• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
    • NFL Week 2
      NFL Week 2
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • Lions-Bills Early Leans
      • Early Survivor Picks
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

    Worst QB crop EVER? Hell NO!!

    «First Previous 12
    Raiders22
    StumpTownStu
    DoubleUp4Life
    Participants:
    Search model icon
    Views: 367
    Posts: 38
    «First Previous 12
     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 33832
    Posted: Apr. 29, 2022 - 12:13 PM ET #26

    @StumpTownStu

     

     

    Browns VP Reveals Problematic Part Of Josh Allen's Game Which Significantly Impacted His Evaluation

    by Brad Taningco May 1, 2018
    2-3 minutes

    The Cleveland Browns ended up taking Baker Mayfield with their No. 1 overall pick in the NFL Draft, presumably over Josh Allen, who was reportedly one of their final two picks. Browns V.P. of player personnel Alonzo Highsmith apparently wasn’t one of the people in the Browns’ front office responsible for putting Allen in that position.

    Highsmith had significant concerns about the big flaw which dogged Allen throughout the entire pre-draft process: his accuracy.

    Buffalo Bills Stack for Week 10 - FanDuel Hurry Up

    “Baker Mayfield lost two receivers and he was the same quarterback,” Highsmith said, via the Canton Repository. “Josh Allen . . . big arm . . . he could throw the ball from here to the moon. When they have to make excuses. . . . Why are they not completing passes? That’s a problem.”

    Allen has notably struggled with his accuracy throughout his entire football-playing career. But despite those concerns about a key aspect of quarterback play, his overwhelming physical gifts and upside were such that the Browns were willing to overlook his accuracy problems to make him one of their final contenders for the top pick.

    However, Highsmith just wasn’t a fan of Allen’s lack of accuracy. He said he had Allen ranked fifth among the quarterbacks who went in the first round, behind Baker Mayfield, Sam Darnold, Josh Rosen, and Lamar Jackson.

    It’s unknown just how much Highsmith helped swing the Browns’ decision from Allen to Mayfield. But as a fan of accuracy, he has to be pleased with the Browns eventually opting for Mayfield, who proved in college that he can get the ball to whomever he wants it to go, regardless of the receivers he has at his disposal.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    @StumpTownStu

     

     

    Browns VP Reveals Problematic Part Of Josh Allen's Game Which Significantly Impacted His Evaluation

    by Brad Taningco May 1, 2018
    2-3 minutes

    The Cleveland Browns ended up taking Baker Mayfield with their No. 1 overall pick in the NFL Draft, presumably over Josh Allen, who was reportedly one of their final two picks. Browns V.P. of player personnel Alonzo Highsmith apparently wasn’t one of the people in the Browns’ front office responsible for putting Allen in that position.

    Highsmith had significant concerns about the big flaw which dogged Allen throughout the entire pre-draft process: his accuracy.

    Buffalo Bills Stack for Week 10 - FanDuel Hurry Up

    “Baker Mayfield lost two receivers and he was the same quarterback,” Highsmith said, via the Canton Repository. “Josh Allen . . . big arm . . . he could throw the ball from here to the moon. When they have to make excuses. . . . Why are they not completing passes? That’s a problem.”

    Allen has notably struggled with his accuracy throughout his entire football-playing career. But despite those concerns about a key aspect of quarterback play, his overwhelming physical gifts and upside were such that the Browns were willing to overlook his accuracy problems to make him one of their final contenders for the top pick.

    However, Highsmith just wasn’t a fan of Allen’s lack of accuracy. He said he had Allen ranked fifth among the quarterbacks who went in the first round, behind Baker Mayfield, Sam Darnold, Josh Rosen, and Lamar Jackson.

    It’s unknown just how much Highsmith helped swing the Browns’ decision from Allen to Mayfield. But as a fan of accuracy, he has to be pleased with the Browns eventually opting for Mayfield, who proved in college that he can get the ball to whomever he wants it to go, regardless of the receivers he has at his disposal.

