Ravens/Bengals Teaser???? Make them both even. What you guys think?
Ravens/Bengals Teaser????
I'll be on Pitt as one of my best plays at 1...
SB loser 4 -18 ATS in week 1 last 22 yrs...
Pitt getting 7 seems a tad too high...
Divisional match-up so I'm figuring a close low scoring game....
Steelers should be run heavy burning clock which bodes well getting g a TD.
BOL Bro
![]()
I'll be on Pitt as one of my best plays at 1...
SB loser 4 -18 ATS in week 1 last 22 yrs...
Pitt getting 7 seems a tad too high...
Divisional match-up so I'm figuring a close low scoring game....
Steelers should be run heavy burning clock which bodes well getting g a TD.
BOL Bro
![]()
@jowchoo
What does "+EV play" mean? That's some lingo I haven't heard before.
Defending champs are 19-3 SU in week 1... don't know about weeks 2 and 3, or the ATS numbers.
@jowchoo
What does "+EV play" mean? That's some lingo I haven't heard before.
Defending champs are 19-3 SU in week 1... don't know about weeks 2 and 3, or the ATS numbers.
Bengals are going to be a disappointment this year. Don't have much opinion on this week 1 game, though... but as others have pointed out, SB losers usually fall on their face in week 1.
Bengals are going to be a disappointment this year. Don't have much opinion on this week 1 game, though... but as others have pointed out, SB losers usually fall on their face in week 1.
@Duderonomy
Expected Value.... plus EV implies your wager has a greater than 50% statistical probability of covering / winning.
You are calculating the value of the odds / likelihood of a cover or win based on the actual odds and vig.
@Duderonomy
Expected Value.... plus EV implies your wager has a greater than 50% statistical probability of covering / winning.
You are calculating the value of the odds / likelihood of a cover or win based on the actual odds and vig.
@getem9
Cool... understand the concept, but never saw that lazy notation before. A little hard to believe the SB winner is a losing proposition over the first 3 weeks, given that they are 19-3 SU in week 1... but I guess it's possible.
@getem9
Cool... understand the concept, but never saw that lazy notation before. A little hard to believe the SB winner is a losing proposition over the first 3 weeks, given that they are 19-3 SU in week 1... but I guess it's possible.
@getem9 Cool... understand the concept, but never saw that lazy notation before. A little hard to believe the SB winner is a losing proposition over the first 3 weeks, given that they are 19-3 SU in week 1... but I guess it's possible.
Yes, I didn't run the numbers but I understand what you're saying ![]()
@getem9 Cool... understand the concept, but never saw that lazy notation before. A little hard to believe the SB winner is a losing proposition over the first 3 weeks, given that they are 19-3 SU in week 1... but I guess it's possible.
Yes, I didn't run the numbers but I understand what you're saying ![]()
Hot Forum Topics
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
