• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
    • NFL Week 2
      NFL Week 2
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

    Week 16 Discussion - Only adults please

    123 Next Last»
    suuma
    MRxKrazz
    vankiep_0007
    VicRaven
    mafia13
    ...
    Participants:
    Search model icon
    Views: 8202
    Posts: 65
    123 Next Last»
     
    suuma
    suuma
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2010
    Posts: 4455
    Posted: Dec. 22, 2015 - 9:13 AM ET #1

    Finally got some time to participate during the week. Wish you all good holidays!

    TNF: Chargers@Raiders

    Leaning Chargers getting five points here and might just lock it in today. The Raiders have been successful at the beginning of the season because Derek Carr had excellent protection and was airing it out at will. Since C Rodney Hudson is out, Carr was 66/124 53% and got sacked 10 times for a loss of 81 yards which equals 4.9 NYPPA in their L3 games. This is an abdysmal number and they have been scoring just 18.3 PPG over that span. Chargers' OL is getting healthy. If King Dunlap progresses this week, Rivers will have time in the pocket and pick the Raiders' secondary apart. They scored 3 points apiece against DEN & KC but they had a terrible matchup against those front sevens. It's a different story against the Raiders. On the other side the SD defense played extremely well in their L3, allowing 10, 10 & 14 offensive points along with a garbage time TD against the Dolphins. Matchup and current form points towards the Chargers who should win this game straight up.


    MNF: Bengals@Broncos

    I love the Bengals in this spot. They have the best recipe against a strong Broncos pass rush: an elite OL. I like McCarron and I give him the edge as a game manager behind a great OL rather than Osweiler behind an average OL against an improved Bengals' pass rush in 2015. I don't believe in Osweiler and he just cannot close games. Over his career he averages 71% completions during the first half and just 51% during the second. In their L2, the Broncos scored ZERO points in the second halves. It seems like teams can adjust to his play very well. Tyler Eifert might be back as well as George Iloka. Eifert gives McCarron a huge advantage for short to intermediate throws which can be very important against the Broncos' pass rush. The Bengals defense should really be enough to contain Osweiler. Some people will say "McCarron needed turnovers to score at San Francisco" - let's be honest here. I don't know what it is but the Niners have held teams to 15.8 PPG before the Bengals game. GB, SEA, ARI - no one scored more than 20 there. He still managed the game and led them to a win. This isn't going to be a great Football game but McCarron has more staff to win with than Osweiler and the matchup favors the Bengals IMO.

    More later. Let's discuss some games
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    To remove first post, remove entire topic.
    Finally got some time to participate during the week. Wish you all good holidays!

    TNF: Chargers@Raiders

    Leaning Chargers getting five points here and might just lock it in today. The Raiders have been successful at the beginning of the season because Derek Carr had excellent protection and was airing it out at will. Since C Rodney Hudson is out, Carr was 66/124 53% and got sacked 10 times for a loss of 81 yards which equals 4.9 NYPPA in their L3 games. This is an abdysmal number and they have been scoring just 18.3 PPG over that span. Chargers' OL is getting healthy. If King Dunlap progresses this week, Rivers will have time in the pocket and pick the Raiders' secondary apart. They scored 3 points apiece against DEN & KC but they had a terrible matchup against those front sevens. It's a different story against the Raiders. On the other side the SD defense played extremely well in their L3, allowing 10, 10 & 14 offensive points along with a garbage time TD against the Dolphins. Matchup and current form points towards the Chargers who should win this game straight up.


    MNF: Bengals@Broncos

    I love the Bengals in this spot. They have the best recipe against a strong Broncos pass rush: an elite OL. I like McCarron and I give him the edge as a game manager behind a great OL rather than Osweiler behind an average OL against an improved Bengals' pass rush in 2015. I don't believe in Osweiler and he just cannot close games. Over his career he averages 71% completions during the first half and just 51% during the second. In their L2, the Broncos scored ZERO points in the second halves. It seems like teams can adjust to his play very well. Tyler Eifert might be back as well as George Iloka. Eifert gives McCarron a huge advantage for short to intermediate throws which can be very important against the Broncos' pass rush. The Bengals defense should really be enough to contain Osweiler. Some people will say "McCarron needed turnovers to score at San Francisco" - let's be honest here. I don't know what it is but the Niners have held teams to 15.8 PPG before the Bengals game. GB, SEA, ARI - no one scored more than 20 there. He still managed the game and led them to a win. This isn't going to be a great Football game but McCarron has more staff to win with than Osweiler and the matchup favors the Bengals IMO.

