But I want to thank you because you were such a cocksucker I took N.O. , please keep posting so I can fade your dumb ass. I have no defense to offer, and I will say that you are gracious in victory, and pure class. Good game, good cap, and I was wrong.
I have no defense to offer, and I will say that you are gracious in victory, and pure class. Good game, good cap, and I was wrong.
Yep, you are right, but they have nothing to do with my embarrassing mishap. I was as wrong as I could be, and discredited myself... just here to respond (like a little bitch, lol) to those who deserve their shots at me. BOL
You are absolutely correct. I discredited myself. I was totally wrong, stubbornly so, and you were dead on correct. Good job.
Ill make it easy for you dumbfuck...your ignorance is as annoying as it is obvious:
the defensive number following each team is the overall rating in the NFL according to yards allowed, the second number is the offensive rating according to yards gained (the rating is listed as 1 is best 2nd is next best..am I going too fast for you?), I took all the opponents of the Pats, and the Saints (remember lil idiot, each team played) listed thier O, and D rating in the NFL year to date, added them togather (that is the '+' sign on the c a c u l a t o r...ok so far??) and divided it by games played, which is the number 10...still with me? this way if 2 teams play each other, adn one team played 4 weeks, and played the steelers, the Patriots, the colts, and the giants... compared to the other team playing the browns, lions, chiefs, and rams....you would see what their points scored/scored against meant...but you want to just know the points scored, and scored against, which will tell you little if the teams played a varied strength schedule.... dude you are just too stupid for me to talk to....I know your level of intellect is not your fault, but I just dont have any more time to waste on explaining trivial math to you..
Yep, you are correct. I will say that I don't regret my method, it paid me many times over, but it did me no good on this one b/c I was too stuborn to believe the Saints might actually be for real... they absolutely are. I learn, lick my wounds, man up, and be done with it. It is not over until I reply to all the well deserved jabs I have coming. I have no plans on changing my capping techiques, but I will be more willing to believe, and not be quite so stubborn.
Good job.
Yep, you are correct. I will say that I don't regret my method, it paid me many times over, but it did me no good on this one b/c I was too stuborn to believe the Saints might actually be for real... they absolutely are. I learn, lick my wounds, man up, and be done with it. It is not over until I reply to all the well deserved jabs I have coming. I have no plans on changing my capping techiques, but I will be more willing to believe, and not be quite so stubborn.
Good job.
yea dont change it... saints just lucky- they wont win shit
Won't bash you buddy. Just seemed your facts were too skewed by the awe of Brady and Belicheat. Tried to warn you that certain stats didn't tell the true story of the Saints defense, especially their pass defense.
Now, let's make get back what we lost next week. NBA time for me.
I thank you Sir. You are exibiting more class than I would have, ... kudos to you.. I appreciate the mercy. This is not over until I reply to the posts by those who I opposed on this topic (I have to reply like a little bitch of course).. thanks again....BOL
You are absolutely correct. I discredited myself. I was totally wrong, stubbornly so, and you were dead on correct. Good job.
DO NOT KNOW IF 38-17 IS A BLOWOUT
BUT IF YOU HAVE TOM BRADY AND RANDY MOSS AND ARE DOWN 21 WITH 5:38 LEFT IN THE GAME AND GET THE BALL BACK AND DECIDE THAT YOU ARE GOING TO SIT YOUR TWO PERENNIAL ALL PROS BECAUSE YOU HAVE DECIDED THAT YOU CANNOT WIN.............YOU HAVE BEEN BLOWNOUT!
NO DISCUSSION IS NEEDED FROM THERE
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