     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 33832
    Posted: Apr. 29, 2022 - 12:17 PM ET #27

    I think that was more the media speculating about if, and to what extent, the tweets mattered.  Not very many scouts or GMs would have made Allen the guy picked in front of Mayfield then.

    But you could be right and the organization would never admit it.

    We just have to go with what they DID say was their reasoning.  It is most believable -- because most of us felt that way at the time.  peace_5

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    I think that was more the media speculating about if, and to what extent, the tweets mattered.  Not very many scouts or GMs would have made Allen the guy picked in front of Mayfield then.

    But you could be right and the organization would never admit it.

    We just have to go with what they DID say was their reasoning.  It is most believable -- because most of us felt that way at the time.  peace_5

     
    StumpTownStu
    StumpTownStu
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2016
    Posts: 22234
    Posted: Apr. 29, 2022 - 12:17 PM ET #28

    Quote Originally Posted by DoubleUp4Life:

    Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu: @Raiders22  The Browns were locked in on Allen until tweets came out on draft day. They didn't say, "Well, Baker was more accurate, bigger moments for a bigger program..." They were locked in. Some old tweets surfaced, they went with Baker.     Probably a 98% chance the BILLS leaked the those old tweets just days before the draft.... Local media outlets always try to corner GM Brandon Beane about it , his responses are always hilarious...In one TV interview with with either Steve Tasker or John Murphy , he covers his eyes and  ears ,and then responds with " I know nothing " Before laughing ... Several front office employees said they were trying to trade up to #2 , But after the tweets they figured 6 or 7 was high enough to get Allen .

    Those tweets were a game changer. I remember thinking, "Oh my god, the Browns are going to play themselves." It was literally the morning of the draft.

    R.I.P. #94 MARSHAWN KNEELAND - DC4L
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by DoubleUp4Life:

    Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu: @Raiders22  The Browns were locked in on Allen until tweets came out on draft day. They didn't say, "Well, Baker was more accurate, bigger moments for a bigger program..." They were locked in. Some old tweets surfaced, they went with Baker.     Probably a 98% chance the BILLS leaked the those old tweets just days before the draft.... Local media outlets always try to corner GM Brandon Beane about it , his responses are always hilarious...In one TV interview with with either Steve Tasker or John Murphy , he covers his eyes and  ears ,and then responds with " I know nothing " Before laughing ... Several front office employees said they were trying to trade up to #2 , But after the tweets they figured 6 or 7 was high enough to get Allen .

    Those tweets were a game changer. I remember thinking, "Oh my god, the Browns are going to play themselves." It was literally the morning of the draft.

     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 33832
    Posted: Apr. 29, 2022 - 12:22 PM ET #29

    I remember the tweets as well.  But you have to remember these GMs realize these are kids and do and say things on social media, etc. that they can overlook.  I mean we believe in second chances, etc. as well.  Look at some of the guys that do get drafted -- Mixon, etc.

     

    I really think the pro-Allen guys were the ones that thought the tweets made the difference -- they didn't.

    The week leading up to the draft the idea they were going with Darnold was out there, etc.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    I remember the tweets as well.  But you have to remember these GMs realize these are kids and do and say things on social media, etc. that they can overlook.  I mean we believe in second chances, etc. as well.  Look at some of the guys that do get drafted -- Mixon, etc.

     

    I really think the pro-Allen guys were the ones that thought the tweets made the difference -- they didn't.

    The week leading up to the draft the idea they were going with Darnold was out there, etc.

     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 33832
    Posted: Apr. 29, 2022 - 12:22 PM ET #30

    For example:

     

    RUMOR: NFL Insider Reveals Latest Twist In Browns' QB Decision With No. 1 Pick

    by Brad Taningco April 23, 2018
    2-3 minutes

    With the No. 1 overall pick in the 2018 NFL Draft, the Cleveland Browns will not select quarterback Josh Allen out of the University of Wyoming. At least that’s what Peter King of Sports Illustrated believes.

