@ shifty...not going to quote in order to save thread space so.
of course we all know rogers is off the charts...but it give Ben another 29 completeions (basically a game +) and his pass ydg will be comparable...comparing QBs alone
Pitt (though not great by now means) has the better running game... 1489 yds vs GB's 1294
spliting hairs here but 'tenfold' is quite an exaggeration...just saying bro
Now, i would love to see the matchup again in the SB no doubt...only with the results switched
0
@ shifty...not going to quote in order to save thread space so.
of course we all know rogers is off the charts...but it give Ben another 29 completeions (basically a game +) and his pass ydg will be comparable...comparing QBs alone
Pitt (though not great by now means) has the better running game... 1489 yds vs GB's 1294
spliting hairs here but 'tenfold' is quite an exaggeration...just saying bro
Now, i would love to see the matchup again in the SB no doubt...only with the results switched
i think kc has a shot, orton might be rusty and sure no way he beats rodgers BUT he still has career 3-0 record at home vs the packers (may be thats nothing to do with sunday's game) anyway i think kc has a shot with orton, if it was palko, no way.
Kc's pass defense is still not that bad, and whatever you say without jennings, gbay 's passing game will be affected.
Anyway, i think laying -900 on a road game is really not worthed.
0
i think kc has a shot, orton might be rusty and sure no way he beats rodgers BUT he still has career 3-0 record at home vs the packers (may be thats nothing to do with sunday's game) anyway i think kc has a shot with orton, if it was palko, no way.
Kc's pass defense is still not that bad, and whatever you say without jennings, gbay 's passing game will be affected.
Anyway, i think laying -900 on a road game is really not worthed.
well nuggins i mean obviously tenfold was a bit exxagerated lol i was just trying to make the point that if gb had the ball that many times in the red they would scored way more points and thats why pitt didnt shit on them like they should have... agreed it would be another great match up though... i would only tease Gb this week as i never like to take dd spreads... **see pats vs colts**
0
well nuggins i mean obviously tenfold was a bit exxagerated lol i was just trying to make the point that if gb had the ball that many times in the red they would scored way more points and thats why pitt didnt shit on them like they should have... agreed it would be another great match up though... i would only tease Gb this week as i never like to take dd spreads... **see pats vs colts**
well nuggins i mean obviously tenfold was a bit exxagerated lol i was just trying to make the point that if gb had the ball that many times in the red they would scored way more points and thats why pitt didnt shit on them like they should have... agreed it would be another great match up though... i would only tease Gb this week as i never like to take dd spreads... **see pats vs colts**
pats vs colts...?..really? why did you have to bring that up?...that game KILLED a HUGE day...because i teased NE on 2 x hefty 13 pt teasers...course all the others but...but i digrese...
it's really hard to say "if this team was here or did that or..." ya know... Pitt fumbled 2 x's in the redzone...(ward and miller both of which don't have the fumblitis affliction)...on passes from ben...both of which would have converted to a 1st down i believe. brutal...
but more than likely...in that exact position, GB would have at least scored
you just can't cap TO's outside of differential... Pitt is prob in the bottom 5 i'm guessing
0
Quote Originally Posted by SHIFTYbook9:
well nuggins i mean obviously tenfold was a bit exxagerated lol i was just trying to make the point that if gb had the ball that many times in the red they would scored way more points and thats why pitt didnt shit on them like they should have... agreed it would be another great match up though... i would only tease Gb this week as i never like to take dd spreads... **see pats vs colts**
pats vs colts...?..really? why did you have to bring that up?...that game KILLED a HUGE day...because i teased NE on 2 x hefty 13 pt teasers...course all the others but...but i digrese...
it's really hard to say "if this team was here or did that or..." ya know... Pitt fumbled 2 x's in the redzone...(ward and miller both of which don't have the fumblitis affliction)...on passes from ben...both of which would have converted to a 1st down i believe. brutal...
but more than likely...in that exact position, GB would have at least scored
you just can't cap TO's outside of differential... Pitt is prob in the bottom 5 i'm guessing
You could have easily made your point that you like gb a lot without acting so immature and like youve never placed a bet before.
