Chicago White Sox Picks
2nd in American League Central
(82 - 77)
Next Game
Fri, Sep 25
19:40 ET
COL @ CHW Picks
MLB Picks
Moneyline
Quinn Allen
Betting Analyst
Sean Burke gives Chicago a significant edge on the mound after posting a 0.82 ERA and 3.10 FIP across his last two appearances. Colorado counters with Tomoyuki Sugano, who owns a 5.10 FIP over his previous five starts and has continued to surrender plenty of hard contact. The White Sox are the stronger side.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
Guaranteed Rate Field ranks as the #6 park in baseball for overall RHB offense, per the leading projection system (THE BAT).. Guaranteed Rate Field has the 4th-shallowest fences in the majors — generally good for long-balls.. Ezequiel Tovar has made big strides with his Barrel% lately, upping his 6.9% seasonal rate to 12.5% in the last two weeks' worth of games.. Ezequiel Tovar's ability to hit the ball at a BABIP-maximizing launch angle (between -4° and 26°) has gotten better in recent games, increasing from 43.5% on the season to 64.7% over the past two weeks.. Despite posting a .262 wOBA this year, the leading projection system (THE BAT X) believes Ezequiel Tovar has experienced some negative variance given the .029 disparity between that figure and his estimated true talent wOBA of .291.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
Miguel Vargas projects as the 20th-best batter in the majors, according to the leading projection system (THE BAT X).. Miguel Vargas is projected to hit 3rd on the lineup card in today's game.. Guaranteed Rate Field ranks as the #6 park in baseball for overall RHB offense, per the leading projection system (THE BAT).. Miguel Vargas pulls a lot of his flyballs (37.1% — 92nd percentile) and is a great match for the park considering he'll be hitting them towards baseball's 5th-shallowest LF fences in today's matchup.. Home field advantage typically improves batter metrics in all categories, and Miguel Vargas will hold that advantage today.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
This year, Andrew Benintendi has been replaced by a pinch-hitter in 38% of his appearances when starting against righty on the mound.. This contest is expected to have the 2nd-best weather for pitching among all the games scheduled today.. There has been a significant decline in Andrew Benintendi's launch angle from last season's 20.6° to 17° this season.. Based on Statcast data, Andrew Benintendi is in the 14th percentile via the leading projection system (THE BAT X)'s version of Expected Batting Average since the start of last season at .220.. Andrew Benintendi has been very bad at hitting the ball to all fields (a crucial ability for batting average), checking in at the 1st percentile in THE BAT X's Spray Score this year.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
Colson Montgomery has primarily hit in the top-half of the lineup this year (76% of the time), but he is projected to hit 8th in the lineup in today's game.. This contest is expected to have the 2nd-best weather for pitching among all the games scheduled today.. In the past week's worth of games, Colson Montgomery's Barrel% has experienced a negative regression, plummeting from his seasonal rate of 12.4% down to 0%.. Colson Montgomery's ability to hit the ball at a HR-maximizing launch angle (between 23° and 34°) has decreased lately, falling from 19% on the season to 0% over the past 7 days.. Sporting a 3.89 K/BB rate this year, Colson Montgomery has shown weak plate discipline, grading out in the 9th percentile.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
