https://colorlines.com/archives/2012/10/the_racist_white_house_is_white_meme.html
https://colorlines.com/archives/2012/10/the_racist_white_house_is_white_meme.html
Want to watch them scatter? I've asked this question numerous times and, while getting plenty of personal attacks, have yet get one answer.
Let's say they are right to s certain extent. Let's hypothesize that 90% of blacks vote Dem. Now let's say that 95% of blacks voted for Obama. That would mean that 5% of blacks voted for Obama because of skin color.
If we assume for one moment that is true, would they then deny that 5% of whites voted for Romney because he was white, or for that matter, any other candidate because he/she was white? I would guess the number is much higher than 5%.
But it hardly means that all whites are racist...far from it. Yet, they continue to harp on blacks being racist.
Quite interesting.....
Want to watch them scatter? I've asked this question numerous times and, while getting plenty of personal attacks, have yet get one answer.
Let's say they are right to s certain extent. Let's hypothesize that 90% of blacks vote Dem. Now let's say that 95% of blacks voted for Obama. That would mean that 5% of blacks voted for Obama because of skin color.
If we assume for one moment that is true, would they then deny that 5% of whites voted for Romney because he was white, or for that matter, any other candidate because he/she was white? I would guess the number is much higher than 5%.
But it hardly means that all whites are racist...far from it. Yet, they continue to harp on blacks being racist.
Quite interesting.....
Want to watch them scatter? I've asked this question numerous times and, while getting plenty of personal attacks, have yet get one answer.
Let's say they are right to s certain extent. Let's hypothesize that 90% of blacks vote Dem. Now let's say that 95% of blacks voted for Obama. That would mean that 5% of blacks voted for Obama because of skin color.
If we assume for one moment that is true, would they then deny that 5% of whites voted for Romney because he was white, or for that matter, any other candidate because he/she was white? I would guess the number is much higher than 5%.
But it hardly means that all whites are racist...far from it. Yet, they continue to harp on blacks being racist.
Quite interesting.....
Want to watch them scatter? I've asked this question numerous times and, while getting plenty of personal attacks, have yet get one answer.
Let's say they are right to s certain extent. Let's hypothesize that 90% of blacks vote Dem. Now let's say that 95% of blacks voted for Obama. That would mean that 5% of blacks voted for Obama because of skin color.
If we assume for one moment that is true, would they then deny that 5% of whites voted for Romney because he was white, or for that matter, any other candidate because he/she was white? I would guess the number is much higher than 5%.
But it hardly means that all whites are racist...far from it. Yet, they continue to harp on blacks being racist.
Quite interesting.....
Want to watch them scatter? I've asked this question numerous times and, while getting plenty of personal attacks, have yet get one answer.
Let's say they are right to s certain extent. Let's hypothesize that 90% of blacks vote Dem. Now let's say that 95% of blacks voted for Obama. That would mean that 5% of blacks voted for Obama because of skin color.
If we assume for one moment that is true, would they then deny that 5% of whites voted for Romney because he was white, or for that matter, any other candidate because he/she was white? I would guess the number is much higher than 5%.
But it hardly means that all whites are racist...far from it. Yet, they continue to harp on blacks being racist.
Quite interesting.....
Want to watch them scatter? I've asked this question numerous times and, while getting plenty of personal attacks, have yet get one answer.
Let's say they are right to s certain extent. Let's hypothesize that 90% of blacks vote Dem. Now let's say that 95% of blacks voted for Obama. That would mean that 5% of blacks voted for Obama because of skin color.
If we assume for one moment that is true, would they then deny that 5% of whites voted for Romney because he was white, or for that matter, any other candidate because he/she was white? I would guess the number is much higher than 5%.
But it hardly means that all whites are racist...far from it. Yet, they continue to harp on blacks being racist.
Quite interesting.....
Actually, it was the youth vote that propelled Obama. And it is always about percentages.
Actually, it was the youth vote that propelled Obama. And it is always about percentages.
Actually, it was the youth vote that propelled Obama. And it is always about percentages.
Actually, it was the youth vote that propelled Obama. And it is always about percentages.
it is one thing to speculate... but speculate reasonably... do you really believe THAT is why? and besides, why did they just SUDDENLY want to take a more active role in 2008 and 2012? social media is not something that has popped up in the last decade...
how exactly do you make it through the world, if you are considering EVERY single possible reason for every scenario, even the ones that are miniscule beyond description, as if they are just as likely as the obvious reason...
PARSIMONY, folks! look into it...
It's funny how you think others are only considering the "miniscule reason" yet you are looking at one angle. We aren't the ones that screaming "White votes don't count anymore" or something in that nature. Your solution is to put a Hispanic Republican on the ticket and coast to the victory? Now, that's nonsense!!
Instead of finding ways to chip away the difference, you are more into proving the blacks are "racists" or calling the youths stupid. If they were, what do that says about the Republicans, the data was out there FOR YEARS. Wait, you just want to wait for the Democrats to hang themselves, that's progressive.
it is one thing to speculate... but speculate reasonably... do you really believe THAT is why? and besides, why did they just SUDDENLY want to take a more active role in 2008 and 2012? social media is not something that has popped up in the last decade...
how exactly do you make it through the world, if you are considering EVERY single possible reason for every scenario, even the ones that are miniscule beyond description, as if they are just as likely as the obvious reason...
PARSIMONY, folks! look into it...
It's funny how you think others are only considering the "miniscule reason" yet you are looking at one angle. We aren't the ones that screaming "White votes don't count anymore" or something in that nature. Your solution is to put a Hispanic Republican on the ticket and coast to the victory? Now, that's nonsense!!
Instead of finding ways to chip away the difference, you are more into proving the blacks are "racists" or calling the youths stupid. If they were, what do that says about the Republicans, the data was out there FOR YEARS. Wait, you just want to wait for the Democrats to hang themselves, that's progressive.
Just another shining example that racists are intellectually challenged.
Just another shining example that racists are intellectually challenged.
Why stop there? You have alrady talked about blacks. Now its the young people. We know women tend to vote Democrat and you have made your comments known about Hispanics. Perhaps we can go back to the days of affluent white property owners voting whilst all other citizens count for 2/3 for purposes of representation.
As an aside, the only difference between you and the poster in number 132 is you use prettier words.
Why stop there? You have alrady talked about blacks. Now its the young people. We know women tend to vote Democrat and you have made your comments known about Hispanics. Perhaps we can go back to the days of affluent white property owners voting whilst all other citizens count for 2/3 for purposes of representation.
As an aside, the only difference between you and the poster in number 132 is you use prettier words.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.