83-55 (+19.17u)
LV -5.5 (-105)
Hayes and Zandalasini are questionable for GS. I like this play if they are ruled out…taking a gamble here at reduced odds.
83-55 (+19.17u)
LV -5.5 (-105)
Hayes and Zandalasini are questionable for GS. I like this play if they are ruled out…taking a gamble here at reduced odds.
83-55 (+19.17u)
LV -5.5 (-105)
Hayes and Zandalasini are questionable for GS. I like this play if they are ruled out…taking a gamble here at reduced odds.
The lines adjust as the books get injury info. If the total sinks that’s an indication that one of the players will be a sit out.
you probably are aware of this but I’ll wait for the info to come in.
I did this on the sky last night and held my breath that the line move down was quality information.
The lines adjust as the books get injury info. If the total sinks that’s an indication that one of the players will be a sit out.
you probably are aware of this but I’ll wait for the info to come in.
I did this on the sky last night and held my breath that the line move down was quality information.
Mr. F,
I had some stats last night on Minnesota but didn't post them because you picked the other side - I don't want anyone to think I'm questioning or jinxing their pick.
On the other hand, maybe you would have wanted to see them. Not that it would make you change, increase, or decrease your bet but just so that you have a full picture with some stats maybe you didn't see, and might be useful for the next game.
Gamblers tend to be a suspicious lot, so I sometimes don't know whether to post or not. Doesn't matter because I rarely post as I don't see a lot of value and constructive talk being shared, as opposed to ego boosting and "Hey look at me!" stuff.
But I do check out your posts if I'm around, and try to contribute if I have something that I think contributors here might be interested in. So I'll ask you - if someone posts info on the other side of your pick would you feel jinxed or do you want all information?
Mr. F,
I had some stats last night on Minnesota but didn't post them because you picked the other side - I don't want anyone to think I'm questioning or jinxing their pick.
On the other hand, maybe you would have wanted to see them. Not that it would make you change, increase, or decrease your bet but just so that you have a full picture with some stats maybe you didn't see, and might be useful for the next game.
Gamblers tend to be a suspicious lot, so I sometimes don't know whether to post or not. Doesn't matter because I rarely post as I don't see a lot of value and constructive talk being shared, as opposed to ego boosting and "Hey look at me!" stuff.
But I do check out your posts if I'm around, and try to contribute if I have something that I think contributors here might be interested in. So I'll ask you - if someone posts info on the other side of your pick would you feel jinxed or do you want all information?
@VeritasAlways
I don’t mind. I like hearing 2 sides of the story.
@VeritasAlways
I don’t mind. I like hearing 2 sides of the story.
@Nabooru
On twitter @UnderdogWNBA
It’s the only way in real time that I know. I get alerts sent to my phone. Can get the alert and open an app and catch some books before they move numbers.
If Hayes and Zandalasini are ruled out it’s a big part of the offense.
It’s a tough line. GS catching points at home has been profitable even winning SU.
@Nabooru
On twitter @UnderdogWNBA
It’s the only way in real time that I know. I get alerts sent to my phone. Can get the alert and open an app and catch some books before they move numbers.
If Hayes and Zandalasini are ruled out it’s a big part of the offense.
It’s a tough line. GS catching points at home has been profitable even winning SU.
"I don’t mind. I like hearing 2 sides of the story."
That's what I thought but I figured I would ask first (like I said, some betters are superstitious, myself included. But I always want to see the chess board from all angles and know all stats before I make a bet.)
Here's what I left out yesterday.
Minnesota has not been a Dog this season, until last night. But last year (same coach, same style of play, same basic team makeup) they were 'Dogs 13 times.
And they won nine of those games . . . SU.
And they were 10-3 ATS.
Collier's likely to be out for another 2 weeks. Obviously the Lynx won't be Dogs in their next game (Washington) but I think four of their next six are on the road including two at NY, might be catching 1-2 pts there based on how the books valued Collier being out last night (+2) as opposed to Minnesota's previous game at Phoenix where they were -3'.
Anyway, just stuff to think about when 'capping their next few games.
Good luck tonight.
"I don’t mind. I like hearing 2 sides of the story."
That's what I thought but I figured I would ask first (like I said, some betters are superstitious, myself included. But I always want to see the chess board from all angles and know all stats before I make a bet.)
Here's what I left out yesterday.
Minnesota has not been a Dog this season, until last night. But last year (same coach, same style of play, same basic team makeup) they were 'Dogs 13 times.
And they won nine of those games . . . SU.
And they were 10-3 ATS.
Collier's likely to be out for another 2 weeks. Obviously the Lynx won't be Dogs in their next game (Washington) but I think four of their next six are on the road including two at NY, might be catching 1-2 pts there based on how the books valued Collier being out last night (+2) as opposed to Minnesota's previous game at Phoenix where they were -3'.
Anyway, just stuff to think about when 'capping their next few games.
Good luck tonight.
@VeritasAlways
Had a couple system plays but liked Seattle #1 defense L5 games. Lynx dropped 91 damn…
So here’s an interesting one. Teams that beat Seattle are 1-11 ATS next game. Not sure I can play the Mystics though.
@VeritasAlways
Had a couple system plays but liked Seattle #1 defense L5 games. Lynx dropped 91 damn…
So here’s an interesting one. Teams that beat Seattle are 1-11 ATS next game. Not sure I can play the Mystics though.
@Nabooru
Yah X now.
I have the app on my phone.
@Nabooru
Yah X now.
I have the app on my phone.
Yea nice call and they missed 4 foul shot in a row. That was crazy. They did what they had to do and I bet it because I thought the injuries but both girls played.
Yea nice call and they missed 4 foul shot in a row. That was crazy. They did what they had to do and I bet it because I thought the injuries but both girls played.
@spottie2935
Those 4 fts in a row I wanted to punch a wall. Betting against GS in the Fortress is not good for the health.
@spottie2935
Those 4 fts in a row I wanted to punch a wall. Betting against GS in the Fortress is not good for the health.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.