• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • NFL Prediction Prices
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
        • Back
        • UFC
        • Odds
        • Picks
        • News & Analysis
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
      • Politics
        • Back
        • Politics
        • Politics Home
        • Presidential Election Odds
        • Midterm Election Odds
        • House Midterm Odds
        • Senate Midterm Odds
        • Texas Midterm Odds
        • Michigan Midterm Odds
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • UFC
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • U.S. Midterm Election
      U.S. Midterm Election
      • Midterm Election Odds Tracker
      • House Control Odds
      • Senate Control Odds
      • How to Trade Midterm Elections
      • Trump Midterm Odds
      • Texas Senate Prediction
      • Best Political Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

    The biggest look-ahead spot in 2015 ? The Chicago Bears became an interesting option in week one

    123456 Next Last»
    suuma
    mafioso
    powerbalance
    lmb4321
    budwiser
    ...
    Participants:
    Search
    Views: 15115
    Posts: 129
    123456 Next Last»
     
    suuma
    suuma
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2010
    Posts: 4455
    Posted: Apr. 22, 2015 - 2:22 AM ET #1

    The Green Bay Packers will open their season in a Sunday 1:00 pm game at Chicago.

    One week after, they will get the Seahawks at home in the Sunday Night Football game in one of the biggest revenge spots of the last few years.

    Even though it's a big rivalry, the Packers won't have the biggest motivation for the Bears as the Cheeseheads absolutely smashed them last season (38-17 & 55-14).

    They will have the Seahawks game in mind all summer long and probably dream about this scene very often: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0mj9fGSyCFA

    The Bears, under new head coach John Fox, will just have their season opener in mind, as they play Arizona at home in week two. In addition, the Packers were everything but strong on the road during the last three seasons.

    With the NFL schedule announcement, the Chicago Bears became an interesting option in week one.





    Reply
    To remove first post, remove entire topic.
    The Green Bay Packers will open their season in a Sunday 1:00 pm game at Chicago.

    One week after, they will get the Seahawks at home in the Sunday Night Football game in one of the biggest revenge spots of the last few years.

    Even though it's a big rivalry, the Packers won't have the biggest motivation for the Bears as the Cheeseheads absolutely smashed them last season (38-17 & 55-14).

    They will have the Seahawks game in mind all summer long and probably dream about this scene very often: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0mj9fGSyCFA

    The Bears, under new head coach John Fox, will just have their season opener in mind, as they play Arizona at home in week two. In addition, the Packers were everything but strong on the road during the last three seasons.

    With the NFL schedule announcement, the Chicago Bears became an interesting option in week one.





     
    mafioso
    mafioso
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2010
    Posts: 2665
    Posted: Apr. 22, 2015 - 4:33 AM ET #2

    God, it kills me to agree as the Bears are a disaster 
    but you are spot on in your assessment.
    Reply
    God, it kills me to agree as the Bears are a disaster 
    but you are spot on in your assessment.
     
    powerbalance
    powerbalance
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2012
    Posts: 300
    Posted: Apr. 22, 2015 - 5:04 AM ET #3

    Jets -2 vs Browns seems the best bet for me in week one.
    Reply
    Jets -2 vs Browns seems the best bet for me in week one.
     
    lmb4321
    lmb4321
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2014
    Posts: 12734
    Posted: Apr. 22, 2015 - 12:55 PM ET #4

    Suuma....great to hear from you.....hope the Veltins is treating you right.......Great observation......wonder what the line will be?.......also noticing the Hawks play at St. Louis week one.....not a gimme either........Can't wait for football to start....Pro and College......
    Reply
    Suuma....great to hear from you.....hope the Veltins is treating you right.......Great observation......wonder what the line will be?.......also noticing the Hawks play at St. Louis week one.....not a gimme either........Can't wait for football to start....Pro and College......
     
    lmb4321
    lmb4321
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2014
    Posts: 12734
    Posted: Apr. 23, 2015 - 12:07 PM ET #5

    Week 1.....Green Bay -4 vs Chicago.......Seattle -4 vs St. Louis....

