Either the the lines have moved or you have a *hitty book. Metz -.5 should around -135 if the lines have moved.
My book has Metz -.5 at -155. Even worse than you stated what you think it should be. I would think this works in my favor if I am to take Brest since the odds are +115.
0
Quote Originally Posted by BritBull:
Either the the lines have moved or you have a *hitty book. Metz -.5 should around -135 if the lines have moved.
My book has Metz -.5 at -155. Even worse than you stated what you think it should be. I would think this works in my favor if I am to take Brest since the odds are +115.
I checked. The line moved. Brest +1 is about -190 now, was -135 when I posted, so no value in your +.5 +115 either. But do change your book they are ripping you off. Metz is at least 10 cents too short compared to what youz have widely available. Next time it will be you on that side.
0
koon....
I checked. The line moved. Brest +1 is about -190 now, was -135 when I posted, so no value in your +.5 +115 either. But do change your book they are ripping you off. Metz is at least 10 cents too short compared to what youz have widely available. Next time it will be you on that side.
Casey.... please introduce me to your bookie if that +1 +120 line is correct.
I'm confused, BB. My book was +.5 at +115, but you said it should be -135. Isn't +115 better than -135? It is odd that my book was only +.5 as opposed to +1 like yours and Casey's though..
0
Quote Originally Posted by BritBull:
Casey.... please introduce me to your bookie if that +1 +120 line is correct.
I'm confused, BB. My book was +.5 at +115, but you said it should be -135. Isn't +115 better than -135? It is odd that my book was only +.5 as opposed to +1 like yours and Casey's though..
I'm confused, BB. My book was +.5 at +115, but you said it should be -135. Isn't +115 better than -135? It is odd that my book was only +.5 as opposed to +1 like yours and Casey's though..
I said if the lines moved, Metz should be -.5 -135.
Casey..... odd, they don't usually make mistakes that big. I don't bother with them any more after being limited a few times. They don't "do" guys who win constantly like Pinny or some Asians.
0
Quote Originally Posted by jkatakoon:
I'm confused, BB. My book was +.5 at +115, but you said it should be -135. Isn't +115 better than -135? It is odd that my book was only +.5 as opposed to +1 like yours and Casey's though..
I said if the lines moved, Metz should be -.5 -135.
Casey..... odd, they don't usually make mistakes that big. I don't bother with them any more after being limited a few times. They don't "do" guys who win constantly like Pinny or some Asians.