(THIS IS A PROTECTION MIDDLE. I DON’T NECESSARILY GET WARM FUZZIES ON THIS
PLAY BUT THE ONLY WAY WE LOSE OUR PLAY # 2 IS IF DETROIT TEARS IT UP IN THE 2ND
HALF. HENCE, WE ARE PROTECTING HALF OF
OUR PLAY #2. SECONDARY NOTE: MCCARTHY
WILL NOT ALLOW GB TO ‘RUN IT UP’ IF THEY GET A LEAD… BEST PASS RUSH THEY SEEN
THIS YR HE WILL WANT TO PROTECT AROG
CURRENT: DAY 1 THE GROUP IS +4
UNITS 1-0
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
PLAY #5: DETROIT ‘PICK EM’ SECOND HALF.
(THIS IS A PROTECTION MIDDLE. I DON’T NECESSARILY GET WARM FUZZIES ON THIS
PLAY BUT THE ONLY WAY WE LOSE OUR PLAY # 2 IS IF DETROIT TEARS IT UP IN THE 2ND
HALF. HENCE, WE ARE PROTECTING HALF OF
OUR PLAY #2. SECONDARY NOTE: MCCARTHY
WILL NOT ALLOW GB TO ‘RUN IT UP’ IF THEY GET A LEAD… BEST PASS RUSH THEY SEEN
THIS YR HE WILL WANT TO PROTECT AROG
CURRENT: DAY 1 THE GROUP IS +4
UNITS 1-0
Suh's ejection single-handedly killed the potential middle.....man! that guy better get some anger management therapy or he will end up in prison someday....yikes!
0
Suh's ejection single-handedly killed the potential middle.....man! that guy better get some anger management therapy or he will end up in prison someday....yikes!
wada ya mean tonga? middles/hedges are just protections plays...I will gladly sacrafice 1 unit (middle) to win the 2 units on the game...all day long.... so we will only end up +5 U's for game 1 (picks 1, 2, and 3)..... walk in the park
0
Quote Originally Posted by Tonga:
wada ya mean tonga? middles/hedges are just protections plays...I will gladly sacrafice 1 unit (middle) to win the 2 units on the game...all day long.... so we will only end up +5 U's for game 1 (picks 1, 2, and 3)..... walk in the park
I'm just curious why you would take Lions at PICK EM 2nd half for a protection middle on your Play #2. Wasn't taking the Over on the 2nd half total ( 26.5 ) the obvious play, giving you a middle of 22 points. Even if Detroit had "torn it up", there's no way they keep Rogers out of the endzone for the entire 2nd half.
0
I'm just curious why you would take Lions at PICK EM 2nd half for a protection middle on your Play #2. Wasn't taking the Over on the 2nd half total ( 26.5 ) the obvious play, giving you a middle of 22 points. Even if Detroit had "torn it up", there's no way they keep Rogers out of the endzone for the entire 2nd half.
I'm just curious why you would take Lions at PICK EM 2nd half for a protection middle on your Play #2. Wasn't taking the Over on the 2nd half total ( 26.5 ) the obvious play, giving you a middle of 22 points. Even if Detroit had "torn it up", there's no way they keep Rogers out of the endzone for the entire 2nd half.
Look...lol... I am tired of explaining what I already explained to all the retro-active Einstiens....... I went 2-1 today, and 0-1 on middles the group has increased their bankroll by almost 9%. If that is not good enough for you--or any other arm chair QB's (that just throw criticisms as opposed to putting yourselves 'out there')--start you own thread.... the answer is above genius....lol
0
Quote Originally Posted by mischkin04:
I'm just curious why you would take Lions at PICK EM 2nd half for a protection middle on your Play #2. Wasn't taking the Over on the 2nd half total ( 26.5 ) the obvious play, giving you a middle of 22 points. Even if Detroit had "torn it up", there's no way they keep Rogers out of the endzone for the entire 2nd half.