    More later. Let's discuss some games
     
    MRxKrazz
    MRxKrazz
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2006
    Posts: 11486
    Posted: Dec. 22, 2015 - 9:50 AM ET #2

    Ouch leaning other sides in both games, after i do my weekly homework, i will come back with my thoughts. 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Ouch leaning other sides in both games, after i do my weekly homework, i will come back with my thoughts. 
     
    vankiep_0007
    vankiep_0007
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2008
    Posts: 24661
    Posted: Dec. 22, 2015 - 10:03 AM ET #3

    Can I come in Suuma... Gl this week Bro
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Can I come in Suuma... Gl this week Bro
     
    VicRaven
    VicRaven
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2015
    Posts: 861
    Posted: Dec. 22, 2015 - 10:22 AM ET #4

    Cincinnati's D is the key factor in this situation. They're on the brink of having one of their best "points against" seasons, since 1978. With McCarron at the helm, they realize they must keep the game flow in check, allowing the newbie to be the game manager, not the all-star hero. They want to make it easier for McCarron. As we saw this week against the Niners, what a better way to do so by setting him up with 3 short drive attempts, resulting in 3 TD's. 
    Although Cincinnati's offense produced a paltry 242 total yards, against the one of the worst defenses in the league. It didn't matter. I realize San Francisco doesn't have the greatest offense, but this is the NFL, and to me, they set up McCarron perfectly. 
    With a basic eye test, I like how McCarron protects the ball and manages the game more so than Osweiler. 
    My two cents on the table. If I play this game, it's Cincinnati. I don't believe they crumble like they have in the past.


    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Cincinnati's D is the key factor in this situation. They're on the brink of having one of their best "points against" seasons, since 1978. With McCarron at the helm, they realize they must keep the game flow in check, allowing the newbie to be the game manager, not the all-star hero. They want to make it easier for McCarron. As we saw this week against the Niners, what a better way to do so by setting him up with 3 short drive attempts, resulting in 3 TD's. 
    Although Cincinnati's offense produced a paltry 242 total yards, against the one of the worst defenses in the league. It didn't matter. I realize San Francisco doesn't have the greatest offense, but this is the NFL, and to me, they set up McCarron perfectly. 
    With a basic eye test, I like how McCarron protects the ball and manages the game more so than Osweiler. 
    My two cents on the table. If I play this game, it's Cincinnati. I don't believe they crumble like they have in the past.


     
    suuma
    suuma
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2010
    Posts: 4455
    Posted: Dec. 22, 2015 - 11:21 AM ET #5

    Quote Originally Posted by MRxKrazz:

    Ouch leaning other sides in both games, after i do my weekly homework, i will come back with my thoughts. 


    Cannot wait !

    @vankiep: sure, you are not trolling haha.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by MRxKrazz:

    Ouch leaning other sides in both games, after i do my weekly homework, i will come back with my thoughts. 


    Cannot wait !

    @vankiep: sure, you are not trolling haha.
     
    suuma
    suuma
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2010
    Posts: 4455
    Posted: Dec. 22, 2015 - 11:24 AM ET #6

    Quote Originally Posted by VicRaven:

    Cincinnati's D is the key factor in this situation. They're on the brink of having one of their best "points against" seasons, since 1978. With McCarron at the helm, they realize they must keep the game flow in check, allowing the newbie to be the game manager, not the all-star hero. They want to make it easier for McCarron. As we saw this week against the Niners, what a better way to do so by setting him up with 3 short drive attempts, resulting in 3 TD's. 
    Although Cincinnati's offense produced a paltry 242 total yards, against the one of the worst defenses in the league. It didn't matter. I realize San Francisco doesn't have the greatest offense, but this is the NFL, and to me, they set up McCarron perfectly. 
    With a basic eye test, I like how McCarron protects the ball and manages the game more so than Osweiler. 
    My two cents on the table. If I play this game, it's Cincinnati. I don't believe they crumble like they have in the past.




