All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

That was a CATCH by Dez

...

Participants:

Posts: 149

MrWhatsItToYa

Veteran

Joined: Mar, 2014

Posts: 3239

Posted: Jan. 11, 2015 - 4:48 PM ET #76

Quote Originally Posted by MrWhatsItToYa:

I'm not sure if it was a catch or not,its a judgement call,depending what you think a football move is,i thought the calvin johson play was a catch when I first saw it,but it leaves it up to the officials judgement unfortunately.But I do think they ball touched the ground.

That was supposed to read.But I do think the ball touched the ground

DiverRon

Veteran

Joined: Jun, 2008

Posts: 3837

Posted: Jan. 11, 2015 - 4:52 PM ET #77

KHARMA IS A girl; DETROIT CLEARLY SHOOULD HAVE BEEN TEAM PLAYING TODAY! Also by NFL Rulebook and precedence set in prior case THIS WAS NOT A CASE.
You can argue and argue but NFL rulebook made it an "easy"
reversal and that's all there is to it folks!

I hate the cowboys and Jerry Jones so I'm happier than a mo-fo!
Maybe Christie can blow Jerry to make him feel better!

VegasVandal

Hall of Fame

Joined: Dec, 2010

Posts: 26913

Posted: Jan. 11, 2015 - 4:53 PM ET #78

Quote Originally Posted by DA_BOYS:

Pereira said it doesn't matter how many steps he took after Long says it looks like he took 3 steps.

Think about what you just said though...What if Dez caught that ball at the 10 yard line, take 9 steps and then elbow hits the ground (with no clear evidence of ball hitting the ground mind you) ....you still think the amount of steps doesn't matter?

sevenout44

Prospect

Joined: Jan, 2006

Posts: 311

Posted: Jan. 11, 2015 - 4:53 PM ET #79

No need to watch late game the NFL will make sure the other golden boy(old man) Manning make it to next week.lol

MTFN50

Veteran

Joined: Apr, 2008

Posts: 2713

Posted: Jan. 11, 2015 - 4:56 PM ET #80

What a dck bye cow girls when they win the bet I know your favorite team won LOL great recipe for losing money 7-1 now all posted .No one who bet the Cowboys waited till it was 5 everyone had it at 7 7.5 Or in teasers maybe a few late comers at 6 .Most packer bettors took the-6 -7very few at -5 This is a gambling site not a teenage girl crush forum .How much u lose betting the Pats

DA_BOYS

Captain

Joined: Sep, 2009

Posts: 5673

Posted: Jan. 11, 2015 - 4:57 PM ET #81

Quote Originally Posted by VegasVandal:

It's not what I said but what pereira said. I completely agree with you. I think the number of steps matter. I thought that the number of steps he took and the stretch for the line both were football moves.

BeeRAD

Veteran

Joined: Jan, 2009

Posts: 1678

Posted: Jan. 11, 2015 - 5:08 PM ET #82

Quote Originally Posted by Syddigs:

So the fix is for the UNDER and NOT for GB winning the game?

Holy crap! Its week 2 of 2015 and you are already a guaranteed finalist for dumbest post of the year.

If dumbest post of the year consists of me stating exactly what happened for the game to stay Under and for me to hit Exactly 6 touchdowns then talk all the **** you want while I cash in. It was clearly a catch. Why so much controversy?? Are you that narrow minded

WahooS

Hall of Fame

Joined: Jul, 2004

Posts: 25634

Posted: Jan. 11, 2015 - 5:26 PM ET #83

Why argue over something you can't change?

Geez, it's NOT a catch by NFL rules, it's quite easy to understand

For fawks sake, stop arguing like children as if your opinion or interpretation matters, it doesn't & Green Bay moves on

undermysac

Legend

Joined: Dec, 2014

Posts: 52190

Posted: Jan. 11, 2015 - 5:34 PM ET #84

Quote Originally Posted by sevenout44:

No need to watch late game the NFL will make sure the other golden boy(old man) Manning make it to next week.lol

People will still watch for Indy to cover 9.

moneymaker14

All-Star

Joined: Jan, 2007

Posts: 12528

Posted: Jan. 11, 2015 - 5:37 PM ET #85

No Super Bow for Jerry

stats1

Captain

Joined: Aug, 2009

Posts: 8153

Posted: Jan. 11, 2015 - 5:54 PM ET #86

terrible play call on 4th n 2 get it 2 witten or Beasley underneath and continue the drive!! There's always next year Cowgirl fans

stats1

Captain

Joined: Aug, 2009

Posts: 8153

Posted: Jan. 11, 2015 - 5:55 PM ET #87

Quote Originally Posted by undermysac:

People will still watch for Indy to cover 9.

don't b sooooo sure

thorne2265

Prospect

Joined: Nov, 2011

Posts: 10

Posted: Jan. 11, 2015 - 6:09 PM ET #88

This should not even be questionable and I even had GB ml and the under.

I have watched the reply 12 times in slow motion!!

He caught the ball and landed with both feet down on the 5 yard line

He he tucked the ball in with both hands

He took a step to the 3 yard line

He grabbed the ball with one hand took another step to the 2 yard line

He reached out with the ball in possession of his left hand

He came short of the goal line with the elbow down and his knee

Even if the hit the ground and moved, the ground can't cause a fumble.