I agree about gb though, no way they lose this game gl
Don't be shocked if this is a trap game!!! Last time this occurred... at the time an undefeated Bronco's (led by John Elway on the road) fell to a 5-8 team in the G-Men. They were also the prior seasons Superbowl Champions, playing against a back up QB. History does have a pattern of repeating itself. I like the PACKERS, but too much wood to lay on the road with a team that nothing to play for and EVERYTHING to loose should ANY key players get injured. EXPECT a CLOSE, slow paced game to help protect players from freakish injuries. Score 20-10 Packers (with a chance of a late score by the Chiefs to push it to 20-17. Rodgers interview.... They're a good football team, and we;re just happy to get out of here with the win. "Quote that" Good luck to u all. I'm laying off and taking the -46!!!! That's $$.$$ in the bank!!!
0
Quote Originally Posted by CalifDreamin:
You could have easily made your point that you like gb a lot without acting so immature and like youve never placed a bet before.
I agree about gb though, no way they lose this game gl
Don't be shocked if this is a trap game!!! Last time this occurred... at the time an undefeated Bronco's (led by John Elway on the road) fell to a 5-8 team in the G-Men. They were also the prior seasons Superbowl Champions, playing against a back up QB. History does have a pattern of repeating itself. I like the PACKERS, but too much wood to lay on the road with a team that nothing to play for and EVERYTHING to loose should ANY key players get injured. EXPECT a CLOSE, slow paced game to help protect players from freakish injuries. Score 20-10 Packers (with a chance of a late score by the Chiefs to push it to 20-17. Rodgers interview.... They're a good football team, and we;re just happy to get out of here with the win. "Quote that" Good luck to u all. I'm laying off and taking the -46!!!! That's $$.$$ in the bank!!!
packers are no steelers.. how many times did the steelers get the ball to the redzone and not sure.. i am weary of the exact numbers im just recalling from the game.. gbs offense dominates pitts offense tenfold.. not only that, kc has 0 offense.. this wont even be close dont worry about the ML take the spread..cheifs are a dead dog here
Have to agree. Steelers offense blew a lot pf chances in that game. GB is not that team. Only question is, will GB cover the over by themselves, or will KC get a few cheap points like the Raiders did last week?
0
Quote Originally Posted by SHIFTYbook9:
packers are no steelers.. how many times did the steelers get the ball to the redzone and not sure.. i am weary of the exact numbers im just recalling from the game.. gbs offense dominates pitts offense tenfold.. not only that, kc has 0 offense.. this wont even be close dont worry about the ML take the spread..cheifs are a dead dog here
Have to agree. Steelers offense blew a lot pf chances in that game. GB is not that team. Only question is, will GB cover the over by themselves, or will KC get a few cheap points like the Raiders did last week?
No value in betting GB at whatever it is now... wayy too much juice..
even when I feel I have close to 95% chance to hit this?
why not throw something on it, this is like a money tree I have been hitting all yr. ML GB how can I lose? have not lost yet, see no reason to beleive the Cheifs will beat the Pack on Sunday
I will get mine, I like money trees where I can go pick it off with a good feeling and 90% sure it will hit, anything can happen but I will be 3-0 come sunday night and will feel good about it ....like most the NFL year
0
Quote Originally Posted by MoneyShot:
No value in betting GB at whatever it is now... wayy too much juice..
even when I feel I have close to 95% chance to hit this?
why not throw something on it, this is like a money tree I have been hitting all yr. ML GB how can I lose? have not lost yet, see no reason to beleive the Cheifs will beat the Pack on Sunday
I will get mine, I like money trees where I can go pick it off with a good feeling and 90% sure it will hit, anything can happen but I will be 3-0 come sunday night and will feel good about it ....like most the NFL year
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.