got murdered by juice yesterday.. just a recap PickEm, how do you feel the best value is attained through this? been betting the E as straight up MLs and the E+ ML and RL, I notice you said grouping a few together works too?
0
got murdered by juice yesterday.. just a recap PickEm, how do you feel the best value is attained through this? been betting the E as straight up MLs and the E+ ML and RL, I notice you said grouping a few together works too?
got murdered by juice yesterday.. just a recap PickEm, how do you feel the best value is attained through this? been betting the E as straight up MLs and the E+ ML and RL, I notice you said grouping a few together works too?
awwhh mann juiced KILLED me yesterday. Tough way to start the week. But I believe the best way to play this . Yes how i tend to play is first; i choose the teams that i like from the system who has the better EDGE; 2nd if a team i like has a postive RL(+1.5) i take that team. If there is another team i like that has the EDGE but has a negative RL(-1.5) i play the ML. Grouping it like this has worked a lot. I like to do a parlay of 2 (E) and 3 (E+) teams which seems to be working really well. You could also play the oppisite team of (E) mind find success that way. Theres plenty of ways to play the system. All im doing is giving the people the Teams that my system says has the better EDGE. (E+) comes from the positive RL (+1.5). If you find a way thats been successful for you, please share!
Thanks again vance and BOL to ya pal
0
Quote Originally Posted by BaggerVANCE:
got murdered by juice yesterday.. just a recap PickEm, how do you feel the best value is attained through this? been betting the E as straight up MLs and the E+ ML and RL, I notice you said grouping a few together works too?
awwhh mann juiced KILLED me yesterday. Tough way to start the week. But I believe the best way to play this . Yes how i tend to play is first; i choose the teams that i like from the system who has the better EDGE; 2nd if a team i like has a postive RL(+1.5) i take that team. If there is another team i like that has the EDGE but has a negative RL(-1.5) i play the ML. Grouping it like this has worked a lot. I like to do a parlay of 2 (E) and 3 (E+) teams which seems to be working really well. You could also play the oppisite team of (E) mind find success that way. Theres plenty of ways to play the system. All im doing is giving the people the Teams that my system says has the better EDGE. (E+) comes from the positive RL (+1.5). If you find a way thats been successful for you, please share!
I see 4-6 on the E games and 4-4 on the E+ games...not sure how you broke even when the angels were -200 for the +1.5 and Tampa was -160 for +1.5 and Atl was -205 for +1.5. I tailed every play,and bet whatever to win 100 each Plus game and also Wash and Det(the only 2 E games you had listed). On the dog ML,i bet 100 to win whatever,so the cubs and mets were a nice profit. All in all,i lost 330 bucks. You've only had one bad night,which was last night,but unless my math and my book is off,you did not break even.Just keeping it real
0
I see 4-6 on the E games and 4-4 on the E+ games...not sure how you broke even when the angels were -200 for the +1.5 and Tampa was -160 for +1.5 and Atl was -205 for +1.5. I tailed every play,and bet whatever to win 100 each Plus game and also Wash and Det(the only 2 E games you had listed). On the dog ML,i bet 100 to win whatever,so the cubs and mets were a nice profit. All in all,i lost 330 bucks. You've only had one bad night,which was last night,but unless my math and my book is off,you did not break even.Just keeping it real
I see 4-6 on the E games and 4-4 on the E+ games...not sure how you broke even when the angels were -200 for the +1.5 and Tampa was -160 for +1.5 and Atl was -205 for +1.5. I tailed every play,and bet whatever to win 100 each Plus game and also Wash and Det(the only 2 E games you had listed). On the dog ML,i bet 100 to win whatever,so the cubs and mets were a nice profit. All in all,i lost 330 bucks. You've only had one bad night,which was last night,but unless my math and my book is off,you did not break even.Just keeping it real
Soo I see the confusion.. Make sure you check out the first page of the forum. & yes E+ did break even. as for how the (E) games are counted.. Each team is and EDGE team. Any money bag - burning moneybag remember this system is BASED upon (E+)
0
Quote Originally Posted by collectNOW:
I see 4-6 on the E games and 4-4 on the E+ games...not sure how you broke even when the angels were -200 for the +1.5 and Tampa was -160 for +1.5 and Atl was -205 for +1.5. I tailed every play,and bet whatever to win 100 each Plus game and also Wash and Det(the only 2 E games you had listed). On the dog ML,i bet 100 to win whatever,so the cubs and mets were a nice profit. All in all,i lost 330 bucks. You've only had one bad night,which was last night,but unless my math and my book is off,you did not break even.Just keeping it real
Soo I see the confusion.. Make sure you check out the first page of the forum. & yes E+ did break even. as for how the (E) games are counted.. Each team is and EDGE team. Any money bag - burning moneybag remember this system is BASED upon (E+)
EDGE: Wsup guys. So I'm just reposting EDGE teams but this time with a reminder. Make SURE to check out the 1st page of the forum to UNDERSTAND how to play my EDGE system. The overall record for (E) shows a winning pick to losing picks . To make things more simple . I nice money bag filled with money compared to a money bag that's getting burned into pieces which could be (E/E+) not too concerned about the overall (E) record what were here for is the money and that's where the (E) record comes in. This system is designed for (E+) plays . That overall record is based only on (E+) teams . Again please check out First page of forum before playing . BOL TO ALL
EDGE: Wsup guys. So I'm just reposting EDGE teams but this time with a reminder. Make SURE to check out the 1st page of the forum to UNDERSTAND how to play my EDGE system. The overall record for (E) shows a winning pick to losing picks . To make things more simple . I nice money bag filled with money compared to a money bag that's getting burned into pieces which could be (E/E+) not too concerned about the overall (E) record what were here for is the money and that's where the (E) record comes in. This system is designed for (E+) plays . That overall record is based only on (E+) teams . Again please check out First page of forum before playing . BOL TO ALL
One thing I have been doing so I don't have to lay any juice is betting each E+ game on its own but parlaying it to the same game that I choose.