When it comes to his home run ability, Mickey Moniak ranks in the 92nd percentile according to the leading projection system (THE BAT X).. Guaranteed Rate Field projects as the #6 venue in the majors for overall left-handed offense, according to the leading projection system (THE BAT).. Mickey Moniak will have the benefit of the platoon advantage against Sean Burke today.. Mickey Moniak pulls a high percentage of his flyballs (39.1% — 96th percentile) and sets up very well considering he'll be hitting them towards MLB's 9th-shallowest RF fences in today's matchup.. Mickey Moniak's launch angle this season (21.5°) is quite a bit higher than his 17.4° angle last year.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
Munetaka Murakami projects as the 2nd-best home run hitter in Major League Baseball, via the leading projection system (THE BAT X).. Munetaka Murakami is projected to bat 4th on the lineup card in this matchup.. Guaranteed Rate Field has the 4th-shallowest fences in the majors — generally good for long-balls.. Munetaka Murakami will have the benefit of the platoon advantage against Tomoyuki Sugano today.. Munetaka Murakami has big-time HR ability (100th percentile) if he makes contact, but that's always far from assured (36.4% K%). Today, however, opposing pitcher Tomoyuki Sugano is a pitch-to-contact type (1st percentile K%) — great news for Murakami.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
T.J. Rumfield is penciled in 4th in the lineup in this matchup.. Guaranteed Rate Field projects as the #6 venue in the majors for overall left-handed offense, according to the leading projection system (THE BAT).. Guaranteed Rate Field has the 4th-shallowest fences in the majors — generally good for long-balls.. T.J. Rumfield will have the handedness advantage against Sean Burke in today's game.. In the last week, T.J. Rumfield's Barrel% has experienced a surge, jumping from his seasonal rate of 5% up to 10%.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
When it comes to his home run ability, Mickey Moniak ranks in the 92nd percentile according to the leading projection system (THE BAT X).. Guaranteed Rate Field projects as the #6 venue in the majors for overall left-handed offense, according to the leading projection system (THE BAT).. Mickey Moniak will have the benefit of the platoon advantage against Sean Burke today.. Mickey Moniak pulls a high percentage of his flyballs (39.1% — 96th percentile) and sets up very well considering he'll be hitting them towards MLB's 9th-shallowest RF fences in today's matchup.. Mickey Moniak's launch angle this season (21.5°) is quite a bit higher than his 17.4° angle last year.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
Munetaka Murakami projects as the 2nd-best home run hitter in Major League Baseball, via the leading projection system (THE BAT X).. Munetaka Murakami is projected to bat 4th on the lineup card in this matchup.. Guaranteed Rate Field projects as the #6 venue in the majors for overall left-handed offense, according to the leading projection system (THE BAT).. Guaranteed Rate Field has the 4th-shallowest fences in the majors — generally good for long-balls.. Munetaka Murakami will have the benefit of the platoon advantage against Tomoyuki Sugano today.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
The leading projection system (THE BAT X) ranks Hunter Goodman as the majors's 14th-best home run batter.. Hunter Goodman is projected to hit 3rd in the lineup in this matchup.. Guaranteed Rate Field ranks as the #6 park in baseball for overall RHB offense, per the leading projection system (THE BAT).. Hunter Goodman pulls a lot of his flyballs (39.9% — 97th percentile) and will have a big advantage hitting them towards the league's 5th-shallowest LF fences in today's matchup.. Grading out in the 100th percentile for power, Hunter Goodman has paced 41.8 HRs per 600 plate appearances this year.