    Great insight, thank you. I agree!
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by VicRaven:

    Cincinnati's D is the key factor in this situation. They're on the brink of having one of their best "points against" seasons, since 1978. With McCarron at the helm, they realize they must keep the game flow in check, allowing the newbie to be the game manager, not the all-star hero. They want to make it easier for McCarron. As we saw this week against the Niners, what a better way to do so by setting him up with 3 short drive attempts, resulting in 3 TD's. 
    Although Cincinnati's offense produced a paltry 242 total yards, against the one of the worst defenses in the league. It didn't matter. I realize San Francisco doesn't have the greatest offense, but this is the NFL, and to me, they set up McCarron perfectly. 
    With a basic eye test, I like how McCarron protects the ball and manages the game more so than Osweiler. 
    My two cents on the table. If I play this game, it's Cincinnati. I don't believe they crumble like they have in the past.




    Great insight, thank you. I agree!
     
    suuma
    suuma
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2010
    Posts: 4455
    Posted: Dec. 22, 2015 - 11:40 AM ET #7

    Quote Originally Posted by pdouble:

    oaklands defense has upped their game the last 2 weeks, and against rivers i have to think that continues this is a massive letdown spot for the chargers, and with this being woodsons last homegame be sure the raiders will have extra motivation, got the raiders last night at -4.5 its 5 this morning , imo 6 to 6.5 is possible
     gl though 


    I get your point but why exactly is it a massive letdown spot? Rivers is proud and he is pissed off the bad season. The Chargers have something to prove and they are on revenge. It's still a divisional game on TNF. I guess Rivers wants to prove that the injuries on OL were a lot of the reasons of why the Chargers struggled this season.

    GL to you
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by pdouble:

    oaklands defense has upped their game the last 2 weeks, and against rivers i have to think that continues this is a massive letdown spot for the chargers, and with this being woodsons last homegame be sure the raiders will have extra motivation, got the raiders last night at -4.5 its 5 this morning , imo 6 to 6.5 is possible
     gl though 


    I get your point but why exactly is it a massive letdown spot? Rivers is proud and he is pissed off the bad season. The Chargers have something to prove and they are on revenge. It's still a divisional game on TNF. I guess Rivers wants to prove that the injuries on OL were a lot of the reasons of why the Chargers struggled this season.

    GL to you
     
    VicRaven
    VicRaven
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2015
    Posts: 861
    Posted: Dec. 22, 2015 - 12:11 PM ET #8

    I believe Carr and his receiving corps have to step it up. Quit dropping the ball!

    Woodson's last home game. Big emotional incentive.

    San Diego coming off of a very emotional win. Possible let down?

    Not sure why the Raiders are a 5 point favorite at this point. This raises my "Spidey senses."

    I'm not sure about the revenge factor, although, last week's Chargers/Dolphins game seemed like it was a factor. Rivers spoke about how he couldn't remember being beat like they were a year ago, at the hands of the Dolphins. 

    I'm thinking this will be a good game to watch. 






    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I believe Carr and his receiving corps have to step it up. Quit dropping the ball!

    Woodson's last home game. Big emotional incentive.

    San Diego coming off of a very emotional win. Possible let down?

    Not sure why the Raiders are a 5 point favorite at this point. This raises my "Spidey senses."

    I'm not sure about the revenge factor, although, last week's Chargers/Dolphins game seemed like it was a factor. Rivers spoke about how he couldn't remember being beat like they were a year ago, at the hands of the Dolphins. 

    I'm thinking this will be a good game to watch. 






     
    suuma
    suuma
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2010
    Posts: 4455
    Posted: Dec. 22, 2015 - 1:06 PM ET #9

    Quote Originally Posted by VicRaven:

    I believe Carr and his receiving corps have to step it up. Quit dropping the ball!

    Woodson's last home game. Big emotional incentive.

    San Diego coming off of a very emotional win. Possible let down?

    Not sure why the Raiders are a 5 point favorite at this point. This raises my "Spidey senses."

    I'm not sure about the revenge factor, although, last week's Chargers/Dolphins game seemed like it was a factor. Rivers spoke about how he couldn't remember being beat like they were a year ago, at the hands of the Dolphins. 

