Final Sep 5
JMU 14 15.0 o56.0
LOU 28 -15.0 u56.0
Final Sep 5
NIU 9 16.5 o45.0
MD 20 -16.5 u45.0
Final Sep 5
WIU 7 31.5 o49.5
NW 42 -31.5 u49.5
Final Sep 5
EWU 14 33.0 o59.5
BSU 51 -33.0 u59.5
Final Sep 6
NWST 0 43.0 o50.5
MINN 66 -43.0 u50.5
Final Sep 6
SJSU 7 37.0 o52.0
TEX 38 -37.0 u52.0
Final 4OT Sep 6
CONN 20
SYR 27
Final Sep 6
UVA 31 3.0 o54.0
NCST 35 -3.0 u54.0
Final Sep 6
KENT 14 48.5 o60.0
TTU 62 -48.5 u60.0
Final Sep 6
FIU 0 42.0 o53.5
PSU 34 -42.0 u53.5
Final Sep 6
TAMC 3 45.5 o58.5
FSU 77 -45.5 u58.5
Final 5OT Sep 6
BAY 48
SMU 45
Final Sep 6
KENN 9 35.5 o51.0
IU 56 -35.5 u51.0
Final Sep 6
ILL 45
DUKE 19
Final Sep 6
CMU 17
PITT 45
Final Sep 6
IOWA 13 3.0 o42.5
ISU 16 -3.0 u42.5
Final Sep 6
LIB 24 -6.5 o50.5
JVST 34 6.5 u50.5
Final Sep 6
USU 22
TAM 44
Final Sep 6
HOW 7
TEM 55
Final Sep 6
WCU 10 17.5 o60.5
WAKE 42 -17.5 u60.5
Final Sep 6
PEAY 6 45.5 o55.5
UGA 28 -45.5 u55.5
Final Sep 6
IDST 22
UNM 32
Final Sep 6
LIN 13 31.0 o56.0
APP 20 -31.0 u56.0
Final Sep 6
BRY 27 14.5 o52.5
MASS 26 -14.5 u52.5
Final Sep 6
GRAM 0 55.5 o62.5
OSU 70 -55.5 u62.5
Final Sep 6
KU 31
MIZZ 42
Final Sep 6
FRES 36
ORST 27
Final Sep 6
SFPA 6 37.0 o48.0
BUFF 45 -37.0 u48.0
Final Sep 6
BGSU 20 23.0 o46.5
CIN 34 -23.0 u46.5
Final 4OT Sep 6
UNT 33 -11.5 o56.5
WMU 30 11.5 u56.5
Final Sep 6
WEBB 12 37.5 o60.5
GT 59 -37.5 u60.5
Final Sep 6
TXST 43 4.5 o64.5
UTSA 36 -4.5 u64.5
Final Sep 6
M-OH 17 16.5 o45.0
RUTG 45 -16.5 u45.0
Final Sep 6
MISS 30 -8.5 o51.0
UK 23 8.5 u51.0
Final Sep 6
UAB 24 20.5 o59.0
NAVY 38 -20.5 u59.0
Final Sep 6
OKST 3 28.5 o55.5
ORE 69 -28.5 u55.5
Final Sep 6
TROY 16
CLEM 27
Final Sep 6
ETSU 17 40.5 o58.5
TENN 72 -40.5 u58.5
Final Sep 6
DEL 7
COLO 31
Final Sep 6
UNI 7 14.0 o47.5
WYO 31 -14.0 u47.5
Final Sep 6
MTU 10 28.5 o45.0
WIS 42 -28.5 u45.0
Final Sep 6
WVU 10 -3.5 o58.5
OHIO 17 3.5 u58.5
Final Sep 6
USF 18 18.0 o58.0
FLA 16 -18.0 u58.0
Final Sep 6
JKST 20 13.5 o53.5
USM 38 -13.5 u53.5
Final Sep 6
ARST 14
ARK 56
Final Sep 6
CSUS 17
NEV 20
Final Sep 6
TXSO 3 44.5 o54.5
CAL 35 -44.5 u54.5
Final Sep 6
MOSU 21 7.0 o54.0
MRSH 20 -7.0 u54.0
Final Sep 6
FAMU 14 22.5 o50.5
FAU 56 -22.5 u50.5
Final Sep 6
CP 9 42.5 o54.0
UTAH 63 -42.5 u54.0
Final Sep 6
CAMP 3 29.5 o56.0
ECU 56 -29.5 u56.0
Final Sep 6
NCCU 6 22.0 o50.5
ODU 54 -22.0 u50.5
Final Sep 6
LIU 28 22.5 o54.5
EMU 23 -22.5 u54.5
Final Sep 6
HOU 35 -14.0 o38.5
RICE 9 14.0 u38.5
Final Sep 6
NCAT 7 38.0 o51.0
UCF 68 -38.0 u51.0
Final Sep 6
WKU 21 7.5 o57.5
TOL 45 -7.5 u57.5
Final Sep 6
MEM 38 -14.5 o58.0
GSU 16 14.5 u58.0
Final Sep 6
COOK 3 53.5 o63.5
MIA 45 -53.5 u63.5
Final Sep 6
UNCO 17 35.0 o52.5
CSU 21 -35.0 u52.5
Final Sep 6
TULN 33 -13.0 o51.5
USA 31 13.0 u51.5
Final Sep 6
ARMY 24 17.0 o48.0
KSU 21 -17.0 u48.0
Final Sep 6
CHSO 0 28.5 o49.0
CCU 13 -28.5 u49.0
Final Sep 6
LT 7 36.5 o49.5
LSU 23 -36.5 u49.5
Final Sep 6
ASU 20 -5.5 o59.0
MSST 24 5.5 u59.0
Final Sep 6
GASO 20 29.0 o62.0
USC 59 -29.0 u62.0
Final Sep 6
BALL 3 43.0 o52.5
AUB 42 -43.0 u52.5
Final Sep 6
VAN 44 1.5 o45.5
VT 20 -1.5 u45.5
Final 5OT Sep 6
BC 40 3.5 o45.5
MSU 42 -3.5 u45.5
Final Sep 6
AKR 0 34.0 o47.0
NEB 68 -34.0 u47.0
Final Sep 6
UNC 20 -15.5 o49.5
CHAR 3 15.5 u49.5
Final Sep 6
MICH 13 4.0 o44.0
OKLA 24 -4.0 u44.0
Final Sep 6
SIU 17 20.0 o51.5
PUR 34 -20.0 u51.5
Final Sep 6
ULM 0 34.0 o50.0
ALA 73 -34.0 u50.0
Final Sep 6
UCLA 23 -1.5 o54.5
UNLV 30 1.5 u54.5
Final Sep 6
MCNS 10 19.0 o49.5
ULL 34 -19.0 u49.5
Final Sep 6
TLSA 14 -3.5 o52.0
NMSU 21 3.5 u52.0
Final Sep 6
UTM 17 7.5 o50.0
UTEP 42 -7.5 u50.0
Final Sep 6
SCAR 10 42.5 o53.5
SOCAR 38 -42.5 u53.5
Final Sep 6
WEB 3 31.5 o56.5
ARIZ 48 -31.5 u56.5
Final Sep 6
STAN 3 20.0 o44.5
BYU 27 -20.0 u44.5
Final Sep 6
SDSU 13 2.0 o46.5
WSU 36 -2.0 u46.5
Final Sep 6
UCD 10 27.5 o53.5
WASH 70 -27.5 u53.5
Final Sep 7
SHSU 20 7.0 o49.0
HAW 37 -7.0 u49.0
Utah State 7th Mountain West1-1
Texas A&M 11th SEC2-0

