Posted:
#8801
@KellyM_1964
Would love to meet you on the street
0
🏈🏈🏈 “To BEt, or not to BEt, that is the question” ...Fubah2's risky bets
Hey, bud! No current bet on late game for me for now. How about you?
Posted:
#8810
Quote Originally Posted by Europa:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by Europa: Good luck on your bets, Fubah! @Europa Hey, bud! No current bet on late game for me for now. How about you?
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by Europa: Good luck on your bets, Fubah! @Europa Hey, bud! No current bet on late game for me for now. How about you?
I got some Rams spread and Rams to win SB future, also hedged some with Seahawks ML in two parlays.
@Europa
It's likely to be very close but gotta like where the score is at now huh, Europa! 
BoL pal! 
1
Posted:
#8819
Seattle won a CLOSE game 31 - 27 but did they OUTPLAY LA, or just fortunate?
Key stats: 10 drives each team!
1st downs: RAMS 26 vs 24
Net yards: RAMS 479 vs 396
OFF YPP: RAMS 8.3 vs 6.1
Turnovers: Seattle gained lucky TO at Rams 17 for an easy TD.
45+yd drives: 5 each
QB Sacked: RAMS 1 vs 3
Keeping in mind Seahawks had the benefit of HFA
And since the game was decided by just 4 pts, that lucky break at RAMS 17 was the difference in the outcome.
When they face New England, Seahawks won't have the benefit of homefield again.
2
Posted:
#8820
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Seattle won a CLOSE game 31 - 27 but did they OUTPLAY LA, or just fortunate? Key stats: 10 drives each team! 1st downs: RAMS 26 vs 24Net yards: RAMS 479 vs 396OFF YPP: RAMS 8.3 vs 6.1 Turnovers: Seattle gained lucky TO at Rams 17 for an easy TD. 45+yd drives: 5 eachQB Sacked: RAMS 1 vs 3 Keeping in mind Seahawks had the benefit of HFAAnd since the game was decided by just 4 pts, that lucky break at RAMS 17 was the difference in the outcome. When they face New England, Seahawks won't have the benefit of homefield again.
Seattle won a CLOSE game 31 - 27 but did they OUTPLAY LA, or just fortunate? Key stats: 10 drives each team! 1st downs: RAMS 26 vs 24Net yards: RAMS 479 vs 396OFF YPP: RAMS 8.3 vs 6.1 Turnovers: Seattle gained lucky TO at Rams 17 for an easy TD. 45+yd drives: 5 eachQB Sacked: RAMS 1 vs 3 Keeping in mind Seahawks had the benefit of HFAAnd since the game was decided by just 4 pts, that lucky break at RAMS 17 was the difference in the outcome. When they face New England, Seahawks won't have the benefit of homefield again.
0
Posted:
#8822
Quote Originally Posted by Europa:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Seattle won a CLOSE game 31 - 27 but did they OUTPLAY LA, or just fortunate? Key stats: 10 drives each team! 1st downs: RAMS 26 vs 24Net yards: RAMS 479 vs 396OFF YPP: RAMS 8.3 vs 6.1 Turnovers: Seattle gained lucky TO at Rams 17 for an easy TD. 45+yd drives: 5 eachQB Sacked: RAMS 1 vs 3 Keeping in mind Seahawks had the benefit of HFAAnd since the game was decided by just 4 pts, that lucky break at RAMS 17 was the difference in the outcome. When they face New England, Seahawks won't have the benefit of homefield again.
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Seattle won a CLOSE game 31 - 27 but did they OUTPLAY LA, or just fortunate? Key stats: 10 drives each team! 1st downs: RAMS 26 vs 24Net yards: RAMS 479 vs 396OFF YPP: RAMS 8.3 vs 6.1 Turnovers: Seattle gained lucky TO at Rams 17 for an easy TD. 45+yd drives: 5 eachQB Sacked: RAMS 1 vs 3 Keeping in mind Seahawks had the benefit of HFAAnd since the game was decided by just 4 pts, that lucky break at RAMS 17 was the difference in the outcome. When they face New England, Seahawks won't have the benefit of homefield again.
Their fortunes could continue into the SB too. Lord knows these games are frequently won by PURE LUCK (ie, massive good fortune usually as a result of UNforced errors) Seattle lost a SB that way....so did Atlanta....so did Philly
0
Hot Forum Topics