So last night for instance I parlayed every single E+ game with the Montreal Canadiens +1.5 -290 and all of them paid at least even money or better. So even though the E+ games went 4-4 I made a little bit because of it paying out a little bit more.
The advantage to this is of course not having to pay any juice and you just have to either break even on the wagers like going 4-4 last night or win more of them than you lose. The down side of course is that if your one game you parlay everything to loses then you lose every bet. I am always looking for something that has a very high chance of winning to parlay all of the E+ games like a high moneyline in the -300 to -460 range to get as close to even money or better on the wagers. Nothing is a sure thing of course but I look at something in that range that has a good situational spot also so my chances of winning the wager are as high as they possibly can be.
Last night I knew Montreal was in a must win to keep the series going and they were playing at home and I figured if they lost they would only do so by one goal so I took the +1.5 on the puck line at -290 which made all of the wagers for E+ pretty much pay better than even money. Montreal of course dominated and won so it worked out. So that is an example of a way I have been doing it for a moneyline or +1.5 line in a good situational spot to get paid even money or better and not lay any juice with these E+ picks.
Another example is the other night i parlayed every game to Brooklyn Nets when it was their first game at home. But I bought points on Brooklyn also. Instead of taking the regular spread which was +1 I bought it all the way up to +8 which made it +8 -400 . So the -400 parlayed to all of the E+ baseball games that were -155, -175, -200 and so on and so forth made them pay close to even money or better on most of them.
Obviously everyone can do it their own way they are comfortable with but just thought I would throw that out there for anyone not wanting to pay juice. Just a way I have been doing it so I don't have to lay that high juice.
I have a feeling the E+ games are going to do very well today after breaking even and having that many favorites cover by more than one run last night. I think it will revert back to dogs today.
Good Luck everyone!
0
One thing I have been doing so I don't have to lay any juice is betting each E+ game on its own but parlaying it to the same game that I choose.
So last night for instance I parlayed every single E+ game with the Montreal Canadiens +1.5 -290 and all of them paid at least even money or better. So even though the E+ games went 4-4 I made a little bit because of it paying out a little bit more.
The advantage to this is of course not having to pay any juice and you just have to either break even on the wagers like going 4-4 last night or win more of them than you lose. The down side of course is that if your one game you parlay everything to loses then you lose every bet. I am always looking for something that has a very high chance of winning to parlay all of the E+ games like a high moneyline in the -300 to -460 range to get as close to even money or better on the wagers. Nothing is a sure thing of course but I look at something in that range that has a good situational spot also so my chances of winning the wager are as high as they possibly can be.
Last night I knew Montreal was in a must win to keep the series going and they were playing at home and I figured if they lost they would only do so by one goal so I took the +1.5 on the puck line at -290 which made all of the wagers for E+ pretty much pay better than even money. Montreal of course dominated and won so it worked out. So that is an example of a way I have been doing it for a moneyline or +1.5 line in a good situational spot to get paid even money or better and not lay any juice with these E+ picks.
Another example is the other night i parlayed every game to Brooklyn Nets when it was their first game at home. But I bought points on Brooklyn also. Instead of taking the regular spread which was +1 I bought it all the way up to +8 which made it +8 -400 . So the -400 parlayed to all of the E+ baseball games that were -155, -175, -200 and so on and so forth made them pay close to even money or better on most of them.
Obviously everyone can do it their own way they are comfortable with but just thought I would throw that out there for anyone not wanting to pay juice. Just a way I have been doing it so I don't have to lay that high juice.
I have a feeling the E+ games are going to do very well today after breaking even and having that many favorites cover by more than one run last night. I think it will revert back to dogs today.
NIice Emerald i like it i like it! Thanks for sharin my man. I like how
you broke it down, very very understandable. Now THAT is how you use the
EDGE system! Glad the it's working well for you ! & hopefully
others can also get a piece of the pie! too. Im looking forward to a big
day today emerald so GL Pal!