    I'm thinking this will be a good game to watch. 








    Thanks. I guess that letdown is the one pdub was referring to.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by VicRaven:

    I believe Carr and his receiving corps have to step it up. Quit dropping the ball!

    Woodson's last home game. Big emotional incentive.

    San Diego coming off of a very emotional win. Possible let down?

    Not sure why the Raiders are a 5 point favorite at this point. This raises my "Spidey senses."

    I'm not sure about the revenge factor, although, last week's Chargers/Dolphins game seemed like it was a factor. Rivers spoke about how he couldn't remember being beat like they were a year ago, at the hands of the Dolphins. 

    I'm thinking this will be a good game to watch. 








    Thanks. I guess that letdown is the one pdub was referring to.
     
    mafia13
    mafia13
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2013
    Posts: 1415
    Posted: Dec. 22, 2015 - 3:01 PM ET #10

    like em both. GL Suuma  
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    like em both. GL Suuma  
     
    mafia13
    mafia13
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2013
    Posts: 1415
    Posted: Dec. 22, 2015 - 3:05 PM ET #11

    Suuma what are your thoughts on Car/Atl and Kc/Cle?  

    Strong leans on Atl and Cle for me  
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Suuma what are your thoughts on Car/Atl and Kc/Cle?  

    Strong leans on Atl and Cle for me  
     
    Biscuit
    Biscuit
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2007
    Posts: 2409
    Posted: Dec. 22, 2015 - 3:53 PM ET #12

    I have initial leans on 2 games.

    I like the Vikings minus whatever over the Giants because I think the G-men will be flat after last week's game......rallying from a 4 TD deficit to tie the game, then losing on a last minute FG.    Also, the Giants D is as bad as the Bears D, so Teddy B should have another good game, like he had last week vs Bears

    I also like the Broncos over the Bengals.   Cincy is heading west for the 2nd straight week, to play in a much more hostile environment than they faced in SFO.    AJ McCarron's 2nd NFL start will be against one of the league's most ferocious defenses ( #1 in opponent yards allowed per game ) .  I see the Broncos winning a low-scoring game, 20-13 or something similar to that

    BOL

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    I have initial leans on 2 games.

    I like the Vikings minus whatever over the Giants because I think the G-men will be flat after last week's game......rallying from a 4 TD deficit to tie the game, then losing on a last minute FG.    Also, the Giants D is as bad as the Bears D, so Teddy B should have another good game, like he had last week vs Bears

    I also like the Broncos over the Bengals.   Cincy is heading west for the 2nd straight week, to play in a much more hostile environment than they faced in SFO.    AJ McCarron's 2nd NFL start will be against one of the league's most ferocious defenses ( #1 in opponent yards allowed per game ) .  I see the Broncos winning a low-scoring game, 20-13 or something similar to that

    BOL

     
    VicRaven
    VicRaven
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2015
    Posts: 861
    Posted: Dec. 22, 2015 - 4:59 PM ET #13

    The Chargers may have only allowed 10, 10, and 14 points the last three games, but for two of those games, they were only able to put up 3 points in each. 
    I think the revenge factor and possibly the last game at Qualcomm are the key factors in putting 30 points on Miami.

    Now we've got Woodson's last home game of the season, with the entire team ready to make it a memorable send off.

    The Chargers allow around 120 yards rushing per game. If Murray is able to take advantage of this flexible run D, it will enable Carr to pick apart the Charger's secondary, especially with Cooper, Crabtree, and Roberts(abdominal injury withstanding), in tow.

    The line at -5 Raiders still has me a bit perplexed. Both teams are about even, allowing around 25 points each. The Raiders are about a field goal better scoring-wise, and With home field advantage accounted for, would make them 6 point favorites. I guess I won't be surprised if the line moves to 6 by Thursday.

    These are just points for pondering, suuma. I would never try to sway someone from their bet. I always like your write ups, so I figured I'd put in my two cents. 



    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    The Chargers may have only allowed 10, 10, and 14 points the last three games, but for two of those games, they were only able to put up 3 points in each. 
    I think the revenge factor and possibly the last game at Qualcomm are the key factors in putting 30 points on Miami.

