Posted:
#1
Let's hear it. 
0
Seriously, what winning percentage is considered "good" based on betting 100 games?
...
Search 
Views: 2388
Posts: 25
Posted:
#11
75%????
...examine,not to cast aspersions over your integrity but from wat i can gather professional gamblers that wager millions of dollars weekly and spend their every waking hour devoted to it are more than happy to hit 56%....ecstatic in fact...and you are hitting 75% long term??on spreads??okay,im just gonna check your history to see your record on plays.wat will i find??
...examine,not to cast aspersions over your integrity but from wat i can gather professional gamblers that wager millions of dollars weekly and spend their every waking hour devoted to it are more than happy to hit 56%....ecstatic in fact...and you are hitting 75% long term??on spreads??okay,im just gonna check your history to see your record on plays.wat will i find??and as for king scorpio who posted 60 decent,65 good,70 great......try 60 great,65 amazing,70 damn near impossible.........talking about long-term of course..i know the question was a 100 game sample but that size is irrelevant so its better to speak big picture.
jeez there some delusional dreamers in this place
0
Posted:
#12
Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet:
75%????...examine,not to cast aspersions over your integrity but from wat i can gather professional gamblers that wager millions of dollars weekly and spend their every waking hour devoted to it are more than happy to hit 56%....ecstatic in fact...and you are hitting 75% long term??on spreads??okay,im just gonna check your history to see your record on plays.wat will i find??
75%????
...examine,not to cast aspersions over your integrity but from wat i can gather professional gamblers that wager millions of dollars weekly and spend their every waking hour devoted to it are more than happy to hit 56%....ecstatic in fact...and you are hitting 75% long term??on spreads??okay,im just gonna check your history to see your record on plays.wat will i find??and as for king scorpio who posted 60 decent,65 good,70 great......try 60 great,65 amazing,70 damn near impossible.........talking about long-term of course..i know the question was a 100 game sample but that size is irrelevant so its better to speak big picture.
jeez there some delusional dreamers in this place
he's responding in the thread for like 100 game sample, no one here is talking long term or a huge sample
0
Posted:
#19
-110 52.83% +110 47.62%
-115 53.59% +115 46.51%
-120 54.55% +120 45.45%
-125 55.56% +125 44.44%
-125 55.56% +125 44.44%
-135 57.45% +135 42.55%
-140 58.33% +140 41.67%
-145 59.18% +145 40.82%
-150 60% +150 40%
-155 60.78% +155 39.22%
-160 61.54% +160 38.46%
-165 62.26% +165 37.74%
-170 62.69% +170 37.04%
-175 63.64% +175 36.36%
-180 64.29% +180 35.71%
-185 64.91% +185 35.09%
-190 65.52% +190 34.48%
-200 66.67% +200 32.26%
-220 68.75% +220 31.25%
-240 70.59% +240 29.41%
-250 71.43% +250 28.57%
use that as a guide.
hitting 50% doesn't mean dcik if you're playiing -135 lines. 
0
Posted:
#24
IMO just winning money is considered good. 100games is not a large sample size but majority of people into this "hobby" are losers. Ive been at it for 4 years now and im only up 144.36u mostly from baseball. As for people hitting over 60% for only 100 games, yea its possible but like everyone else said its unsustainable in the long run
0
Hot Forum Topics
