The Bedu Report: John Morrison's NBA System 2002-2003 results.

I just thought I'd post these results just to show you that this system isn't the answer to your prayers.  The lines were taken from the ATS database.

VERSION 1:

 These are the rules that I used to get these results.  We are only taking the first 3 games of an away series.  Any "push" or a "no line" on Game 1 of the series ended the play for that series.

RESULTS:

A = 29 wins

B = 17 wins

C =  5  wins

Losses = 3

The teams that lost were:

MIAMI  ( 6-10 road record at the time of lost series.)

TORONTO  ( 8-21 road record at the time of lost series.)

MILWAUKEE  ( 14-20 road record at the time of lost series.)

Note:  Chicago and Cleveland both had only 3 road wins each for the entire season, so the 3 losses couldn't be filtered out by the worst road record rule.

VERSION 1 (Games 4 thru 6)

This is for the people who play games 4 thru 6 of the road trip.

RESULTS:

A = 2 wins

B = 2 wins

C = 2 wins

L = 0

VERSION 1 (Playing the opposite or home teams against JM's version.)

RESULTS:

A = 38 wins

B = 12 wins

C =  1  win

Losses = 4

2-game loss = 1

Note:  The 2-game loss came against Portland.  Game 2 of the series resulted in a "push."  Portland went on to cover game 3 of the series which made it a 2-game loss.

Since we're playing against the JM system, I used the BEST road record filter instead of the WORST road record. 

The teams that we played against and lost were:

PORTLAND ( 2-5 road record )

GOLDEN STATE ( 6-16 road record )

BOSTON  ( 10-13 road record )

MEMPHIS  ( 4-25 road record )

2-Game loss was PORTLAND  ( 15-8 road record )

Note:  Dallas had a better road record of 16-6 at the time of the 2nd Portland series.

VERSION 1:  (Playing the opposite of JM on games 4 thru 6.)

A = 5 wins

B = 1 win

C = 0 wins

L = 0

That's all I got for VERSION 1.  I'll add the results for VERSION 2 and the UPDATED version when I have time.

Hope this helps you guys out.

GOOD LUCK!!! 

results from 7 years ago ?

My thoughts to this thread......WHO CARES...............Unreal the people that hate Morrison for whatever reason.......all I know is its 2009 and  I have made a ton of money with Morrison this year.

You would be far better off  accepting his plays rather than spinning your wheels trying to find a way to beat them.....like it or not his systems work.

I'm just the messenger.  I have nothing against JM or the system.  It's close to a good system, but I'm just showing you that it needs some better filters.

I'm guessing that JM finally back tested his Version 2 more than a couple of years, because it sure wouldn't have won you any money.  Why else would he UPDATE such a great system?

Good luck to all.

VERSION 2:  Same rules as Version 1 except instead of all 3 teams from the opposite conference, only 2 out of 3 need to be from the opposite conference.

RESULTS:

A = 20 wins

B =  6  wins

C =  4  wins

Losses = 4

The teams that lost were:

WASHINGTON  ( 1-2 road record at the time of lost series.)    Worst road record at the time was Golden State at 1-6.

CLEVELAND  ( 1-5 road record at the time of lost series.)   Worst road record at the time was Golden State at 1-6.

GOLDEN STATE  ( 2-6 road record at the time of lost series.)   Worst road record at the time was Cleveland & Chicago at 1-12.

CLEVELAND  ( 3-27 road record at the time of lost series.)   Worst road record at the time was Chicago at 3-32.

VERSION 2:  (Games 4 thru 6)

RESULTS:

A = 3 wins

B = 1 win

C = 1 win

Losses = 0

VERSION 2: (Playing the opposite or home teams against JM's version.

RESULTS:

A = 21 wins

B =  7 wins

C =  5 wins

Losses = 1

Since we're playing against the JM system, I used the BEST road record filter instead of the WORST road record.

The team that we played against and lost was:

SAN ANTONIO  ( 23-13 road record.)   Best road record at the time was Dallas at 26-11.

VERSION 2: (Playing the opposite of JM on games 4 thru 6.)

RESULTS:

A = 2 wins

B = 3 wins

C = 0 wins

Losses = 0

VERSION 2:  UPDATED VERSION

RESULTS:

A = 5 wins

B = 1 win

C = 0 wins

Losses = 0

VERSION 2:  UPDATED VERSION (Playing the opposite or home teams.)

RESULTS:

A = 3 wins

B = 1 win

C = 2 wins

Losses = 0

If anybody has a better filter to improve our winning %, please reply.

Good luck to all. 

 

JM is waiting on us to come up with some filters so he then can brodi 'em and market for himself claiming their his 
That's how he's pushing the NHL system too
Never had one til McBain did it up