So far, using morrison's old nfl system where you bet the home underdog who plays on a different playing surface than the road favorite, the record is 23-14 (62%) when you tweak the system a bit. For example, just like in the nba, you buy three points, except you buy three points for the home underdog for the nfl. Also, if a home underdog's star player is out for the game, then you bet the favorite, plus buying the three points. Take yesterday for example:
Atlanta +5.5 - Matt Ryan and Michael Turner were out for the game against Philadelphia, therefore you take Philadelphia at -2.5 (-5.5 buy 3 points = -2.5).
Arizona +3.5 - A home underdog that plays on a different playing surface than favorite Minnesota.Buy 3 points. Take Arizona at +6.5
Washington +9.5 - Home underdog vs New Orleans. Buy 3 points. Take Washington at +12.5
Miami +4.5 - Home underdog vs. New England. Buy 3 points. Take Miami at +7.5
Philadelphia, Arizona, Washington, and Miami all covered yesterday. A perfect 4-0. I'm thinking that if this system is filtered a little bit more, the 62% rate of success so far, could be even higher. You may not even need to buy points, but I figure it should be done to cover yourself a bit. I just thought I'd share this bit of info since Morrison currently has a new system involving 3 straight SU and ATS losses, and it seems that Morrison's old nfl system (with a few tweaks) has done just as well, if not better, than his new system.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
So far, using morrison's old nfl system where you bet the home underdog who plays on a different playing surface than the road favorite, the record is 23-14 (62%) when you tweak the system a bit. For example, just like in the nba, you buy three points, except you buy three points for the home underdog for the nfl. Also, if a home underdog's star player is out for the game, then you bet the favorite, plus buying the three points. Take yesterday for example:
Atlanta +5.5 - Matt Ryan and Michael Turner were out for the game against Philadelphia, therefore you take Philadelphia at -2.5 (-5.5 buy 3 points = -2.5).
Arizona +3.5 - A home underdog that plays on a different playing surface than favorite Minnesota.Buy 3 points. Take Arizona at +6.5
Washington +9.5 - Home underdog vs New Orleans. Buy 3 points. Take Washington at +12.5
Miami +4.5 - Home underdog vs. New England. Buy 3 points. Take Miami at +7.5
Philadelphia, Arizona, Washington, and Miami all covered yesterday. A perfect 4-0. I'm thinking that if this system is filtered a little bit more, the 62% rate of success so far, could be even higher. You may not even need to buy points, but I figure it should be done to cover yourself a bit. I just thought I'd share this bit of info since Morrison currently has a new system involving 3 straight SU and ATS losses, and it seems that Morrison's old nfl system (with a few tweaks) has done just as well, if not better, than his new system.
yea morrison sent me an email wit a new filter 4 this system... its take the home- underdog favorite only if there getting double digits, i didnt back test it so i dont kno if its any good though
0
yea morrison sent me an email wit a new filter 4 this system... its take the home- underdog favorite only if there getting double digits, i didnt back test it so i dont kno if its any good though
Hot Forum Topics