Possession was very obvious way before the lunge.

And if you were to call it a fumble he regained possession in the end zone.

Those who say it was not a catch need to quit, you are embarrassing yourselves. It was obviously a catch that resulted in a bad call, which caused the initial call (a catch) to be overturned (which is really confusing to me)

Without undisputed evidence in should not have been over turned.

It worked out great for my bet but Dallas got screwed!!

IT WAS A 100% CATCH

vinnievibes

Prospect

Joined: Sep, 2013

Posts: 412

Posted: Jan. 11, 2015 - 6:13 PM ET #89

more nit picking, frame by frame, millisecond review to ruin the game

stevopa

Veteran

Joined: Nov, 2008

Posts: 1004

Posted: Jan. 11, 2015 - 6:24 PM ET #90

Quote Originally Posted by thorne2265:

This should not even be questionable and I even had GB ml and the under.

I have watched the reply 12 times in slow motion!!

He caught the ball and landed with both feet down on the 5 yard line

He he tucked the ball in with both hands

He took a step to the 3 yard line

He grabbed the ball with one hand took another step to the 2 yard line

He reached out with the ball in possession of his left hand

He came short of the goal line with the elbow down and his knee

Even if the hit the ground and moved, the ground can't cause a fumble.

Possession was very obvious way before the lunge.

And if you were to call it a fumble he regained possession in the end zone.

Without undisputed evidence in should not have been over turned.

It worked out great for my bet but Dallas got screwed!!

IT WAS A 100% CATCH

Did you watch the Fox halftime where they quoted the NFL VP as stating it was the right call? Just asking.

tikitom

Veteran

Joined: Sep, 2006

Posts: 2311

Posted: Jan. 11, 2015 - 6:40 PM ET #91

Quote Originally Posted by stevopa:

Did you watch the Fox halftime where they quoted the NFL VP as stating it was the right call? Just asking.

So, they investigated themselves and decided they're not guilty?

You don't say.

Tell me more.

VegasVandal

Hall of Fame

Joined: Dec, 2010

Posts: 26913

Posted: Jan. 11, 2015 - 6:43 PM ET #92

Quote Originally Posted by tikitom:

So, they investigated themselves and decided they're not guilty?

You don't say.

Tell me more.

Yup the sheeple will follow as they are told

eaglequill

Veteran

Joined: Jan, 2012

Posts: 1136

Posted: Jan. 11, 2015 - 6:47 PM ET #93

Quote Originally Posted by mightiestmojo:

Now you know how Lions fans felt last week.

But the difference is the Lions still had every opportunity to win the game they had the ball and could have went on 4th down. Still plenty of opportunities..This cost Dallas their season. their last chance...a little bit of a difference.

stevopa

Veteran

Joined: Nov, 2008

Posts: 1004

Posted: Jan. 11, 2015 - 6:50 PM ET #94

Quote Originally Posted by tikitom:

So, they investigated themselves and decided they're not guilty?

You don't say.

Tell me more.

NFL came out last week and said the blown PI call in the Dallas/Detroit was wrong and the flag should never have been picked up. Seems like you are picking and choosing situations that fit your need. What else you got?

stevopa

Veteran

Joined: Nov, 2008

Posts: 1004

Posted: Jan. 11, 2015 - 7:01 PM ET #95

Ans suddenly all the voices go quiet. When you try to make your candle brighter by extinguishing others you might want to take a good look at the things being said for any inconsistencies, and all around BS. Thank you, come again!

LOLKNBR

Captain

Joined: Jul, 2013

Posts: 5266

Posted: Jan. 11, 2015 - 7:03 PM ET #96

100% was a catch!

Kraut

Prospect

Joined: Jun, 2010

Posts: 226

Posted: Jan. 11, 2015 - 7:14 PM ET #97

If he would've broke the goal line when he stretches and the ref calls a td, could they have then said that there was no "football move"???

Gimme a break.

stevopa

Veteran

Joined: Nov, 2008

Posts: 1004

Posted: Jan. 11, 2015 - 7:19 PM ET #98

Quote Originally Posted by Kraut:

If he would've broke the goal line when he stretches and the ref calls a td, could they have then said that there was no "football move"???

Gimme a break.

No, they couldn't. The play would have been dead as soon as crossed the goal line and it would have been a TD based on a legitimate "football move". The determination was that Bryant did not extend the ball in a significant manner to warrant a "football move". What do you guys not understand about this? You are talking about hypothetical situations that never occurred.

muledog

Veteran

Joined: Oct, 2006

Posts: 1268

Posted: Jan. 11, 2015 - 7:23 PM ET #99

Quote Originally Posted by DA_BOYS:

I believe he did make a football move a-hole. He took two steps and dove for the end zone after securing the football.

You my friend are a a-hole

Kraut

Prospect

Joined: Jun, 2010

Posts: 226

Posted: Jan. 11, 2015 - 7:43 PM ET #100

Quote Originally Posted by stevopa:

Quote Originally Posted by Kraut:

If he would've broke
the goal line when he stretches and the ref calls a td, could they have then said that there was no "football move"???Gimme a break.

So what you're saying is because he didn't cross the goal line then it is not a "legitimate" "football move"? Seriously dude??

All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

That was a CATCH by Dez

Hot Forum Topics