Quote Originally Posted by powerbalance:
For now I strongly disagree with the Bears angle.
First, Rogers said after the NFC championships loss that next year, they'll need to win away games to get home field advantage during the play offs.
Second, the Packers will be on the mission next year to get what they missed by a finger. (Just like the Spurs was on a mission last year after Ray Allen's three)
With that being said, they have to win that week 1 game at Chicago, a team they destroyed twice next year.
Don't expect them to be flabby and soft and waiting for Seahawks.
The Green Bay Packer will be focus every single snap until they'll reach what they feel they diserved, which is a trip to Santa Clara.
I'm not saying Packers -4 is a lock, I'm saying the emotional angle or "the sandwich game" doesn't apply in that game IMO.
Thanks for your opinion. It is a good basis for a discussion and most likely worth an own thread.
If I learned one thing in my lifetime watching pro sports, it's that I never listen to phrases those coaches, managers or quarterbacks tell us. They have to tell you those things. Packers were 8-0 at home and 4-4 on the road - so it's obvious they need to improve on the road. Did you ever hear from those guys that they don't want to win their next game ?
As much as you keep telling the media you have to win that next game, you don't have the exact same motivation depending on the situation and opponent. Of course the Packers will say they want to win at Chicago and will focus on that game and don't think ahead to Seattle. But it just isn't the truth. If you have ever played team sports, you will know that. There are games which you can't get 100% up for.
I'm not saying the Packers will be flabby and soft, but I'm saying some guys won't be 100% focused on the Bears, because they have Seattle in their minds. Maybe they are 90% - it could be enough to not get the Packers' best effort. Even if they come out strong, there will be the moment during the game in which the Seahawks come into their minds. It's human nature.
Last season the Chiefs started vs. Tennessee before playing the Broncos. They knew they have to beat the SB runner-up to have a shot at winning their division. Do you really think the Chiefs had the Titans in mind during the summer ? No, it was the Broncos. The Chiefs lost 10-26 at Arrowhead, it was one of two games the Titans won last year. Furthermore it was probably the worst Chiefs game in 2014. If you had given them the Raiders in week two, they wouldn't have lost or at least wouldn't have showed such a terrible performance. They thought it's gonna be easy because the boss is waiting the next Sunday.