Actually, it has everything to do with the government and the people running these companies say so over & over.
Haha..
Well since the business CEO's are looking at someone to blame it must be true.
Go interview a CEO and ask them if their company hires based off cash levels or off business need.
There are probably 10% of companies that hire because they have excess cash, while 100% will hire based on demand need. The 10% that hire based on cash are always those who are R&D companies that STILL hire R&D irregardless of cash levels but will risk that marginal hiring if they have more cash..and that is not because of excess cash, rather R&D develops pipelines for future supply and pricing for product. So the hiring decision still revolves around demand.
So actually it has nothing to do with government..any CEO whining because of government regulation or the IRS rules will still not hire if demand does not exist for their products/services.
Listening to CEO's talking their book is humorous, I guess that goes to show that some people lack the understanding of hiring what determines hiring needs.
A CEO would lose their job if they didnt talk their book and complain about the unfairness of government regulation..the less the regulation the higher the profits, the higher the barriers between the consumer and the business as to disclosure. Of COURSE any CEO would rather have zero regulation, zero competition and unlimited price control.
"If the government weren't so mean we would hire more"
0
Quote Originally Posted by 14daroad:
Actually, it has everything to do with the government and the people running these companies say so over & over.
Haha..
Well since the business CEO's are looking at someone to blame it must be true.
Go interview a CEO and ask them if their company hires based off cash levels or off business need.
There are probably 10% of companies that hire because they have excess cash, while 100% will hire based on demand need. The 10% that hire based on cash are always those who are R&D companies that STILL hire R&D irregardless of cash levels but will risk that marginal hiring if they have more cash..and that is not because of excess cash, rather R&D develops pipelines for future supply and pricing for product. So the hiring decision still revolves around demand.
So actually it has nothing to do with government..any CEO whining because of government regulation or the IRS rules will still not hire if demand does not exist for their products/services.
Listening to CEO's talking their book is humorous, I guess that goes to show that some people lack the understanding of hiring what determines hiring needs.
A CEO would lose their job if they didnt talk their book and complain about the unfairness of government regulation..the less the regulation the higher the profits, the higher the barriers between the consumer and the business as to disclosure. Of COURSE any CEO would rather have zero regulation, zero competition and unlimited price control.
"If the government weren't so mean we would hire more"
Well since the business CEO's are looking at someone to blame it must be true.
So in other words, you, who does not own a business and who has never owned a business, responding by saying "they're lying" is supposed to advance some sort of discussion.
0
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
Haha..
Well since the business CEO's are looking at someone to blame it must be true.
So in other words, you, who does not own a business and who has never owned a business, responding by saying "they're lying" is supposed to advance some sort of discussion.
So in other words, you, who does not own a business and who has never owned a business, responding by saying "they're lying" is supposed to advance some sort of discussion.
Yeah CEO's never lie or distort information for protection of their business interests.
0
Quote Originally Posted by 14daroad:
So in other words, you, who does not own a business and who has never owned a business, responding by saying "they're lying" is supposed to advance some sort of discussion.
Yeah CEO's never lie or distort information for protection of their business interests.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.