Consensus Picks
More ConsensusCOL @ CHW · Props
| GAME & PLAYER PROPS | PROJECTIONS | ANALYSIS | BEST ODDS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TOTAL
|
|||||||
|
SPREAD
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
M. Murakami
(1B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.74
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
4.48%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
J. McCarthy
(LF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.92
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
4.37%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
A. Benintendi
(DH)
0.5 Total Hits
0.78
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
2.99%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
M. Vargas
(3B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.95
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
1.91%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
B. Montgomery
(RF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.82
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-0.51%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
T. Rumfield
(1B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.78
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-0.84%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
C. Montgomery
(SS)
0.5 Total Hits
0.72
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
-1.65%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
M. Moniak
(LF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.63
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
-2.12%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
T. Peters
(CF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.82
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-2.43%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
H. Goodman
(C)
0.5 Total Hits
0.80
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-2.6%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
Z. Veen
(LF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.56
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
-3.23%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
K. Karros
(3B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.81
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-3.43%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
E. Tovar
(SS)
0.5 Total Hits
0.73
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
-4.39%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
K. Teel
(C)
0.5 Total Hits
0.90
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-10.84%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
S. Antonacci
(LF)
0.5 Total Hits
1.01
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-13.7%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
R. Grichuk
(DH)
0.5 Total Hits
0.86
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-16.6%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
E. Tovar
(SS)
1.5 Total Bases
1.20
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
12.74%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
M. Vargas
(3B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.78
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
11.95%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
A. Benintendi
(DH)
1.5 Total Bases
0.79
PROJECTION
-0.7
DIFFERENCE
11.35%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
C. Montgomery
(SS)
1.5 Total Bases
0.71
PROJECTION
-0.8
DIFFERENCE
10.78%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
M. Moniak
(LF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.26
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
9.73%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
T. Rumfield
(1B)
1.5 Total Bases
0.76
PROJECTION
-0.7
DIFFERENCE
7.25%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
K. Teel
(C)
1.5 Total Bases
1.53
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
6.68%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
H. Goodman
(C)
1.5 Total Bases
1.59
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
6.51%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
Z. Veen
(LF)
1.5 Total Bases
0.56
PROJECTION
-0.9
DIFFERENCE
5.61%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
K. Karros
(3B)
1.5 Total Bases
0.80
PROJECTION
-0.7
DIFFERENCE
4.87%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
S. Antonacci
(LF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.49
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
4.45%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
R. Grichuk
(DH)
1.5 Total Bases
1.52
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
-0.76%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
J. McCarthy
(LF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.40
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
-3.5%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
B. Montgomery
(RF)
1.5 Total Bases
0.82
PROJECTION
-0.7
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
M. Murakami
(1B)
1.5 Total Bases
0.75
PROJECTION
-0.7
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
M. Murakami
(1B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.25
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
10.22%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
M. Moniak
(LF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.15
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
0.37%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
R. Grichuk
(DH)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.15
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-1.44%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
E. Tovar
(SS)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.10
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-3.57%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
C. Montgomery
(SS)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.21
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-3.96%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
B. Montgomery
(RF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.08
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-3.98%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
S. Antonacci
(LF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.08
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-3.98%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
J. McCarthy
(LF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.08
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-4.39%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
M. Vargas
(3B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.19
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-4.76%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
Z. Veen
(LF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.08
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-5.05%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
A. Benintendi
(DH)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.14
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-5.13%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
T. Rumfield
(1B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.09
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-5.17%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
T. Peters
(CF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.11
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-12.35%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
H. Goodman
(C)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.20
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-17.47%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
K. Teel
(C)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.14
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-19.78%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
K. Karros
(3B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.09
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-21.68%
EV
|
|||||||
|
STRIKEOUTS THROWN
T. Sugano
(SP)
3.5 Strikeouts Thrown
3.75
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-1.64%
EV
|
|||||||
|
STRIKEOUTS THROWN
S. Burke
(SP)
5.5 Strikeouts Thrown
6.18
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
-4.96%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
T. Rumfield
(1B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.42
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
18.37%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
M. Moniak
(LF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.43
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
17.37%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
M. Murakami
(1B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.74
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
14.75%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
H. Goodman
(C)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.59
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
14.25%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