    Reply

    Week 1.....Green Bay -4 vs Chicago.......Seattle -4 vs St. Louis....

     
    suuma
    suuma
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2010
    Posts: 4455
    Posted: Apr. 24, 2015 - 6:22 AM ET #6

    Wow, more than four months left and bookmakers have lines out ?

    Chicago at more than a FG looks solid at first glance.
    Reply
    Wow, more than four months left and bookmakers have lines out ?

    Chicago at more than a FG looks solid at first glance.
     
    budwiser
    budwiser
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 17917
    Posted: Apr. 24, 2015 - 7:16 PM ET #7

    I usually ignore motivation in the pros.  College, yeah

    What about Seattle-Rams.  If you want to talk motivation what about losing the Super Bowl on a bs play and having to play on the road vs a tough team

    Getting 4 points?  I think this thing is headed down, certainly not up
    Reply
    I usually ignore motivation in the pros.  College, yeah

    What about Seattle-Rams.  If you want to talk motivation what about losing the Super Bowl on a bs play and having to play on the road vs a tough team

    Getting 4 points?  I think this thing is headed down, certainly not up
     
    suuma
    suuma
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2010
    Posts: 4455
    Posted: Apr. 25, 2015 - 3:56 AM ET #8

    Quote Originally Posted by budwiser:

    I usually ignore motivation in the pros.  College, yeah

    What about Seattle-Rams.  If you want to talk motivation what about losing the Super Bowl on a bs play and having to play on the road vs a tough team

    Getting 4 points?  I think this thing is headed down, certainly not up


    Than you ignore a very important facet of capping the NFL. A few examples from last season I quickly remember:

    In week 12 of the last season, the Kansas City Chiefs traveled to Oakland for a TNF game after they won against Seattle and before they played the Broncos - classic sandwich game. The Raiders haven't won like 16 games in a row and put everything they had together for that primetime game at home. Chiefs had little motivation and guess what ? They lost outright.

    The Chargers were on a five-game win-streak when playing against KC at home after they have beaten Oakland on the road. They had a TNF game at Denver on deck and lost outright against KC. They couldn't come up for that game.

    After their season opener against GB, the Seahawks had to play at San Diego before their big Super Bowl rematch at home against the Broncos. Classic sandwich game - the Seahawks lost by 9 points against the Chargers.

    I like your reasoning on the Seahawks game. It's an interesting angle.


    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by budwiser:

    I usually ignore motivation in the pros.  College, yeah

    What about Seattle-Rams.  If you want to talk motivation what about losing the Super Bowl on a bs play and having to play on the road vs a tough team

    Getting 4 points?  I think this thing is headed down, certainly not up


    Than you ignore a very important facet of capping the NFL. A few examples from last season I quickly remember:

    In week 12 of the last season, the Kansas City Chiefs traveled to Oakland for a TNF game after they won against Seattle and before they played the Broncos - classic sandwich game. The Raiders haven't won like 16 games in a row and put everything they had together for that primetime game at home. Chiefs had little motivation and guess what ? They lost outright.

    The Chargers were on a five-game win-streak when playing against KC at home after they have beaten Oakland on the road. They had a TNF game at Denver on deck and lost outright against KC. They couldn't come up for that game.

    After their season opener against GB, the Seahawks had to play at San Diego before their big Super Bowl rematch at home against the Broncos. Classic sandwich game - the Seahawks lost by 9 points against the Chargers.

    I like your reasoning on the Seahawks game. It's an interesting angle.


     
    budwiser
    budwiser
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 17917
    Posted: Apr. 25, 2015 - 7:21 AM ET #9

    Actually I was on the Raiders that game.  I had a thread about it.  There were other things, like the Riaders saying it was their Super Bowl because it was their first time on national tv in forever.  Also KC had a very short time to get out West after as you said a big game against Seattle.  We also had the "teams that lose after playing Seattle" angle.  So there was a lot to look at, including motivation.

