Euro 2012....
book is letting me parlay a italy or spain in 90 and to lift the cup? is that a mistake or legitimate ?
What book?
book is letting me parlay a italy or spain in 90 and to lift the cup? is that a mistake or legitimate ?
What book?
Fuck it I'll watch some Soccer (Futbol
)........![]()
![]()
I'm rollin with ya Van and wish you tons of luck. My biggest win was a futures bet on Green Bay to win the SB a couple yrs back. That was the toughest game to watch of my life and they pulled it out for me. I hope you get to feel that rush at the end of the game. ![]()
100/240![]()
![]()
Fuck it I'll watch some Soccer (Futbol
)........![]()
![]()
I'm rollin with ya Van and wish you tons of luck. My biggest win was a futures bet on Green Bay to win the SB a couple yrs back. That was the toughest game to watch of my life and they pulled it out for me. I hope you get to feel that rush at the end of the game. ![]()
100/240![]()
![]()
Dude, it seems like you're asking about every bet under the sun, like a sad little puppy begging for a play.
I'd say it's a good bet he has no interest adding any bets whatsoever, especially one like a first half draw or other random shit you keep asking about. Sounds like you've been following the thread, and if so you would know that.
But hey keep trying I guess.
OK.
Dude, it seems like you're asking about every bet under the sun, like a sad little puppy begging for a play.
I'd say it's a good bet he has no interest adding any bets whatsoever, especially one like a first half draw or other random shit you keep asking about. Sounds like you've been following the thread, and if so you would know that.
But hey keep trying I guess.
OK.
One quick question before the big game. If I'm not mistaken when you are wagering if you are playing fav you place x units and when playing dog you also place x amount of units. If I got that right, don't you that way over-betting dogs (or under-betting favs)? Shouldn't one play to win x amount of units regardless what the odds are?
One quick question before the big game. If I'm not mistaken when you are wagering if you are playing fav you place x units and when playing dog you also place x amount of units. If I got that right, don't you that way over-betting dogs (or under-betting favs)? Shouldn't one play to win x amount of units regardless what the odds are?
Well - not that much fun in the end, and not profitable either. My downfall was the futures - too much lumped in to the anti-Enland basket. Will learn from it for next time.
That was not a typical 4-0 scoreling - it really could have been totally different with a few breaks - but it goes this way sometimes.
Its been a lot of fun. Now - about 6 weeks with nothing to do!
GL all - until next time...
![]()
Well - not that much fun in the end, and not profitable either. My downfall was the futures - too much lumped in to the anti-Enland basket. Will learn from it for next time.
That was not a typical 4-0 scoreling - it really could have been totally different with a few breaks - but it goes this way sometimes.
Its been a lot of fun. Now - about 6 weeks with nothing to do!
GL all - until next time...
![]()
Should of waited before I locked in on Italy pk, the odds have gotten better. Take Italy pk +200 and thank me later. Spanish midgets are going to be frustrated tonight.
Should of waited before I locked in on Italy pk, the odds have gotten better. Take Italy pk +200 and thank me later. Spanish midgets are going to be frustrated tonight.
Not conceding a goal in last 2 Euros and 2010 WC knock out stages.
It really is. Thats a pretty good formula for winning tournaments.
![]()
Not conceding a goal in last 2 Euros and 2010 WC knock out stages.
It really is. Thats a pretty good formula for winning tournaments.
![]()
If you got Italy at 14/1 ...
Dangerous math on that one, I think. "Won" amount under a perfect hedge I think would have been closer to 4.45 units, I think. Not a whiz with this stuff, could be wrong, I just do a lot of quick math with arbs, and think it would have been closer to that.
Didn't post in the thread, but kept up with it fairly consistently. Very entertaining, great capping, you've gotten a lot of thanks for the time you put into it, one more, thanks for posting Vanzack![]()
I especially liked your perspective on whether to hedge in this situation. The "utility" angle was something I've never really considered in my decision process. Obviously, with hindsight, hedge would have ended up more profitable, but in the end, it was just 2 units, for the chance at 28...very tought to move away from that, especially when you thought Italy had value![]()
If you got Italy at 14/1 ...