Look...lol... I am tired of explaining what I already explained to all the retro-active Einstiens....... I went 2-1 today, and 0-1 on middles the group has increased their bankroll by almost 9%. If that is not good enough for you--or any other arm chair QB's (that just throw criticisms as opposed to putting yourselves 'out there')--start you own thread.... the answer is above genius....lol
I'm just curious why you would take Lions at PICK EM 2nd half for a protection middle on your Play #2. Wasn't taking the Over on the 2nd half total ( 26.5 ) the obvious play, giving you a middle of 22 points. Even if Detroit had "torn it up", there's no way they keep Rogers out of the endzone for the entire 2nd half.
NO YOU DIDN'T!!! LMFAO....!!!!
YOU HAD THE NERVE TO WRITE THIS QUESTIONING ME ON A DAY THAT YOU WENT 1-2 AND I WENT 2-1 (0-1 ON MIDDLES) AND +5 UNITS? I WON $ AND YOU LOST $ AND YOU WRITE THIS? LOL..... wow
I'm just curious why you would take Lions at PICK EM 2nd half for a protection middle on your Play #2. Wasn't taking the Over on the 2nd half total ( 26.5 ) the obvious play, giving you a middle of 22 points. Even if Detroit had "torn it up", there's no way they keep Rogers out of the endzone for the entire 2nd half.
NO YOU DIDN'T!!! LMFAO....!!!!
YOU HAD THE NERVE TO WRITE THIS QUESTIONING ME ON A DAY THAT YOU WENT 1-2 AND I WENT 2-1 (0-1 ON MIDDLES) AND +5 UNITS? I WON $ AND YOU LOST $ AND YOU WRITE THIS? LOL..... wow
I just figured a top handicapper like yourself couldn't possibly overlook a moneymaking oppurtunity. Too bad you can't handle us arm chairers voicing an opinion.
gl
0
I just figured a top handicapper like yourself couldn't possibly overlook a moneymaking oppurtunity. Too bad you can't handle us arm chairers voicing an opinion.
I'm just curious why you would take Lions at PICK EM 2nd half for a protection middle on your Play #2. Wasn't taking the Over on the 2nd half total ( 26.5 ) the obvious play, giving you a middle of 22 points. Even if Detroit had "torn it up", there's no way they keep Rogers out of the endzone for the entire 2nd half.
Ok mischkin04... should not of jumped on you (long day and will be capping for another 7 hrs).. you asked a question, and are probably just inexperienced and no one has ever explained the concept to you. A 'protection middle' is a play you would like to win, but actually expect to lose. This play you are looking at (above) was right on target and not a 'loss' as you understand a 'loss' to be. I could of 'hedged' (what I would bet you thought this was) and just played the Over 2nd half to protect the 2 Units Under I had on the game, but I don't/won't bet against my plays. Hence, as STATED the ONLY way the game would of gone OVER would be w/ 48.5 pts in the 2nd half, and the ONLY way I saw that happening was IF Detroit got 'live' and was scoring up a bunch (hence resting their D, hence they would've had slowed down GB and won the 2nd half)...if Det did not get 'LIVE' in the 2nd half, they would lose the half and I win more on the UNDER......... hopefully you understand this, but I have no more time to explain it in simpler terms for you...sorry
0
Quote Originally Posted by mischkin04:
I'm just curious why you would take Lions at PICK EM 2nd half for a protection middle on your Play #2. Wasn't taking the Over on the 2nd half total ( 26.5 ) the obvious play, giving you a middle of 22 points. Even if Detroit had "torn it up", there's no way they keep Rogers out of the endzone for the entire 2nd half.
Ok mischkin04... should not of jumped on you (long day and will be capping for another 7 hrs).. you asked a question, and are probably just inexperienced and no one has ever explained the concept to you. A 'protection middle' is a play you would like to win, but actually expect to lose. This play you are looking at (above) was right on target and not a 'loss' as you understand a 'loss' to be. I could of 'hedged' (what I would bet you thought this was) and just played the Over 2nd half to protect the 2 Units Under I had on the game, but I don't/won't bet against my plays. Hence, as STATED the ONLY way the game would of gone OVER would be w/ 48.5 pts in the 2nd half, and the ONLY way I saw that happening was IF Detroit got 'live' and was scoring up a bunch (hence resting their D, hence they would've had slowed down GB and won the 2nd half)...if Det did not get 'LIVE' in the 2nd half, they would lose the half and I win more on the UNDER......... hopefully you understand this, but I have no more time to explain it in simpler terms for you...sorry
I just figured a top handicapper like yourself couldn't possibly overlook a moneymaking oppurtunity. Too bad you can't handle us arm chairers voicing an opinion.
