Quote Originally Posted by Barbarossa: Quote Originally Posted by DiamondJack: McCarthy sucks, hopefully he lands Chicago job so my Vikes can benefit from more years of Bears misery prediction for tonights game available ? unbiased ... Nothing but a few props for me before kick off. Either way I think this game stays really close just hoping Darnold does not see any ghosts
Darnold coming in with some serious negative momentum
0
Quote Originally Posted by DiamondJack:
Quote Originally Posted by Barbarossa: Quote Originally Posted by DiamondJack: McCarthy sucks, hopefully he lands Chicago job so my Vikes can benefit from more years of Bears misery prediction for tonights game available ? unbiased ... Nothing but a few props for me before kick off. Either way I think this game stays really close just hoping Darnold does not see any ghosts
Darnold coming in with some serious negative momentum
Quote Originally Posted by DiamondJack: Quote Originally Posted by Barbarossa: Quote Originally Posted by DiamondJack: McCarthy sucks, hopefully he lands Chicago job so my Vikes can benefit from more years of Bears misery prediction for tonights game available ? unbiased ... Nothing but a few props for me before kick off. Either way I think this game stays really close just hoping Darnold does not see any ghosts Darnold coming in with some serious negative momentum
For what it is worth... EVERY time the media pumped up the Vikes they looked like garbage (both DET games and the Rams game) but anytime they made they disrespect the Vikes they look like world beaters. Darnold all season turned a bad game the next game into a good one. Now this is the playoffs so who really knows for sure. Just saying I wouldn't count them out. To the person who said the Vikes keep it a one score game they are like 9-1 in one score games. But yes they tend to play soft coverage in the late 4th Q if they can coast and win which leads to it being a one score game.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Alfalfa9:
Quote Originally Posted by DiamondJack: Quote Originally Posted by Barbarossa: Quote Originally Posted by DiamondJack: McCarthy sucks, hopefully he lands Chicago job so my Vikes can benefit from more years of Bears misery prediction for tonights game available ? unbiased ... Nothing but a few props for me before kick off. Either way I think this game stays really close just hoping Darnold does not see any ghosts Darnold coming in with some serious negative momentum
For what it is worth... EVERY time the media pumped up the Vikes they looked like garbage (both DET games and the Rams game) but anytime they made they disrespect the Vikes they look like world beaters. Darnold all season turned a bad game the next game into a good one. Now this is the playoffs so who really knows for sure. Just saying I wouldn't count them out. To the person who said the Vikes keep it a one score game they are like 9-1 in one score games. But yes they tend to play soft coverage in the late 4th Q if they can coast and win which leads to it being a one score game.
Quote Originally Posted by jesron1269: Anyone like a parlay of Monza/Fiorentina over 1.5 and Real Sociedad/Villarreal over 1.5? Real Sociedad averages only 1.61 gpg in the league and I have them Under 2.5 today. In Italy its below freezing might be a slow start.
Thank you! BOL today DJ!
0
Quote Originally Posted by DiamondJack:
Quote Originally Posted by jesron1269: Anyone like a parlay of Monza/Fiorentina over 1.5 and Real Sociedad/Villarreal over 1.5? Real Sociedad averages only 1.61 gpg in the league and I have them Under 2.5 today. In Italy its below freezing might be a slow start.
Your right about the Vikings disrespect. I would have backed the Rams if the game was in LA. Who knows what some of the players might be thinking with what is going on with the fires.
0
@jesron1269
Your right about the Vikings disrespect. I would have backed the Rams if the game was in LA. Who knows what some of the players might be thinking with what is going on with the fires.
@jesron1269 Your right about the Vikings disrespect. I would have backed the Rams if the game was in LA. Who knows what some of the players might be thinking with what is going on with the fires.
It appeared to have an impact on the Chargers. To say that they had clear focus (especially on offense) was laughable. I mean dude if that was my home how in the hell do you play a football game. So I get it. I think you might be right about the Rams possibily being effected by the fire too.
