https://www.wunderground.com/blog/JeffMasters/comment.html?entrynum=2149
What I failed to convey,although it mundane,is that I absolutely think we should indeed limit activities that we know cause negative impacts on our environment.
Someone who doesn't smoke wants clean air to breathe,and if their airspace is tolerable,then they're happy.
Well,what about the air beyond our next inhalation ?
Shouldn't we be concerned about the air and climate / weather everywhere and its affects / effects on our planet and fellow humans ?
Political philosophies shouldn't cause an individual to eschew scientific data or lead them to interpret data in such a way as to fit their political agenda.
I'm a little corny with this,but I wanted to post something about general precepts that seem to be too oft bypassed with an issue such as this one.
What I failed to convey,although it mundane,is that I absolutely think we should indeed limit activities that we know cause negative impacts on our environment.
Someone who doesn't smoke wants clean air to breathe,and if their airspace is tolerable,then they're happy.
Well,what about the air beyond our next inhalation ?
Shouldn't we be concerned about the air and climate / weather everywhere and its affects / effects on our planet and fellow humans ?
Political philosophies shouldn't cause an individual to eschew scientific data or lead them to interpret data in such a way as to fit their political agenda.
I'm a little corny with this,but I wanted to post something about general precepts that seem to be too oft bypassed with an issue such as this one.
What I failed to convey,although it mundane,is that I absolutely think we should indeed limit activities that we know cause negative impacts on our environment.
Someone who doesn't smoke wants clean air to breathe,and if their airspace is tolerable,then they're happy.
Well,what about the air beyond our next inhalation ?
Shouldn't we be concerned about the air and climate / weather everywhere and its affects / effects on our planet and fellow humans ?
Political philosophies shouldn't cause an individual to eschew scientific data or lead them to interpret data in such a way as to fit their political agenda.
I'm a little corny with this,but I wanted to post something about general precepts that seem to be too oft bypassed with an issue such as this one.
Yeah I think it's important though for people to understand the consequences for future generations because down the road at the pace we're at now, there could be some really awful quality of living standards.
Things can be done, like much more heavily taxing on cigarettes, SUVs etc... but its tough to say what could be done to help reduce the negative effects.
The people that try and deny these claims that the climate is warming are really just whack jobs. Whats ultimately being evaluated is at what rate will this climate change have a drastic impact on society and earth
What I failed to convey,although it mundane,is that I absolutely think we should indeed limit activities that we know cause negative impacts on our environment.
Someone who doesn't smoke wants clean air to breathe,and if their airspace is tolerable,then they're happy.
Well,what about the air beyond our next inhalation ?
Shouldn't we be concerned about the air and climate / weather everywhere and its affects / effects on our planet and fellow humans ?
Political philosophies shouldn't cause an individual to eschew scientific data or lead them to interpret data in such a way as to fit their political agenda.
I'm a little corny with this,but I wanted to post something about general precepts that seem to be too oft bypassed with an issue such as this one.
Yeah I think it's important though for people to understand the consequences for future generations because down the road at the pace we're at now, there could be some really awful quality of living standards.
Things can be done, like much more heavily taxing on cigarettes, SUVs etc... but its tough to say what could be done to help reduce the negative effects.
The people that try and deny these claims that the climate is warming are really just whack jobs. Whats ultimately being evaluated is at what rate will this climate change have a drastic impact on society and earth
Places are still experiencing record cools. The key is that the record lows and record highs used to be in balance. Now, the record highs experienced vastly outnumber the record lows experienced.
Ya Northern Cali, Wash, BC have had some pretty low temps, but those areas are pretty damn chilly and don't seem to get that warm often.
Places are still experiencing record cools. The key is that the record lows and record highs used to be in balance. Now, the record highs experienced vastly outnumber the record lows experienced.
Ya Northern Cali, Wash, BC have had some pretty low temps, but those areas are pretty damn chilly and don't seem to get that warm often.
Climate was HOTTER in Roman, medieval times than now....
A new study measuring temperatures over the past two millennia has concluded that in fact the temperatures seen in the last decade are far from being the hottest in history.
A large team of scientists making a comprehensive study of data from tree rings say that in fact global temperatures have been on a falling trend for the past 2,000 years and they have often been noticeably higher than they are today - despite the absence of any significant amounts of human-released carbon dioxide in the atmosphere back then.
If it is the case that actually the climate has often been warmer without any significant CO emissions having taken place - suggesting that CO emissions simply aren't that important - the case for huge efforts to cut those emissions largely disappears.
According to the scientists' new paper, published in hefty climate journal Nature Climate Change, the cooling effect of orbital shifting on the climate has been up to four times as powerful as anthropogenic (human-caused) warming pressures.
Climate was HOTTER in Roman, medieval times than now....
A new study measuring temperatures over the past two millennia has concluded that in fact the temperatures seen in the last decade are far from being the hottest in history.
A large team of scientists making a comprehensive study of data from tree rings say that in fact global temperatures have been on a falling trend for the past 2,000 years and they have often been noticeably higher than they are today - despite the absence of any significant amounts of human-released carbon dioxide in the atmosphere back then.
If it is the case that actually the climate has often been warmer without any significant CO emissions having taken place - suggesting that CO emissions simply aren't that important - the case for huge efforts to cut those emissions largely disappears.
According to the scientists' new paper, published in hefty climate journal Nature Climate Change, the cooling effect of orbital shifting on the climate has been up to four times as powerful as anthropogenic (human-caused) warming pressures.
Climate was HOTTER in Roman, medieval times than now....
A new study measuring temperatures over the past two millennia has concluded that in fact the temperatures seen in the last decade are far from being the hottest in history.
A large team of scientists making a comprehensive study of data from tree rings say that in fact global temperatures have been on a falling trend for the past 2,000 years and they have often been noticeably higher than they are today - despite the absence of any significant amounts of human-released carbon dioxide in the atmosphere back then.
If it is the case that actually the climate has often been warmer without any significant CO emissions having taken place - suggesting that CO emissions simply aren't that important - the case for huge efforts to cut those emissions largely disappears.
According to the scientists' new paper, published in hefty climate journal Nature Climate Change, the cooling effect of orbital shifting on the climate has been up to four times as powerful as anthropogenic (human-caused) warming pressures.
Climate was HOTTER in Roman, medieval times than now....
A new study measuring temperatures over the past two millennia has concluded that in fact the temperatures seen in the last decade are far from being the hottest in history.
A large team of scientists making a comprehensive study of data from tree rings say that in fact global temperatures have been on a falling trend for the past 2,000 years and they have often been noticeably higher than they are today - despite the absence of any significant amounts of human-released carbon dioxide in the atmosphere back then.
If it is the case that actually the climate has often been warmer without any significant CO emissions having taken place - suggesting that CO emissions simply aren't that important - the case for huge efforts to cut those emissions largely disappears.
According to the scientists' new paper, published in hefty climate journal Nature Climate Change, the cooling effect of orbital shifting on the climate has been up to four times as powerful as anthropogenic (human-caused) warming pressures.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.