Z. Veen
(LF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.29
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
11.78%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
E. Tovar
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.35
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
10.15%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
A. Benintendi
(DH)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.48
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
9.59%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
M. Vargas
(3B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.68
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
7.55%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
C. Montgomery
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.58
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
7.52%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
K. Teel
(C)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.52
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
6.22%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
K. Karros
(3B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.33
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
5.56%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
B. Montgomery
(RF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.36
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
1.47%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
S. Antonacci
(LF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.37
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
0.93%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
T. Peters
(CF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.43
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
0.68%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
R. Grichuk
(DH)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.50
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
0.21%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
J. McCarthy
(LF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.33
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
-0%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
M. Moniak
(LF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.52
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
14.57%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
E. Tovar
(SS)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.43
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
12.89%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
H. Goodman
(C)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.91
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
12.75%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
M. Murakami
(1B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.19
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
12.66%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
C. Montgomery
(SS)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.90
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
9.96%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
T. Rumfield
(1B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.60
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
8.9%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
M. Vargas
(3B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.31
PROJECTION
+0.8
DIFFERENCE
7.92%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
J. McCarthy
(LF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.69
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
7.76%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
A. Benintendi
(DH)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.74
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
7.39%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
K. Teel
(C)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.05
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
6.13%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
Z. Veen
(LF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.16
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
4.27%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
K. Karros
(3B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.52
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
1.93%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
S. Antonacci
(LF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.96
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-0.83%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
B. Montgomery
(RF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.61
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
-5.07%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
R. Grichuk
(DH)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.84
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-5.8%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
T. Peters
(CF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.68
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
-9.11%
EV
|
|||||||
- Proj. Diff: Low to High
- Proj. Diff: High to Low
- Proj. Rating: Low to High
- Proj. Rating: High to Low
- +EV: Low to High
- +EV: High to Low
TOTAL
SPREAD
TOTAL HITS
M. Murakami
(1B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.74
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
4.48%
EV
TOTAL HITS
J. McCarthy
(LF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.92
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
4.37%
EV
TOTAL HITS
A. Benintendi
(DH)
0.5 Total Hits
0.78
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
2.99%
EV
TOTAL HITS
M. Vargas
(3B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.95
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
1.91%
EV
TOTAL HITS
B. Montgomery
(RF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.82
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-0.51%
EV
TOTAL HITS
T. Rumfield
(1B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.78
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-0.84%
EV
TOTAL HITS
C. Montgomery
(SS)
0.5 Total Hits
0.72
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
-1.65%
EV
TOTAL HITS
M. Moniak
(LF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.63
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
-2.12%
EV
TOTAL HITS
T. Peters
(CF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.82
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-2.43%
EV
TOTAL HITS
H. Goodman
(C)
0.5 Total Hits
0.80
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-2.6%
EV
TOTAL HITS
Z. Veen
(LF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.56
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
-3.23%
EV
TOTAL HITS
K. Karros
(3B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.81
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-3.43%
EV
TOTAL HITS
E. Tovar
(SS)
0.5 Total Hits
0.73
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
-4.39%
EV
TOTAL HITS
K. Teel
(C)
0.5 Total Hits
0.90
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-10.84%
EV
TOTAL HITS
S. Antonacci
(LF)
0.5 Total Hits
1.01
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-13.7%
EV
TOTAL HITS
R. Grichuk
(DH)
0.5 Total Hits
0.86
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-16.6%
EV
TOTAL BASES
E. Tovar
(SS)
1.5 Total Bases
1.20
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
12.74%
EV
TOTAL BASES
M. Vargas
(3B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.78
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
11.95%
EV
TOTAL BASES
A. Benintendi
(DH)
1.5 Total Bases
0.79
PROJECTION
-0.7
DIFFERENCE
11.35%
EV
TOTAL BASES
C. Montgomery
(SS)
1.5 Total Bases
0.71
PROJECTION
-0.8
DIFFERENCE
10.78%
EV
TOTAL BASES
M. Moniak
(LF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.26
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
9.73%
EV
TOTAL BASES
T. Rumfield
(1B)
1.5 Total Bases
0.76
PROJECTION
-0.7
DIFFERENCE
7.25%
EV
TOTAL BASES
K. Teel
(C)
1.5 Total Bases
1.53
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
6.68%
EV
TOTAL BASES
H. Goodman
(C)
1.5 Total Bases
1.59
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
6.51%
EV
TOTAL BASES
Z. Veen
(LF)
1.5 Total Bases
0.56
PROJECTION
-0.9
DIFFERENCE
5.61%
EV
TOTAL BASES
K. Karros
(3B)
1.5 Total Bases
0.80
PROJECTION
-0.7
DIFFERENCE
4.87%
EV
TOTAL BASES
S. Antonacci
(LF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.49
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
4.45%
EV
TOTAL BASES
R. Grichuk
(DH)
1.5 Total Bases
1.52
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
-0.76%
EV
TOTAL BASES
J. McCarthy
(LF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.40
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
-3.5%
EV
TOTAL BASES
B. Montgomery
(RF)
1.5 Total Bases
0.82
PROJECTION
-0.7
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
TOTAL BASES
M. Murakami
(1B)
1.5 Total Bases
0.75
PROJECTION
-0.7
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
M. Murakami