Dangerous math on that one, I think. "Won" amount under a perfect hedge I think would have been closer to 4.45 units, I think. Not a whiz with this stuff, could be wrong, I just do a lot of quick math with arbs, and think it would have been closer to that.
Didn't post in the thread, but kept up with it fairly consistently. Very entertaining, great capping, you've gotten a lot of thanks for the time you put into it, one more, thanks for posting Vanzack![]()
I especially liked your perspective on whether to hedge in this situation. The "utility" angle was something I've never really considered in my decision process. Obviously, with hindsight, hedge would have ended up more profitable, but in the end, it was just 2 units, for the chance at 28...very tought to move away from that, especially when you thought Italy had value![]()
Dangerous math on that one, I think. "Won" amount under a perfect hedge I think would have been closer to 4.45 units, I think. Not a whiz with this stuff, could be wrong, I just do a lot of quick math with arbs, and think it would have been closer to that.
Didn't post in the thread, but kept up with it fairly consistently. Very entertaining, great capping, you've gotten a lot of thanks for the time you put into it, one more, thanks for posting Vanzack![]()
I especially liked your perspective on whether to hedge in this situation. The "utility" angle was something I've never really considered in my decision process. Obviously, with hindsight, hedge would have ended up more profitable, but in the end, it was just 2 units, for the chance at 28...very tought to move away from that, especially when you thought Italy had value![]()
Thanks for the compliments. No regrets on my end.
Now - a 6 week vaca from all sports.
![]()
Dangerous math on that one, I think. "Won" amount under a perfect hedge I think would have been closer to 4.45 units, I think. Not a whiz with this stuff, could be wrong, I just do a lot of quick math with arbs, and think it would have been closer to that.
Didn't post in the thread, but kept up with it fairly consistently. Very entertaining, great capping, you've gotten a lot of thanks for the time you put into it, one more, thanks for posting Vanzack![]()
I especially liked your perspective on whether to hedge in this situation. The "utility" angle was something I've never really considered in my decision process. Obviously, with hindsight, hedge would have ended up more profitable, but in the end, it was just 2 units, for the chance at 28...very tought to move away from that, especially when you thought Italy had value![]()
Thanks for the compliments. No regrets on my end.
Now - a 6 week vaca from all sports.
![]()
Dangerous math on that one, I think. "Won" amount under a perfect hedge I think would have been closer to 4.45 units, I think. Not a whiz with this stuff, could be wrong, I just do a lot of quick math with arbs, and think it would have been closer to that.
Didn't post in the thread, but kept up with it fairly consistently. Very entertaining, great capping, you've gotten a lot of thanks for the time you put into it, one more, thanks for posting Vanzack![]()
I especially liked your perspective on whether to hedge in this situation. The "utility" angle was something I've never really considered in my decision process. Obviously, with hindsight, hedge would have ended up more profitable, but in the end, it was just 2 units, for the chance at 28...very tought to move away from that, especially when you thought Italy had value![]()
Dangerous math on that one, I think. "Won" amount under a perfect hedge I think would have been closer to 4.45 units, I think. Not a whiz with this stuff, could be wrong, I just do a lot of quick math with arbs, and think it would have been closer to that.
Didn't post in the thread, but kept up with it fairly consistently. Very entertaining, great capping, you've gotten a lot of thanks for the time you put into it, one more, thanks for posting Vanzack![]()
I especially liked your perspective on whether to hedge in this situation. The "utility" angle was something I've never really considered in my decision process. Obviously, with hindsight, hedge would have ended up more profitable, but in the end, it was just 2 units, for the chance at 28...very tought to move away from that, especially when you thought Italy had value![]()
Thanks for the compliments. No regrets on my end.
Now - a 6 week vaca from all sports.
![]()
Thanks for the compliments. No regrets on my end.
Now - a 6 week vaca from all sports.
