t's very interesting that BOTH of this Sunday's conference championship games in the NFL playoffs have played out the same way in terms of sharp betting.
Green Bay and Pittsburgh are the favorites.
Green Bay and Pittsburgh get meaningful support at -3, so much so that sportsbooks had to raise the juice to -120, or -130 at that number before finally settling in at -3.5.
During the course of events right at the open, or later in the week, some stores posted a favorite by four points, but immediately saw the dog get hit fairly hard.
That makes it pretty clear. Sharps (professional wagerers) like the favorites -3 and the dogs +4!
Good night everyone, see you next time!
It's just not any more complicated than that at the moment. I will be interested to see if additional sharp action comes in on the underdogs over the weekend if the line stays at -3.5. Wise Guys who liked the favorite are already in at -3 or -3 with additional juice. They could read the tea leaves and made sure they got in at that critical number. My sense is that some dog lovers are waiting to see if the public backs the favorites up to four or more on game day. Then they'd come in at lines that offer a little more insurance than just 3.5.
Could the public back the dogs? Most of the time I'd say no. But, we have VERY appealing underdogs this week in terms of squares. Chicago is a team they could easily support at home in a Cinderella story. The Jets are a popular betting team most of the time, and just won outright two weeks in a row as underdogs. As a general rule, the public is going to bet favorites in championship games. That's just always the case in all sports going back since gambling started. This year, things could get interesting.
I haven't talked about the totals yet. There's nothing to talk about! Green Bay/Chicago opened at 43 and has stayed there. NY Jets/Pittsburgh opened at 38.5 and has stayed there. Both cities have the potential for weather influences. It makes sense to wait until the last second unless you know for sure bad weather is coming that would inspire an Under bet. That being said, all four teams have experience playing in cold weather. And, all three cold weather games went OVER last week! Games in Pittsburgh, Chicago, and New England landed on 55, 59, and 49 thanks to a lot of cheap field position points, and some strong armed quarterbacks who could throw through the win.
-Nick Bogdanovich
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
t's very interesting that BOTH of this Sunday's conference championship games in the NFL playoffs have played out the same way in terms of sharp betting.
Green Bay and Pittsburgh are the favorites.
Green Bay and Pittsburgh get meaningful support at -3, so much so that sportsbooks had to raise the juice to -120, or -130 at that number before finally settling in at -3.5.
During the course of events right at the open, or later in the week, some stores posted a favorite by four points, but immediately saw the dog get hit fairly hard.
That makes it pretty clear. Sharps (professional wagerers) like the favorites -3 and the dogs +4!
Good night everyone, see you next time!
It's just not any more complicated than that at the moment. I will be interested to see if additional sharp action comes in on the underdogs over the weekend if the line stays at -3.5. Wise Guys who liked the favorite are already in at -3 or -3 with additional juice. They could read the tea leaves and made sure they got in at that critical number. My sense is that some dog lovers are waiting to see if the public backs the favorites up to four or more on game day. Then they'd come in at lines that offer a little more insurance than just 3.5.
Could the public back the dogs? Most of the time I'd say no. But, we have VERY appealing underdogs this week in terms of squares. Chicago is a team they could easily support at home in a Cinderella story. The Jets are a popular betting team most of the time, and just won outright two weeks in a row as underdogs. As a general rule, the public is going to bet favorites in championship games. That's just always the case in all sports going back since gambling started. This year, things could get interesting.
I haven't talked about the totals yet. There's nothing to talk about! Green Bay/Chicago opened at 43 and has stayed there. NY Jets/Pittsburgh opened at 38.5 and has stayed there. Both cities have the potential for weather influences. It makes sense to wait until the last second unless you know for sure bad weather is coming that would inspire an Under bet. That being said, all four teams have experience playing in cold weather. And, all three cold weather games went OVER last week! Games in Pittsburgh, Chicago, and New England landed on 55, 59, and 49 thanks to a lot of cheap field position points, and some strong armed quarterbacks who could throw through the win.
i've been told that Nick Bogdanovich isn't a sharp handicapper! but it was by someone on these forums, so take that for what it's worth (which is nothing!)...
