Ive got a friend who has been running a bunch of systems for me on his computer so I had him run the BSS system. Now all I had him do was track the record if you bet the OVER any time a team was playing its 4th game in 6 nights. The results arent too great, unfortunately. Here they are, this is betting the OVER
Betting the opposite would net you a 52.6% winning pct but there were years where youd have lost money either way. This is one system I got pretty excited about but unfortunately it looks like just a "nice run"
Is amazing, Ive had my friend run like 10 systemsand ALL of them were between 48.5% and 51.5%, ts crazy how all these things end up hovering around 50%, shows you how powerful the vig really is.
ANyways, if youve got any systems you want run list them here and I'll have my friend run them
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Ive got a friend who has been running a bunch of systems for me on his computer so I had him run the BSS system. Now all I had him do was track the record if you bet the OVER any time a team was playing its 4th game in 6 nights. The results arent too great, unfortunately. Here they are, this is betting the OVER
Betting the opposite would net you a 52.6% winning pct but there were years where youd have lost money either way. This is one system I got pretty excited about but unfortunately it looks like just a "nice run"
Is amazing, Ive had my friend run like 10 systemsand ALL of them were between 48.5% and 51.5%, ts crazy how all these things end up hovering around 50%, shows you how powerful the vig really is.
ANyways, if youve got any systems you want run list them here and I'll have my friend run them
please check this one out it was posted recently in here
Take a team that should not be "favored".....LOL What does that mean? Well, any team that is less in overall points but is favored...For example, the La Kings have less points than the Edmonton Oilers but they were favored tonight? So you bet the Kings...It lost tonight in shootouts but overall there is 1-3 plays a night and it wins at an alarming clip! You can take it further and bet the team that is favored on the puck line and you will get +190 to +250 and this too wins at a big percentage....Do your homework and go back and track what I am saying!!! It is a money maker if you like Hockey!!
0
please check this one out it was posted recently in here
Take a team that should not be "favored".....LOL What does that mean? Well, any team that is less in overall points but is favored...For example, the La Kings have less points than the Edmonton Oilers but they were favored tonight? So you bet the Kings...It lost tonight in shootouts but overall there is 1-3 plays a night and it wins at an alarming clip! You can take it further and bet the team that is favored on the puck line and you will get +190 to +250 and this too wins at a big percentage....Do your homework and go back and track what I am saying!!! It is a money maker if you like Hockey!!
was wondering what exactly your friend was using to backtrack and simulate these systems for previous years of data
The guy runs some program or "script" (m computer retarded). I guess all the scores and dates are in some database or somethig and he writes programs to checkthe past results
0
Quote Originally Posted by elithepunk:
was wondering what exactly your friend was using to backtrack and simulate these systems for previous years of data
The guy runs some program or "script" (m computer retarded). I guess all the scores and dates are in some database or somethig and he writes programs to checkthe past results
Ive got a friend who has been running a bunch of systems for me on his computer so I had him run the BSS system. Now all I had him do was track the record if you bet the OVER any time a team was playing its 4th game in 6 nights. The results arent too great, unfortunately. Here they are, this is betting the OVER
Betting the opposite would net you a 52.6% winning pct but there were years where youd have lost money either way. This is one system I got pretty excited about but unfortunately it looks like just a "nice run"
Is amazing, Ive had my friend run like 10 systemsand ALL of them were between 48.5% and 51.5%, ts crazy how all these things end up hovering around 50%, shows you how powerful the vig really is.
ANyways, if youve got any systems you want run list them here and I'll have my friend run them
Yes. I am tracking my own system to play those teams that have covered their last game by more than 10 points and are playing against a team that failed to cover by 10 or more in their last game. So far the record is 19-9-1 in NCABB from 2/7/09. I have looked at a couple situations in the NBA and the play is 1-1 there but mainly concentrating on college hoops because I feel the linesmakers are a little slower their to adjust for teams playing better than expected against teams playing poorer than expected in their last games. If possible would love to see it backtracked.
