I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters

@wallstreetcappers

 You can find various online talks on this now and how to address groups or individuals informally. 

Gal vs. Guy: What's the Difference?

Gal is informal slang for a girl or woman, while Guy is a term for a man; both are often used to refer to people in general.

“Gal” is a colloquial term, primarily used to denote a woman or a girl. “Guy,” on the contrary, is a casual term used to refer to a man or boy. Both terms are very informal and are often used in casual conversation.

“Gal” has its roots in English and has been used historically to colloquially refer to women. “Guy,” on the other hand, originally denoted a man but has evolved in modern usage to sometimes refer to people in general, regardless of gender.

When using “gal,” one typically is referring specifically to a female, whereas “guy” is much broader in its application, often used to address both individuals and groups. “Guy” is arguably more prevalent in everyday language due to its flexible usage.

For example, the lady online asked it this way:

What might be a female gendered or non-gendered version of 'guys'?

Some that I've considered don't feel right about (though these may be reasonable answers) are:

• dolls: too old-fashioned
• babes: too informal
• ladies: too formal or I've heard from women, too creepy
• women: too factual
• girls: too patronizing (as much as 'boys')
• everyone, you all: too bland
• y'all: perfectly non-sexist but too regional (might work, but not everywhere)

One answer was this:

Gals comes to mind, as in the commonly used expression guys and gals.

But the issue is nowadays so many things are ‘offensive’.

You see a lot of people just say to a group of people, ‘guys’ or ‘folks’ or ‘y’all’.

But ‘guy’ singularly is gender-specific.

So, what is the similar option when you want an informal term for a female specifically.

As you can see above some terms have changed over the years to be not so good.

Maybe ‘gal’ is headed that way.  But it is still appropriate in informal language.

Of course, any word can have a bad tone or connotation if followed by obviously bad adjectives etc.

But all in all, I think it is still fine to differentiate in informal settings between a man or a woman by using those two terms.

@Raiders22

 Third time...you made the claim so can you provide extensive direct proof and can you provide it in your own words essay style to my satisfaction? The you can find stuff is Trump level trash, you made the claim so you provide the proof and details, DIRECT details to your insult and sexist remark please.

Does this tone sound familiar? It should...

Sure.  You folks essentially tried 'nationalizing' elections back when you were in charge.

That is the term you gave it: "For the People Act".  This would pretty much have taken it out of the states hands as far as ID or cleaning up the rolls, etc.

So, my question to you is still the same:  why did you not get upset about that attempt at 'nationalizing' elections?  But now you bellyache about it?

@wallstreetcappers

 The you can find stuff is Trump level trash

Sorry, I honestly assumed you knew about this sort of thing.

But, since you apparently do not, it is much more productive just to get a quick overview to inform yourself on it.

Otherwise, we would be spinning our wheels because you do not know about the proposed policy.

But that is the gist of it.

@Raiders22

 Ok define YOU FOLKS, who is YOU FOLKS and how did YOU FOLKS TRIED? I give you an F for content and proof, given how pathetic you are with this approach you are not going to slide by with YOU FOLKS TRIED as an answer...who is you folks, when did you folks try and when did my gal do something?

Your claim pal not mine, dont throw out a claim and then say that it is MY job to prove YOUR CLAIM...lol you are doing a horrible job defending YOUR CLAIM big fella.

You said it...you did not explain or pontificate or prove or even give a crap amount of depth or detail just you tossed out a turd burger and then try to insult me that I am not smart enough to find out the answer to YOUR CLAIM....how about you be smart enough and YOU back up YOUR CLAIM...

So, I have explained it to you now.

How do you feel about it?

@wallstreetcappers

I seriously doubt you are the guy to be giving advice on denotation and connotation on words and phrases or any other semantical things.

Aren't you the guy that got confused on a French phrase and when corrected doubled down and then tripled down.

Then you use 'dood' as if it is a word.  You will not find that in any dictionary or online legitimate dictionary.  It is only used as rare online slang.  In fact, you are the only person I have ever seen use it.  The first 10 times you used it maybe it was cute.  Now I am beginning to think that you really think it is the correct word.

Then you use the phrase 'zero-ego' as if you know what it means.  This is your new favorite phrase. 

To paraphrase the guy, "I see you keep using this, but I am beginning to think it does not mean what you think means."