0
i've been told that Nick Bogdanovich isn't a sharp handicapper! but it was by someone on these forums, so take that for what it's worth (which is nothing!)...
Could people please think before they write!!!!!!!!!!!
Nick Bogdonovich was a head linesmaker at Binion's Horseshoe – and later at the Stratosphere and the Mandalay Bay.
Your welcome for the education,no charge
most importantly, he was the linesmaker at the M Resort when they first opened, and in one year established the M Resort (a brand new Hotel) as the sharpest sportsbook in Las Vegas (ahead of the Hilton, MGM, Mirage and others)...
Nick Bogdanovich is not only a sharp, he is one of the sharpest there is!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Blackshirt51:
Could people please think before they write!!!!!!!!!!!
Nick Bogdonovich was a head linesmaker at Binion's Horseshoe – and later at the Stratosphere and the Mandalay Bay.
Your welcome for the education,no charge
most importantly, he was the linesmaker at the M Resort when they first opened, and in one year established the M Resort (a brand new Hotel) as the sharpest sportsbook in Las Vegas (ahead of the Hilton, MGM, Mirage and others)...
Nick Bogdanovich is not only a sharp, he is one of the sharpest there is!
most importantly, he was the linesmaker at the M Resort when they first opened, and in one year established the M Resort (a brand new Hotel) as the sharpest sportsbook in Las Vegas (ahead of the Hilton, MGM, Mirage and others)...
Nick Bogdanovich is not only a sharp, he is one of the sharpest there is!
Ice, he may be a sharp as you state but do you think he will give us regular bettors any tidbits in his weekly articles? I read it every week when it posted on here & I never come away with anything that I wouldnt pick up from reading the line movement myself.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Ice4Blood:
most importantly, he was the linesmaker at the M Resort when they first opened, and in one year established the M Resort (a brand new Hotel) as the sharpest sportsbook in Las Vegas (ahead of the Hilton, MGM, Mirage and others)...
Nick Bogdanovich is not only a sharp, he is one of the sharpest there is!
Ice, he may be a sharp as you state but do you think he will give us regular bettors any tidbits in his weekly articles? I read it every week when it posted on here & I never come away with anything that I wouldnt pick up from reading the line movement myself.
When I took them at 13-1 SB Match-up last weekend I doubt that was the "sharp move"
These fucking games are pretty much Pick-em caliber, of course i expect GB and Pitt victories, but whoever gets the best odds is the "sharp"...I like to think 13-1 on a 50/50 proposition was pretty sharp, but last week that probably would've sounded foolish. Can the next sharp prediction please tell me if the Pitt O-line will hold up long enough for Ben to find Wallace and Sanders???
0
Quote Originally Posted by davidn28:
PIT and GB superbowl!
When I took them at 13-1 SB Match-up last weekend I doubt that was the "sharp move"
These fucking games are pretty much Pick-em caliber, of course i expect GB and Pitt victories, but whoever gets the best odds is the "sharp"...I like to think 13-1 on a 50/50 proposition was pretty sharp, but last week that probably would've sounded foolish. Can the next sharp prediction please tell me if the Pitt O-line will hold up long enough for Ben to find Wallace and Sanders???
I paid for his picks 2 years ago. He was freakin money on his NFL picks but brutal everywhere else. The free info is just comments on what he see's being done by "sharps" that he knows and have nothing to do with what he gives out as picks. I would have bought his picks again this year but was broke after following his baseball bets.
0
I paid for his picks 2 years ago. He was freakin money on his NFL picks but brutal everywhere else. The free info is just comments on what he see's being done by "sharps" that he knows and have nothing to do with what he gives out as picks. I would have bought his picks again this year but was broke after following his baseball bets.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.