    I said usually ignore.  So yes I do pay attention, sometimes.  You're right-KC Oakland was a motivational angle.

    I'm not against your Bears.  I think points in a divisional matchup is generally a good idea.  As for motivation-which Cutler is going to show up.  Paid him all that $ and sometimes he acts like he doesn't care.  If pressed I'd take the Bears with the points too. 

    Good motivational angles sometimes occur when a team or person gets called out.  Wager on the team that was called out-told they suck, will be beat, whatever.

    LIke I said college it's a bigger angle.  Just from years and years of doing this stuff.  Kids are more emotional, and in the pros for most of these guys it's a job.

     

     

    Reply

    Actually I was on the Raiders that game.  I had a thread about it.  There were other things, like the Riaders saying it was their Super Bowl because it was their first time on national tv in forever.  Also KC had a very short time to get out West after as you said a big game against Seattle.  We also had the "teams that lose after playing Seattle" angle.  So there was a lot to look at, including motivation.

    I said usually ignore.  So yes I do pay attention, sometimes.  You're right-KC Oakland was a motivational angle.

    I'm not against your Bears.  I think points in a divisional matchup is generally a good idea.  As for motivation-which Cutler is going to show up.  Paid him all that $ and sometimes he acts like he doesn't care.  If pressed I'd take the Bears with the points too. 

    Good motivational angles sometimes occur when a team or person gets called out.  Wager on the team that was called out-told they suck, will be beat, whatever.

    LIke I said college it's a bigger angle.  Just from years and years of doing this stuff.  Kids are more emotional, and in the pros for most of these guys it's a job.

     

     

     
    budwiser
    budwiser
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 17917
    Posted: Apr. 25, 2015 - 7:24 AM ET #10

    Another angle on  your pick is generally John Fox does well quickly. Also, the Packers won't have film of the Bears under Fox

    So yeah like I said not against your selection, may put a little on it, not much but we'll see.  

    Reply

    Another angle on  your pick is generally John Fox does well quickly. Also, the Packers won't have film of the Bears under Fox

    So yeah like I said not against your selection, may put a little on it, not much but we'll see.  

     
    The Hawk
    The Hawk
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2006
    Posts: 19693
    Posted: Apr. 25, 2015 - 1:52 PM ET #11

    Biggest look ahead?









    ..............................this thread
    Reply
    Biggest look ahead?









    ..............................this thread
     
    kevmode
    kevmode
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2011
    Posts: 6587
    Posted: Apr. 25, 2015 - 8:33 PM ET #12

    I couldn't take the Bears in this game they stink on defense.  Until the Bears show me something I won't be betting them.  
    Reply
    I couldn't take the Bears in this game they stink on defense.  Until the Bears show me something I won't be betting them.  
     
    suuma
    suuma
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2010
    Posts: 4455
    Posted: Apr. 26, 2015 - 6:50 AM ET #13

    Quote Originally Posted by budwiser:

    Actually I was on the Raiders that game.  I had a thread about it.  There were other things, like the Riaders saying it was their Super Bowl because it was their first time on national tv in forever.  Also KC had a very short time to get out West after as you said a big game against Seattle.  We also had the "teams that lose after playing Seattle" angle.  So there was a lot to look at, including motivation.

    I said usually ignore.  So yes I do pay attention, sometimes.  You're right-KC Oakland was a motivational angle.

    I'm not against your Bears.  I think points in a divisional matchup is generally a good idea.  As for motivation-which Cutler is going to show up.  Paid him all that $ and sometimes he acts like he doesn't care.  If pressed I'd take the Bears with the points too. 

    Good motivational angles sometimes occur when a team or person gets called out.  Wager on the team that was called out-told they suck, will be beat, whatever.

    LIke I said college it's a bigger angle.  Just from years and years of doing this stuff.  Kids are more emotional, and in the pros for most of these guys it's a job.