    In his first-round mock draft ahead of this week’s draft, King wrote on The MMQB that one of his well-connected sources says the Browns will not take Allen with the top pick over USC quarterback Sam Darnold:

    “We’re all prisoners of the people we know in this league. And someone I trust, who is very often right and is very well-connected, told me Sunday it’s not Allen [for the Browns].”

    The notion of Allen going to the Browns has picked up significant steam over the past couple of weeks. This is despite the significant concerns surrounding Allen’s shaky accuracy. King himself contributed to this, as he reported that a “friend” of Browns GM John Dorsey said Allen was the team’s pick at No. 1. Dorsey also dropped a sizable hint about possibly favoring Allen due to the superior size of his hands compared to Darnold.

    But apparently, those rumors may very well be all noise if King’s source is to be believed. While it makes some sense for the Browns to take Allen – someone who potentially has the higher upside and will have the chance to develop while Tyrod Taylor starts – he does have some significant bust potential due to his lack of accuracy.

    As King himself notes, Darnold is a safe pick, most likely the safer of the two. And given the Browns’ catastrophic history with quarterbacks, no one would blame them if they opted to take him and his relatively higher floor over Allen’s higher ceiling at No. 1 overall. But with the draft now just a few days away, the wait to find out which quarterback the Browns ultimately pick won’t be that much longer.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    For example:

     

    RUMOR: NFL Insider Reveals Latest Twist In Browns' QB Decision With No. 1 Pick

    by Brad Taningco April 23, 2018
    2-3 minutes

    With the No. 1 overall pick in the 2018 NFL Draft, the Cleveland Browns will not select quarterback Josh Allen out of the University of Wyoming. At least that’s what Peter King of Sports Illustrated believes.

    In his first-round mock draft ahead of this week’s draft, King wrote on The MMQB that one of his well-connected sources says the Browns will not take Allen with the top pick over USC quarterback Sam Darnold:

    “We’re all prisoners of the people we know in this league. And someone I trust, who is very often right and is very well-connected, told me Sunday it’s not Allen [for the Browns].”

    The notion of Allen going to the Browns has picked up significant steam over the past couple of weeks. This is despite the significant concerns surrounding Allen’s shaky accuracy. King himself contributed to this, as he reported that a “friend” of Browns GM John Dorsey said Allen was the team’s pick at No. 1. Dorsey also dropped a sizable hint about possibly favoring Allen due to the superior size of his hands compared to Darnold.

    But apparently, those rumors may very well be all noise if King’s source is to be believed. While it makes some sense for the Browns to take Allen – someone who potentially has the higher upside and will have the chance to develop while Tyrod Taylor starts – he does have some significant bust potential due to his lack of accuracy.

    As King himself notes, Darnold is a safe pick, most likely the safer of the two. And given the Browns’ catastrophic history with quarterbacks, no one would blame them if they opted to take him and his relatively higher floor over Allen’s higher ceiling at No. 1 overall. But with the draft now just a few days away, the wait to find out which quarterback the Browns ultimately pick won’t be that much longer.

     
    DoubleUp4Life
    DoubleUp4Life
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2007
    Posts: 66896
    Posted: Apr. 29, 2022 - 12:24 PM ET #31

    Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22:

    I remember the tweets as well.  But you have to remember these GMs realize these are kids and do and say things on social media, etc. that they can overlook.  I mean we believe in second chances, etc. as well.  Look at some of the guys that do get drafted -- Mixon, etc. I really think the por-Allen guys were the ones that thought the tweets made the difference -- they didn't. The week leading up to the draft the idea they were going with Darnold was out there, etc.

     

    The oddsmakers disagree wirh you ..

