Posted plays now 31-17-1 (64%)
Tried telling him weeks ago stop pushing a record with a 14-0 record that was never posted...he started like 80% and will be below 60% by the end of the week 
Gambling Karma will always get ya 
Nobody cares about a 14-0 record that was never seen...was just trying to help, now watching the thread fade quickly
Dont forget Cleveland +1 today ..... lost big 59 to 37
But to your point, he may very well have some sort of system but I think what this is ultimately uncovering is that there is no real system that is going to hit at a very high %. It all comes back to earth which is the reason why he started his thread at 14-0 which no one ever could explain where exactly he posted the first 14 winners. 
But one thing I give him credit for is that even though plenty of his "followers" have been clamouring for him to start a new thread he has purposely kept the "14-0 Angle" thread. I think we all know why. 
Posted plays now 31-17-1 (64%)
Tried telling him weeks ago stop pushing a record with a 14-0 record that was never posted...he started like 80% and will be below 60% by the end of the week
Gambling Karma will always get ya Nobody cares about a 14-0 record that was never seen...was just trying to help, now watching the thread fade quickly
Dont forget Cleveland +1 today ..... lost big 59 to 37
But to your point, he may very well have some sort of system but I think what this is ultimately uncovering is that there is no real system that is going to hit at a very high %. It all comes back to earth which is the reason why he started his thread at 14-0 which no one ever could explain where exactly he posted the first 14 winners.
But one thing I give him credit for is that even though plenty of his "followers" have been clamouring for him to start a new thread he has purposely kept the "14-0 Angle" thread. I think we all know why.
It was Cleveland +1 not Indiana, Indiana plays against golden state tonight, let's not get it wrong I wish the guy would hit 14 in a row and that he had a system that was truly profitable but to loss multiple games by sooo many points is just not possible , once turd once in a while you can chalk up to just human error but not 3 games, nobody who caps sharp is do far on the wrong side unless they are relying solely on angle alone instead of using all possible numbers, matchups and scenerios, just think its wrong to mislead people with overinflated records and alias totes
Established in 1995,
let try/make it 1/2 
Hot Forum Topics