(1B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.25
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
10.22%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
M. Moniak
(LF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.15
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
0.37%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
R. Grichuk
(DH)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.15
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-1.44%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
E. Tovar
(SS)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.10
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-3.57%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
C. Montgomery
(SS)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.21
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-3.96%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
B. Montgomery
(RF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.08
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-3.98%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
S. Antonacci
(LF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.08
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-3.98%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
J. McCarthy
(LF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.08
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-4.39%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
M. Vargas
(3B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.19
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-4.76%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
Z. Veen
(LF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.08
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-5.05%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
A. Benintendi
(DH)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.14
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-5.13%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
T. Rumfield
(1B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.09
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-5.17%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
T. Peters
(CF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.11
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-12.35%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
H. Goodman
(C)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.20
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-17.47%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
K. Teel
(C)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.14
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-19.78%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
K. Karros
(3B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.09
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-21.68%
EV
STRIKEOUTS THROWN
T. Sugano
(SP)
3.5 Strikeouts Thrown
3.75
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-1.64%
EV
STRIKEOUTS THROWN
S. Burke
(SP)
5.5 Strikeouts Thrown
6.18
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
-4.96%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
T. Rumfield
(1B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.42
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
18.37%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
M. Moniak
(LF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.43
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
17.37%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
M. Murakami
(1B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.74
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
14.75%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
H. Goodman
(C)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.59
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
14.25%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
Z. Veen
(LF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.29
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
11.78%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
E. Tovar
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.35
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
10.15%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
A. Benintendi
(DH)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.48
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
9.59%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
M. Vargas
(3B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.68
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
7.55%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
C. Montgomery
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.58
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
7.52%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
K. Teel
(C)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.52
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
6.22%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
K. Karros
(3B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.33
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
5.56%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
B. Montgomery
(RF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.36
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
1.47%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
S. Antonacci
(LF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.37
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
0.93%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
T. Peters
(CF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.43
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
0.68%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
R. Grichuk
(DH)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.50
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
0.21%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
J. McCarthy
(LF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.33
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
-0%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
M. Moniak
(LF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.52
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
14.57%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
E. Tovar
(SS)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.43
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
12.89%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
H. Goodman
(C)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.91
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
12.75%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
M. Murakami
(1B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.19
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
12.66%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
C. Montgomery
(SS)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.90
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
9.96%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
T. Rumfield
(1B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.60
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
8.9%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
M. Vargas
(3B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.31
PROJECTION
+0.8
DIFFERENCE
7.92%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
J. McCarthy
(LF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.69
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
7.76%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
A. Benintendi
(DH)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.74
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
7.39%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
K. Teel
(C)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.05
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
6.13%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
Z. Veen
(LF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.16
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
4.27%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
K. Karros
(3B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.52
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
1.93%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
S. Antonacci
(LF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.96
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-0.83%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
B. Montgomery
(RF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.61
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
-5.07%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
R. Grichuk
(DH)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.84
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-5.8%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
T. Peters
(CF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.68
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
-9.11%
EV
COL @ CHW · Trends
Over
Under
COL
CHW
COL
CHW
COL
CHW
Over
Under
Over
Under
COL
CHW