    Before the tweets Allen was heavily juiced to to go in the top 3 ( from my old school notebooks it was -325 ) 

    After the tweets +155 

    BEST OF HEALTH, HAPPINESS,WEALTH, BLESSINGS and LUCK TO ALL !!
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22:

    I remember the tweets as well.  But you have to remember these GMs realize these are kids and do and say things on social media, etc. that they can overlook.  I mean we believe in second chances, etc. as well.  Look at some of the guys that do get drafted -- Mixon, etc. I really think the por-Allen guys were the ones that thought the tweets made the difference -- they didn't. The week leading up to the draft the idea they were going with Darnold was out there, etc.

     

    The oddsmakers disagree wirh you ..

    Before the tweets Allen was heavily juiced to to go in the top 3 ( from my old school notebooks it was -325 ) 

    After the tweets +155 

     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 33832
    Posted: Apr. 29, 2022 - 12:29 PM ET #32

    @DoubleUp4Life

     

     Cool -- maybe you guys are correct and that swayed them.  I can only go with the folks I know and the past articles now that lead up to the draft.  It was not like this was an Andrew Luck talent and Allen was a clearcut #1 pick -- he was not.  So there was a lot of speculation on which QB they were going with.  peace_5

    Do you have any quotes on that -- I will look and see if there are.  I just know they had looked very closely at all the QBs leading up to that draft and had narrowed it down to 3 and were going back and forth, etc.

    So, not me the oddsmakers were disagreeing with -- but a lot more guys leading up to draft day.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    @DoubleUp4Life

     

     Cool -- maybe you guys are correct and that swayed them.  I can only go with the folks I know and the past articles now that lead up to the draft.  It was not like this was an Andrew Luck talent and Allen was a clearcut #1 pick -- he was not.  So there was a lot of speculation on which QB they were going with.  peace_5

    Do you have any quotes on that -- I will look and see if there are.  I just know they had looked very closely at all the QBs leading up to that draft and had narrowed it down to 3 and were going back and forth, etc.

    So, not me the oddsmakers were disagreeing with -- but a lot more guys leading up to draft day.

     
    StumpTownStu
    StumpTownStu
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2016
    Posts: 22234
    Posted: Apr. 29, 2022 - 12:39 PM ET #33

    @Raiders22

     May 1st, after the draft. Of course teams are gonna try to spin narratives and make their decision seem based on football and not PR but if you followed the lead up to the draft, all the way up to the days before the draft, and then the morning of the draft, everybody assumed the Browns would draft Allen. Tweets come out morning of. The Browns draft Baker. It's like if you have two prospective mates. You're more attracted to one. You think she will give you better babies. Maybe she'll be better in the sack. Then you find out she has bad credit and past shoplifting charges. You're gonna marry the safe choice. You'll never go and admit that you were really into the other chick. You'll doubt everything that you loved about your now wife. If the Browns were so in love with Baker, Baker wouldn't known he was the first pick weeks before the draft. Everybody would have known. Even in cases where there is a legit question of who the consensus top QB is a la Peyton Manning v. Ryan Leaf, Cam Newton v. Blaine Gabbert, there's never REALLY a question of who the top guy is. Rewind back, for those who were around and into football back then, for all the hoopla made about it leading up to the draft, did anyone ever actually believe that the Colts were taking Ryan Leaf? Fuck no!

    Josh Allen was the projected top QB in the final days leading up to the draft, even after regressing a bit in his senior season. Any questions about his accuracy were dwarfed by both his own measurables, his height, hand size, arm strength, athleticism, etc. and dwarfed by Baker's own questions. His lack of size, his off field antics, etc.

    Bottom line is Josh Allen would've been a Brown if not for some old tweets. And I promise you the Brown ownership regrets punking out. The Bills, on the other hand, said, "This kid is a legit 6'5" with big hands and we play outside in Buffalo.