Thanks,
JJ
0
Quote Originally Posted by ChanceP:
Ive got a friend who has been running a bunch of systems for me on his computer so I had him run the BSS system. Now all I had him do was track the record if you bet the OVER any time a team was playing its 4th game in 6 nights. The results arent too great, unfortunately. Here they are, this is betting the OVER
Betting the opposite would net you a 52.6% winning pct but there were years where youd have lost money either way. This is one system I got pretty excited about but unfortunately it looks like just a "nice run"
Is amazing, Ive had my friend run like 10 systemsand ALL of them were between 48.5% and 51.5%, ts crazy how all these things end up hovering around 50%, shows you how powerful the vig really is.
ANyways, if youve got any systems you want run list them here and I'll have my friend run them
Yes. I am tracking my own system to play those teams that have covered their last game by more than 10 points and are playing against a team that failed to cover by 10 or more in their last game. So far the record is 19-9-1 in NCABB from 2/7/09. I have looked at a couple situations in the NBA and the play is 1-1 there but mainly concentrating on college hoops because I feel the linesmakers are a little slower their to adjust for teams playing better than expected against teams playing poorer than expected in their last games. If possible would love to see it backtracked.
Yes. I am tracking my own system to play those teams that have covered their last game by more than 10 points and are playing against a team that failed to cover by 10 or more in their last game. So far the record is 19-9-1 in NCABB from 2/7/09. I have looked at a couple situations in the NBA and the play is 1-1 there but mainly concentrating on college hoops because I feel the linesmakers are a little slower their to adjust for teams playing better than expected against teams playing poorer than expected in their last games. If possible would love to see it backtracked.
Thanks,
JJ
I saw ur post on this yesterday I believe and I had him run the system, but for the NBA. I emailed him right before I wrote his about dong it for college but I prolly wont hear back from him till morning, but he'll do it. Anyways, here's the NBA results for your system. I had him run it for 10 points, 15 points, an 20 points. I know your system is just 10 points but I said fuck it and had him run them all
Yes. I am tracking my own system to play those teams that have covered their last game by more than 10 points and are playing against a team that failed to cover by 10 or more in their last game. So far the record is 19-9-1 in NCABB from 2/7/09. I have looked at a couple situations in the NBA and the play is 1-1 there but mainly concentrating on college hoops because I feel the linesmakers are a little slower their to adjust for teams playing better than expected against teams playing poorer than expected in their last games. If possible would love to see it backtracked.
Thanks,
JJ
I saw ur post on this yesterday I believe and I had him run the system, but for the NBA. I emailed him right before I wrote his about dong it for college but I prolly wont hear back from him till morning, but he'll do it. Anyways, here's the NBA results for your system. I had him run it for 10 points, 15 points, an 20 points. I know your system is just 10 points but I said fuck it and had him run them all
Thanks Chance...my thinking is that the college hoops lines because of so many games do not get as much attention as the NBA lines. This theory would probably work better in the beginning and middle of the season rather than later when the books have really sharpened the lines based on experience from the prior games. Looking forward to see the back track on college hoops.
JJ
0
Thanks Chance...my thinking is that the college hoops lines because of so many games do not get as much attention as the NBA lines. This theory would probably work better in the beginning and middle of the season rather than later when the books have really sharpened the lines based on experience from the prior games. Looking forward to see the back track on college hoops.
You can't back track overs for previous years compared to this year because of the rules changes. I bet the strong trends from BSS not just the overs. The overs has some of the lowest win percentages. Go look at the 2nd BSS Jbrent has a really good break down of trends in there.
0
You can't back track overs for previous years compared to this year because of the rules changes. I bet the strong trends from BSS not just the overs. The overs has some of the lowest win percentages. Go look at the 2nd BSS Jbrent has a really good break down of trends in there.
I thought the no commercial break after a icing has had a impact on overs and is it not the first year.
