Reply
    Quote Post
    2
    Report User

    Two *BEST BET winners in Women's hoops on Sunday!

    W  LADY HUSKIES +11.5-120 *Best Bet
    W  IOWA -150 (live; early 1stQ) *Best Bet

     

    Those wins bring my Women's *Best Bets to:  29 - 13  an_2drinks

     

     
    witswits
    witswits
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2000
    Posts: 2540
    Posted: Mar. 27, 2023 - 5:11 PM ET #1240

    @fubah2

     I keep looking at the girls lines and see South Carolina at -250 to win the Tourney. They seem so superior to all others at this point being double digit favs every game.

     

    Do you feel this has something of value?  I still have trouble laying 2.5 to win 1 unit or playing the big chalk.

     

     

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    @fubah2

     I keep looking at the girls lines and see South Carolina at -250 to win the Tourney. They seem so superior to all others at this point being double digit favs every game.

     

    Do you feel this has something of value?  I still have trouble laying 2.5 to win 1 unit or playing the big chalk.

     

     

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 52895
    Posted: Mar. 27, 2023 - 5:57 PM ET #1241

                NIT PICKING WOMEN

     

    Florida+3.5/+130   @BOWLING GREEN -3.5/-180

    My rankings:
    #62 Florida     at #59 BOWLING GREEN

     

    The bottom line:
    Florida in SEC against opps similar to Bowling Green went 2 - 3, plus 2 playoff wins, specifically 3 - 1 OTR at those similar opps!

    BOWLING GREEN in MAC against opps similar to FLorida went 3 - 3, plus 2 solid playoff wins but against teams slightly weaker than Florida, but specifically ON HOMECOURT 4 - 0 -- although one was OT, and another was an opp slightly weaker than Florida (Memphis, last game)

    PASS

    Reply
    Quote Post
    2
    Report User

                NIT PICKING WOMEN

     

    Florida+3.5/+130   @BOWLING GREEN -3.5/-180

    My rankings:
    #62 Florida     at #59 BOWLING GREEN

     

    The bottom line:
    Florida in SEC against opps similar to Bowling Green went 2 - 3, plus 2 playoff wins, specifically 3 - 1 OTR at those similar opps!

    BOWLING GREEN in MAC against opps similar to FLorida went 3 - 3, plus 2 solid playoff wins but against teams slightly weaker than Florida, but specifically ON HOMECOURT 4 - 0 -- although one was OT, and another was an opp slightly weaker than Florida (Memphis, last game)

    PASS

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 52895
    Posted: Mar. 27, 2023 - 6:36 PM ET #1242

    Quote Originally Posted by witswits:

    @fubah2  I keep looking at the girls lines and see South Carolina at -250 to win the Tourney.

    They seem so superior to all others at this point being double digit favs every game.   Do you feel this has something of value? 

    I still have trouble laying 2.5 to win 1 unit or playing the big chalk.

     

    Thanks for the reminder!  I normally don't consider any futures until final 4 due to my concerns about fluke injuries or opt outs before then, but now that you mention it, after Gamecocks whup the Terps tonight the futures line on South Carolina will rise!

    The Lady Gamecocks are the DOMINANT FORCE in NCAA.   There are very good reasons why they are DD favs most of the time.  I won't go into all the reasons but a few:  they spread the ball around and their bench gets a heavy does of action. Meaning they DO NOT rely on any ONE superstar (like Caitlin Clark for IOWA)  So if any starter goes down due to injury or foul troubles - NO BIGGIE! - they don't miss a beat at all!  That also means coach Staley can, if she needs to, platoon her players and push the ball in a very high-paced game to wear down the opps with no loss in scoring or defense.  What a luxury to have.

    Well, that and her starting forward line is the tallest in Women's NCAA at 6'7" and 6'5" and 6'4"

    Here's a solution for anyone who has trepidation about betting chalk: 

    an_light BET A SMALLER AMOUNT than the ML odds! an_happydude 

     

    Say your usual bet is lay $100 to win $91 on spreads....then here, even though the moneyline is -250 or -280 or whatever, just bet your usual $100 to win a smaller amount. 