    R.I.P. #94 MARSHAWN KNEELAND - DC4L
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    @Raiders22

     May 1st, after the draft. Of course teams are gonna try to spin narratives and make their decision seem based on football and not PR but if you followed the lead up to the draft, all the way up to the days before the draft, and then the morning of the draft, everybody assumed the Browns would draft Allen. Tweets come out morning of. The Browns draft Baker. It's like if you have two prospective mates. You're more attracted to one. You think she will give you better babies. Maybe she'll be better in the sack. Then you find out she has bad credit and past shoplifting charges. You're gonna marry the safe choice. You'll never go and admit that you were really into the other chick. You'll doubt everything that you loved about your now wife. If the Browns were so in love with Baker, Baker wouldn't known he was the first pick weeks before the draft. Everybody would have known. Even in cases where there is a legit question of who the consensus top QB is a la Peyton Manning v. Ryan Leaf, Cam Newton v. Blaine Gabbert, there's never REALLY a question of who the top guy is. Rewind back, for those who were around and into football back then, for all the hoopla made about it leading up to the draft, did anyone ever actually believe that the Colts were taking Ryan Leaf? Fuck no!

    Josh Allen was the projected top QB in the final days leading up to the draft, even after regressing a bit in his senior season. Any questions about his accuracy were dwarfed by both his own measurables, his height, hand size, arm strength, athleticism, etc. and dwarfed by Baker's own questions. His lack of size, his off field antics, etc.

    Bottom line is Josh Allen would've been a Brown if not for some old tweets. And I promise you the Brown ownership regrets punking out. The Bills, on the other hand, said, "This kid is a legit 6'5" with big hands and we play outside in Buffalo.

     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 33832
    Posted: Apr. 29, 2022 - 12:44 PM ET #34

    Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:

    @Raiders22  May 1st, after the draft. Of course teams are gonna try to spin narratives and make their decision seem based on football and not PR but if you followed the lead up to the draft, all the way up to the days before the draft, and then the morning of the draft, everybody assumed the Browns would draft Allen. Tweets come out morning of. The Browns draft Baker. It's like if you have two prospective mates. You're more attracted to one. You think she will give you better babies. Maybe she'll be better in the sack. Then you find out she has bad credit and past shoplifting charges. You're gonna marry the safe choice. You'll never go and admit that you were really into the other chick. You'll doubt everything that you loved about your now wife. If the Browns were so in love with Baker, Baker wouldn't known he was the first pick weeks before the draft. Everybody would have known. Even in cases where there is a legit question of who the consensus top QB is a la Peyton Manning v. Ryan Leaf, Cam Newton v. Blaine Gabbert, there's never REALLY a question of who the top guy is. Rewind back, for those who were around and into football back then, for all the hoopla made about it leading up to the draft, did anyone ever actually believe that the Colts were taking Ryan Leaf? Fuck no! Josh Allen was the projected top QB in the final days leading up to the draft, even after regressing a bit in his senior season. Any questions about his accuracy were dwarfed by both his own measurables, his height, hand size, arm strength, athleticism, etc. and dwarfed by Baker's own questions. His lack of size, his off field antics, etc. Bottom line is Josh Allen would've been a Brown if not for some old tweets. And I promise you the Brown ownership regrets punking out. The Bills, on the other hand, said, "This kid is a legit 6'5" with big hands and we play outside in Buffalo.

     

    The issue is EVERYBODY did NOT assume that.  That was my point.  It was up in the air -- at best.  Most folks thought he was already 3rd place.

    For sure there was speculation Leaf.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:

