All Forums | Systems & Strategies

Following the Covers Experts' Free Picks

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 2024
Posts: 13
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 214
Posted: #1
I have tried many different strategies and systems and none seem to be working. Thining of buying pks from the "Cover Experts". But before I do that, they'll need to prove  to me that they are worth getting paid.
 
So, for the remainder of September, on a daily basis, I'll select 2 free picks from various Experts. Will not list the experts' names or which games I'm choosing. If I can get a winning percentage of over 55% for the remainder of Sept. I think they are worth the $. (I WILL POST MY RECORD EVERYDAY SO EVERYONE CAN SEE). Those free picks are usually for MLB, NCAAF and NFL. Let's see if these guys are for real.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 2628
Posted: #2
Don't waste your time, they are
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 146
Posted: #3
Cool, hayhay, lets see what you come up with....
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 214
Posted: #4
Quote Originally Posted by KongKiller:

Don't waste your time, they are

Thanks Kong. But every time I go to the "Free Picks" page, it seems like these "experts" are always going through some outrageous winning streaks like 17-5 last 22 MLB games or 9-2 NCAAF. But there's no proof. By doing this experiment, at least I can get an idea if there's any remote possible truth to them...
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 214
Posted: #5
I forgot to post yesterday's record. By the way, instead of restricting to selecting 2 picks from the Covers Experts' Free Picks page, I may choose more or less picks depending on how many of their free picks I actually like. Went 1-1 yesterday which means I lost money (juice).

9/18 = 1-1 (MLB)
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 64
Posted: #6
I think you have a bad system...
Its better to follow only one expert and bet every pick...my opinion...

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 214
Posted: #7
9/19 = 1-0 (MLB)
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2002
Posts: 497
Posted: #8
i tried this yesterday and got burned.
better off following the forums

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 64
Posted: #9
or just bet the opposite
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 284
Posted: #10
Not very scientific, but I can tell y'all that I bought most of the expert picks before starting my own thread and they were break even at best.  I had the same result with other folks on the web selling picks.  Covers is in the business of promoting the guys paying for the advertising, without regard to who is profitable long-term.  Think 'yellow pages'.

Find someone who is posting live to the public their picks and has a 3-5 year record and I'll sign up (at any price).  Anyone not willing to post their historical picks over a few seasons is either a fraud or not profitable.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 2628
Posted: #11
Quote Originally Posted by sdiinc:

Not very scientific, but I can tell y'all that I bought most of the expert picks before starting my own thread and they were break even at best.  I had the same result with other folks on the web selling picks.  Covers is in the business of promoting the guys paying for the advertising, without regard to who is profitable long-term.  Think 'yellow pages'.

Find someone who is posting live to the public their picks and has a 3-5 year record and I'll sign up (at any price).  Anyone not willing to post their historical picks over a few seasons is either a fraud or not profitable.

Well said!  PSIC and SDIINC are great to follow!

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 214
Posted: #12
I've been tailing the free picks again and so far I'm 8-1 in March Madness! Some of them were just pure luck like the Missouri game yesterday which I had Missouri -2.5 and the Marquette player step inside on the inbound pass.

We all had some bad streaks/experience w/covers experts, but I just can't help but to think they must be at least a "little" better than the avg. capper since this is their full-time job. right?
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 86
Posted: #13
Watched NBA picks for one week ...11 different experts...16-16-2...best expert 6-1, worst expert 0-3-1...r
All Forums | Systems & Strategies
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.