![]()
I might be wrong, I probably should have just not said anything, main purpose of my post was to thank Van for all his work in this thread, I just am a little OCD when it comes to probability/statistics. I may even have misintepreted, definitely not looking to argue on it
. Since you asked though, my math was:
1 Unit at +1400 on Italy (1 to win 14)
9.54 Units on Spain at -175 ( 9.54 to win 5.45)
If Italy wins, you win 14, but lose 9.54 - net +4.46
If Spain wins, you lose 1, but win 5.45 - net +4.45
I might be wrong, I probably should have just not said anything, main purpose of my post was to thank Van for all his work in this thread, I just am a little OCD when it comes to probability/statistics. I may even have misintepreted, definitely not looking to argue on it
. Since you asked though, my math was:
1 Unit at +1400 on Italy (1 to win 14)
9.54 Units on Spain at -175 ( 9.54 to win 5.45)
If Italy wins, you win 14, but lose 9.54 - net +4.46
If Spain wins, you lose 1, but win 5.45 - net +4.45
And, I only meant dangerous, because making a small mistake on the math can be pretty dangerous, from my own experience. I've done it too many times myself, and cost myself dearly for it![]()
And, I only meant dangerous, because making a small mistake on the math can be pretty dangerous, from my own experience. I've done it too many times myself, and cost myself dearly for it![]()
Maybe u should have watched the games 3 more times and u would have hedged with Spain. Oh well all that blah blah blah posts can still be put to good use...print and use for toilet paper. Enjoy sir.
Maybe u should have watched the games 3 more times and u would have hedged with Spain. Oh well all that blah blah blah posts can still be put to good use...print and use for toilet paper. Enjoy sir.
I might be wrong, I probably should have just not said anything, main purpose of my post was to thank Van for all his work in this thread, I just am a little OCD when it comes to probability/statistics. I may even have misintepreted, definitely not looking to argue on it
. Since you asked though, my math was:
1 Unit at +1400 on Italy (1 to win 14)
9.54 Units on Spain at -175 ( 9.54 to win 5.45)
If Italy wins, you win 14, but lose 9.54 - net +4.46
If Spain wins, you lose 1, but win 5.45 - net +4.45
I might be wrong, I probably should have just not said anything, main purpose of my post was to thank Van for all his work in this thread, I just am a little OCD when it comes to probability/statistics. I may even have misintepreted, definitely not looking to argue on it
. Since you asked though, my math was:
1 Unit at +1400 on Italy (1 to win 14)
9.54 Units on Spain at -175 ( 9.54 to win 5.45)
If Italy wins, you win 14, but lose 9.54 - net +4.46
If Spain wins, you lose 1, but win 5.45 - net +4.45
I think the error in your calculation was using 73.6% and 26.4% when translating the -175 money line. Should have been 63.6% and 36.4%, I think. If you used those percentages, the same calculation you presented would have calculated a worth of the original wager of 4.46 (i.e., the value of a "perfect hedge" in that situation.)
The rest of your post may have looked to do more than wipe out risk entirely, (I wasn't thinking about that angle, I usually like to wipe out risk as much as I can when I do arbs) but I still think your initial calculation was incorrect![]()
I think the error in your calculation was using 73.6% and 26.4% when translating the -175 money line. Should have been 63.6% and 36.4%, I think. If you used those percentages, the same calculation you presented would have calculated a worth of the original wager of 4.46 (i.e., the value of a "perfect hedge" in that situation.)
The rest of your post may have looked to do more than wipe out risk entirely, (I wasn't thinking about that angle, I usually like to wipe out risk as much as I can when I do arbs) but I still think your initial calculation was incorrect![]()
If you got Italy at 14/1 ...
If you got Italy at 14/1 ...