    PRESTO!! NO CHANCE OF A HUGE LOSS!!  an_2drinks

    And yeah, I would recommend that bet at -250 odds (only laying your usual amount though)

     

     

    Reply
    Quote Post
    2
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by witswits:

    @fubah2  I keep looking at the girls lines and see South Carolina at -250 to win the Tourney.

    They seem so superior to all others at this point being double digit favs every game.   Do you feel this has something of value? 

    I still have trouble laying 2.5 to win 1 unit or playing the big chalk.

     

    Thanks for the reminder!  I normally don't consider any futures until final 4 due to my concerns about fluke injuries or opt outs before then, but now that you mention it, after Gamecocks whup the Terps tonight the futures line on South Carolina will rise!

    The Lady Gamecocks are the DOMINANT FORCE in NCAA.   There are very good reasons why they are DD favs most of the time.  I won't go into all the reasons but a few:  they spread the ball around and their bench gets a heavy does of action. Meaning they DO NOT rely on any ONE superstar (like Caitlin Clark for IOWA)  So if any starter goes down due to injury or foul troubles - NO BIGGIE! - they don't miss a beat at all!  That also means coach Staley can, if she needs to, platoon her players and push the ball in a very high-paced game to wear down the opps with no loss in scoring or defense.  What a luxury to have.

    Well, that and her starting forward line is the tallest in Women's NCAA at 6'7" and 6'5" and 6'4"

    Here's a solution for anyone who has trepidation about betting chalk: 

    an_light BET A SMALLER AMOUNT than the ML odds! an_happydude 

     

    Say your usual bet is lay $100 to win $91 on spreads....then here, even though the moneyline is -250 or -280 or whatever, just bet your usual $100 to win a smaller amount. 

    PRESTO!! NO CHANCE OF A HUGE LOSS!!  an_2drinks

    And yeah, I would recommend that bet at -250 odds (only laying your usual amount though)

     

     

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 52895
    Posted: Mar. 27, 2023 - 7:16 PM ET #1243

    an_light  *NOTE:
           In my capping style for both MENS and WOMENS NCAA,
    I completely disregard all games played before Christmas
    (including any in conf)

         The second half of the season is most recent and therefore
    more relative to the way a team is playing, compared with
    pre-Christmas tournaments in the Bahamas/Hawaii or whatever.

        Quite often teams have new coaching staffs, and usually a few
    new players (transfers, rookies) and it takes time to determine
    best lineups, chemistry, and make evaluations in game conditions.
    To me, pre-Chirstmas games are like an extended preseason
    in the NFL. Experimentation is frequent, so they can prepare for
    the much more meaningful CONFERENCE games in the New Year.

    In fact big favs having new faces will often experiment to the point
    that they either lose games, or almost, to much weaker opps --
    and that in turn raises the rating of that weaker team just BY LUCK,
    not by superior skills. Many teams are overvalued as a result of
    fluky wins in preseason, or conversely fluky losses. I look for those
    over-valuations within conference standings and find lines that are
    from 2 to 5 points off from where they should be if we just disregard
    their upset win (or loss) over an opp where a completely different
    result was expected. Same as preseason NFL!!

    Also, in conference schedules yield plenty of "common opponents"
    for comparisons. And I typically start betting in last week of
    January to give conference teams time to sort themselves out.
    My capping success is rooted in just those final 6 weeks of the
    CONFERENCE games. Once into the various tournaments,
    evaluations are much tougher to make...

    I am NOT suggesting anyone switch to my way of capping.
    But this method is what works well for me....

    So if you happen to read in my posted game analysis that it looks
    to you like I am not considering a matchup between two teams that
    occurred last November, now you know why....


    However, if considering those games has proven year-after-year
    to result in profits for YOU, then by all means keep doing it! an_2drinks

    Reply
    Quote Post
    2
    Report User

    an_light  *NOTE:
           In my capping style for both MENS and WOMENS NCAA,
    I completely disregard all games played before Christmas
    (including any in conf)

         The second half of the season is most recent and therefore
    more relative to the way a team is playing, compared with
    pre-Christmas tournaments in the Bahamas/Hawaii or whatever.

