All Forums | Website Promotions

Ridiculously absurd MLB System!

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 275164
Posts: 2223
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 4125
Posted: #901
Quote Originally Posted by JEFFTHEHAT:


Why are you posting a play that wasn't a play as a loss? Cubs today, you are tracking ML for your own reason! You might be confusing people since the system is 12-0!


Apologies, were the Cubs not a B game today? Sorry about that I will keep track outside of the thread.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2014
Posts: 19
Posted: #902
Jeff 4/13 was miami +1.5 right? What was the rating? +1.5 -? I'm trying to keep track.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 3843
Posted: #903
Quote Originally Posted by axd440:

Jeff 4/13 was miami +1.5 right? What was the rating? +1.5 -? I'm trying to keep track.

It was a (B) game
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2014
Posts: 19
Posted: #904
Was the phillies ML +155 on 4/13?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2014
Posts: 19
Posted: #905
Ya I know (b) but I mean what was the run line for the marlins? Negative -xxx ?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 3843
Posted: #906
Quote Originally Posted by axd440:

Was the phillies ML +155 on 4/13?

I don't track ML since I'm only playing RL
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 3843
Posted: #907
Quote Originally Posted by axd440:

Ya I know (b) but I mean what was the run line for the marlins? Negative -xxx ?

MIA +1.5 was -200
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2014
Posts: 19
Posted: #908
Jeff nvm I found out thanks :) it was RL +1.5 -175
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2014
Posts: 19
Posted: #909
Oh ok cool thanks :)
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2010
Posts: 334
Posted: #910
Jeff, tomorrow we have PHI +1.5, IS that correct?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2014
Posts: 2
Posted: #911
So for today Phillies +1.5, Game A?
Please confirm :)

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2012
Posts: 49
Posted: #912
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2012
Posts: 49
Posted: #913
[Quote: Originally Posted by DonStk1] So for today Phillies +1.5, Game A?
Please confirm :)

YES, Phillies +1.5 is the play. (A)
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 3843
Posted: #914
Today we have PHI +1.5 (A) 

Record 12-0

A) 10
B) 2
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 3843
Posted: #915
Tracking plays:

ATL (A)
CIN (A)
ST.L +1.5 (A)
S.D. (A)
LAA +1.5 (A)

Record 9-1

A) 6
B) 3

Loss - 11.08 down -2.08 units
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 3843
Posted: #916
Quote Originally Posted by bobmackey:


Congrats! You hit 90% and LOST money!  This is proof that the risk is far too great for the reward! But keep telling yourself you're a " genius".

Glad your back 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 3843
Posted: #917
Quote Originally Posted by bobmackey:


Congrats! You hit 90% and LOST money!  This is proof that the risk is far too great for the reward! But keep telling yourself you're a " genius".

You might want to grab a dictionary while your at it and look up the word TRACKING! You might gain a percentage point on your I.Q and bring it up to double digits.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2003
Posts: 32362
Posted: #918

oooooooooooooooooooo


mit guy


flawless



~~~~~ZOSO~~~~~
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2004
Posts: 1101
Posted: #919
yeah right...I would bet 100 units to onne that you are not an MIT guy....that is some funny stuff there...I have not wake and  baked in a week but that comment makes me laugh like i am right now...that is coming from a Stanford guy.....errr season ticket holder.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 3843
Posted: #920
I guess results for 5+ years are just lucky. Woo hoo I got lucky!
Oh and the 17 year system holy crap! 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 3843
Posted: #921
Quote Originally Posted by bobmackey:

Hey Jeff, can you provide a link to your system results posted here at Covers for the past 5 years and 17 years respectively?  I think everyone here would really appreciate that! 

The parameters and systems are here on covers. Just go to systems and strategies. Everybody who has followed knows! 

It's a beautiful thing when you can continually crush the odds. Just have to be smart enough to find what works. An MIT guy like yourself should be able to do that no problem. I find it quite easy myself. 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 3843
Posted: #922
Quote Originally Posted by bobmackey:

Jeff, can you please answer the question in post #920 for everyone? Thanks in advance!

Not a problem, two words. MAKES MONEY!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2013
Posts: 2600
Posted: #923
He doesn't need to address anything. If you don't like the system, don't follow or bet the games. Just don't come around and trash it. He's gonna continue to post (hopefully) so you're wasting your time. Let it go.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2013
Posts: 2600
Posted: #924
Disagree. Who cares about thread title. Btw, he says it's a ridiculously absurd so there's that. Not sure how that's attracting attention to himself. Everyone knows the risks. He's said he adapted system from someone else. Doubt he cares if he looks stupid. If he posts results, you'll find a way to discredit them. Just ignore the thread and stop.  
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 3843
Posted: #925
Quote Originally Posted by bobmackey:


I respectfully disagree! For the benefit of the members here he does need to address the risks! And especially given the attention he drew to himself through his thread title! 

Here's what I know: this is NOT Jeff's chase system!
Here's what I think: Jeff doesn't know how to answer any of these questions because this system is not his and therefore he runs the risk of looking stupid and being exposed if he does answer! 


Why do you think its not my system? Everything I post is my system. Just because your jealous doesn't mean you need to clog the thread. I suppose all my systems are plagiarized. Even the one I'm working on now posting the tracking plays! Only been doing this 30 years I would say many have taken my systems. 

As far data majorly flawed that makes me LMAO, no data Is flawed except in the way you don't understand it. But that part I can't help you with. I'll keep making money while you keep bashing. But in the end the joke is really on you sir. 
All Forums | Website Promotions
About Us
Betting Guides
Betting Sites
Contests
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.