This is exactly the problem with the Republican brand right now. This guy looks like a goof-ball.
Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli has challenged a recent court ruling finding Virginia’s anti-sodomy law unconstitutional.
The appeal has gotten national attention as Cuccinelli’s gubernatorial bid ramps up.
A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit ruled on March 12 that Virginia’s “Crimes Against Nature” statute, which banned oral and anal sex, violates the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. One judge dissented, agreeing with a lower court that the Supreme Court’s ruling in Lawrence v. Texas on sodomy laws applied only to consenting adults. The case in question involved a teenage girl and a 47-year-old man, William Scott MacDonald, who was convicted of soliciting a minor to commit a felony.
And what is maddening about this is that he is using the same mentality as gun grabbers in pretending there aren't already laws in place to prevent sexual advances against minors.
“This case is not about sexual orientation, but using current law to protect a 17 year-old girl from a 47 year-old sexual predator,”
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
This is exactly the problem with the Republican brand right now. This guy looks like a goof-ball.
Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli has challenged a recent court ruling finding Virginia’s anti-sodomy law unconstitutional.
The appeal has gotten national attention as Cuccinelli’s gubernatorial bid ramps up.
A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit ruled on March 12 that Virginia’s “Crimes Against Nature” statute, which banned oral and anal sex, violates the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. One judge dissented, agreeing with a lower court that the Supreme Court’s ruling in Lawrence v. Texas on sodomy laws applied only to consenting adults. The case in question involved a teenage girl and a 47-year-old man, William Scott MacDonald, who was convicted of soliciting a minor to commit a felony.
And what is maddening about this is that he is using the same mentality as gun grabbers in pretending there aren't already laws in place to prevent sexual advances against minors.
“This case is not about sexual orientation, but using current law to protect a 17 year-old girl from a 47 year-old sexual predator,”
But I assume you will vote for him in November right 14? At least you recognize that he is part if the wider branding problem. He quite likely takes a sure GOP win to a loss because he is too polarizing.
0
But I assume you will vote for him in November right 14? At least you recognize that he is part if the wider branding problem. He quite likely takes a sure GOP win to a loss because he is too polarizing.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