        Quite often teams have new coaching staffs, and usually a few
    new players (transfers, rookies) and it takes time to determine
    best lineups, chemistry, and make evaluations in game conditions.
    To me, pre-Chirstmas games are like an extended preseason
    in the NFL. Experimentation is frequent, so they can prepare for
    the much more meaningful CONFERENCE games in the New Year.

    In fact big favs having new faces will often experiment to the point
    that they either lose games, or almost, to much weaker opps --
    and that in turn raises the rating of that weaker team just BY LUCK,
    not by superior skills. Many teams are overvalued as a result of
    fluky wins in preseason, or conversely fluky losses. I look for those
    over-valuations within conference standings and find lines that are
    from 2 to 5 points off from where they should be if we just disregard
    their upset win (or loss) over an opp where a completely different
    result was expected. Same as preseason NFL!!

    Also, in conference schedules yield plenty of "common opponents"
    for comparisons. And I typically start betting in last week of
    January to give conference teams time to sort themselves out.
    My capping success is rooted in just those final 6 weeks of the
    CONFERENCE games. Once into the various tournaments,
    evaluations are much tougher to make...

    I am NOT suggesting anyone switch to my way of capping.
    But this method is what works well for me....

    So if you happen to read in my posted game analysis that it looks
    to you like I am not considering a matchup between two teams that
    occurred last November, now you know why....


    However, if considering those games has proven year-after-year
    to result in profits for YOU, then by all means keep doing it! an_2drinks

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 52895
    Posted: Mar. 27, 2023 - 7:22 PM ET #1244

                       WOMEN - ELITE 8

     

    Maryland vs. S.Carolina

    My rankings:
    #7 Maryland   vs.   #1 S.Carolina

     

    BOTTOM LINE:
    S.Carolina is big time head & shoulders above the rest of teams, figuratively and literally! VERY TALL! And they are the BEST TEAM -- haven't lost a single game.

    Tonight's game is being played in Greenville, SOUTH CAROLINA - a mere 1:50 drive from Columbia, but of course they have fans of the Lady Gamecocks all over the entire state! So it will be a partisan crowd for sure.

    The line is outrageous on SC. Backdoor spread cover for Terps is possible in garbage time but I do not expect this one to be close ....though Terps are very good and they will hang with SC for quite awhile, I suspect...

    Reply
    Quote Post
    2
    Report User

                       WOMEN - ELITE 8

     

    Maryland vs. S.Carolina

    My rankings:
    #7 Maryland   vs.   #1 S.Carolina

     

    BOTTOM LINE:
    S.Carolina is big time head & shoulders above the rest of teams, figuratively and literally! VERY TALL! And they are the BEST TEAM -- haven't lost a single game.

    Tonight's game is being played in Greenville, SOUTH CAROLINA - a mere 1:50 drive from Columbia, but of course they have fans of the Lady Gamecocks all over the entire state! So it will be a partisan crowd for sure.

    The line is outrageous on SC. Backdoor spread cover for Terps is possible in garbage time but I do not expect this one to be close ....though Terps are very good and they will hang with SC for quite awhile, I suspect...

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 52895
    Posted: Mar. 27, 2023 - 7:37 PM ET #1245

    WOMENS LIVE ACTION BET:  Gamecocks down 15 - 21 after 1Q, just started into 2ndQ 

    SC -290   *Best Bet

    Reply
    Quote Post
    2
    Report User

    WOMENS LIVE ACTION BET:  Gamecocks down 15 - 21 after 1Q, just started into 2ndQ 

    SC -290   *Best Bet

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 52895
    Posted: Mar. 27, 2023 - 7:48 PM ET #1246

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    WOMENS LIVE ACTION BET:  Gamecocks down 15 - 21 after 1Q, just started into 2ndQ  SC -290   *Best Bet

     

    Terps still leading 23 - 22  midway into 2Q ...........

    then SC hits a layup to get the lead back finallly!.......unfortunately a Maryland gal is down on the floor, possibly hurt

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    WOMENS LIVE ACTION BET:  Gamecocks down 15 - 21 after 1Q, just started into 2ndQ  SC -290   *Best Bet

     

    Terps still leading 23 - 22  midway into 2Q ...........

    then SC hits a layup to get the lead back finallly!.......unfortunately a Maryland gal is down on the floor, possibly hurt

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 52895
    Posted: Mar. 27, 2023 - 8:15 PM ET #1247

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: WOMENS LIVE ACTION BET:  Gamecocks down 15 - 21 after 1Q, just started into 2ndQ  SC -290   *Best Bet   Terps still leading 23 - 22  midway into 2Q ........... then SC hits a layup to get the lead back finallly!.......unfortunately a Maryland gal is down on the floor, possibly hurt

    SC, playing a virtual home game, is now up 38 - 30 at the half and the line on them has shot up to -4000 LOL

    But Terps will make a run and close the gap at least once in the 2H if not twice....

