All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

titans is a perfect example..

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 1291
Posts: 20
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 3556
Posted: #1
always bet MLs..this was perfect example of point shavin..I would rather play 2 teams ML in parlay then 1 team on spread..
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2011
Posts: 3965
Posted: #2
I got them as a pk
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 273
Posted: #3
had to make my bets quickly before game time and got ten -1.5 I have def learned from this so sourrrr
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2011
Posts: 1581
Posted: #4
why did Hou go for 2?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 394
Posted: #5
Point shaven, you're serious?
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 847
Posted: #6
Losing at -1.5 and winning on the ML will cost you far more juice over the long run than anyone who loses a play that probably 19 out of 20 times wouldn't matter.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 4090
Posted: #7

these fuckers set up game.  This score will take all money from titan -1,  -1.5

 

 

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 5526
Posted: #8

Quote Originally Posted by 416bet:

why did Hou go for 2?

its fixed

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 847
Posted: #9
And anyone who thinks this is point shaving is a moron.  The RB who fumbled would have to be in coordination with the entire tennessee defense as well as the opposing head coach to go for two...you're an idiot.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 5526
Posted: #10
Quote Originally Posted by winner005:

its fixed

 

specailly after 5yd penalty, they stiil going for..mother fucker

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 3556
Posted: #11
Quote Originally Posted by winner005:

its fixed

clearly the most obvious fix i can recall in a long time..

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 29
Posted: #12
No actually it was completely logical for the Texans to go for 2, they already have a spot secured in the playoffs why risk playing OT when you can just end it? They have nothing to prove or play for by taking it to OT
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 5598
Posted: #13
Every thread from this javiervasquez is so fuggin stupid. Guy is so dumb, not smart enough to realize all the people that would have to be involved to do all this fixing hes always talking about. I start to.lose.faith in humanity when I realize some people are this dumb, its just crazy. Every thread from this guy is just so moronic
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 4090
Posted: #14

Quote Originally Posted by eplpuzzys:

No actually it was completely logical for the Texans to go for 2, they already have a spot secured in the playoffs why risk playing OT when you can just end it? They have nothing to prove or play for by taking it to OT

 

if you said that they don't want to risk for injure....why they try to come back last minute. The more they try, the more chance they get injured.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2002
Posts: 774
Posted: #15
Quote Originally Posted by eplpuzzys:

No actually it was completely logical for the Texans to go for 2, they already have a spot secured in the playoffs why risk playing OT when you can just end it? They have nothing to prove or play for by taking it to OT


I would buy that ... if Houston hadn't taken the ball after the turnover and driven down the field trying to score a TD like their lives depended on it. They didn't seem to mind risking their wr's and 9th string QB then, now did they?
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2005
Posts: 41476
Posted: #16
On the -1 point spreads, the money line is purposely devalued by the books. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 4090
Posted: #17

Quote Originally Posted by godsfavoritedog:



I would buy that ... if Houston hadn't taken the ball after the turnover and driven down the field trying to score a TD like their lives depended on it. They didn't seem to mind risking their wr's and 9th string QB then, now did they?

I agree with you.... All because of spread -1. Vegas does not want to lose this....how many bets on Hou for the team playing for nothing

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 3556
Posted: #18

Quote Originally Posted by CalifDreamin:

Every thread from this javiervasquez is so fuggin stupid. Guy is so dumb, not smart enough to realize all the people that would have to be involved to do all this fixing hes always talking about. I start to.lose.faith in humanity when I realize some people are this dumb, its just crazy. Every thread from this guy is just so moronic

and yet again..you read them..what does that make you..if you read moronic posts?

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 3556
Posted: #19
Quote Originally Posted by hangnga:

I agree with you.... All because of spread -1. Vegas does not want to lose this....how many bets on Hou for the team playing for nothing

 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 3556
Posted: #20

Quote Originally Posted by RyanCam:

JavierVasquez whining about a fix because he had Titans on the spread.

Had he didn't, this thread would never have occurred


Funny how you laugh at others for saying fix but when you say its fix... its a fix?  Javier is nothing but a hypocrite

not only this is a obvious fix its obvious you are a moron..when you think i bet titans on -1 when i always play mls and I always talk against spreads.., specially..you are dumb when you think i would bet spread when ml & spread is similar..go away loser..

All Forums | NFL Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.