15 - 11.5 - 3 WLP
+4.62 units
1. Greece +.5 at +112 1 unit - WIN
2. Russia to win at +128 for 3 units - WIN
3. Dutch -170 for 2 units - LOSS
4. Germany -.5 -105 for 1 unit - WIN
5. Germany under 2.5 -107 for 1 unit - WIN
6. Italy +.5 and +1 -105 for 2.5 units - WIN
7. Croatia -.5 +120 for 1.5 units - WIN
8. France PK -120 5 units - PUSH
9. Swe/Ukr over 2 -126 3 units - WIN
10. Russia +142 3 units - LOSS
11. Czech PK and -.5 +108 1.5 units - WIN
12. Portugal -.5 +102 for 2 units - WIN
13. Italy Pk and -.5 for 4 units - HALF LOSS
14. Spain -1.5 -110 for 2 units - WIN
15. Ukr/Fra over 2 -120 3 units - PUSH
16. Sweden +.5 -130 1 unit - LOSS
17. Rus/Gre - No bet
18. Pol/Cze - No bet
19. Ger/Den over 2.5 -115 for 2 units - WIN
20. Portugal PK +103 4 units - WIN
21. Spain -140 for 2 units - WIN
22. Ireland +1.5 -115 1 unit - LOSS
23.France -150 for 2.5 units - LOSS
24Under 2.5 -115 for 2 units.WIN
25 Czech +.5 +115 1 unit.LOSS
26 Greece / Germany under 2.5 -110 2 units.LOSS
27France +.5 +115 in 90 mins for 3 units.LOSS
28 Italy big tomorrow - 4 units in regulation time at a PK, PUSH
29 and 2 units to advance. WIN
30 Spain in 90 -100 for 2 unitsLOSS
31 Germany -.5 -105 to win in 90 for 2 units.LOSS
32 Italy to lift the cup at +145 for 3 units..LOSS
Futures:
Italy to win the tournament +1425. 2 unitsLOSS
England to come in last in group D anywhere from +500 to +600. 3 unitsLOSS
England not to win the group at -210. 2 unitsLOSS
England to go under 5.5 points in the group anywhere from PK to -150. 3 unitsLOSS
Ukraine to advance from group D +145. 2 unitsLOSS
Russia to win group A +170. 3 units LOSS
Republic of Ireland to finish last in Group C -125. 3 units. win
Denmark to finish last in group B -167. 2 units.LOSS
1 - 7 WL-18.29 units
Final Record
16- 18.5 - 3 WLP -13.67 units
15 - 11.5 - 3 WLP
+4.62 units
1. Greece +.5 at +112 1 unit - WIN
2. Russia to win at +128 for 3 units - WIN
3. Dutch -170 for 2 units - LOSS
4. Germany -.5 -105 for 1 unit - WIN
5. Germany under 2.5 -107 for 1 unit - WIN
6. Italy +.5 and +1 -105 for 2.5 units - WIN
7. Croatia -.5 +120 for 1.5 units - WIN
8. France PK -120 5 units - PUSH
9. Swe/Ukr over 2 -126 3 units - WIN
10. Russia +142 3 units - LOSS
11. Czech PK and -.5 +108 1.5 units - WIN
12. Portugal -.5 +102 for 2 units - WIN
13. Italy Pk and -.5 for 4 units - HALF LOSS
14. Spain -1.5 -110 for 2 units - WIN
15. Ukr/Fra over 2 -120 3 units - PUSH
16. Sweden +.5 -130 1 unit - LOSS
17. Rus/Gre - No bet
18. Pol/Cze - No bet
19. Ger/Den over 2.5 -115 for 2 units - WIN
20. Portugal PK +103 4 units - WIN
21. Spain -140 for 2 units - WIN
22. Ireland +1.5 -115 1 unit - LOSS
23.France -150 for 2.5 units - LOSS
24Under 2.5 -115 for 2 units.WIN
25 Czech +.5 +115 1 unit.LOSS
26 Greece / Germany under 2.5 -110 2 units.LOSS
27France +.5 +115 in 90 mins for 3 units.LOSS
28 Italy big tomorrow - 4 units in regulation time at a PK, PUSH
29 and 2 units to advance. WIN
30 Spain in 90 -100 for 2 unitsLOSS
31 Germany -.5 -105 to win in 90 for 2 units.LOSS
32 Italy to lift the cup at +145 for 3 units..LOSS
Futures:
Italy to win the tournament +1425. 2 unitsLOSS
England to come in last in group D anywhere from +500 to +600. 3 unitsLOSS
England not to win the group at -210. 2 unitsLOSS
England to go under 5.5 points in the group anywhere from PK to -150. 3 unitsLOSS
Ukraine to advance from group D +145. 2 unitsLOSS
Russia to win group A +170. 3 units LOSS
Republic of Ireland to finish last in Group C -125. 3 units. win
Denmark to finish last in group B -167. 2 units.LOSS
1 - 7 WL-18.29 units
Final Record
16- 18.5 - 3 WLP -13.67 units
Hot Forum Topics
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