     

     



    Don't get me wrong. I don't bet solely on a motivational angle. I always look into those situations and if I see such a strong one, I try to use it as a basis for capping that certain game. I won't put any money on the Bears until September when I evaluated everything I need to know - it's just a circled situation.


    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by budwiser:

    Actually I was on the Raiders that game.  I had a thread about it.  There were other things, like the Riaders saying it was their Super Bowl because it was their first time on national tv in forever.  Also KC had a very short time to get out West after as you said a big game against Seattle.  We also had the "teams that lose after playing Seattle" angle.  So there was a lot to look at, including motivation.

    I said usually ignore.  So yes I do pay attention, sometimes.  You're right-KC Oakland was a motivational angle.

    I'm not against your Bears.  I think points in a divisional matchup is generally a good idea.  As for motivation-which Cutler is going to show up.  Paid him all that $ and sometimes he acts like he doesn't care.  If pressed I'd take the Bears with the points too. 

    Good motivational angles sometimes occur when a team or person gets called out.  Wager on the team that was called out-told they suck, will be beat, whatever.

    LIke I said college it's a bigger angle.  Just from years and years of doing this stuff.  Kids are more emotional, and in the pros for most of these guys it's a job.

     

     



    Don't get me wrong. I don't bet solely on a motivational angle. I always look into those situations and if I see such a strong one, I try to use it as a basis for capping that certain game. I won't put any money on the Bears until September when I evaluated everything I need to know - it's just a circled situation.


     
    suuma
    suuma
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2010
    Posts: 4455
    Posted: Apr. 26, 2015 - 6:51 AM ET #14

    Quote Originally Posted by The Hawk:

    Biggest look ahead?









    ..............................this thread


    Touché
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by The Hawk:

    Biggest look ahead?









    ..............................this thread


    Touché
     
    budwiser
    budwiser
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 17917
    Posted: Apr. 26, 2015 - 10:28 AM ET #15

    Quote Originally Posted by suuma:



    Don't get me wrong. I don't bet solely on a motivational angle. I always look into those situations and if I see such a strong one, I try to use it as a basis for capping that certain game. I won't put any money on the Bears until September when I evaluated everything I need to know - it's just a circled situation.




    Agree with that.

    I also circle ahead of time.

    I think we're on the same page.  Bet one sport only, and few games.  You'll go nuts trying to understand everything.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by suuma:



    Don't get me wrong. I don't bet solely on a motivational angle. I always look into those situations and if I see such a strong one, I try to use it as a basis for capping that certain game. I won't put any money on the Bears until September when I evaluated everything I need to know - it's just a circled situation.




    Agree with that.

    I also circle ahead of time.

    I think we're on the same page.  Bet one sport only, and few games.  You'll go nuts trying to understand everything.
     
    powerbalance
    powerbalance
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2012
    Posts: 300
    Posted: Apr. 27, 2015 - 5:15 AM ET #16

    For now I strongly disagree with the Bears angle.

    First, Rogers said after the NFC championships loss that next year, they'll need to win away games to get home field advantage during the play offs.

    Second, the Packers will be on the mission next year to get what they missed by a finger. (Just like the Spurs was on a mission last year after Ray Allen's three)

    With that being said, they have to win that week 1 game at Chicago, a team they destroyed twice next year.

    Don't expect them to be flabby and soft and waiting for Seahawks.
    The Green Bay Packer will be focus every single snap until they'll reach what they feel they diserved, which is a trip to Santa Clara.

    I'm not saying Packers -4 is a lock, I'm saying the emotional angle or "the sandwich game" doesn't apply in that game IMO.
    Reply
    For now I strongly disagree with the Bears angle.

    First, Rogers said after the NFC championships loss that next year, they'll need to win away games to get home field advantage during the play offs.