Utah State @ Texas A&M preview

Kyle Field

Last Meeting ( Sep 19, 2009 ) Utah State 30, Texas A&M 38

The Texas A&M Aggies (1-0) hope to establish consistency in multiple aspects when they face the Utah State Aggies (1-0) on Saturday afternoon in College Station, Texas.

Texas A&M, ranked 19th in the Associated Press Top 25 poll, saw some encouraging signs and some that were alarming in last Saturday's season-opening 42-24 win over UTSA.

Texas A&M, which lost four of its final five games last season following a 7-1 start, got strong performances from returning starting quarterback Marcel Reed and key transfers KC Concepcion and Mario Craver.

Reed threw for a career-best four touchdown passes and totaled 289 yards through the air. Concepcion, an NC State transfer, returned a punt for a touchdown and caught a TD pass while Craver, a Mississippi State transfer, had 122 receiving yards and two scoring grabs among his eight receptions.

"I think these opening games are more and more challenging every year because between roster schemes, you don't have a great pulse or feel for what you're getting into," Texas A&M coach Mike Elko said. "And so we've just kind of learned how to be ready to adjust and adapt. I think that's literally what it comes down to so much in these games."

But A&M yielded 203 rushing yards, including 177 to Robert Henry Jr., while mustering only 108 rushing yards, most of which was accumulated in the second half.

"You always look for relative points of reference. UTSA did a nice job and it was a helpful game for us," said Utah State coach Bronco Mendenhall, who is in his first season with the program. "The game went competitive for a long time. Anytime you play a team you look for what might have worked and what we could do similarly. Our style isn't exactly the same as UTSA's, but you look for concepts that might be successful."

Texas A&M won its only previous matchup with Utah State, 38-30, in a 2009 home game.

Elko and Mendenhall are familiar with each other from their respective time coaching in the Atlantic Coast Conference.

"Obviously a tremendously successful head coach. Did a great job at BYU," Elko said of Mendenhall, who coached Virginia from 2016-21. "We coached against him when he was at UVA and I was the defensive coordinator at Wake Forest, and so I've always kind of followed his program from afar."

Mendenhall and his staff brought in 69 new players, including 36 who made their debuts in last week's 28-16 win over UTEP.

Coming off a 4-8 campaign, Utah State is counting on starting quarterback Bryson Barnes to be an impact player. He showed he's capable of it by throwing for a touchdown and 233 yards. However, the offensive line raised some concerns by allowing six sacks.

It's an area that Mendenhall knows must improve against a stout Texas A&M defense, which only mustered one sack last week but has the personnel to disrupt offenses up front.

"Just really well-coordinated and really well-coached," Mendenhall said. "There's a rhyme and reason and method for what they're doing and why, and good personnel to do it with. It's a proven system with lots of success at a historic place that's able to attract good talent and it's a great challenge."

--Field Level Media

Pages Related to This Topic

Weather Forecast