Igor was solid in the net, after letting in a soft goal early in the game. Chris K's goal was huge. A big momentum shift. I was impressed that the Rangers finally started to realize that body checking is legal in the NHL Was busy watching the Penguins on my laptop, Predators, on my tablet and Football on my friend's laptop. Quite a night. Let's Go Rangers!
Igor was solid in the net, after letting in a soft goal early in the game. Chris K's goal was huge. A big momentum shift. I was impressed that the Rangers finally started to realize that body checking is legal in the NHL Was busy watching the Penguins on my laptop, Predators, on my tablet and Football on my friend's laptop. Quite a night. Let's Go Rangers!
Coyotes-Sharks Under 6.5 Played this last night at 6.5 === I see 6 + 110 At many outs this morning. I still like it at these odds. I made the game 5.5 flat
Sharps are betting very late, so I'll have to wait to post their plays. Back later.
Coyotes-Sharks Under 6.5 Played this last night at 6.5 === I see 6 + 110 At many outs this morning. I still like it at these odds. I made the game 5.5 flat
Sharps are betting very late, so I'll have to wait to post their plays. Back later.
Thanks buddy...liking VGK all day...no interest in the Carolina 'Joes' late steaming a big ol' clambake of Detroit wing dings. Not saying they won't win...just not my side of the draw.
Always great listening/talking with you...I was smiling as you described all the devices you had at MSG last night. You might need a suite if you're gonna be working that hard lol!!!
Thanks buddy...liking VGK all day...no interest in the Carolina 'Joes' late steaming a big ol' clambake of Detroit wing dings. Not saying they won't win...just not my side of the draw.
Always great listening/talking with you...I was smiling as you described all the devices you had at MSG last night. You might need a suite if you're gonna be working that hard lol!!!
Thx Red - I have been checking Twitter and they post some draftkings %Handle & %Bets numbers early in the day. Carolina did not match up (60% Handle %67 Bets) but Jets and Frenchies both did. Was just curious to see how that Twitter post aligns with your friends observations.
Thx Red - I have been checking Twitter and they post some draftkings %Handle & %Bets numbers early in the day. Carolina did not match up (60% Handle %67 Bets) but Jets and Frenchies both did. Was just curious to see how that Twitter post aligns with your friends observations.
Early splits are meaningless, because the sharp money is wagered later in the day. Carolina was the highest bet made by the sharps today. They also played the Jets, but for a little less. So, my advice would be to ignore what is posted on Twitter. It will only confuse you, if it doesn't match-up to what I post. Best Of Luck!
Early splits are meaningless, because the sharp money is wagered later in the day. Carolina was the highest bet made by the sharps today. They also played the Jets, but for a little less. So, my advice would be to ignore what is posted on Twitter. It will only confuse you, if it doesn't match-up to what I post. Best Of Luck!
Thanks for sharing Does your friend see what actual sharp accounts are betting or just where the action/money is for DK? If you have other sports picks, please do share, BOL!
Thanks for sharing Does your friend see what actual sharp accounts are betting or just where the action/money is for DK? If you have other sports picks, please do share, BOL!
@DB51daBEARS Thanks, Bear. Always Look Forward To Your Encouraging Comments. Much Appreciated.
You're very welcome, Red. Now I have to re-type my whole write-up on Canucks @ Flames...g'dmnit grrrrrrr. Was just about done explaining why I favor the Canucks and went to NHL.com for some stats and inexplicably signed out of Covers??? WTH??? Like the Canucks ML (gotta see what my offshore guy has on it now).
@DB51daBEARS Thanks, Bear. Always Look Forward To Your Encouraging Comments. Much Appreciated.
You're very welcome, Red. Now I have to re-type my whole write-up on Canucks @ Flames...g'dmnit grrrrrrr. Was just about done explaining why I favor the Canucks and went to NHL.com for some stats and inexplicably signed out of Covers??? WTH??? Like the Canucks ML (gotta see what my offshore guy has on it now).