gl
Boy.. I really bother you don't I lol.... no biggie.. I am used to that in this game (capping)...and yeah..sorry to sound egotisical, but I am a top capper, and no. (scroll up 1 reply) I did not 'miss' an opportunity... I effectively protected my larger investment... hopefully you are more educated now after reading that.... Hope it helped... just a note though.. when you have an archived/verifiable losing day, don't toss stones at those of us who had documented/verifiable winning days..it makes you look dumb bro jus sayin... GL
0
Quote Originally Posted by mischkin04:
I just figured a top handicapper like yourself couldn't possibly overlook a moneymaking oppurtunity. Too bad you can't handle us arm chairers voicing an opinion.
gl
Boy.. I really bother you don't I lol.... no biggie.. I am used to that in this game (capping)...and yeah..sorry to sound egotisical, but I am a top capper, and no. (scroll up 1 reply) I did not 'miss' an opportunity... I effectively protected my larger investment... hopefully you are more educated now after reading that.... Hope it helped... just a note though.. when you have an archived/verifiable losing day, don't toss stones at those of us who had documented/verifiable winning days..it makes you look dumb bro jus sayin... GL
Ok mischkin04... should not of jumped on you (long day and will be capping for another 7 hrs).. you asked a question, and are probably just inexperienced and no one has ever explained the concept to you. A 'protection middle' is a play you would like to win, but actually expect to lose. This play you are looking at (above) was right on target and not a 'loss' as you understand a 'loss' to be. I could of 'hedged' (what I would bet you thought this was) and just played the Over 2nd half to protect the 2 Units Under I had on the game, but I don't/won't bet against my plays. Hence, as STATED the ONLY way the game would of gone OVER would be w/ 48.5 pts in the 2nd half, and the ONLY way I saw that happening was IF Detroit got 'live' and was scoring up a bunch (hence resting their D, hence they would've had slowed down GB and won the 2nd half)...if Det did not get 'LIVE' in the 2nd half, they would lose the half and I win more on the UNDER......... hopefully you understand this, but I have no more time to explain it in simpler terms for you...sorry
Didn't you just do the opposite and protect/hedge your bet on the Utah/Col game total today? I suggested this should have been the play on Pack/ Det, where you had an even larger middle, and I get dismissed as being uneducated on wagering. Also, I didn't post my Tday picks as a suppostion to help others increase thier bankroll as you did.
0
Quote Originally Posted by KScapping:
Ok mischkin04... should not of jumped on you (long day and will be capping for another 7 hrs).. you asked a question, and are probably just inexperienced and no one has ever explained the concept to you. A 'protection middle' is a play you would like to win, but actually expect to lose. This play you are looking at (above) was right on target and not a 'loss' as you understand a 'loss' to be. I could of 'hedged' (what I would bet you thought this was) and just played the Over 2nd half to protect the 2 Units Under I had on the game, but I don't/won't bet against my plays. Hence, as STATED the ONLY way the game would of gone OVER would be w/ 48.5 pts in the 2nd half, and the ONLY way I saw that happening was IF Detroit got 'live' and was scoring up a bunch (hence resting their D, hence they would've had slowed down GB and won the 2nd half)...if Det did not get 'LIVE' in the 2nd half, they would lose the half and I win more on the UNDER......... hopefully you understand this, but I have no more time to explain it in simpler terms for you...sorry
Didn't you just do the opposite and protect/hedge your bet on the Utah/Col game total today? I suggested this should have been the play on Pack/ Det, where you had an even larger middle, and I get dismissed as being uneducated on wagering. Also, I didn't post my Tday picks as a suppostion to help others increase thier bankroll as you did.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
But I was 
' em KS. Keep up the good work. I might not tail all your plays but I love reading the write ups, lots of good info in there.
Hot Forum Topics