    Now we've got Woodson's last home game of the season, with the entire team ready to make it a memorable send off.

    The Chargers allow around 120 yards rushing per game. If Murray is able to take advantage of this flexible run D, it will enable Carr to pick apart the Charger's secondary, especially with Cooper, Crabtree, and Roberts(abdominal injury withstanding), in tow.

    The line at -5 Raiders still has me a bit perplexed. Both teams are about even, allowing around 25 points each. The Raiders are about a field goal better scoring-wise, and With home field advantage accounted for, would make them 6 point favorites. I guess I won't be surprised if the line moves to 6 by Thursday.

    These are just points for pondering, suuma. I would never try to sway someone from their bet. I always like your write ups, so I figured I'd put in my two cents. 



     
    Moonstormsnow
    Moonstormsnow
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2015
    Posts: 2096
    Posted: Dec. 22, 2015 - 5:37 PM ET #14

    I am on Denver... It's going to be a big stage for AJ.. As I stated in a brief write up, playing at BAMA is about as close to an NFL, prime time, national stage, in the college ranks, but this is the NFL, on the road, with a lot at stake, against the top D in the league. I like AJ and the bengals, so I'm not down on them, just think Denver steps it up here. Coming off that loss as well. One of my favorite plays this year was a few weeks back with CINCY plus points at Zona on Sunday night, but again, this is a BIG spot for a QB on his second NFL start... GL this week 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I am on Denver... It's going to be a big stage for AJ.. As I stated in a brief write up, playing at BAMA is about as close to an NFL, prime time, national stage, in the college ranks, but this is the NFL, on the road, with a lot at stake, against the top D in the league. I like AJ and the bengals, so I'm not down on them, just think Denver steps it up here. Coming off that loss as well. One of my favorite plays this year was a few weeks back with CINCY plus points at Zona on Sunday night, but again, this is a BIG spot for a QB on his second NFL start... GL this week 
     
    bunny24
    bunny24
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2008
    Posts: 430
    Posted: Dec. 22, 2015 - 6:08 PM ET #15

    Marvin Lewis and his Cincinnati Bungals on prime time...lol....A.J. Green is so freaking soft it's laughable...Denver let that game get away from them but c'mon...the Steelers are the only team in the AFC standing between New England and another trip to the Super bowl...this game is easy, don't overthink it....has everybody forgotten the Bengals on another MNF game recently?...Of course haven't... they were laying 10.5 (huge lumber) and lost outright to the Texans!....this is a miserable spot for a pea heart team like the Bungals...Forget about it!!!!
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Marvin Lewis and his Cincinnati Bungals on prime time...lol....A.J. Green is so freaking soft it's laughable...Denver let that game get away from them but c'mon...the Steelers are the only team in the AFC standing between New England and another trip to the Super bowl...this game is easy, don't overthink it....has everybody forgotten the Bengals on another MNF game recently?...Of course haven't... they were laying 10.5 (huge lumber) and lost outright to the Texans!....this is a miserable spot for a pea heart team like the Bungals...Forget about it!!!!
     
    gmitran
    gmitran
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2006
    Posts: 1744
    Posted: Dec. 22, 2015 - 6:51 PM ET #16

    SF gave up 255 (Sea) / 170 (Chi) / 230 (Cle) rushing yds in 3 of 4 games before Cinci, yet Cinci only able to put up 68 yds in 36 attempts.  Den rush D is #1 so lots of pressure on AJ to produce.  Though Den lost last 2 games, they did have big leads (-12 yds 1H for Oak) so think they bounce back here + AJ on road against one of better HF-adv team, B2B West Coast trip too.

    GL!
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    SF gave up 255 (Sea) / 170 (Chi) / 230 (Cle) rushing yds in 3 of 4 games before Cinci, yet Cinci only able to put up 68 yds in 36 attempts.  Den rush D is #1 so lots of pressure on AJ to produce.  Though Den lost last 2 games, they did have big leads (-12 yds 1H for Oak) so think they bounce back here + AJ on road against one of better HF-adv team, B2B West Coast trip too.

