Which is more advisable betting 1-2 games per day or 5-6. Is it harder to get a winning percentage with 5-6 because of the juice, or do you make less with less games because your % is based on fewer games?. So is like a 55% win rate over 100 game per month more profitable than over 30 games per month?
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Which is more advisable betting 1-2 games per day or 5-6. Is it harder to get a winning percentage with 5-6 because of the juice, or do you make less with less games because your % is based on fewer games?. So is like a 55% win rate over 100 game per month more profitable than over 30 games per month?
Which is more advisable betting 1-2 games per day or 5-6. Is it harder to get a winning percentage with 5-6 because of the juice, or do you make less with less games because your % is based on fewer games?. So is like a 55% win rate over 100 game per month more profitable than over 30 games per month?
If your win rate is 55% and you know it's gonna be 55% you want to play as many games as possible.
100 games at 55% win rate (with the standard -110 juice) is gonna give you 5.5 units won every 100 bets. (100 games, 55-45 record, 4.5 units lost on juice)
30 games at 55% is gonna give you either a 16-14 record or 17-13 (depending on which way the half game went). If we figure the 17-13 that would give you 2.7 units won every 30 games bet.
So if yo bet 100 games a month vs 30 games a month you will come out ahead with the more games.
Now if your concern is keeping your win rate at 55% with the more games everything above this line is a moot point.
0
Quote Originally Posted by eyeball:
Which is more advisable betting 1-2 games per day or 5-6. Is it harder to get a winning percentage with 5-6 because of the juice, or do you make less with less games because your % is based on fewer games?. So is like a 55% win rate over 100 game per month more profitable than over 30 games per month?
If your win rate is 55% and you know it's gonna be 55% you want to play as many games as possible.
100 games at 55% win rate (with the standard -110 juice) is gonna give you 5.5 units won every 100 bets. (100 games, 55-45 record, 4.5 units lost on juice)
30 games at 55% is gonna give you either a 16-14 record or 17-13 (depending on which way the half game went). If we figure the 17-13 that would give you 2.7 units won every 30 games bet.
So if yo bet 100 games a month vs 30 games a month you will come out ahead with the more games.
Now if your concern is keeping your win rate at 55% with the more games everything above this line is a moot point.
MOST PROS PLAY 1000-3000 GAMES A YEAR EXPECTING A SMALL 2-4% PROFIT ON THE DOLLAR. THEY DON'T CARE ABOUT A HIGH WINNING PCT. BUT HOW MANY UNITS THEY WIN.
0
MOST PROS PLAY 1000-3000 GAMES A YEAR EXPECTING A SMALL 2-4% PROFIT ON THE DOLLAR. THEY DON'T CARE ABOUT A HIGH WINNING PCT. BUT HOW MANY UNITS THEY WIN.
MOST PROS PLAY 1000-3000 GAMES A YEAR EXPECTING A SMALL 2-4% PROFIT ON THE DOLLAR. THEY DON'T CARE ABOUT A HIGH WINNING PCT. BUT HOW MANY UNITS THEY WIN.
Understood, but what makes you think you can hit 55% of 3,000 games. Its harder to pick 55% against 3,000 games than 55% against 300 games.
I mean there are too many bad calls and weird things that happen. The odds are against you to begin with -110 to win 100.
Its just like vegas you might have a winning streak but after time the odds get to you.
Most "professionals" are scammer touts on the net
0
Un
Quote Originally Posted by sambuca frank:
MOST PROS PLAY 1000-3000 GAMES A YEAR EXPECTING A SMALL 2-4% PROFIT ON THE DOLLAR. THEY DON'T CARE ABOUT A HIGH WINNING PCT. BUT HOW MANY UNITS THEY WIN.
Understood, but what makes you think you can hit 55% of 3,000 games. Its harder to pick 55% against 3,000 games than 55% against 300 games.
I mean there are too many bad calls and weird things that happen. The odds are against you to begin with -110 to win 100.
Its just like vegas you might have a winning streak but after time the odds get to you.
Capping 3000 games is 8.2 games per day, risking an average 9 units each day. Your example has that after a year your up 39 units . SO to me you have 25% of yearly winnings risked each day
But the 300 game example at +35 units, has a daily risk of 1.1 unit or risking 3% of years winnings each day.
AND a whole lot less capping.
as to whats "easier", 53% wins of 3000 plays or 58% of 3000 plays.
About the same to me, both very difficult.
I just like having less exposure per day, so i go with less picks over more.
0
Hey sambuca, what about the daily risk???
Capping 3000 games is 8.2 games per day, risking an average 9 units each day. Your example has that after a year your up 39 units . SO to me you have 25% of yearly winnings risked each day
But the 300 game example at +35 units, has a daily risk of 1.1 unit or risking 3% of years winnings each day.
AND a whole lot less capping.
as to whats "easier", 53% wins of 3000 plays or 58% of 3000 plays.
About the same to me, both very difficult.
I just like having less exposure per day, so i go with less picks over more.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