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: WOMENS LIVE ACTION BET:  Gamecocks down 15 - 21 after 1Q, just started into 2ndQ  SC -290   *Best Bet   Terps still leading 23 - 22  midway into 2Q ........... then SC hits a layup to get the lead back finallly!.......unfortunately a Maryland gal is down on the floor, possibly hurt

    SC, playing a virtual home game, is now up 38 - 30 at the half and the line on them has shot up to -4000 LOL

    But Terps will make a run and close the gap at least once in the 2H if not twice....

     
    KellyM_1964
    KellyM_1964
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2009
    Posts: 16734
    Posted: Mar. 27, 2023 - 9:09 PM ET #1248

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    NIT PICKING WOMEN   Florida+3.5/+130   @BOWLING GREEN -3.5/-180 My rankings:#62 Florida     at #59 BOWLING GREEN   The bottom line:Florida in SEC against opps similar to Bowling Green went 2 - 3, plus 2 playoff wins, specifically 3 - 1 OTR at those similar opps! BOWLING GREEN in MAC against opps similar to FLorida went 3 - 3, plus 2 solid playoff wins but against teams slightly weaker than Florida, but specifically ON HOMECOURT 4 - 0 -- although one was OT, and another was an opp slightly weaker than Florida (Memphis, last game) PASS

    homecourt holds firm in the nit once again ! thumbs_up

     

     

    "I'm the MOST HONEST human being that GOD EVER created!" - Donald "the felon" Trump
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    NIT PICKING WOMEN   Florida+3.5/+130   @BOWLING GREEN -3.5/-180 My rankings:#62 Florida     at #59 BOWLING GREEN   The bottom line:Florida in SEC against opps similar to Bowling Green went 2 - 3, plus 2 playoff wins, specifically 3 - 1 OTR at those similar opps! BOWLING GREEN in MAC against opps similar to FLorida went 3 - 3, plus 2 solid playoff wins but against teams slightly weaker than Florida, but specifically ON HOMECOURT 4 - 0 -- although one was OT, and another was an opp slightly weaker than Florida (Memphis, last game) PASS

    homecourt holds firm in the nit once again ! thumbs_up

     

     

     
    KellyM_1964
    KellyM_1964
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2009
    Posts: 16734
    Posted: Mar. 27, 2023 - 9:11 PM ET #1249

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    *NOTE:
           In my capping style for both MENS and WOMENS NCAA,
    I completely disregard all games played before Christmas
    (including any in conf)

     

         The second half of the season is most recent and therefore
    more relative to the way a team is playing, compared with
    pre-Christmas tournaments in the Bahamas/Hawaii or whatever.

        Quite often teams have new coaching staffs, and usually a few
    new players (transfers, rookies) and it takes time to determine
    best lineups, chemistry, and make evaluations in game conditions.
    To me, pre-Chirstmas games are like an extended preseason
    in the NFL. Experimentation is frequent, so they can prepare for
    the much more meaningful CONFERENCE games in the New Year.

    In fact big favs having new faces will often experiment to the point
    that they either lose games, or almost, to much weaker opps --
    and that in turn raises the rating of that weaker team just BY LUCK,
    not by superior skills. Many teams are overvalued as a result of
    fluky wins in preseason, or conversely fluky losses. I look for those
    over-valuations within conference standings and find lines that are
    from 2 to 5 points off from where they should be if we just disregard
    their upset win (or loss) over an opp where a completely different
    result was expected. Same as preseason NFL!!

    Also, in conference schedules yield plenty of "common opponents"
    for comparisons. And I typically start betting in last week of
    January to give conference teams time to sort themselves out.
    My capping success is rooted in just those final 6 weeks of the
    CONFERENCE games. Once into the various tournaments,
    evaluations are much tougher to make...

