Yes. So far using this system all the money line favorites have won. The four losses I have came from the underdog spread on the Packers +2.5 on 11/6/17, the underdog spreads on the Lakers +6.5 and Minnesota +8.5 on 11/8/17, and the underdog spread on Clemson +16.5 on 11/11/17. All other picks consisting of money line favorites and underdog spreads have won.
0
Yes. So far using this system all the money line favorites have won. The four losses I have came from the underdog spread on the Packers +2.5 on 11/6/17, the underdog spreads on the Lakers +6.5 and Minnesota +8.5 on 11/8/17, and the underdog spread on Clemson +16.5 on 11/11/17. All other picks consisting of money line favorites and underdog spreads have won.
Nice record, but we are all about the $$$. You don't need to reveal what you're betting, but some kind of accounting in terms of units or $$$ up or down or ROI means more than won lost records.
Just an idea. Bol
0
Nice record, but we are all about the $$$. You don't need to reveal what you're betting, but some kind of accounting in terms of units or $$$ up or down or ROI means more than won lost records.
Close games today but the system pulls thru again!! And for anyone else following my picks that my system puts out, I'm guessing you're having a great week so far! Let's get at it again tomorrow!
Overall record 18-4 (81%)
Overall return = $13,600
Week of 11/13/17 - 11/19/17
Week record 3-0 (100%) week return = $3,000
0
Close games today but the system pulls thru again!! And for anyone else following my picks that my system puts out, I'm guessing you're having a great week so far! Let's get at it again tomorrow!
So the system only looks at primetime games, those games are usually blown up/advertised by media. Also primetime games are usually the games with the most action and more often than not one-sided. Depending on the two teams Playing, the matchup ratings are based on hype of the Game, if one team is on a winning/losing streak, who is favored or catching points. Any primetime game with a matchup rating over 100 I play the underdog spread, and rating less than 100 I play the ML favorite. Also I only play the games that the system puts out. Some days it's 1 Game, 2 games, or even 4 games. I don't play any other games to minimize my chance of losing on the side and killing my winnings from the system.
0
So the system only looks at primetime games, those games are usually blown up/advertised by media. Also primetime games are usually the games with the most action and more often than not one-sided. Depending on the two teams Playing, the matchup ratings are based on hype of the Game, if one team is on a winning/losing streak, who is favored or catching points. Any primetime game with a matchup rating over 100 I play the underdog spread, and rating less than 100 I play the ML favorite. Also I only play the games that the system puts out. Some days it's 1 Game, 2 games, or even 4 games. I don't play any other games to minimize my chance of losing on the side and killing my winnings from the system.
Even if the line dropped to 3 I would still take the three points. The system doesn't say which line to take. It says the underdog spread. So +3, +3 1/2, or +2, take the points because it's the underdog spread.
0
Even if the line dropped to 3 I would still take the three points. The system doesn't say which line to take. It says the underdog spread. So +3, +3 1/2, or +2, take the points because it's the underdog spread.
I'm thinking the explanation for taking the ML favorite is because the favorite wins more than covers. And underdog spread because the underdog covers more than wins. But then again it's what the system calls for so I just follow it.
0
I'm thinking the explanation for taking the ML favorite is because the favorite wins more than covers. And underdog spread because the underdog covers more than wins. But then again it's what the system calls for so I just follow it.
Tough losses today went 0-2. One thing I learned about this system is it's not 100% fail proof. It will have losing days but it hasn't yet had a losing week.
Overall record 18-6 (75%)
Overall return = $11,400
Week of 11/13/17 - 11/19/17
Week record 3-2 (60%)
week return= $800
0
Tough losses today went 0-2. One thing I learned about this system is it's not 100% fail proof. It will have losing days but it hasn't yet had a losing week.
NBA matchup ratings for 11/15/17Cleveland vs Charlotte = 128Philadelphia vs Los Angeles = 128Plays: Charlotte +1 1/2 -110Wager = Risking $1,100 to Win $1,000Los Angeles +3 1/2 -110Wager = Risking $1,100 to Win $1,000
So, time to start actually explaining this "system". b/c yesterday in THIS forum you posted your pick as LAL+3.5, but in the NBA forum, you posted PHI ML. don't really get to say there's some mysterious metric, then pick both sides of the game while trying to build followers as a tout.
NBA matchup ratings for 11/15/17Cleveland vs Charlotte = 128Philadelphia vs Los Angeles = 128Plays: Charlotte +1 1/2 -110Wager = Risking $1,100 to Win $1,000Los Angeles +3 1/2 -110Wager = Risking $1,100 to Win $1,000
So, time to start actually explaining this "system". b/c yesterday in THIS forum you posted your pick as LAL+3.5, but in the NBA forum, you posted PHI ML. don't really get to say there's some mysterious metric, then pick both sides of the game while trying to build followers as a tout.
So, time to start actually explaining this "system". b/c yesterday in THIS forum you posted your pick as LAL+3.5, but in the NBA forum, you posted PHI ML. don't really get to say there's some mysterious metric, then pick both sides of the game while trying to build followers as a tout.
Nice work Dutch. (Of course, he was predicting that Philly would win by 3 or less.)
His ACTUAL record is 4-2 of course, because that's what he's posted before games. The touting thing is bothersome, claiming an 83% win rate when it's now 67%.
OP, keep it up - seems like it's more of a chalk system than anything. We'll see tonight!
0
Quote Originally Posted by therealdutch:
So, time to start actually explaining this "system". b/c yesterday in THIS forum you posted your pick as LAL+3.5, but in the NBA forum, you posted PHI ML. don't really get to say there's some mysterious metric, then pick both sides of the game while trying to build followers as a tout.
Nice work Dutch. (Of course, he was predicting that Philly would win by 3 or less.)
His ACTUAL record is 4-2 of course, because that's what he's posted before games. The touting thing is bothersome, claiming an 83% win rate when it's now 67%.
OP, keep it up - seems like it's more of a chalk system than anything. We'll see tonight!
Yeah, starting a post with an unverifiable record of 20-8 is kinda BS. Then not explaining the super secret way of ranking is another tout red flag. This thread should be removed to the picks section, not a system.
Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
0
Yeah, starting a post with an unverifiable record of 20-8 is kinda BS. Then not explaining the super secret way of ranking is another tout red flag. This thread should be removed to the picks section, not a system.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
(
Hot Forum Topics
