65%-70% win rate system
NBA matchup ratings for 11/15/17Cleveland vs Charlotte = 128Philadelphia vs Los Angeles = 128Plays: Charlotte +1 1/2 -110Wager = Risking $1,100 to Win $1,000Los Angeles +3 1/2 -110Wager = Risking $1,100 to Win $1,000
So, time to start actually explaining this "system". b/c yesterday in THIS forum you posted your pick as LAL+3.5, but in the NBA forum, you posted PHI ML. don't really get to say there's some mysterious metric, then pick both sides of the game while trying to build followers as a tout.
https://www.covers.com/forum/ViewThread/102571012/philadelphia-at-la-lakers11152017-113000-pm
NBA matchup ratings for 11/15/17Cleveland vs Charlotte = 128Philadelphia vs Los Angeles = 128Plays: Charlotte +1 1/2 -110Wager = Risking $1,100 to Win $1,000Los Angeles +3 1/2 -110Wager = Risking $1,100 to Win $1,000
So, time to start actually explaining this "system". b/c yesterday in THIS forum you posted your pick as LAL+3.5, but in the NBA forum, you posted PHI ML. don't really get to say there's some mysterious metric, then pick both sides of the game while trying to build followers as a tout.
https://www.covers.com/forum/ViewThread/102571012/philadelphia-at-la-lakers11152017-113000-pm
So, time to start actually explaining this "system". b/c yesterday in THIS forum you posted your pick as LAL+3.5, but in the NBA forum, you posted PHI ML. don't really get to say there's some mysterious metric, then pick both sides of the game while trying to build followers as a tout.
https://www.covers.com/forum/ViewThread/102571012/philadelphia-at-la-lakers11152017-113000-pm
Nice work Dutch.
(Of course, he was predicting that Philly would win by 3 or less.)
His ACTUAL record is 4-2 of course, because that's what he's posted before games. The touting thing is bothersome, claiming an 83% win rate when it's now 67%.
OP, keep it up - seems like it's more of a chalk system than anything. We'll see tonight!
So, time to start actually explaining this "system". b/c yesterday in THIS forum you posted your pick as LAL+3.5, but in the NBA forum, you posted PHI ML. don't really get to say there's some mysterious metric, then pick both sides of the game while trying to build followers as a tout.
https://www.covers.com/forum/ViewThread/102571012/philadelphia-at-la-lakers11152017-113000-pm
Nice work Dutch.
(Of course, he was predicting that Philly would win by 3 or less.)
His ACTUAL record is 4-2 of course, because that's what he's posted before games. The touting thing is bothersome, claiming an 83% win rate when it's now 67%.
OP, keep it up - seems like it's more of a chalk system than anything. We'll see tonight!
Hot Forum Topics
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
