I don't know Colonel, I think the Halos are going to have just enough to steal game 1. They had more success against Sabathia than they did against Burnett and I like the wave they are riding.
Vs. Sabathia (Career)
Figgins – (5/16, 3BB), 1 HR, 2 SO, .313 AVG
Abreu – (3/9) .400 OBP
Hunter – (20/68), 17 RBI, .294 AVG, .351 OBP, .544 SLG
[Note: Hunter has 74 Plate Appearances against Sabathia – 2nd most against any pitcher]
Guerrero – (3/15), 3 SO
Rivera – (3/11), 2 RBI, 1 SO
Morales – (3/9), 2 RBI, 0 SO
Kendrick – (8/12), .667 AVG, .692 OBP, 1 SO
Mathis – (1/5), 1 BB
Aybar – Never Faced Sabathia
*Iztruis – (5/10), .583 OBP
*Napoli – (3/9), 1 HR, .500 OBP
In 2009, the Angels went 17 for 53 against Sabathia. This was good for a .321 AVG and .379 OBP.
The link below stacks the Angel lineup against Burnett and Pettitte also if anyone is interested.
Love the Halos at +160 (Might look at the run line -130, just in case Colonels' prognostication skills are working on high.) Best of Luck
0
I don't know Colonel, I think the Halos are going to have just enough to steal game 1. They had more success against Sabathia than they did against Burnett and I like the wave they are riding.
Vs. Sabathia (Career)
Figgins – (5/16, 3BB), 1 HR, 2 SO, .313 AVG
Abreu – (3/9) .400 OBP
Hunter – (20/68), 17 RBI, .294 AVG, .351 OBP, .544 SLG
[Note: Hunter has 74 Plate Appearances against Sabathia – 2nd most against any pitcher]
Guerrero – (3/15), 3 SO
Rivera – (3/11), 2 RBI, 1 SO
Morales – (3/9), 2 RBI, 0 SO
Kendrick – (8/12), .667 AVG, .692 OBP, 1 SO
Mathis – (1/5), 1 BB
Aybar – Never Faced Sabathia
*Iztruis – (5/10), .583 OBP
*Napoli – (3/9), 1 HR, .500 OBP
In 2009, the Angels went 17 for 53 against Sabathia. This was good for a .321 AVG and .379 OBP.
The link below stacks the Angel lineup against Burnett and Pettitte also if anyone is interested.
I don't know Colonel, I think the Halos are going to have just enough to steal game 1. They had more success against Sabathia than they did against Burnett and I like the wave they are riding.
Vs. Sabathia (Career)
Figgins – (5/16, 3BB), 1 HR, 2 SO, .313 AVG Abreu – (3/9) .400 OBP Hunter – (20/68), 17 RBI, .294 AVG, .351 OBP, .544 SLG [Note: Hunter has 74 Plate Appearances against Sabathia – 2nd most against any pitcher] Guerrero – (3/15), 3 SO Rivera – (3/11), 2 RBI, 1 SO Morales – (3/9), 2 RBI, 0 SO Kendrick – (8/12), .667 AVG, .692 OBP, 1 SO Mathis – (1/5), 1 BB Aybar – Never Faced Sabathia *Iztruis – (5/10), .583 OBP *Napoli – (3/9), 1 HR, .500 OBP
In 2009, the Angels went 17 for 53 against Sabathia. This was good for a .321 AVG and .379 OBP.
The link below stacks the Angel lineup against Burnett and Pettitte also if anyone is interested.
Love the Halos at +160 (Might look at the run line -130, just in case Colonels' prognostication skills are working on high.) Best of Luck
This Angel outfit certainly knows how to beat the Yankees...There is no doubt in my mind that they could steal game 1.... I'm hoping the bullpen decides this game eeek
Good Luck eeek
0
Quote Originally Posted by eeek13:
I don't know Colonel, I think the Halos are going to have just enough to steal game 1. They had more success against Sabathia than they did against Burnett and I like the wave they are riding.
Vs. Sabathia (Career)
Figgins – (5/16, 3BB), 1 HR, 2 SO, .313 AVG Abreu – (3/9) .400 OBP Hunter – (20/68), 17 RBI, .294 AVG, .351 OBP, .544 SLG [Note: Hunter has 74 Plate Appearances against Sabathia – 2nd most against any pitcher] Guerrero – (3/15), 3 SO Rivera – (3/11), 2 RBI, 1 SO Morales – (3/9), 2 RBI, 0 SO Kendrick – (8/12), .667 AVG, .692 OBP, 1 SO Mathis – (1/5), 1 BB Aybar – Never Faced Sabathia *Iztruis – (5/10), .583 OBP *Napoli – (3/9), 1 HR, .500 OBP
In 2009, the Angels went 17 for 53 against Sabathia. This was good for a .321 AVG and .379 OBP.
The link below stacks the Angel lineup against Burnett and Pettitte also if anyone is interested.
