Pats 42-10 and 38-10
Usually i think they don't but.......
Good team, but they took advantage of the easiest schedule in the NFL this year. There's a reason they are only a 3.5pt home favorite vs the Chargers. ![]()
Good team, but they took advantage of the easiest schedule in the NFL this year. There's a reason they are only a 3.5pt home favorite vs the Chargers. ![]()
Play against team who score 30 or more and allow 10 or less in back to back games if they don't play a division opponent. But not sure if the system applies in playoffs off 2 regular season games because the playoffs are all in games where teams play their best the whole way. Same way it doesn't apply vs division opponents because those are important games
Play against team who score 30 or more and allow 10 or less in back to back games if they don't play a division opponent. But not sure if the system applies in playoffs off 2 regular season games because the playoffs are all in games where teams play their best the whole way. Same way it doesn't apply vs division opponents because those are important games
The Patriots are not frauds, each team plays who ever they are scheduled & they either win or lose. They did lose to the worst team in NFL in week 1, the Raiders but week 1 is always an anomaly.
Years ago, the Patriots & Brady lost to the Bills 0-31 week 1, then Pats beat the Bills 31-0 week 17 & went in to win the SB. Crazy things can always happen week 1.
With all that said, yes the Bator rule is in play but I don't know if it carries over into playoffs.
The Patriots are not frauds, each team plays who ever they are scheduled & they either win or lose. They did lose to the worst team in NFL in week 1, the Raiders but week 1 is always an anomaly.
Years ago, the Patriots & Brady lost to the Bills 0-31 week 1, then Pats beat the Bills 31-0 week 17 & went in to win the SB. Crazy things can always happen week 1.
With all that said, yes the Bator rule is in play but I don't know if it carries over into playoffs.
the original system I had from Taxi Dave says "no playoffs". but frankly there's no reason why not. with what I show (I use 12 points instead of 10), it's
2-23 ATS without playoffs
3-28 ATS with playoffs
the original system I had from Taxi Dave says "no playoffs". but frankly there's no reason why not. with what I show (I use 12 points instead of 10), it's
2-23 ATS without playoffs
3-28 ATS with playoffs
So 1-5 ATS in playoffs, interesting, thanks for that info.
So 1-5 ATS in playoffs, interesting, thanks for that info.
@SecretAgentMan1
Dogbitewilliams said in playoffs 2-5 ats however facing a team off a loss like chargers are its 1-1 ats in playoffs no real data like regular season he added
@SecretAgentMan1
Dogbitewilliams said in playoffs 2-5 ats however facing a team off a loss like chargers are its 1-1 ats in playoffs no real data like regular season he added
Teams are 9-32 ATS since November 1999 off two straight games in which they scored 30+ and allowed 10-. That said, the last 2 have covered (including the Rams vs Niners this year).
If they scored 40+ in at least one of the two games, the record is 1-18 ATS since December 2005.
Both of these include playoffs. ![]()
Teams are 9-32 ATS since November 1999 off two straight games in which they scored 30+ and allowed 10-. That said, the last 2 have covered (including the Rams vs Niners this year).
If they scored 40+ in at least one of the two games, the record is 1-18 ATS since December 2005.
Both of these include playoffs. ![]()
Pats have scored a minimum 28 in 5 straight games. Wonder if there is an impact on scoring or the game when a team achieves that end of year.
Someone gotta look into that. Taxi is already good in itself but Chargers especially with Herbert injury are a bit of a choke team
Pats have scored a minimum 28 in 5 straight games. Wonder if there is an impact on scoring or the game when a team achieves that end of year.
Someone gotta look into that. Taxi is already good in itself but Chargers especially with Herbert injury are a bit of a choke team
Pats defensive QBPR is 21st in the league.
Look at the offenses they played and they finished 21st against these offense.
I seen on ESPN I think it was. that the Pats offense played the easiest group as a whole of pass defenses in the league.
As they were comparing Stafford to Maye for MVP , Rams offense played 3rd hardest pass defenses in the league.
The thing is though there seems to be so many people doubting the Pats because of that easy schedule . It seems to obvious, I doubt it is that easy.
Pats defensive QBPR is 21st in the league.
Look at the offenses they played and they finished 21st against these offense.
I seen on ESPN I think it was. that the Pats offense played the easiest group as a whole of pass defenses in the league.
As they were comparing Stafford to Maye for MVP , Rams offense played 3rd hardest pass defenses in the league.
The thing is though there seems to be so many people doubting the Pats because of that easy schedule . It seems to obvious, I doubt it is that easy.
Unfortunately I dont know whether that applies to playoffs.
I saw that and was wondering if it does.
Although I do have fade on Pats in 1st playoff game.
I think it is Chargers or no play.
Unfortunately I dont know whether that applies to playoffs.
I saw that and was wondering if it does.
Although I do have fade on Pats in 1st playoff game.
I think it is Chargers or no play.
I still remember this game. 2010 Season Pats 14-2, and the favorites to win SB.
They won 34-3 then 38-7 going into playoffs.
Pats had like a 12.9 margin of victory but lost SU to the 11-5 Jets 28-21 Jets with a measly 3.9 margin of victory and that was with Brady who led the league in QBPR at 111 which back then was very strong QBPR.
I still remember this game. 2010 Season Pats 14-2, and the favorites to win SB.
They won 34-3 then 38-7 going into playoffs.
Pats had like a 12.9 margin of victory but lost SU to the 11-5 Jets 28-21 Jets with a measly 3.9 margin of victory and that was with Brady who led the league in QBPR at 111 which back then was very strong QBPR.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.