No, the no commerical break isn't even a blip on the stat map. That is in the first year though. The major changes a few years ago is what has skewed all the hockey stats from the start of time.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Stake24:
I thought the no commercial break after a icing has had a impact on overs and is it not the first year.
No, the no commerical break isn't even a blip on the stat map. That is in the first year though. The major changes a few years ago is what has skewed all the hockey stats from the start of time.
You can't back track overs for previous years compared to this year because of the rules changes. I bet the strong trends from BSS not just the overs. The overs has some of the lowest win percentages. Go look at the 2nd BSS Jbrent has a really good break down of trends in there.
I took a look at that when he posted it and it jived with what I have seen so far.
The overs on the teams with a losing record is . In fact most all of the really strong winning percentages are keyed to the road team having a losing record. But as I said before it's all in how you view a losing team. Some will just go by the W-L and not pay attention to the OT/SO L's. I make sure and count those as losses also.
What ever happened to the guy that started this. I think he disappeared, posted he was visiting his parents and disappeared again. Wasn't he trying to do the gambling thing full time?
4 B2B plays today.
Pitt
Boston (Winning record)
Minny (Winning record)
Toronto....(Way losing record)
I just don't look back for the 4 in 6 games, although I did for the Avs game. Doesn't apply
0
Quote Originally Posted by Stake24:
You can't back track overs for previous years compared to this year because of the rules changes. I bet the strong trends from BSS not just the overs. The overs has some of the lowest win percentages. Go look at the 2nd BSS Jbrent has a really good break down of trends in there.
I took a look at that when he posted it and it jived with what I have seen so far.
The overs on the teams with a losing record is . In fact most all of the really strong winning percentages are keyed to the road team having a losing record. But as I said before it's all in how you view a losing team. Some will just go by the W-L and not pay attention to the OT/SO L's. I make sure and count those as losses also.
What ever happened to the guy that started this. I think he disappeared, posted he was visiting his parents and disappeared again. Wasn't he trying to do the gambling thing full time?
4 B2B plays today.
Pitt
Boston (Winning record)
Minny (Winning record)
Toronto....(Way losing record)
I just don't look back for the 4 in 6 games, although I did for the Avs game. Doesn't apply
I took a look at that when he posted it and it jived with what I have seen so far.
The overs on the teams with a losing record is . In fact most all of the really strong winning percentages are keyed to the road team having a losing record. But as I said before it's all in how you view a losing team. Some will just go by the W-L and not pay attention to the OT/SO L's. I make sure and count those as losses also.
What ever happened to the guy that started this. I think he disappeared, posted he was visiting his parents and disappeared again. Wasn't he trying to do the gambling thing full time?
4 B2B plays today.
Pitt
Boston (Winning record)
Minny (Winning record)
Toronto....(Way losing record)
I just don't look back for the 4 in 6 games, although I did for the Avs game. Doesn't apply
So Lippsman, all 4 of these games you play over or do you play the sides? Little confused.
thanks and good luck
0
Quote Originally Posted by Lippsman:
I took a look at that when he posted it and it jived with what I have seen so far.
The overs on the teams with a losing record is . In fact most all of the really strong winning percentages are keyed to the road team having a losing record. But as I said before it's all in how you view a losing team. Some will just go by the W-L and not pay attention to the OT/SO L's. I make sure and count those as losses also.
What ever happened to the guy that started this. I think he disappeared, posted he was visiting his parents and disappeared again. Wasn't he trying to do the gambling thing full time?
4 B2B plays today.
Pitt
Boston (Winning record)
Minny (Winning record)
Toronto....(Way losing record)
I just don't look back for the 4 in 6 games, although I did for the Avs game. Doesn't apply
So Lippsman, all 4 of these games you play over or do you play the sides? Little confused.
I played Over on the Pitt game and over on the Rangers game. Also it called for a play on the Caps and Rangers. Would need to put those two in a parlay or PL them -.5 or -1
0
I played Over on the Pitt game and over on the Rangers game. Also it called for a play on the Caps and Rangers. Would need to put those two in a parlay or PL them -.5 or -1
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.