Love the Halos at +160 (Might look at the run line -130, just in case Colonels' prognostication skills are working on high.) Best of Luck
This Angel outfit certainly knows how to beat the Yankees...There is no doubt in my mind that they could steal game 1.... I'm hoping the bullpen decides this game eeek
I Love the Angels against the Yankees. The Angels are arguably the best team in baseball right now. It's not who is the best, but who is hot. The Angels are smoking....They have had the Yankees number the last ten years. Look at the stats if you don't believe me. Hard to win in NY, but they can, and if history is indicative they have no fear! Take the Angels +1.5 Great bet.
GL All.
0
I Love the Angels against the Yankees. The Angels are arguably the best team in baseball right now. It's not who is the best, but who is hot. The Angels are smoking....They have had the Yankees number the last ten years. Look at the stats if you don't believe me. Hard to win in NY, but they can, and if history is indicative they have no fear! Take the Angels +1.5 Great bet.
I Love the Angels against the Yankees. The Angels are arguably the best team in baseball right now. It's not who is the best, but who is hot. The Angels are smoking....They have had the Yankees number the last ten years. Look at the stats if you don't believe me. Hard to win in NY, but they can, and if history is indicative they have no fear! Take the Angels +1.5 Great bet.
GL All.
you said: "The Angels are arguably the best team in baseball right now."
i can also argue that the yankees are the best team in baseball.
you said: "It's not who is the best, but who is hot. The Angels are smoking."
so are the yankees, especially a-rod's bat at the present time.
you said: "They have had the Yankees number the last ten years."
the last 10 years don't really matter right now. there's no doubt the angels have been a thorn in the yankees side in recent years, but the yankees gained a lot of confidence against this angels team late in the season by taking 2 out of 3 from them in anaheim and winning 3 of the last 4 meetings overall.
you said : "Hard to win in NY"
you're right.....the yankees are 40-12 in their last 52 home games.
g'luck!!!
0
Quote Originally Posted by bearclaw:
I Love the Angels against the Yankees. The Angels are arguably the best team in baseball right now. It's not who is the best, but who is hot. The Angels are smoking....They have had the Yankees number the last ten years. Look at the stats if you don't believe me. Hard to win in NY, but they can, and if history is indicative they have no fear! Take the Angels +1.5 Great bet.
GL All.
you said: "The Angels are arguably the best team in baseball right now."
i can also argue that the yankees are the best team in baseball.
you said: "It's not who is the best, but who is hot. The Angels are smoking."
so are the yankees, especially a-rod's bat at the present time.
you said: "They have had the Yankees number the last ten years."
the last 10 years don't really matter right now. there's no doubt the angels have been a thorn in the yankees side in recent years, but the yankees gained a lot of confidence against this angels team late in the season by taking 2 out of 3 from them in anaheim and winning 3 of the last 4 meetings overall.
you said : "Hard to win in NY"
you're right.....the yankees are 40-12 in their last 52 home games.
Don't go runnin' the streets of Santiago,running naked,spitin' on people's faces now...hehehe...
HIREDGUNZ98 is right on the mark..Value goes to Flying Halos.
Naturally Hoping for Yanks win ,should have ample opportunity to catch up, should this one goes wrong but can't take Angels too lightly here,after sweeping BosuX...Impressive and unexpected ,especially with Boston dominating LA all year long. Easy pic,Big $ was made vs. Weaker Twinkie team who Yanks just own.
Halos are on a cloud above.Lackey shutting out BosuX,
Pretty Impressive...Got a bad feeling about ZZ facing superior slugging team.Getting 1 1/2 run is just toooo good to pass on...Hope Yanks win by one.
BOLA
! ` ?
' ! "
Welcome back Mr. Johnny Moose ___ _______
0
Forgive me Gus,
Don't go runnin' the streets of Santiago,running naked,spitin' on people's faces now...hehehe...
HIREDGUNZ98 is right on the mark..Value goes to Flying Halos.
Naturally Hoping for Yanks win ,should have ample opportunity to catch up, should this one goes wrong but can't take Angels too lightly here,after sweeping BosuX...Impressive and unexpected ,especially with Boston dominating LA all year long. Easy pic,Big $ was made vs. Weaker Twinkie team who Yanks just own.
Halos are on a cloud above.Lackey shutting out BosuX,
Pretty Impressive...Got a bad feeling about ZZ facing superior slugging team.Getting 1 1/2 run is just toooo good to pass on...Hope Yanks win by one.
The pitching in this game I believe is a toss up. These are two offensive juggaunuts. Going with the hot team is probably the way to go. I think the yankees bullpen has a slight advantage, and I think that playing at home is more of a factor.
On the other hand +160 is an unbelievable value for a solid team with equal offense who for the past decade has the yankees number.
Being a yankee fan my heart says yankees, but my mind says angels +160.
I think i'll go with my mind. ANGELS ML +160.