    @Raiders22  May 1st, after the draft. Of course teams are gonna try to spin narratives and make their decision seem based on football and not PR but if you followed the lead up to the draft, all the way up to the days before the draft, and then the morning of the draft, everybody assumed the Browns would draft Allen. Tweets come out morning of. The Browns draft Baker. It's like if you have two prospective mates. You're more attracted to one. You think she will give you better babies. Maybe she'll be better in the sack. Then you find out she has bad credit and past shoplifting charges. You're gonna marry the safe choice. You'll never go and admit that you were really into the other chick. You'll doubt everything that you loved about your now wife. If the Browns were so in love with Baker, Baker wouldn't known he was the first pick weeks before the draft. Everybody would have known. Even in cases where there is a legit question of who the consensus top QB is a la Peyton Manning v. Ryan Leaf, Cam Newton v. Blaine Gabbert, there's never REALLY a question of who the top guy is. Rewind back, for those who were around and into football back then, for all the hoopla made about it leading up to the draft, did anyone ever actually believe that the Colts were taking Ryan Leaf? Fuck no! Josh Allen was the projected top QB in the final days leading up to the draft, even after regressing a bit in his senior season. Any questions about his accuracy were dwarfed by both his own measurables, his height, hand size, arm strength, athleticism, etc. and dwarfed by Baker's own questions. His lack of size, his off field antics, etc. Bottom line is Josh Allen would've been a Brown if not for some old tweets. And I promise you the Brown ownership regrets punking out. The Bills, on the other hand, said, "This kid is a legit 6'5" with big hands and we play outside in Buffalo.

     

    The issue is EVERYBODY did NOT assume that.  That was my point.  It was up in the air -- at best.  Most folks thought he was already 3rd place.

    For sure there was speculation Leaf.

     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 33832
    Posted: Apr. 29, 2022 - 12:46 PM ET #35

    Josh Allen might be No. 1 pick of NFL draft, but he's not among our top 40 prospects

    No, I didn't forget about Josh Allen.

    Just two days from the NFL draft, it's impossible to overlook the Wyoming quarterback. Prospects are too often depicted as "polarizing," yet that label seems apt for Allen given the gulf between his backers and skeptics.

    Seen as a likely top-five pick and maybe even the leading candidate for the Cleveland Browns with the No. 1 overall selection, Allen has a wealth of readily evident physical tools. At 6-5 and 237 pounds, he can uncork deep throws with ease and looks comfortable doing so on the run.

    Yet his production in college was more than lacking and left many wondering why he so regularly struggled to handle Mountain West Conference competition.

    Omitting Allen from my list of top 40 prospects in the 2018 NFL draft was neither an intended slight nor an oversight. Rather, it seemed the best way to establish how he truly stands as a player at this time: a project who, while offering considerable upside, presents serious questions about whether he will be able to fully capitalize on his physical gifts.

    Part of the case for Allen is that the right staff can unlock his ability and help make those highlight-reel throws his baseline. This is the kind of "why don't they make the whole plane out of the black box" kind of thinking, however, that often leads to regime changes. Allen infamously completed just 56% of his passes at Wyoming, a mark falling well short of expectations given the talent level he routinely faced.

    Of the 27 quarterbacks drafted in the first round throughout the last 10 years, only former Tennessee Titans pick Jake Locker had a lower completion rate in college (55.4%). Josh Freeman and Matt Ryan were the only other two under 60%, but Ryan's stats belied his clear proficiency as a passer in the short-to-intermediate area.

    That one mark alone, of course, can't tell the full story about any prospect's overall accuracy. But the track record of comparable quarterbacks has shown these issues aren't easily cleaned up.

    "Bottom line is the accuracy usually just doesn't jump five points," NFL Network analyst Charles Davis told USA TODAY Sports. "You get to the NFL and the windows are tighter, and the guys are quicker. You don't become a more accurate thrower, as a general rule."

     

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Josh Allen might be No. 1 pick of NFL draft, but he's not among our top 40 prospects

    No, I didn't forget about Josh Allen.

    Just two days from the NFL draft, it's impossible to overlook the Wyoming quarterback. Prospects are too often depicted as "polarizing," yet that label seems apt for Allen given the gulf between his backers and skeptics.

    Seen as a likely top-five pick and maybe even the leading candidate for the Cleveland Browns with the No. 1 overall selection, Allen has a wealth of readily evident physical tools. At 6-5 and 237 pounds, he can uncork deep throws with ease and looks comfortable doing so on the run.