    Second, the Packers will be on the mission next year to get what they missed by a finger. (Just like the Spurs was on a mission last year after Ray Allen's three)

    With that being said, they have to win that week 1 game at Chicago, a team they destroyed twice next year.

    Don't expect them to be flabby and soft and waiting for Seahawks.
    The Green Bay Packer will be focus every single snap until they'll reach what they feel they diserved, which is a trip to Santa Clara.

    I'm not saying Packers -4 is a lock, I'm saying the emotional angle or "the sandwich game" doesn't apply in that game IMO.
     
    suuma
    suuma
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2010
    Posts: 4455
    Posted: Apr. 27, 2015 - 8:54 AM ET #17

    Quote Originally Posted by powerbalance:

    For now I strongly disagree with the Bears angle.

    First, Rogers said after the NFC championships loss that next year, they'll need to win away games to get home field advantage during the play offs.

    Second, the Packers will be on the mission next year to get what they missed by a finger. (Just like the Spurs was on a mission last year after Ray Allen's three)

    With that being said, they have to win that week 1 game at Chicago, a team they destroyed twice next year.

    Don't expect them to be flabby and soft and waiting for Seahawks.
    The Green Bay Packer will be focus every single snap until they'll reach what they feel they diserved, which is a trip to Santa Clara.

    I'm not saying Packers -4 is a lock, I'm saying the emotional angle or "the sandwich game" doesn't apply in that game IMO.


    Thanks for your opinion. It is a good basis for a discussion and most likely worth an own thread.

    If I learned one thing in my lifetime watching pro sports, it's that I never listen to phrases those coaches, managers or quarterbacks tell us. They have to tell you those things. Packers were 8-0 at home and 4-4 on the road - so it's obvious they need to improve on the road. Did you ever hear from those guys that they don't want to win their next game ?

    As much as you keep telling the media you have to win that next game, you don't have the exact same motivation depending on the situation and opponent. Of course the Packers will say they want to win at Chicago and will focus on that game and don't think ahead to Seattle. But it just isn't the truth. If you have ever played team sports, you will know that. There are games which you can't get 100% up for.

    I'm not saying the Packers will be flabby and soft, but I'm saying some guys won't be 100% focused on the Bears, because they have Seattle in their minds. Maybe they are 90% - it could be enough to not get the Packers' best effort. Even if they come out strong, there will be the moment during the game in which the Seahawks come into their minds. It's human nature.

    Last season the Chiefs started vs. Tennessee before playing the Broncos. They knew they have to beat the SB runner-up to have a shot at winning their division. Do you really think the Chiefs had the Titans in mind during the summer ? No, it was the Broncos. The Chiefs lost 10-26 at Arrowhead, it was one of two games the Titans won last year. Furthermore it was probably the worst Chiefs game in 2014. If you had given them the Raiders in week two, they wouldn't have lost or at least wouldn't have showed such a terrible performance. They thought it's gonna be easy because the boss is waiting the next Sunday.


    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by powerbalance:

    For now I strongly disagree with the Bears angle.

    First, Rogers said after the NFC championships loss that next year, they'll need to win away games to get home field advantage during the play offs.

    Second, the Packers will be on the mission next year to get what they missed by a finger. (Just like the Spurs was on a mission last year after Ray Allen's three)

    With that being said, they have to win that week 1 game at Chicago, a team they destroyed twice next year.

    Don't expect them to be flabby and soft and waiting for Seahawks.
    The Green Bay Packer will be focus every single snap until they'll reach what they feel they diserved, which is a trip to Santa Clara.

    I'm not saying Packers -4 is a lock, I'm saying the emotional angle or "the sandwich game" doesn't apply in that game IMO.


    Thanks for your opinion. It is a good basis for a discussion and most likely worth an own thread.

    If I learned one thing in my lifetime watching pro sports, it's that I never listen to phrases those coaches, managers or quarterbacks tell us. They have to tell you those things. Packers were 8-0 at home and 4-4 on the road - so it's obvious they need to improve on the road. Did you ever hear from those guys that they don't want to win their next game ?