0
Quote Originally Posted by DiamondJack:
@jesron1269 Your right about the Vikings disrespect. I would have backed the Rams if the game was in LA. Who knows what some of the players might be thinking with what is going on with the fires.
It appeared to have an impact on the Chargers. To say that they had clear focus (especially on offense) was laughable. I mean dude if that was my home how in the hell do you play a football game. So I get it. I think you might be right about the Rams possibily being effected by the fire too.
Quote Originally Posted by benhogan76: I would add capping NFL games on what happened previous week outside of major injury is pointless. I don't know if I agree with that. Situational capping is very alive and well.
What is this situation here?
Max Miller a great member of congress!
0
Quote Originally Posted by jesron1269:
Quote Originally Posted by benhogan76: I would add capping NFL games on what happened previous week outside of major injury is pointless. I don't know if I agree with that. Situational capping is very alive and well.
Quote Originally Posted by jesron1269: Quote Originally Posted by benhogan76: I would add capping NFL games on what happened previous week outside of major injury is pointless. I don't know if I agree with that. Situational capping is very alive and well. What is this situation here?
I already addressed it but honestly for get this game. You glazed over the entire NFL saying that outside of injury what happened the previous week is pointless. If that was the case lines would be set for all 18 weeks before the season starts and only adjusted based on where the money is coming in. Of course what happens from week to week matter. Situational capping is very common in the NFL. So I disagree with your blanket statement. You obviously are entitled to your opinion.
0
Quote Originally Posted by benhogan76:
Quote Originally Posted by jesron1269: Quote Originally Posted by benhogan76: I would add capping NFL games on what happened previous week outside of major injury is pointless. I don't know if I agree with that. Situational capping is very alive and well. What is this situation here?
I already addressed it but honestly for get this game. You glazed over the entire NFL saying that outside of injury what happened the previous week is pointless. If that was the case lines would be set for all 18 weeks before the season starts and only adjusted based on where the money is coming in. Of course what happens from week to week matter. Situational capping is very common in the NFL. So I disagree with your blanket statement. You obviously are entitled to your opinion.
@jesron1269 Your right about the Vikings disrespect. I would have backed the Rams if the game was in LA. Who knows what some of the players might be thinking with what is going on with the fires.
you would think they run the extra mile for their city , but then again ...the damn Chargers did shit
The Pastor of Disaster
0
Quote Originally Posted by DiamondJack:
@jesron1269 Your right about the Vikings disrespect. I would have backed the Rams if the game was in LA. Who knows what some of the players might be thinking with what is going on with the fires.
you would think they run the extra mile for their city , but then again ...the damn Chargers did shit
Quote Originally Posted by benhogan76: Quote Originally Posted by jesron1269: Quote Originally Posted by benhogan76: I would add capping NFL games on what happened previous week outside of major injury is pointless. I don't know if I agree with that. Situational capping is very alive and well. What is this situation here? I already addressed it but honestly for get this game. You glazed over the entire NFL saying that outside of injury what happened the previous week is pointless. If that was the case lines would be set for all 18 weeks before the season starts and only adjusted based on where the money is coming in. Of course what happens from week to week matter. Situational capping is very common in the NFL. So I disagree with your blanket statement. You obviously are entitled to your opinion.
Max Miller a great member of congress!
0
Quote Originally Posted by jesron1269:
Quote Originally Posted by benhogan76: Quote Originally Posted by jesron1269: Quote Originally Posted by benhogan76: I would add capping NFL games on what happened previous week outside of major injury is pointless. I don't know if I agree with that. Situational capping is very alive and well. What is this situation here? I already addressed it but honestly for get this game. You glazed over the entire NFL saying that outside of injury what happened the previous week is pointless. If that was the case lines would be set for all 18 weeks before the season starts and only adjusted based on where the money is coming in. Of course what happens from week to week matter. Situational capping is very common in the NFL. So I disagree with your blanket statement. You obviously are entitled to your opinion.
Hot Forum Topics