    GL!
     
    gmitran
    gmitran
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2006
    Posts: 1744
    Posted: Dec. 22, 2015 - 7:14 PM ET #17

    Crazy fact - If Den loses to Cinci, they would miss play-off entirely if Pitts (@ Bal, @ Cle), KC (Cle, Oak) and NYJ (NE, @Buf) wins out.  I see Pitts and KC wins out.  NE hurting again and Buf w/o McCoy and how much motivation left after high expectation for yr.

    I think Den give max effort here.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Crazy fact - If Den loses to Cinci, they would miss play-off entirely if Pitts (@ Bal, @ Cle), KC (Cle, Oak) and NYJ (NE, @Buf) wins out.  I see Pitts and KC wins out.  NE hurting again and Buf w/o McCoy and how much motivation left after high expectation for yr.

    I think Den give max effort here.
     
    bunny24
    bunny24
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2008
    Posts: 430
    Posted: Dec. 22, 2015 - 7:29 PM ET #18

    gmitran...nice posts...great insight..A.J. Green will be awol in this game in my opinion..Tyler...rookie a bit banged up...he heard tippy toes against the Texans in that Monday night game I referred to(he dropped 3 bread basket catches in that game)...good luck at Mile High...I see a lot of turn overs created by the home side....24-6 kind of a game.....lot's of side line shots of the red rifle (sorry bb-gun..lol)....enjoy this one my friends..stay thirsty
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    gmitran...nice posts...great insight..A.J. Green will be awol in this game in my opinion..Tyler...rookie a bit banged up...he heard tippy toes against the Texans in that Monday night game I referred to(he dropped 3 bread basket catches in that game)...good luck at Mile High...I see a lot of turn overs created by the home side....24-6 kind of a game.....lot's of side line shots of the red rifle (sorry bb-gun..lol)....enjoy this one my friends..stay thirsty
     
    Getty3
    Getty3
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 25178
    Posted: Dec. 22, 2015 - 7:29 PM ET #19

    Statistically, Oakland has the best pass protection in the league. San Diego's pass rush is ranked #26 of 32 teams, even though their overall pass defense is #12. Give Carr time in the pocket, and he'll hit his marks. Oakland is growing into the future, Diego is looking at LA. Maybe Danny Woodhead scores 3 TDs again. Maybe not. Probably not. Has anyone else scored for that team in the past 5 games? Stevie Johnson? Yeah, right. Chargers look great. Not.

    Ready to pounce on Jacksonville at the first opener when available. Brees or no Brees. Inconsequential. The oddsmaker will handle that for me.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Statistically, Oakland has the best pass protection in the league. San Diego's pass rush is ranked #26 of 32 teams, even though their overall pass defense is #12. Give Carr time in the pocket, and he'll hit his marks. Oakland is growing into the future, Diego is looking at LA. Maybe Danny Woodhead scores 3 TDs again. Maybe not. Probably not. Has anyone else scored for that team in the past 5 games? Stevie Johnson? Yeah, right. Chargers look great. Not.

    Ready to pounce on Jacksonville at the first opener when available. Brees or no Brees. Inconsequential. The oddsmaker will handle that for me.
     
    bunny24
    bunny24
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2008
    Posts: 430
    Posted: Dec. 22, 2015 - 7:41 PM ET #20

    I'm a die hard Bolts fan and love Rivers..toughest QB in the league...ok maybe Big Ben...this line reeks( I had it at 3 tops)..I think the Chargers laid it on the line last week against a team that has completely given up and a lame duck coach (Campbell)...Tannehill might be a Bill next year..you heard it first here
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I'm a die hard Bolts fan and love Rivers..toughest QB in the league...ok maybe Big Ben...this line reeks( I had it at 3 tops)..I think the Chargers laid it on the line last week against a team that has completely given up and a lame duck coach (Campbell)...Tannehill might be a Bill next year..you heard it first here
     
    bunny24
    bunny24
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2008
    Posts: 430
    Posted: Dec. 22, 2015 - 7:48 PM ET #21

    Raiders should cover pretty easy here based on the really fishy line put out (remember Vegas took it on the chin last week and this line is screaming San Diego money..all the San Diego money will be greatly appreciated by the house...dogs will rule the day (mostly) on Sunday but not in this game guys
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Raiders should cover pretty easy here based on the really fishy line put out (remember Vegas took it on the chin last week and this line is screaming San Diego money..all the San Diego money will be greatly appreciated by the house...dogs will rule the day (mostly) on Sunday but not in this game guys
     