    As much as you keep telling the media you have to win that next game, you don't have the exact same motivation depending on the situation and opponent. Of course the Packers will say they want to win at Chicago and will focus on that game and don't think ahead to Seattle. But it just isn't the truth. If you have ever played team sports, you will know that. There are games which you can't get 100% up for.

    I'm not saying the Packers will be flabby and soft, but I'm saying some guys won't be 100% focused on the Bears, because they have Seattle in their minds. Maybe they are 90% - it could be enough to not get the Packers' best effort. Even if they come out strong, there will be the moment during the game in which the Seahawks come into their minds. It's human nature.

    Last season the Chiefs started vs. Tennessee before playing the Broncos. They knew they have to beat the SB runner-up to have a shot at winning their division. Do you really think the Chiefs had the Titans in mind during the summer ? No, it was the Broncos. The Chiefs lost 10-26 at Arrowhead, it was one of two games the Titans won last year. Furthermore it was probably the worst Chiefs game in 2014. If you had given them the Raiders in week two, they wouldn't have lost or at least wouldn't have showed such a terrible performance. They thought it's gonna be easy because the boss is waiting the next Sunday.


     
    powerbalance
    powerbalance
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2012
    Posts: 300
    Posted: Apr. 27, 2015 - 9:50 AM ET #18

    I played basketball at a decent level (not pro but I was paid), so I have a little experience.
    When I was playing a game, I wasn't thinking about the next one even if a big game was coming, it's just who I am, maybe it's rare.

    I get your point and Chiefs game is a damn good example and I think that emotion could reach many teams and many players , but what's the point if you're Green Bay to put yourself in a difficult situation by losing at Chicago before welcoming Seattle and risking to start 0-2. I think they have to be focus, I just can't see it with a hurting Green Bay. Right now they are my favourite to win SB50 next year.

    It's funny the chiefs played at Houston, then they host Denver. Will we witness the same type of performance by them ?
    We also have the Eagles playing at Atlanta and then host Dallas!


    I'm not a good football capper tho 
    I don't share my bets, I was 33-39 last year but won 4 units ovr because I put a big bet on the Pats.




    Reply
    I played basketball at a decent level (not pro but I was paid), so I have a little experience.
    When I was playing a game, I wasn't thinking about the next one even if a big game was coming, it's just who I am, maybe it's rare.

    I get your point and Chiefs game is a damn good example and I think that emotion could reach many teams and many players , but what's the point if you're Green Bay to put yourself in a difficult situation by losing at Chicago before welcoming Seattle and risking to start 0-2. I think they have to be focus, I just can't see it with a hurting Green Bay. Right now they are my favourite to win SB50 next year.

    It's funny the chiefs played at Houston, then they host Denver. Will we witness the same type of performance by them ?
    We also have the Eagles playing at Atlanta and then host Dallas!


    I'm not a good football capper tho 
    I don't share my bets, I was 33-39 last year but won 4 units ovr because I put a big bet on the Pats.




     
    suuma
    suuma
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2010
    Posts: 4455
    Posted: Apr. 27, 2015 - 10:44 AM ET #19

    Quote Originally Posted by powerbalance:

    I played basketball at a decent level (not pro but I was paid), so I have a little experience.
    When I was playing a game, I wasn't thinking about the next one even if a big game was coming, it's just who I am, maybe it's rare.

    I get your point and Chiefs game is a damn good example and I think that emotion could reach many teams and many players , but what's the point if you're Green Bay to put yourself in a difficult situation by losing at Chicago before welcoming Seattle and risking to start 0-2. I think they have to be focus, I just can't see it with a hurting Green Bay. Right now they are my favourite to win SB50 next year.

    It's funny the chiefs played at Houston, then they host Denver. Will we witness the same type of performance by them ?
    We also have the Eagles playing at Atlanta and then host Dallas!


