Posted:
#1
0
That was a CATCH by Dez
Posted:
#20
Quote Originally Posted by DA_BOYS:
Elbow down!!!!! How is that overturned?
Dude, learn the rules of the game. The same precedent is in play for a catch in the end zone when no "football move" made. A player must maintain possession through the ground. Whether any part of his body touches the ground is immaterial. You guys are clueless!Elbow down!!!!! How is that overturned?
0
Posted:
#21
Quote Originally Posted by stevopa:
Dude, learn the rules of the game. The same precedent is in play for a catch in the end zone when no "football move" made. A player must maintain possession through the ground. Whether any part of his body touches the ground is immaterial. You guys are clueless!
we are on the same page here Dude, learn the rules of the game. The same precedent is in play for a catch in the end zone when no "football move" made. A player must maintain possession through the ground. Whether any part of his body touches the ground is immaterial. You guys are clueless!
0
Posted:
#25
Quote Originally Posted by chuhung:
Lol ever hear of the rule ground caused the fumble etc... Same thing as a RB trying to extend for the goal line and ground causes it to come out.
Unbelievable! It is not the same thing as RB extending the ball. Possession of a catch is based on a receiver maintaining possession through the ground when a "football move" is not made. Mike Perairra explained it perfectly. You guys need to get educated on the game.Lol ever hear of the rule ground caused the fumble etc... Same thing as a RB trying to extend for the goal line and ground causes it to come out.
0
Hot Forum Topics
