Has ANYONE or ANY SYSTEMS BACKTRACKED to show consistant positive or small negative results for 10+ years straight as spot-plays or only a 2-3 game chase. I know of MANY systmes that banked 2 years even 3 years in row but if you looked back 10 years they end up way under. They even bust at the most present/current year after doing 2-3 years big profits.
The only good systems to me are spot plays that are around 60+%/year and NO TWEAKING some years or streaks (in which MANY cappers like to do and don't realize they are scewing the research to their benefit of TOUT success ... not for the benefit of a TRUE WINNING SYSTEM) unless it calls for it to be CONSISTANTLY done YEAR AFTER YEAR.
That would be the BOMB SYSTEM! I have yet seen any. I think I saw:
hrabi_pero's 4/4 system.
So far that looks to be the only proven for a length of time.
It shows 9 years BackTracked with some of the current year. One year shows got crushed and another minus a few units but the others were positive. The best thing it's SPOT PLAYS! I can wager BIG on the games.
Personally, I would prefer to wager $500-1000 a game for a 60% SPOT System vs. $100-200 on the 1st game of chasers. More profit on SPOT PLAY wagered heavily then CHASING even though chasing can have a 95% win ratio.
Thanks for any info... but so far hrabi_pero's 4/4 is the only one that I see backtracked almost 10 years with great results.
0
Has ANYONE or ANY SYSTEMS BACKTRACKED to show consistant positive or small negative results for 10+ years straight as spot-plays or only a 2-3 game chase. I know of MANY systmes that banked 2 years even 3 years in row but if you looked back 10 years they end up way under. They even bust at the most present/current year after doing 2-3 years big profits.
The only good systems to me are spot plays that are around 60+%/year and NO TWEAKING some years or streaks (in which MANY cappers like to do and don't realize they are scewing the research to their benefit of TOUT success ... not for the benefit of a TRUE WINNING SYSTEM) unless it calls for it to be CONSISTANTLY done YEAR AFTER YEAR.
That would be the BOMB SYSTEM! I have yet seen any. I think I saw:
hrabi_pero's 4/4 system.
So far that looks to be the only proven for a length of time.
It shows 9 years BackTracked with some of the current year. One year shows got crushed and another minus a few units but the others were positive. The best thing it's SPOT PLAYS! I can wager BIG on the games.
Personally, I would prefer to wager $500-1000 a game for a 60% SPOT System vs. $100-200 on the 1st game of chasers. More profit on SPOT PLAY wagered heavily then CHASING even though chasing can have a 95% win ratio.
Thanks for any info... but so far hrabi_pero's 4/4 is the only one that I see backtracked almost 10 years with great results.
Has ANYONE or ANY SYSTEMS BACKTRACKED to show consistant positive or small negative results for 10+ years straight as spot-plays or only a 2-3 game chase. I know of MANY systmes that banked 2 years even 3 years in row but if you looked back 10 years they end up way under. They even bust at the most present/current year after doing 2-3 years big profits.
The only good systems to me are spot plays that are around 60+%/year and NO TWEAKING some years or streaks (in which MANY cappers like to do and don't realize they are scewing the research to their benefit of TOUT success ... not for the benefit of a TRUE WINNING SYSTEM) unless it calls for it to be CONSISTANTLY done YEAR AFTER YEAR.
That would be the BOMB SYSTEM! I have yet seen any. I think I saw:
hrabi_pero's 4/4 system.
So far that looks to be the only proven for a length of time.
It shows 9 years BackTracked with some of the current year. One year shows got crushed and another minus a few units but the others were positive. The best thing it's SPOT PLAYS! I can wager BIG on the games.
Personally, I would prefer to wager $500-1000 a game for a 60% SPOT System vs. $100-200 on the 1st game of chasers. More profit on SPOT PLAY wagered heavily then CHASING even though chasing can have a 95% win ratio.
Thanks for any info... but so far hrabi_pero's 4/4 is the only one that I see backtracked almost 10 years with great results.
Sorry..meant to be a new thread.
0
Quote Originally Posted by King-of-the-NFL:
Has ANYONE or ANY SYSTEMS BACKTRACKED to show consistant positive or small negative results for 10+ years straight as spot-plays or only a 2-3 game chase. I know of MANY systmes that banked 2 years even 3 years in row but if you looked back 10 years they end up way under. They even bust at the most present/current year after doing 2-3 years big profits.
The only good systems to me are spot plays that are around 60+%/year and NO TWEAKING some years or streaks (in which MANY cappers like to do and don't realize they are scewing the research to their benefit of TOUT success ... not for the benefit of a TRUE WINNING SYSTEM) unless it calls for it to be CONSISTANTLY done YEAR AFTER YEAR.
That would be the BOMB SYSTEM! I have yet seen any. I think I saw:
hrabi_pero's 4/4 system.
So far that looks to be the only proven for a length of time.
It shows 9 years BackTracked with some of the current year. One year shows got crushed and another minus a few units but the others were positive. The best thing it's SPOT PLAYS! I can wager BIG on the games.
Personally, I would prefer to wager $500-1000 a game for a 60% SPOT System vs. $100-200 on the 1st game of chasers. More profit on SPOT PLAY wagered heavily then CHASING even though chasing can have a 95% win ratio.
Thanks for any info... but so far hrabi_pero's 4/4 is the only one that I see backtracked almost 10 years with great results.
On your google spreadsheet for 3 June on the Progression plays it says Colo/Hou over 2G. Does this mean you are playing the over regardless of what the number is? I understand its a two game chase.
0
On your google spreadsheet for 3 June on the Progression plays it says Colo/Hou over 2G. Does this mean you are playing the over regardless of what the number is? I understand its a two game chase.
On your google spreadsheet for 3 June on the Progression plays it says Colo/Hou over 2G. Does this mean you are playing the over regardless of what the number is? I understand its a two game chase.
Thats exactly right Birdman. We are taking the under or over regardless of the total. The reason I don't put it is bc if we go into game 2 the total will be different and it's another thing to change on the sheet. Completely unneccesary work.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Birdman79:
On your google spreadsheet for 3 June on the Progression plays it says Colo/Hou over 2G. Does this mean you are playing the over regardless of what the number is? I understand its a two game chase.
Thats exactly right Birdman. We are taking the under or over regardless of the total. The reason I don't put it is bc if we go into game 2 the total will be different and it's another thing to change on the sheet. Completely unneccesary work.
Guys I'm off to Jamaica on friday and will have limited access to the internet on the beach mon. I will do my best to post the plays in the spreadsheet, doubt I'll have enough time to post in the thread. Thanks for the support and see you all when I get back june 12.
Guys I'm off to Jamaica on friday and will have limited access to the internet on the beach mon. I will do my best to post the plays in the spreadsheet, doubt I'll have enough time to post in the thread. Thanks for the support and see you all when I get back june 12.
Rough Thursday... Were down -1.92 units this month, but im not too worried about it. Investing in sports has it's ups and downs just like the wife does =).... sometimes the downs with the wife are much longer then with sports investing haha!
Flight leaves in the morning, I'll touch base back in here in a week.... in the mean time, I'll update the spreadsheet as much as possible.
later guys oh and thanks for the kind emails!
0
Rough Thursday... Were down -1.92 units this month, but im not too worried about it. Investing in sports has it's ups and downs just like the wife does =).... sometimes the downs with the wife are much longer then with sports investing haha!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