    I'm not a good football capper tho 
    I don't share my bets, I was 33-39 last year but won 4 units ovr because I put a big bet on the Pats.






    I think that's the point. They don't want to lose at Chicago and put themselves into that situation. But wanting to win at 100% or 95% can make the difference in this sport. I can tell you a hundred examples from Soccer about that situation or the classic sandwich spot.

    You are right - interesting situation with the Chiefs playing at Houston. It should be considered when evaluating that game. There can be so many variables until September, but I think for the Eagles game, it's a bit different. It's a prime time game, the doubted Chip Kelly offense against the "new" Falcons under Dan Quinn - there could be a lot of hype by the media. So I expect a different kind of focusing by the Eagles players than I expect by the Chiefs for example. But like I said, just at first glance.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by powerbalance:

    I played basketball at a decent level (not pro but I was paid), so I have a little experience.
    When I was playing a game, I wasn't thinking about the next one even if a big game was coming, it's just who I am, maybe it's rare.

    I get your point and Chiefs game is a damn good example and I think that emotion could reach many teams and many players , but what's the point if you're Green Bay to put yourself in a difficult situation by losing at Chicago before welcoming Seattle and risking to start 0-2. I think they have to be focus, I just can't see it with a hurting Green Bay. Right now they are my favourite to win SB50 next year.

    It's funny the chiefs played at Houston, then they host Denver. Will we witness the same type of performance by them ?
    We also have the Eagles playing at Atlanta and then host Dallas!


    I'm not a good football capper tho 
    I don't share my bets, I was 33-39 last year but won 4 units ovr because I put a big bet on the Pats.






    I think that's the point. They don't want to lose at Chicago and put themselves into that situation. But wanting to win at 100% or 95% can make the difference in this sport. I can tell you a hundred examples from Soccer about that situation or the classic sandwich spot.

    You are right - interesting situation with the Chiefs playing at Houston. It should be considered when evaluating that game. There can be so many variables until September, but I think for the Eagles game, it's a bit different. It's a prime time game, the doubted Chip Kelly offense against the "new" Falcons under Dan Quinn - there could be a lot of hype by the media. So I expect a different kind of focusing by the Eagles players than I expect by the Chiefs for example. But like I said, just at first glance.
     
    powerbalance
    powerbalance
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2012
    Posts: 300
    Posted: Apr. 27, 2015 - 2:21 PM ET #20

    I was thinking about that, in pro level such as NFL, details are very very important. The difference between 100% focus and 95%, you will see that in the details, so it's a game changer.
    At the level I used to play, a 100% and a 95% focus doesn't change much, so maybe I didn't realise the difference between big games and sandwich games.

    Yeah, I really didn't look far in those game as you said it's just first glance but I miss NFL so it's good to talk about




    Reply
    I was thinking about that, in pro level such as NFL, details are very very important. The difference between 100% focus and 95%, you will see that in the details, so it's a game changer.
    At the level I used to play, a 100% and a 95% focus doesn't change much, so maybe I didn't realise the difference between big games and sandwich games.

    Yeah, I really didn't look far in those game as you said it's just first glance but I miss NFL so it's good to talk about




     
    The Hawk
    The Hawk
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2006
    Posts: 19693
    Posted: Apr. 27, 2015 - 7:52 PM ET #21

    Quote Originally Posted by suuma:



    Touché

    Just kidding! The fact I read this thread means I'm looking ahead myslelf!

    If you plan ahead, nothing surprised you. Great look ahead to "looking ahead"
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by suuma:



    Touché

    Just kidding! The fact I read this thread means I'm looking ahead myslelf!

    If you plan ahead, nothing surprised you. Great look ahead to "looking ahead"
     
    Greedybastard
    Greedybastard
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2007
    Posts: 3031
    Posted: Apr. 28, 2015 - 9:54 PM ET #22

    The combination of Jay Cutler, Jon Fox and Adam Gase will negate any look ahead factor the Bears would have. This is going to be an utterly terrible grouping for the Bears. A clueless OC, QB and head coach are not going to present a challenge to the Pack.