He tallies the wagers, & views who are placing them. That's why I know the difference between early wagers, as opposed to late wagers. Early stream in Hockey & Baskets can be misleading, because they will sometimes bet the wrong side to drive the number up or down. They use this strategy to throw off the followers of lines moves. After the numbers moves enough, they will bet the other or (sharp) side, at a better price, creating more value & a possibility of middling the game. Middling means winning both sides of their bets. Example = Let's say the Devils are playing the Rangers at home. The Devils open up at -180 -1.5 goals even. They bet the Devils -180. Since it's respected money, the oddsmakers immediately move the Devils line to -210 -1.5 goals + 110ml. Sharps really prefer the Rangers +1.5 goals in this game. Now they place a bigger wager on the Rangers + 1.5 goals + 110. This facilitates not only more VALUE on the side they like, but also an opportunity to win both sides of their wagers if the Devils win by 1 goal. You'll be surprised how many times this strategy works. I hope you now understand why early line moves can be misleading. Thanks for viewing my thread.
He tallies the wagers, & views who are placing them. That's why I know the difference between early wagers, as opposed to late wagers. Early stream in Hockey & Baskets can be misleading, because they will sometimes bet the wrong side to drive the number up or down. They use this strategy to throw off the followers of lines moves. After the numbers moves enough, they will bet the other or (sharp) side, at a better price, creating more value & a possibility of middling the game. Middling means winning both sides of their bets. Example = Let's say the Devils are playing the Rangers at home. The Devils open up at -180 -1.5 goals even. They bet the Devils -180. Since it's respected money, the oddsmakers immediately move the Devils line to -210 -1.5 goals + 110ml. Sharps really prefer the Rangers +1.5 goals in this game. Now they place a bigger wager on the Rangers + 1.5 goals + 110. This facilitates not only more VALUE on the side they like, but also an opportunity to win both sides of their wagers if the Devils win by 1 goal. You'll be surprised how many times this strategy works. I hope you now understand why early line moves can be misleading. Thanks for viewing my thread.
Best Of Luck on your Canuck wager. Personally, I have no opinion on the game myself. I saw Tie Domi last week. Boy, did he gain weight. He was in town to watch his son play The Devils. The Rangers could use a couple of rough & tumble players like him, to stir things up, when they are low energy. Lol
Best Of Luck on your Canuck wager. Personally, I have no opinion on the game myself. I saw Tie Domi last week. Boy, did he gain weight. He was in town to watch his son play The Devils. The Rangers could use a couple of rough & tumble players like him, to stir things up, when they are low energy. Lol
@DB51daBEARS Best Of Luck on your Canuck wager. Personally, I have no opinion on the game myself. I saw Tie Domi last week. Boy, did he gain weight. He was in town to watch his son play The Devils. The Rangers could use a couple of rough & tumble players like him, to stir things up, when they are low energy. Lol
LOL Red...Domi still looks scary He should think about acting...lots of guys who look like Tie are making good bucks in front of the cameras.
If the James Bond series wasn't on it's last legs, he could mos def be a Bond Villian (or a henchman)!!!
Cheers buddy
PS - Yep...Rangers for sure could use some more tough guys. Loved Ryan Reaves and happy he's getting playing time in Minny but he wasn't the answer. Letting Copp and Vitrano go sucked (imo)!!! Both guys would go into the corners and dig, and Vitrano was so underrated/underappreciated (again imo).
@DB51daBEARS Best Of Luck on your Canuck wager. Personally, I have no opinion on the game myself. I saw Tie Domi last week. Boy, did he gain weight. He was in town to watch his son play The Devils. The Rangers could use a couple of rough & tumble players like him, to stir things up, when they are low energy. Lol
LOL Red...Domi still looks scary He should think about acting...lots of guys who look like Tie are making good bucks in front of the cameras.
If the James Bond series wasn't on it's last legs, he could mos def be a Bond Villian (or a henchman)!!!
Cheers buddy
PS - Yep...Rangers for sure could use some more tough guys. Loved Ryan Reaves and happy he's getting playing time in Minny but he wasn't the answer. Letting Copp and Vitrano go sucked (imo)!!! Both guys would go into the corners and dig, and Vitrano was so underrated/underappreciated (again imo).