    I am NOT suggesting anyone switch to my way of capping.
    But this method is what works well for me....

    So if you happen to read in my posted game analysis that it looks
    to you like I am not considering a matchup between two teams that
    occurred last November, now you know why....


    However, if considering those games has proven year-after-year
    to result in profits for YOU, then by all means keep doing it! 

    goodpost  thx !

     

    "I'm the MOST HONEST human being that GOD EVER created!" - Donald "the felon" Trump
    Reply
    Quote Post
    2
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    *NOTE:
           In my capping style for both MENS and WOMENS NCAA,
    I completely disregard all games played before Christmas
    (including any in conf)

     

         The second half of the season is most recent and therefore
    more relative to the way a team is playing, compared with
    pre-Christmas tournaments in the Bahamas/Hawaii or whatever.

        Quite often teams have new coaching staffs, and usually a few
    new players (transfers, rookies) and it takes time to determine
    best lineups, chemistry, and make evaluations in game conditions.
    To me, pre-Chirstmas games are like an extended preseason
    in the NFL. Experimentation is frequent, so they can prepare for
    the much more meaningful CONFERENCE games in the New Year.

    In fact big favs having new faces will often experiment to the point
    that they either lose games, or almost, to much weaker opps --
    and that in turn raises the rating of that weaker team just BY LUCK,
    not by superior skills. Many teams are overvalued as a result of
    fluky wins in preseason, or conversely fluky losses. I look for those
    over-valuations within conference standings and find lines that are
    from 2 to 5 points off from where they should be if we just disregard
    their upset win (or loss) over an opp where a completely different
    result was expected. Same as preseason NFL!!

    Also, in conference schedules yield plenty of "common opponents"
    for comparisons. And I typically start betting in last week of
    January to give conference teams time to sort themselves out.
    My capping success is rooted in just those final 6 weeks of the
    CONFERENCE games. Once into the various tournaments,
    evaluations are much tougher to make...

    I am NOT suggesting anyone switch to my way of capping.
    But this method is what works well for me....

    So if you happen to read in my posted game analysis that it looks
    to you like I am not considering a matchup between two teams that
    occurred last November, now you know why....


    However, if considering those games has proven year-after-year
    to result in profits for YOU, then by all means keep doing it! 

    goodpost  thx !

     

     
     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 52895
    Posted: Mar. 28, 2023 - 3:26 PM ET #1250

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    W  LADY HUSKIES +11.5-120 *Best Bet
    W  IOWA -150 (live; early 1stQ) *Best Bet

    Those wins bring my Women's *Best Bets to:  29 - 13 

     

     

     

    WOMENS LIVE ACTION BET:  Gamecocks down 15 - 21 after 1Q, just started into 2ndQ 

    W   SC -290   *Best Bet

    That win raises my Women's *Best Bets to:  30 - 13   

                                                                  an_2drinks

     

     

     

    Reply
    Quote Post
    2
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    W  LADY HUSKIES +11.5-120 *Best Bet
    W  IOWA -150 (live; early 1stQ) *Best Bet

    Those wins bring my Women's *Best Bets to:  29 - 13 

     

     

     

    WOMENS LIVE ACTION BET:  Gamecocks down 15 - 21 after 1Q, just started into 2ndQ 

    W   SC -290   *Best Bet

    That win raises my Women's *Best Bets to:  30 - 13   

                                                                  an_2drinks

     

     

     

    All Forums | College Basketball
    «First Previous 505152 ... 99100101 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 446,805 Covers arrow
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 256,965 Covers arrow
    • Saturday 09/12/2026 807 Covers arrow
    • Serious Streak Survivor Strategies 1,918,126 Covers arrow
    • 9/12 🔥🔥?????? 3,918 Covers arrow
    • I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters 57,624 Covers arrow
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 96,199 Covers arrow
    • Anyone Tracking Scoring Drought System? 27,879 Covers arrow
    • Buckeyes/Longhorns in game 1,006 Covers arrow
    • ***Macwesties * Sat. Sept. 12, 2026 * NCAAF * Week #2 * College Football Plays*** 4,544 Covers arrow

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.