    Leave it to Fox to be completely unprepared for anything Aaron Rodgers brings to the table, and leave it to Gase to have a one-dimensional game plan. Too many weapons for the Pack for Fox to gameplan for. Gase can't turn the reigns over to his QB like he usually does because Cutler can't read a defense.

    Reply

    The combination of Jay Cutler, Jon Fox and Adam Gase will negate any look ahead factor the Bears would have. This is going to be an utterly terrible grouping for the Bears. A clueless OC, QB and head coach are not going to present a challenge to the Pack.

    Leave it to Fox to be completely unprepared for anything Aaron Rodgers brings to the table, and leave it to Gase to have a one-dimensional game plan. Too many weapons for the Pack for Fox to gameplan for. Gase can't turn the reigns over to his QB like he usually does because Cutler can't read a defense.

     
    undermysac
    undermysac
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2014
    Posts: 52604
    Posted: Apr. 29, 2015 - 5:54 PM ET #23

    The Bears made the best Fires and Hires this offseason in team History.

    I can't for one minute guess/forsee/hope what the Bears are going to be like THIS year.

    Throw everything you know about them last year,and Fox, and Gase, out the window. This is a new team, w/ a new GM, and it's being built from the ground up.

    In regards to the OP. Love the sandwich angle and anyone who looks for spots like these has seen them before. Good thread.
    Reply
    The Bears made the best Fires and Hires this offseason in team History.

    I can't for one minute guess/forsee/hope what the Bears are going to be like THIS year.

    Throw everything you know about them last year,and Fox, and Gase, out the window. This is a new team, w/ a new GM, and it's being built from the ground up.

    In regards to the OP. Love the sandwich angle and anyone who looks for spots like these has seen them before. Good thread.
     
    begginerboy
    begginerboy
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2013
    Posts: 15267
    Posted: Apr. 30, 2015 - 5:04 PM ET #24

    Remember what Rodgers said after losing to Seattle? He said the Packers lost too many road games which prevented them from getting home field against Seattle. Now their 1st game is on the road. You were supposed to remind me about that. 
    Reply
    Remember what Rodgers said after losing to Seattle? He said the Packers lost too many road games which prevented them from getting home field against Seattle. Now their 1st game is on the road. You were supposed to remind me about that. 
     
     
    suuma
    suuma
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2010
    Posts: 4455
    Posted: May. 2, 2015 - 5:20 AM ET #25

    Quote Originally Posted by undermysac:

    The Bears made the best Fires and Hires this offseason in team History.

    I can't for one minute guess/forsee/hope what the Bears are going to be like THIS year.

    Throw everything you know about them last year,and Fox, and Gase, out the window. This is a new team, w/ a new GM, and it's being built from the ground up.

    In regards to the OP. Love the sandwich angle and anyone who looks for spots like these has seen them before. Good thread.


    Interesting view
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by undermysac:

    The Bears made the best Fires and Hires this offseason in team History.

    I can't for one minute guess/forsee/hope what the Bears are going to be like THIS year.

    Throw everything you know about them last year,and Fox, and Gase, out the window. This is a new team, w/ a new GM, and it's being built from the ground up.

    In regards to the OP. Love the sandwich angle and anyone who looks for spots like these has seen them before. Good thread.


    Interesting view
    All Forums | NFL Betting Forum
    123456 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 289,653
    • BEARS/SEATTLE live in game COMMENTS welcome 782
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 112,288
    • Monday 11/02/2026 716
    • PART DEUX 181
    • Streak Survivor Winner List 21,862
    • 11/2 2,314
    • *EdgeHunter MNF Bears VS. Seahawks! 12-2 Run — Trust the Research, Let the Plays Speak!* 2,978
    • Week 10 Money 2,230
    • Florida Man - Monday Night 5,138

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Privacy Choices Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo
    Covers Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.