@dyamarik Early splits are meaningless, because the sharp money is wagered later in the day. Carolina was the highest bet made by the sharps today. They also played the Jets, but for a little less. So, my advice would be to ignore what is posted on Twitter. It will only confuse you, if it doesn't match-up to what I post. Best Of Luck!
That is what I was thinking was happening. I have been checking and nothing further comes out on Twitter or elsewhere. Honestly I don't trust any "free" sites that post that info. Feels like books and or sharps can just make shit up to get you to bet how they want. Thanks again.
@dyamarik Early splits are meaningless, because the sharp money is wagered later in the day. Carolina was the highest bet made by the sharps today. They also played the Jets, but for a little less. So, my advice would be to ignore what is posted on Twitter. It will only confuse you, if it doesn't match-up to what I post. Best Of Luck!
That is what I was thinking was happening. I have been checking and nothing further comes out on Twitter or elsewhere. Honestly I don't trust any "free" sites that post that info. Feels like books and or sharps can just make shit up to get you to bet how they want. Thanks again.
100%. John Ewing of BetMGM is posting all sorts of splits now and it feels way too convenient. I don't know if I trust or believe all of the readily available data out there. I do, however, trust some gentleman named Redlad on this forum lol (the numbers don't lie).
100%. John Ewing of BetMGM is posting all sorts of splits now and it feels way too convenient. I don't know if I trust or believe all of the readily available data out there. I do, however, trust some gentleman named Redlad on this forum lol (the numbers don't lie).
Thanks for the insight. Been on covers for quite a while and trying to improve my betting. Figured I don’t know shit so I’ve filtered through the forums here and found a few “cappers” including yourself with the best records/quality picks and will just play them and see what happens. Either way it’s all of us versus the bookies anyways. Thanks once again for sharing
Thanks for the insight. Been on covers for quite a while and trying to improve my betting. Figured I don’t know shit so I’ve filtered through the forums here and found a few “cappers” including yourself with the best records/quality picks and will just play them and see what happens. Either way it’s all of us versus the bookies anyways. Thanks once again for sharing
Believe it or not. BetMGM is not considered a sharp Sportsbook. Sharpest Sportsbook are Pinnacle, Circa & Heritage. Hopefully, Draft Kings will join the list. Of course, I have a vested interest, because I brought up, so much of their stock.
Believe it or not. BetMGM is not considered a sharp Sportsbook. Sharpest Sportsbook are Pinnacle, Circa & Heritage. Hopefully, Draft Kings will join the list. Of course, I have a vested interest, because I brought up, so much of their stock.
I'm passing tonight on this small card. Sharps might be cooling off as they have gone 2-2 the last 2 nights in Hockey. Tonight they're on a very rare underdog. Maybe they read Bear's write-up. Lol
I'm passing tonight on this small card. Sharps might be cooling off as they have gone 2-2 the last 2 nights in Hockey. Tonight they're on a very rare underdog. Maybe they read Bear's write-up. Lol
I was going to ask why I never see them on Dogs! Maybe there's a good reason. Good to see them on the Nucks though. Hard for me to believe they wouldn't find some super value plays and smash em.
I was going to ask why I never see them on Dogs! Maybe there's a good reason. Good to see them on the Nucks though. Hard for me to believe they wouldn't find some super value plays and smash em.
Yikes! = They just bought back 3/4 of the Canucks play. It will still have to stand as an official play, but I also bought back some, as well. Why you have to wait for the late moves. Best I can do is = bonus play NY Knicks + 4 in the NBA. Canucks can still get there, but not a high confidence wager anymore.
Yikes! = They just bought back 3/4 of the Canucks play. It will still have to stand as an official play, but I also bought back some, as well. Why you have to wait for the late moves. Best I can do is = bonus play NY Knicks + 4 in the NBA. Canucks can still get there, but not a high confidence wager anymore.
Crazy. Have to be disciplined and just follow their picks for now lol. It will be interesting to see what they got tonight with a big card and some heavy favs for hockey anyways
Crazy. Have to be disciplined and just follow their picks for now lol. It will be interesting to see what they got tonight with a big card and some heavy favs for hockey anyways
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.