Round 2 SDQL

season>=2024 and playoffs=1 and D and tA(qb pressures)<oA(qb pressures) and line<9.5

(8-1) ATS by 10.0 points...5-0 this year

Play on:

Bills, Niners, Bears

season>=2024 and D and playoffs=1 and tA(RTD)>oA(RTD) and total>38.5

(7-1) ATS by 7.3 pts

Play on:

Bills,  Bears

As Dogs, teams averaging more rushing tds and protecting their qbs better are ATS winners (15-2)

and (14-3) SU suggests money line dogs should be in play as well.

Showed a +3% profit in round 1,as Lawrence and Jax imploded and cost me substantial profits.

Will be aggressive again this round.

season>=2024 and D and playoffs=1 and tA(points)<oA(points) and total<55.5 and line<10

(2-8) OU by -7.2 pts

Play under:

Niners, Bears, Texans

season>=2024 and D and playoffs=1 and tA(points)<oA(points) and total<55.5 and line<10 and p:total<44

(1-7) OU by 9.5 pts

Play under

Texans,............gl

Money line plays:

1. Bills -105 (5%)

2. Bears +175 (3%)

3. Niners +290 (2%)

4. Texans +150 (3%)

Totals:

1. Niners under 45.5 (4%)

2. Bears under 49.5 (4%)

3. Texans under 41.5 (5%)

Teasers 6 pt two teamers (-110)

1. Bills+5.5 / Niners +13.5

2. Bills +5.5 / Texans +3

3. Bills +5.5 / Bears +9.5

4. Texans under 47.5 / Niners +13.5

5. Texans under 47.5 / Bears under 55.5

6. Texans under 47.5 / Niners under 51.5

7. texans under 47.5 / Bills +5.5

ALL plays are (3.5%)....................................................................................................good luck

In #2 the Texans should be +9.5

Bills should read +6.5...no edit botton on this bush league site.

I hate to ask you to write that out in english but could you translate 1 or 2 of them Im having a hard time understanding what they are saying

See post 3

What a garbage reposting product here.

In the playoffs,since 2023, a Dog who allows fewer qb pressures than it's opponent and where the line is less than

+10 is (8-1) ats beating the line by an average of 10.0 points (massive). (5-0) this year.

This is post #1 translation...hope this helps.

since 2024, ">=2024" in sdql post #1

no matter how you look at it, it's not that big a sample size.

This site is written and maintained by a highschool kid. It can't handle even basic formatting and a forum is all about text.

BOL 

fff

wind>10 and A and season>=2018 and P:O and PP:O and AF and line>=-4  (rams ML and ATS both 13-2)

Po:dps>3 and tA(o:points)<21 and season>=2020 and DA and Po:PENY>30 (pats ML 46-28)

p:dpa>=10 and AF and total>38 and P:L and season>=2015 and line>=-4 (rams ML 17-6)

Additional 6 pt teasers -(110)

1. SEA/SF over 39 and Texans under 47

2. SEA/SF over 39 and Texans under 47

3. SEA/SF over and Bills +7.5

All 3.5%

disregard #2 it is a dupe.

There cannot be an edit button after 5 minutes.  If Covers allowed that, hordes of posters would change their losing picks to winners.

Good luck this week.

BO, I fiddled with your second query and got this:

Po:dps>3 and tA(o:points)<21 and season > 2013 and AD and Po:PENY>30 and total < 42.2

SU:  11-31 (-6.9,26.2%)

ATS:  12-26-4 (-3.5,31.6%)

Maybe you prefer to exclude those older seasons; to each his own.

Good luck.

JC, I know you like those Munchkin queries which I regard as unreliable because of the small sample size, but here is one with a large average OU margin:

PO = 1 and streak > 5.5 and HF and DIV

OU:  4-0-0 (12.2,100.0%) bet SF-SEA Over

I see you have SF-SEA Under 45.5 so I hope this query is unreliable garbage.

Good luck.

Thx DBW. I have Niners Over in some teasers to play a nice middle (39-45.5)

Maybe 24-21 SF

Good Luck this weekend

GL