Wisconsin Sues Kalshi, Polymarket, Other Prediction Market Companies 

Brad Senkiw - Contributor at Covers.com
Brad Senkiw • News Editor 16+ years betting experience
Updated: Apr 24, 2026 , 10:23 AM ET • 4 min read

The state has requested preliminary and permanent injunctions to keep trading exchanges from offering sports outcome contracts there.

Photo By - Reuters Connect. Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul.

The Badger State has joined the growing battle against prediction market platforms in court. 

Key Takeaways

  • Wisconsin’s Attorney General calls prediction market platforms’ sports contracts “unlawful.”

  • The Badger State is threatening punitive measures and is requesting preliminary and permanent injunctions. 

  • Wisconsin currently only allows retail sports betting, although online wagering could be coming eventually. 

The Wisconsin Department of Justice announced on Thursday that the state has filed lawsuits against Kalshi, Robinhood, Polymarket, Coinbase, and Crypto.com. The complaints include any affiliates of those trading exchanges. 

Wisconsin alleges that prediction market platforms are operating unlawful commercial gambling through illegal sports betting in a state that currently only offers retail wagering. 

“Thinly disguising unlawful conduct doesn’t make it lawful,” Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul said. “These companies’ alleged facilitation of sports betting in Wisconsin should be shut down.”

Enjoying Covers content? Add us as a preferred source on your Google account Add as a preferred source on Google

Time to respond

Wisconsin lawmakers recently approved a bill that could bring online sports betting to the Badger State, but a long process and work with tribal nations remains. In the meantime, state authorities are looking to punish prediction market operators.  

The lawsuits, filed in Dane County, Wisconsin, allege that those prediction companies are “creating a public nuisance.” The state has requested preliminary and permanent injunctions to keep trading exchanges from offering sports outcome contracts there, and Haul is looking to enforce the law against them. 

“If you do not provide a proper answer within twenty (20) days, the court may grant judgment against you for the award of money or other legal action requested in the complaint, and you may lose your right to object to anything that is or may be incorrect in the complaint,” Haul wrote to several of the prediction platforms. “A judgment may be enforced as provided by law. A judgment awarding money may become a lien against any real estate you own now or in the future and may also be enforced by garnishment or seizure of property.”

Allegedly running afoul

Prediction platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket offer sports event contracts that more than a dozen U.S. states deem as unlawful sports betting. 

Wisconsin authorities claim these listed trading exchanges are paying out “bets” on sports-related outcome odds and allege that operators are collecting a fee for every trade, which goes against the state’s gambling laws. 

Wisconsin noted that Kalshi has reportedly generated $1 billion in revenue from sports event contracts, making up 90% of the operator’s estimated annualized profit. 

Battle continues 

Nevada became the first U.S. state to successfully and legally keep a trading exchange from operating in a jurisdiction when it won a permanent injunction against Kalshi earlier this month. 

Kalshi, Crypto.com, Coinbase, and others have also filed lawsuits of their own against several other states in an effort to avoid punitive measures in legal sports betting jurisdictions. These trading exchanges argue that they are regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, a federal agency, and don’t have to abide by state regulations that require licenses to operate. 

The CFTC has backed prediction companies by suing Arizona, Illinois, and Connecticut after those states issued cease-and-desist orders to several trading exchanges. The ongoing prediction market news and legal battles across the country are expected to continue through 2026 and could eventually end up in the U.S. Supreme Court.   

Pages related to this topic

Brad Senkiw - Covers
News Editor

Brad has been covering sports betting and iGaming industry news for Covers since 2023. He writes about a wide range of topics, including sportsbook insights, proposed legislation, regulator decision-making, state revenue reports, and online sports betting launches. Brad reported heavily on North Carolina’s legal push for and creation of online sportsbooks, appearing on numerous Tar Heel State radio and TV news shows for his insights.

Before joining Covers, Brad spent over 15 years as a reporter and editor, covering college sports for newspapers and websites while also hosting a radio show for seven years.

Popular Content

Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo