Posted:
#976
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:
glitch in covers software ???
glitch in covers software ???
There seemed to be for about 2 hours. Repaired now I guess.
TESTING
0
🏈🏈🏈 “To BEt, or not to BEt, that is the question” ...Fubah2's risky bets
Uplifting State of the Union Address tonight! at 9:00 et
Posted:
#982
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
SuperDuper Bowl props I am seriously considering but not yet decided: Alt. line, KC +10 -400 looks to have a very good shot to cover
SuperDuper Bowl props I am seriously considering but not yet decided: Alt. line, KC +10 -400 looks to have a very good shot to cover
A lot of juice but I can't forsee Chiefs being routed.
GL 
0
Posted:
#984
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
SuperDuper Bowl props I am seriously considering but not yet decided: Alt. line, KC +10 -400 looks to have a very good shot to cover
SuperDuper Bowl props I am seriously considering but not yet decided: Alt. line, KC +10 -400 looks to have a very good shot to cover
Even toying with the idea of betting both teams at +10 on the alt line, as the odds are high this will be a close game
Undecided.
0
Posted:
#985
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
SuperDuper Bowl props I am seriously considering but not yet decided: Alt. line, KC +10 -400 looks to have a very good shot to cover
SuperDuper Bowl props I am seriously considering but not yet decided: Alt. line, KC +10 -400 looks to have a very good shot to cover
Even toying with the idea of betting both teams at +10 on the alt line, as the odds are high this will be a close game
Undecided.
0
Posted:
#988
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:
This is honestly what the majority of gamblers do not understand. You try to get your chips in on a bet that is a perceived edge. Sometimes it wins, sometimes it loses. But if you are able to repeat it enough - you will win. So I always say - the process is way more important than any result. The process is what proves you can do this longterm, the result is just a short term data point. In your example above, if you can flip the coin once - you will lose 50% of the time. But if you can get 100 flips at the same odds, or 1k flips - you are going to be profitable. So many around here criticize +odds ML dogs for losing. I like to say - I make wagers ALL THE TIME THAT I THINK WILL LOSE. What? Yes. I make +odds wagers all the time that are likely to lose. But when you are betting +500 dogs, you are only betting that you think the real odds are less than +500 - you are not betting that it has a better than 50/50 chance of winning. A lot of this separates amateurs who bet their rent on every game vs guys that look at long term results.
Yes, very good points.
2
Posted:
#989
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack: This is honestly what the majority of gamblers do not understand. You try to get your chips in on a bet that is a perceived edge. Sometimes it wins, sometimes it loses. But if you are able to repeat it enough - you will win. So I always say - the process is way more important than any result. The process is what proves you can do this longterm, the result is just a short term data point.
This is a winning formula because even a small edge repeated scores of times will produce a good profit. That should be the bottom line.
1
Posted:
#992
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
SuperDuper Bowl props I am seriously considering but not yet decided: This looks good if we assume a slow first Q.....Outcome of first team drive? KC Chiefs no score -150.....not ready to pull the trigger on this one yet.
SuperDuper Bowl props I am seriously considering but not yet decided: This looks good if we assume a slow first Q.....Outcome of first team drive? KC Chiefs no score -150.....not ready to pull the trigger on this one yet.
Patrick Mahomes is named NFL’s 2022 Most Valuable Player 
1
Posted:
#998
[Quote: Originally Posted by fubah2] SuperDuper Bowl props I am seriously considering but not yet decided: ??EAGLES to score UNDER 3.5 TDs -210??? ....for me to lose this one the EAGLES would need to score 4 TDs....so at least 28 pts for the Eagles plus whatever in fieldgoals.....I am not so sure I am seeing them score 30+ against the Chiefs, because a good offense with Mahomes is likely to in turn reduce the number of possessions for Hurts.
Undecided but this looks decent
0
Posted:
#999
[Quote: Originally Posted by fubah2] SuperDuper Bowl props I am seriously considering but not yet decided: ??EAGLES to score UNDER 3.5 TDs -210??? ....for me to lose this one the EAGLES would need to score 4 TDs....so at least 28 pts for the Eagles plus whatever in fieldgoals.....I am not so sure I am seeing them score 30+ against the Chiefs, because a good offense with Mahomes is likely to in turn reduce the number of possessions for Hurts.
Undecided but this looks decent
2
Hot Forum Topics
Established in 1995,Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Covers is verified safe by:
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.