0
NIice Emerald i like it i like it! Thanks for sharin my man. I like how
you broke it down, very very understandable. Now THAT is how you use the
EDGE system! Glad the it's working well for you ! & hopefully
others can also get a piece of the pie! too. Im looking forward to a big
day today emerald so GL Pal!
Ok.I.. read post #1 and every one after that,and it is still confusing with every one else's remarks and theorys based on parlaying to get even money. I am a pretty intelligent guy,so let's put this in laymans terms.I am a 100 dollar bettor.....if I am betting a dog,i bet 100 to win whatever. If I am betting a fav,i bet whatever to win 100. I get how to bet the E+ games,but am confused on how to bet the E games. These are the bets that I just placed with my book,getting reduced juice on the E+ games. Mets +1.5 =$180 to win $100 Cleve +1.5 =$185 to win $100 SD +1.5= $200 to win $100 Colo+1.5= $160 to win $100 Hou +1.5=$160 to win $100 Sea +1.5=$165 to win $100 What would my bets be on the E games? Thanks
0
Ok.I.. read post #1 and every one after that,and it is still confusing with every one else's remarks and theorys based on parlaying to get even money. I am a pretty intelligent guy,so let's put this in laymans terms.I am a 100 dollar bettor.....if I am betting a dog,i bet 100 to win whatever. If I am betting a fav,i bet whatever to win 100. I get how to bet the E+ games,but am confused on how to bet the E games. These are the bets that I just placed with my book,getting reduced juice on the E+ games. Mets +1.5 =$180 to win $100 Cleve +1.5 =$185 to win $100 SD +1.5= $200 to win $100 Colo+1.5= $160 to win $100 Hou +1.5=$160 to win $100 Sea +1.5=$165 to win $100 What would my bets be on the E games? Thanks
Yes yes much easier with numbers lol but as long as you know how to play the E+ games; thats where ive found most success. Now, how to play E games? That I dont know yet, im looking how E+ does this month, tally up enough E games and try to FIND a way to play the E games. I display all the results for that very reason.. HELP lol see if the other cappers out there could figure out a way to play (E) games in a profitable way. Im gonna send you a PM colleect
If theres any more questions, feel free to ask! BOL
0
Yes yes much easier with numbers lol but as long as you know how to play the E+ games; thats where ive found most success. Now, how to play E games? That I dont know yet, im looking how E+ does this month, tally up enough E games and try to FIND a way to play the E games. I display all the results for that very reason.. HELP lol see if the other cappers out there could figure out a way to play (E) games in a profitable way. Im gonna send you a PM colleect
If theres any more questions, feel free to ask! BOL
From what it looks like to me is that all of the E+ bets are also E bets. The thing that makes them different is that E+ bets are always +1.5 runline bets while E bets are always money line bets.
Also there are a few E games that aren't E+ games and those E games are ALWAYS favorites.
So to make this easy E games that are NOT E+ games are ALWAYS favorites on the moneyline.
E games that are ALSO E+ games are ALWAYS underdogs on the moneyline.
The one exception to the above is when an E+ team opens as an underdog and the line moves enough to make them a favorite. That is the only time they would be a Favorite.
Damn, I totally understand what I am saying but what I typed sounds confusing. Sounds like a mathematical equation lol...
0
From what it looks like to me is that all of the E+ bets are also E bets. The thing that makes them different is that E+ bets are always +1.5 runline bets while E bets are always money line bets.
Also there are a few E games that aren't E+ games and those E games are ALWAYS favorites.
So to make this easy E games that are NOT E+ games are ALWAYS favorites on the moneyline.
E games that are ALSO E+ games are ALWAYS underdogs on the moneyline.
The one exception to the above is when an E+ team opens as an underdog and the line moves enough to make them a favorite. That is the only time they would be a Favorite.
Damn, I totally understand what I am saying but what I typed sounds confusing. Sounds like a mathematical equation lol...
Emerald....that is what I did last night,and went 4-6 on the E games and 4-4 on the E+ games,losing $330 bucks.(see post #181) 707 said he broke even because he went 6-4 on the E games and 4-4 on the E+ games.. That's what I am confused about. How did I go 4-6 and he went 6-4 on the same teams? That makes a big difference in winning or losing At least we all agree on what the E+ games mean....you bet the dog on the RL,albeit high juice.
0
Emerald....that is what I did last night,and went 4-6 on the E games and 4-4 on the E+ games,losing $330 bucks.(see post #181) 707 said he broke even because he went 6-4 on the E games and 4-4 on the E+ games.. That's what I am confused about. How did I go 4-6 and he went 6-4 on the same teams? That makes a big difference in winning or losing At least we all agree on what the E+ games mean....you bet the dog on the RL,albeit high juice.
At least we all agree on what the E+ games mean....you bet the dog on the RL,albeit high juice.
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
