Who's better than you with totals right now? .... exactly
But I will repeat my mantra here since it is one I believe strongly in... if you are going to "tail" my totals, its best to do so consistently, as last night's AND the previous night's very different performances will attest. I undertake to provide picks that will at the very worst break even, and if I ever get into the negatives in a significant way I would probably not even post any more plays until I got it straightened out on my own... hate the idea of people tailing just once or twice and losing - I know how that feels from other sports
0
Quote Originally Posted by OLDPORT:
Who's better than you with totals right now? .... exactly
But I will repeat my mantra here since it is one I believe strongly in... if you are going to "tail" my totals, its best to do so consistently, as last night's AND the previous night's very different performances will attest. I undertake to provide picks that will at the very worst break even, and if I ever get into the negatives in a significant way I would probably not even post any more plays until I got it straightened out on my own... hate the idea of people tailing just once or twice and losing - I know how that feels from other sports
Hi JT, I am having a hard enough time finding time in the day to manage MY thread only a daily basis ...
I'm quite sorry if I didn't notice that you are "exclusive" as well... never really find many guys who really stick to them (as I do) in their capping. I make no secret of the fact I just tail OP and one or two other guys on sides, since they really are among the very best
0
Hi JT, I am having a hard enough time finding time in the day to manage MY thread only a daily basis ...
I'm quite sorry if I didn't notice that you are "exclusive" as well... never really find many guys who really stick to them (as I do) in their capping. I make no secret of the fact I just tail OP and one or two other guys on sides, since they really are among the very best
To answer your ?, I see that the totals with the 5.5 sometimes as something like buying a 1/2 pt (I'm sure something you never do). The line should be 5, but the juice is on that 1/2 goal. That is what I felt I was doing last night. Minny ,IMO, was a game total that should have been 5. I saw a 3-2 game at most. I was 15 secs away.
0
"The Specialist"
To answer your ?, I see that the totals with the 5.5 sometimes as something like buying a 1/2 pt (I'm sure something you never do). The line should be 5, but the juice is on that 1/2 goal. That is what I felt I was doing last night. Minny ,IMO, was a game total that should have been 5. I saw a 3-2 game at most. I was 15 secs away.
Yes bracks, its obvious what is happening - the books are reluctant to disturb the somewhat newly established pattern of putting out 5.5 as the low number (you never see 6.5s these days but they used to be commonplace 2 seasons ago). Instead, they are loading up the juice to compensate. Eventually it will get too unweildy, when things really start to tighten up and the most reliable offensive and defensive/goaltending patterns begin to emerge. At that time they will once again start putting out fives. What else are they going to do when, say, Van is visiting Minny in January and playoff berth/seeding is at stake - two of the very best goalies - one horrible offense and another only half decent... you will see the 5s eventually
0
Yes bracks, its obvious what is happening - the books are reluctant to disturb the somewhat newly established pattern of putting out 5.5 as the low number (you never see 6.5s these days but they used to be commonplace 2 seasons ago). Instead, they are loading up the juice to compensate. Eventually it will get too unweildy, when things really start to tighten up and the most reliable offensive and defensive/goaltending patterns begin to emerge. At that time they will once again start putting out fives. What else are they going to do when, say, Van is visiting Minny in January and playoff berth/seeding is at stake - two of the very best goalies - one horrible offense and another only half decent... you will see the 5s eventually
Hi JT, I am having a hard enough time finding time in the day to manage MY thread only a daily basis ...
I'm quite sorry if I didn't notice that you are "exclusive" as well... never really find many guys who really stick to them (as I do) in their capping. I make no secret of the fact I just tail OP and one or two other guys on sides, since they really are among the very best
I'm at 61% this year...guess I just have to make a name of a name for myself...whos OP?
0
Quote Originally Posted by happycap:
Hi JT, I am having a hard enough time finding time in the day to manage MY thread only a daily basis ...
I'm quite sorry if I didn't notice that you are "exclusive" as well... never really find many guys who really stick to them (as I do) in their capping. I make no secret of the fact I just tail OP and one or two other guys on sides, since they really are among the very best
I'm at 61% this year...guess I just have to make a name of a name for myself...whos OP?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.