    Humchucker
    Humchucker
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2015
    Posts: 92
    Posted: Dec. 22, 2015 - 8:17 PM ET #22

    I like the Chargers pick and don't see a "letdown" game here. I think Rivers is going to have a "throw 50 times" kind of game here where they have Woodhead out more on 1st/2nd down and find ways to get him the ball in space largely abandoning the run and rely on short passes. By spreading the defense (3/4 receivers sets) and relying on those short passes, I actually think it will open up the running game (delayed draws up the middle, and inside runs AFTER forcing the Raiders to adjust by spreading out). SD defense has actually been quite impressive even in losses lately and I think that continues here. Just hoping Khalil Mack doesn't have another 5 sack day like a couple weeks back. Not saying SD for sure wins straight up (wouldn't bet them ML even though they very well could win SU, but I think they keep it within a field goal)

    I actually am leaning the other way on the Denver game as I think McCarron will be outmatched by Denver's defense. Denver will be playing for a first round bye (if they win their next 2 and CIN wins their last game, DEN would finish 2nd in the AFC by virtue of beating CIN in the head to head right?). I know CIN is also playing for a first round bye so I'm not approaching this from a motivational angle, but I do think that DEN has an edge being at home. I think CIN will be out of sync on offense due to McCarron being inexperienced and unable to audible his way out of unfavorable alignments/plays ( the crowd for DEN will make it very difficult on 3rd downs especially). If DEN is able to put up any points on offense, AJ is going to be forced to be more than a game manager and I don't think it goes well. I will be teasing DEN to +3.5 and the Under to 47.5. Anyone else notice the team totals numbers being a bit weird on this game? CIN is set as o/u 16.5 and DEN is set as o/u 22.5 which is 6 points apart with a game spread of only 3.5 and a total of 40.5? Shouldn't the totals line up with the spread a little more?
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I like the Chargers pick and don't see a "letdown" game here. I think Rivers is going to have a "throw 50 times" kind of game here where they have Woodhead out more on 1st/2nd down and find ways to get him the ball in space largely abandoning the run and rely on short passes. By spreading the defense (3/4 receivers sets) and relying on those short passes, I actually think it will open up the running game (delayed draws up the middle, and inside runs AFTER forcing the Raiders to adjust by spreading out). SD defense has actually been quite impressive even in losses lately and I think that continues here. Just hoping Khalil Mack doesn't have another 5 sack day like a couple weeks back. Not saying SD for sure wins straight up (wouldn't bet them ML even though they very well could win SU, but I think they keep it within a field goal)

    I actually am leaning the other way on the Denver game as I think McCarron will be outmatched by Denver's defense. Denver will be playing for a first round bye (if they win their next 2 and CIN wins their last game, DEN would finish 2nd in the AFC by virtue of beating CIN in the head to head right?). I know CIN is also playing for a first round bye so I'm not approaching this from a motivational angle, but I do think that DEN has an edge being at home. I think CIN will be out of sync on offense due to McCarron being inexperienced and unable to audible his way out of unfavorable alignments/plays ( the crowd for DEN will make it very difficult on 3rd downs especially). If DEN is able to put up any points on offense, AJ is going to be forced to be more than a game manager and I don't think it goes well. I will be teasing DEN to +3.5 and the Under to 47.5. Anyone else notice the team totals numbers being a bit weird on this game? CIN is set as o/u 16.5 and DEN is set as o/u 22.5 which is 6 points apart with a game spread of only 3.5 and a total of 40.5? Shouldn't the totals line up with the spread a little more?
     
    searchwarrant
    searchwarrant
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2003
    Posts: 71024
    Posted: Dec. 22, 2015 - 8:47 PM ET #23

    I would put my behind on the Raiders if I had an behind left. 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I would put my behind on the Raiders if I had an behind left. 
     
    undermysac
    undermysac
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2014
    Posts: 52206
    Posted: Dec. 22, 2015 - 10:41 PM ET #24

    Cinci@Denver

    I noticed AJ Green was in significant discomfort. He tweaked his back the day before the 49er game in the walkthrough. Only hauled in one pass all game. Something to keep an eye on.