    Yet his production in college was more than lacking and left many wondering why he so regularly struggled to handle Mountain West Conference competition.

    Omitting Allen from my list of top 40 prospects in the 2018 NFL draft was neither an intended slight nor an oversight. Rather, it seemed the best way to establish how he truly stands as a player at this time: a project who, while offering considerable upside, presents serious questions about whether he will be able to fully capitalize on his physical gifts.

    Part of the case for Allen is that the right staff can unlock his ability and help make those highlight-reel throws his baseline. This is the kind of "why don't they make the whole plane out of the black box" kind of thinking, however, that often leads to regime changes. Allen infamously completed just 56% of his passes at Wyoming, a mark falling well short of expectations given the talent level he routinely faced.

    Of the 27 quarterbacks drafted in the first round throughout the last 10 years, only former Tennessee Titans pick Jake Locker had a lower completion rate in college (55.4%). Josh Freeman and Matt Ryan were the only other two under 60%, but Ryan's stats belied his clear proficiency as a passer in the short-to-intermediate area.

    That one mark alone, of course, can't tell the full story about any prospect's overall accuracy. But the track record of comparable quarterbacks has shown these issues aren't easily cleaned up.

    "Bottom line is the accuracy usually just doesn't jump five points," NFL Network analyst Charles Davis told USA TODAY Sports. "You get to the NFL and the windows are tighter, and the guys are quicker. You don't become a more accurate thrower, as a general rule."

     

     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 33832
    Posted: Apr. 29, 2022 - 12:46 PM ET #36

    Allen told Pro Football Talk Live recently that he believes criticism about his accuracy is overblown, and that working with private coach Jordan Palmer has helped him with footwork he described as "jacked." Improving the mechanics of his delivery will no doubt help, but his ball placement issues are just one symptom of a larger problem.

    According to Sports Illustrated and Pro Football Focus, Allen had a passer rating of 73.4 when under pressure — well below the other top quarterbacks in the class and even the NCAA-wide average of 90. As he repeatedly struggled to identify blitzes and go through his progression in a speedy manner, he too often settled for dangerous throws and ended up with an interception rate of one per 30.9 passes throughout his career.

    To be fair, Allen has faced a level of scrutiny heavy even for a top quarterback in the NFL draft, as his high school completion rate was used by some to highlight concerns. He's also faced comparisons to the likes of Kyle Boller, the former Ravens first rounder who completed just 47.8% of his passes. Others have wondered if he is at risk of becoming the next Christian Hackenberg, who has yet to play a single down for the Jets two years after being selected in the second round.

    "Josh is a much better player — I don't think it's close with him and Hackenberg," NFL Network analyst Daniel Jeremiah told USA TODAY Sports. "But some of the rawness, there's a similarity there."

    The right coaching staff might be able to mold Allen into the player he needs to become. With time to develop, perhaps he will translate his impressive pure throwing ability into a long career as a high-level starter.

    Or maybe it's best to keep expectations tempered — at least for now.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Allen told Pro Football Talk Live recently that he believes criticism about his accuracy is overblown, and that working with private coach Jordan Palmer has helped him with footwork he described as "jacked." Improving the mechanics of his delivery will no doubt help, but his ball placement issues are just one symptom of a larger problem.

    According to Sports Illustrated and Pro Football Focus, Allen had a passer rating of 73.4 when under pressure — well below the other top quarterbacks in the class and even the NCAA-wide average of 90. As he repeatedly struggled to identify blitzes and go through his progression in a speedy manner, he too often settled for dangerous throws and ended up with an interception rate of one per 30.9 passes throughout his career.

    To be fair, Allen has faced a level of scrutiny heavy even for a top quarterback in the NFL draft, as his high school completion rate was used by some to highlight concerns. He's also faced comparisons to the likes of Kyle Boller, the former Ravens first rounder who completed just 47.8% of his passes. Others have wondered if he is at risk of becoming the next Christian Hackenberg, who has yet to play a single down for the Jets two years after being selected in the second round.

