joshfactor

could easily see pacers winning game 2 & the thunder winning games 3 & 4...pacers dont defend home court special. OKC could get down 3-1 & still win.

rockets outrebounded the warriors bigly every single game. lost.

the game is measured in scores not boards.

IMO the thunder are lacking in the close out dept when games are close, because they blow everyone out. IMO the pacers may give them trouble given how cinderella they been playing & the total media silence on their success.

however pacers dont have that D so OKC being the fav is logical.

Massachusetts marijuana is the gold standard.

not a fan of any team getting off a 2000 mile flight & plays next day. Jet lag makes for sleepy bats.

why not...pacers shot 76% in G7 1H last year, now same average in end of Q4 in G1. where is this knicks defense you speak of?

halliburton 5 fouls in the first minute!

900 septillion x 0 = 0.

i was betting on boston D fense in game 4 & it didnt go well. i have to sit out this game because both teams lay down wben i bet them. no more.

my play is to wait for the knicks to get up DD then collapse.

OMG the 90s is becoming ancient history...it was only half my lifetime ago!

maybe the knicks are bad enough to be one of the few teams to drop a series after being up 3 - 1.

 Frankly boston is playing better team ball without tatum, sort of like the knicks played better team ball when brunson was out.

they are at home, healthy, facing a team who lost their best player. & still cant get more than a 1 score lay?

i bet the knicks go up 20 & lose outright in the last 5m.

F the knicks they were supposed to lose game 4. they screwed my life up.

knicks have led by 6 over 3 games. down 20 all 3. the series is all about what celtics show up. the way i see it the celtics cover the next 3 & put this team away.

there is a chemistry problem on the knick offense. they flowed better when brunson was hurt. since he returned their O has been inconsistent & dependent on brunson, who is a ball hog like john starks.

puff puff pass...

coaches dont play. & tatum/porzinski have been garbage. What can a coach say to make open looks go down instead of brick?

at this rate OKC will be up 80.

correlating gambling to the game changing is seeing what you want to see. no proof of this at all. 

the celtics & the thunder losing is irrelevant to this matchup. boston played like garbage & let a crap team win, while the nugs had the talent to keep up. the warriors are nowhere near the nugs level.

when you have 2 poison apples, what to do.

under?