Posted:
#226
NO SYSTEM B PLAYS FOR TODAY
GIANFRANCO1114 MLB SYSTEM
Posted:
#229
Quote Originally Posted by Liteorfree23:
Have you lost any of your chases this season. Thanks In.advance
Have you lost any of your chases this season. Thanks In.advance
here is the spreadsheet:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1SCuCYvnWfyKTY3Kta45OewCmNyHp4X79KGkZwJPJcrw/edit#gid=1961205173
2 of 139 plays (0.014%) had to go all the way to Game 7 and both won Game 7
3 of 139 (0.021%) have needed a Game 6
82 straight have not needed more then 5 games (knock on wood)
Posted:
#237
Quote Originally Posted by natcanada:
Hey G...if you have time, Any thoughts on Clev?
Hey G...if you have time, Any thoughts on Clev?
nat ... what u see on the spreadsheet is LITERALLY every baseball game i bet throughout the year. 99.9% of bettors bet a million games cause its their local team or a game is on ESPN or the all star game. thats how the books make money. the more games = the more chances you lose.
instead i take a little risk out of it and play the odds that a team will not go on a long losing streak. i bet that team until it wins. the goal this year is to make 100K and I over 80% of the way there. Once I hit 100K I am done with baseball, including the playoffs
Posted:
#239
So basically as long as there are no teams that lose 8 in a row at home, then you'll net 100k for the year? If the 8 in a row happens once, you would approximately break even for the year (if you stop that particular chase). If 8 in a row happens twice, then you'd lose approximately 100k for the year (also assuming you stop that particular chase). Those losses double if 9 in a row happens. Is that breakdown correct in a nutshell?
Posted:
#249
Quote Originally Posted by SlowCurve20:
So basically as long as there are no teams that lose 8 in a row at home, then you'll net 100k for the year? If the 8 in a row happens once, you would approximately break even for the year (if you stop that particular chase). If 8 in a row happens twice, then you'd lose approximately 100k for the year (also assuming you stop that particular chase). Those losses double if 9 in a row happens. Is that breakdown correct in a nutshell?
So basically as long as there are no teams that lose 8 in a row at home, then you'll net 100k for the year? If the 8 in a row happens once, you would approximately break even for the year (if you stop that particular chase). If 8 in a row happens twice, then you'd lose approximately 100k for the year (also assuming you stop that particular chase). Those losses double if 9 in a row happens. Is that breakdown correct in a nutshell?
SlowCurve, I don't see how those numbers could even be close. See post#79...a game 7 wager of 426,000 (allegedly) on the Dodgers that won. If that (alleged) wager were a loss, you would have had to double that amount for game 8 (depending on the price). This would have your bankroll on the hook to the tune of around 1.7mil should that game 8 not go your way! In this case however, game seven went the way of the poster and all (alleged) losses were recovered (tho the figures as posted don't really add up). Anywhoo, that scary game 7 scenario required over 600K of bankroll (approx. 1220units). So, to put it into perspective, if you were a $1-bettor, you would have needed about $1,220 (all of which would've been at risk) to gain $1 on the Dodgers using this system. Before the faithful in this thread turn the torch my way, be aware that I am NOT out to bash the poster, or the system here...I am merely putting this chase system into perspective while trying to answer the often-ignored question of "how much bank roll is required for THIS system?" In all fairness it should be observed that this system has not suffered a loss, and is in positive territory. A $1-dollar bettor would be up about $160, an approximate 13 percent gain on bankroll...which, imo is commendable. Hope this helps...GL to all 
Posted:
#250
Quote Originally Posted by chaser15:
SlowCurve, I don't see how those numbers could even be close. See post#79...a game 7 wager of 426,000 (allegedly) on the Dodgers that won. If that (alleged) wager were a loss, you would have had to double that amount for game 8 (depending on the price). This would have your bankroll on the hook to the tune of around 1.7mil should that game 8 not go your way! In this case however, game seven went the way of the poster and all (alleged) losses were recovered (tho the figures as posted don't really add up). Anywhoo, that scary game 7 scenario required over 600K of bankroll (approx. 1220units). So, to put it into perspective, if you were a $1-bettor, you would have needed about $1,220 (all of which would've been at risk) to gain $1 on the Dodgers using this system. Before the faithful in this thread turn the torch my way, be aware that I am NOT out to bash the poster, or the system here...I am merely putting this chase system into perspective while trying to answer the often-ignored question of "how much bank roll is required for THIS system?" In all fairness it should be observed that this system has not suffered a loss, and is in positive territory. A $1-dollar bettor would be up about $160, an approximate 13 percent gain on bankroll...which, imo is commendable. Hope this helps...GL to all
Ahh, I assumed every play was even odds and starting at a $500 bet. I believe that's why my numbers are off. With money line pricing, I could see how that would really inflate the needed bankroll to keep chasing. Appreciate the insight.
Hot Forum Topics