0
The pitching in this game I believe is a toss up. These are two offensive juggaunuts. Going with the hot team is probably the way to go. I think the yankees bullpen has a slight advantage, and I think that playing at home is more of a factor.
On the other hand +160 is an unbelievable value for a solid team with equal offense who for the past decade has the yankees number.
Being a yankee fan my heart says yankees, but my mind says angels +160.
I don't agree with you. The Angels’ ratio of RBI to home runs (4.79) is higher than any team potentially heading for the postseason. The Yankees and Rangers, not surprisingly, have the lowest percentages (3.53 and 3.11, respectively). In other words, while the Bombers and Rangers fuel their run-scoring engines with homers, the Angels rely on other methods to score runs.
At one point last week, all nine hitters in Anaheim’s lineup had batting averages of .300 or better. According to the Elias Sports Bureau, no team since the 1934 Tigers had accomplished that at least 100 games into a season.
The formula certainly has worked against the Yankees, as the Angels have beaten them four out of six games this year. Anaheim has hit just six home runs against the Bombers’ pitching — an average of one a game — but have batted .340 while outscoring the Yankees, 71-59.
History is on the Angels’ side. They’re 32-17 in their last 49 games against the Yankees, including a three-game sweep before the All-Star Game during which Anaheim outscored the Yankees, 29-18, without Vladimir Guerrero, Torii Hunter and Juan Rivera. You say history doesn't matter, I disagree.
GL ALL
0
I don't agree with you. The Angels’ ratio of RBI to home runs (4.79) is higher than any team potentially heading for the postseason. The Yankees and Rangers, not surprisingly, have the lowest percentages (3.53 and 3.11, respectively). In other words, while the Bombers and Rangers fuel their run-scoring engines with homers, the Angels rely on other methods to score runs.
At one point last week, all nine hitters in Anaheim’s lineup had batting averages of .300 or better. According to the Elias Sports Bureau, no team since the 1934 Tigers had accomplished that at least 100 games into a season.
The formula certainly has worked against the Yankees, as the Angels have beaten them four out of six games this year. Anaheim has hit just six home runs against the Bombers’ pitching — an average of one a game — but have batted .340 while outscoring the Yankees, 71-59.
History is on the Angels’ side. They’re 32-17 in their last 49 games against the Yankees, including a three-game sweep before the All-Star Game during which Anaheim outscored the Yankees, 29-18, without Vladimir Guerrero, Torii Hunter and Juan Rivera. You say history doesn't matter, I disagree.
(1) Sabathia has made the playoffs both of the last two years. In 2007, with Cleveland, he was 1-2 with an 8.80 ERA, including losing Game 7. Last year, in a Brewers uniform, he was 0-1 with with an ERA of 12.27!! The guy tends to pitch a lot of innnings and is dog meat by play-off time. He has pitched 230 innings this year - sixth highest in MLB. Woof.
(2) At some point A-Rod will look at a calender, realize it's October and his testicles will shrink to the size of peas.
Value is with...
ANGELS +160
0
I pointed this out in the Minnesota series:
(1) Sabathia has made the playoffs both of the last two years. In 2007, with Cleveland, he was 1-2 with an 8.80 ERA, including losing Game 7. Last year, in a Brewers uniform, he was 0-1 with with an ERA of 12.27!! The guy tends to pitch a lot of innnings and is dog meat by play-off time. He has pitched 230 innings this year - sixth highest in MLB. Woof.
(2) At some point A-Rod will look at a calender, realize it's October and his testicles will shrink to the size of peas.
(1) Sabathia has made the playoffs both of the last two years. In 2007, with Cleveland, he was 1-2 with an 8.80 ERA, including losing Game 7. Last year, in a Brewers uniform, he was 0-1 with with an ERA of 12.27!! The guy tends to pitch a lot of innnings and is dog meat by play-off time. He has pitched 230 innings this year - sixth highest in MLB. Woof.
(2) At some point A-Rod will look at a calender, realize it's October and his testicles will shrink to the size of peas.
Value is with...
ANGELS +160
RIGHT ON !!....and CC has never felt the pressure of even pitching THIS DEEP IN THE PLAYOFFS (Championship Series/ World Series)....He will WILT here
0
Quote Originally Posted by BloodyShredder:
I pointed this out in the Minnesota series:
(1) Sabathia has made the playoffs both of the last two years. In 2007, with Cleveland, he was 1-2 with an 8.80 ERA, including losing Game 7. Last year, in a Brewers uniform, he was 0-1 with with an ERA of 12.27!! The guy tends to pitch a lot of innnings and is dog meat by play-off time. He has pitched 230 innings this year - sixth highest in MLB. Woof.
(2) At some point A-Rod will look at a calender, realize it's October and his testicles will shrink to the size of peas.
Value is with...
ANGELS +160
RIGHT ON !!....and CC has never felt the pressure of even pitching THIS DEEP IN THE PLAYOFFS (Championship Series/ World Series)....He will WILT here
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
over 8.5
eeek
(A) 
____
Hot Forum Topics