    Huge situations for both teams. Winner gets the wildcard bye for the playoffs.  Denver has a small chance of missing the playoffs...if the Jets and Chiefs win out, and Denver loses their next 2, they are out! I know the chances are slim but this gives them a little extra fuel.

    X's and O's...why does Denver continue to give Hillman the ball in short yardage situations?? It's not as bad as chip kelly calling daren sproles # on 4th n 1 in a single TE set and riley cooper the lead blocker but c'mon...get CJ Anderson in there.

    On defense I think Denver gets back to form here. They just got schooled by a Pitt offense that proved their worth last week. They remind me of the Cardinals when they had Fitz, Boldin and Warner. Pitt has Brown, Bryant, and Big Ben. They spread out Denver last week, and the speed of the WR's killed. Can the Bengals do that as well? That leads me to where I started, AJ Green. Is he healthy? Is Eifert healthy? Can Marvin Jones or Sanu beat these outstanding corner backs in man coverage? 

    Too many questions for me to back the bengals, not sure if I will back Denver either. I agree about your assessment of the O lines, the importance is always over looked by many. I think if cinci is going to move the ball they will need to have a good gameplan for Giovanni Bernard, using screens, shovel passes, draws. Get that aggressive denver D to change direction when they least expect it.

    This will be a monster of a game to watch, can't wait

    BOL SUMMA


    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Cinci@Denver

    I noticed AJ Green was in significant discomfort. He tweaked his back the day before the 49er game in the walkthrough. Only hauled in one pass all game. Something to keep an eye on.

    Huge situations for both teams. Winner gets the wildcard bye for the playoffs.  Denver has a small chance of missing the playoffs...if the Jets and Chiefs win out, and Denver loses their next 2, they are out! I know the chances are slim but this gives them a little extra fuel.

    X's and O's...why does Denver continue to give Hillman the ball in short yardage situations?? It's not as bad as chip kelly calling daren sproles # on 4th n 1 in a single TE set and riley cooper the lead blocker but c'mon...get CJ Anderson in there.

    On defense I think Denver gets back to form here. They just got schooled by a Pitt offense that proved their worth last week. They remind me of the Cardinals when they had Fitz, Boldin and Warner. Pitt has Brown, Bryant, and Big Ben. They spread out Denver last week, and the speed of the WR's killed. Can the Bengals do that as well? That leads me to where I started, AJ Green. Is he healthy? Is Eifert healthy? Can Marvin Jones or Sanu beat these outstanding corner backs in man coverage? 

    Too many questions for me to back the bengals, not sure if I will back Denver either. I agree about your assessment of the O lines, the importance is always over looked by many. I think if cinci is going to move the ball they will need to have a good gameplan for Giovanni Bernard, using screens, shovel passes, draws. Get that aggressive denver D to change direction when they least expect it.

    This will be a monster of a game to watch, can't wait

    BOL SUMMA


     
     
    suuma
    suuma
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2010
    Posts: 4455
    Posted: Dec. 23, 2015 - 1:57 AM ET #25

    Wow didn't expect such a thread

    Just insightful comments, thanks fellas! Will re-read again and try to answer/discuss if I see things different or want to give a controversial opinion.


    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Wow didn't expect such a thread

    Just insightful comments, thanks fellas! Will re-read again and try to answer/discuss if I see things different or want to give a controversial opinion.


    All Forums | NFL Betting Forum
    123 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 448,710 Covers arrow
    • 🏈🏈🏈 “To BEt, or not to BEt, that is the question” ...Fubah2's risky bets 302,167 Covers arrow
    • Thursday 09/17/2026 737 Covers arrow
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 257,829 Covers arrow
    • Couple Beers 5,045 Covers arrow
    • I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters 58,316 Covers arrow
    • PART DEUX 182 Covers arrow
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 97,771 Covers arrow
    • DET@BUFF Under 55 Small Write up 3,189 Covers arrow
    • ***Macwesties * Thur. Sept. 17, 2026 * NFL * TNF * Football Plays*** 3,973 Covers arrow

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.