Iv been in the process of developing a formula. It is based aroudn the stat, the stats correlation to winning games, and its revelence in that individual game. Im in the process of developing what to "weigh" each stat based on Its correlation to winning. Then how much that "value" should be used in that specific game. For example, rushing yeards will be weighed very heavily, but may not have much revelence in a texas tech.
Was wondering how many people actually use ceated formulas or forecast models to handicapp their games?
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Iv been in the process of developing a formula. It is based aroudn the stat, the stats correlation to winning games, and its revelence in that individual game. Im in the process of developing what to "weigh" each stat based on Its correlation to winning. Then how much that "value" should be used in that specific game. For example, rushing yeards will be weighed very heavily, but may not have much revelence in a texas tech.
Was wondering how many people actually use ceated formulas or forecast models to handicapp their games?
I utilize a system that is based SOLELY on one statistical aspect (offensive and defensive rushing) and a handful of intangibles. It is the only system I've found that is unbiased and relevant to every game (not all qualify) and has proven to be consistently successful.
0
I utilize a system that is based SOLELY on one statistical aspect (offensive and defensive rushing) and a handful of intangibles. It is the only system I've found that is unbiased and relevant to every game (not all qualify) and has proven to be consistently successful.