    "Josh is a much better player — I don't think it's close with him and Hackenberg," NFL Network analyst Daniel Jeremiah told USA TODAY Sports. "But some of the rawness, there's a similarity there."

    The right coaching staff might be able to mold Allen into the player he needs to become. With time to develop, perhaps he will translate his impressive pure throwing ability into a long career as a high-level starter.

    Or maybe it's best to keep expectations tempered — at least for now.

     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 33832
    Posted: Apr. 29, 2022 - 12:48 PM ET #37

    These are folks 'speculating' BEFORE the draft--it was NOT assumed, largely, by the GMs and scouts that the Browns were going with Allen.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    These are folks 'speculating' BEFORE the draft--it was NOT assumed, largely, by the GMs and scouts that the Browns were going with Allen.

     
     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 33832
    Posted: Apr. 29, 2022 - 12:52 PM ET #38

    People forget how talented Leaf was:

    Peyton Manning Week: Draft Manning or Ryan Leaf?

    Phillip B. Wilson
    6-8 minutes

    INDIANAPOLIS — In the beginning, as hard as it is to believe, the Indianapolis Colts could have ended up with Ryan Leaf instead of Peyton Manning.

    As much as 20-20 hindsight into Colts history couldn’t be clearer that Manning was the correct choice with the No. 1 overall pick in 1998, a decision that dramatically changed the franchise, as well as the Indianapolis sports landscape, was initially uncertain.

    Truth is, when Colts general manager Bill Polian consulted with his coaches and scouting staff, the feedback was 50-50. Some were convinced Leaf had the stronger arm and greater upside. And other teams thought so, too.

    A Newsday poll of 20 NFL general managers favored Leaf over Manning: “The overwhelming consensus: Manning may have the more recognizable name, but Leaf clearly is the preferred quarterback among league executives. Fourteen of the 20 polled said they would draft Leaf over Manning, citing the Washington State quarterback’s stronger arm, better mobility, and more promising long-term prospect as a franchise-caliber player.”

     

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    People forget how talented Leaf was:

    Peyton Manning Week: Draft Manning or Ryan Leaf?

    Phillip B. Wilson
    6-8 minutes

    INDIANAPOLIS — In the beginning, as hard as it is to believe, the Indianapolis Colts could have ended up with Ryan Leaf instead of Peyton Manning.

    As much as 20-20 hindsight into Colts history couldn’t be clearer that Manning was the correct choice with the No. 1 overall pick in 1998, a decision that dramatically changed the franchise, as well as the Indianapolis sports landscape, was initially uncertain.

    Truth is, when Colts general manager Bill Polian consulted with his coaches and scouting staff, the feedback was 50-50. Some were convinced Leaf had the stronger arm and greater upside. And other teams thought so, too.

    A Newsday poll of 20 NFL general managers favored Leaf over Manning: “The overwhelming consensus: Manning may have the more recognizable name, but Leaf clearly is the preferred quarterback among league executives. Fourteen of the 20 polled said they would draft Leaf over Manning, citing the Washington State quarterback’s stronger arm, better mobility, and more promising long-term prospect as a franchise-caliber player.”

     

    All Forums | NFL Betting Forum
    «First Previous 12

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 446,988 Covers arrow
    • Monday 9/14/2026 683 Covers arrow
    • Serious Streak Survivor Strategies 1,918,136 Covers arrow
    • Couple Beers 2,272 Covers arrow
    • I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters 57,689 Covers arrow
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 97,258 Covers arrow
    • Trump's legacy? 25,417 Covers arrow
    • Week One-Post Week One Plays Here 1,864 Covers arrow
    • *** MONDAY NFL *** 6,623 Covers arrow
    • Betting NFL isnt the same anymore Tapping out. 1,361 Covers arrow

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.