Yeahhhhh seems fishy though. Don't like how 65-70% of ppl are on GB and the line is moving in SEA's favour. Keep in mind travel. Wanna bet GB but will likely lay off. BOL
GB has started the first two games at Lambeau + the last time they played was last thursday..i don't think 10 days off will affect travel whatsoever.. Take GB man. BOL
0
Quote Originally Posted by CannedGoods:
Yeahhhhh seems fishy though. Don't like how 65-70% of ppl are on GB and the line is moving in SEA's favour. Keep in mind travel. Wanna bet GB but will likely lay off. BOL
GB has started the first two games at Lambeau + the last time they played was last thursday..i don't think 10 days off will affect travel whatsoever.. Take GB man. BOL
I'm the biggest packer fan on this thread and i'm laying a ton on sea +3 possibly ml aswell. cuwgolfer you are a typical narrow-minded homer and are fade material the rest of the season. bol to all
0
I'm the biggest packer fan on this thread and i'm laying a ton on sea +3 possibly ml aswell. cuwgolfer you are a typical narrow-minded homer and are fade material the rest of the season. bol to all
Fade material the rest of the year??? Haha sweet. With how I have been doing this nfl / NCAA season I dare you to fade me. I am as good as anyone on here and have shown it so far in football. Your just talking out of your ass. Fade me if you want to lose money. Yes smart man you are.... Haha such a tool
0
Fade material the rest of the year??? Haha sweet. With how I have been doing this nfl / NCAA season I dare you to fade me. I am as good as anyone on here and have shown it so far in football. Your just talking out of your ass. Fade me if you want to lose money. Yes smart man you are.... Haha such a tool
And u being the "biggest packer fan" means what exactly? I'm betting them to win $ not because they are my favorite team, but because I feel they are the better team with the better qb. But nice try though...
0
And u being the "biggest packer fan" means what exactly? I'm betting them to win $ not because they are my favorite team, but because I feel they are the better team with the better qb. But nice try though...
"I'm the biggest packer fan on this thread and i'm laying a ton on sea +3 possibly ml aswell. cuwgolfer you are a typical narrow-minded homer and are fade material the rest of the season. bol to all "
0
"I'm the biggest packer fan on this thread and i'm laying a ton on sea +3 possibly ml aswell. cuwgolfer you are a typical narrow-minded homer and are fade material the rest of the season. bol to all "
you seriously think the cardinals are good? are you serious? Hernandez got knocked out of the game and NE NEEDS to play with a 2 TE set. They always have and their offense is ran through that. It was a good win for AZ but they are not good. No. They have no QB and no RB. they will not make the playoffs so no, they are not good, and if you think they are i want some of what you are smoking
Cardinals are 2-0 how bout the pack? And they beat two quality NFL teams. Think this line is one of the biggest traps on the board. GB run defense is pooty and so is the O line. Playing against a good D and a solid RB aka "Hold My Dick". It's the seahawks or no play IMO. Regardless BOL in your wagers.
0
Quote Originally Posted by cuwgolfer:
you seriously think the cardinals are good? are you serious? Hernandez got knocked out of the game and NE NEEDS to play with a 2 TE set. They always have and their offense is ran through that. It was a good win for AZ but they are not good. No. They have no QB and no RB. they will not make the playoffs so no, they are not good, and if you think they are i want some of what you are smoking
Cardinals are 2-0 how bout the pack? And they beat two quality NFL teams. Think this line is one of the biggest traps on the board. GB run defense is pooty and so is the O line. Playing against a good D and a solid RB aka "Hold My Dick". It's the seahawks or no play IMO. Regardless BOL in your wagers.
"I'm the biggest packer fan on this thread and i'm laying a ton on sea +3 possibly ml aswell. cuwgolfer you are a typical narrow-minded homer and are fade material the rest of the season. bol to all "
And Golfer, do your "double check" again because you will wonder why SEA will come out on top in this contest. The winning game plan against GB is to keep Rodgers on the sideline. Last week, Marshawn Lynch did it 26 times for 122 yards – 100 in the second half – and the Seahawks had 182 against a Dallas defense that ranked No. 7 against the run last season and allowed the defending Super Bowl champion Giants 82 rushing yards in the season opener. The Packers are allowing averages of 140 rushing yards per game and 5.1 yards per carry. Lynch is a BEAST at home. If the line stay at SEA +3 and GB -120 or higher I will double down my bet on SEA. Plus, SEA has one of the BEST Special Team in the league. They should provide the offense with plenty of short field on kickoff to help ease the Rookie QB.
0
Quote Originally Posted by esprague:
"I'm the biggest packer fan on this thread and i'm laying a ton on sea +3 possibly ml aswell. cuwgolfer you are a typical narrow-minded homer and are fade material the rest of the season. bol to all "
And Golfer, do your "double check" again because you will wonder why SEA will come out on top in this contest. The winning game plan against GB is to keep Rodgers on the sideline. Last week, Marshawn Lynch did it 26 times for 122 yards – 100 in the second half – and the Seahawks had 182 against a Dallas defense that ranked No. 7 against the run last season and allowed the defending Super Bowl champion Giants 82 rushing yards in the season opener. The Packers are allowing averages of 140 rushing yards per game and 5.1 yards per carry. Lynch is a BEAST at home. If the line stay at SEA +3 and GB -120 or higher I will double down my bet on SEA. Plus, SEA has one of the BEST Special Team in the league. They should provide the offense with plenty of short field on kickoff to help ease the Rookie QB.
The question is really who has the better defense?? Who causes more turnovers?
Also I don't like blatantly saying that rookie QB's dont win because they did in week 2, but MNF against a focused Packer team and rested too may not be what the doc ordered for Seattle.
Trust me I love playing on Seattle home games as I did last week against the Cowgirls, but this is not a good spot for them and will end up being a valuable game lesson for Wilson in the coming years. The final score will be 27-16 and it may be close for a while but the Pack will sure find a way to get in the end zone and the noise factor may not become a big issue later in the game!
BOL
0
The question is really who has the better defense?? Who causes more turnovers?
Also I don't like blatantly saying that rookie QB's dont win because they did in week 2, but MNF against a focused Packer team and rested too may not be what the doc ordered for Seattle.
Trust me I love playing on Seattle home games as I did last week against the Cowgirls, but this is not a good spot for them and will end up being a valuable game lesson for Wilson in the coming years. The final score will be 27-16 and it may be close for a while but the Pack will sure find a way to get in the end zone and the noise factor may not become a big issue later in the game!
Haha some people on here are funny man. Let's just let the game speak for its self. I'd rather just watch the game because some people on here are clueless. I'll be back late Monday night to see what Seattle backers have to say when gb covers the spread.
0
Haha some people on here are funny man. Let's just let the game speak for its self. I'd rather just watch the game because some people on here are clueless. I'll be back late Monday night to see what Seattle backers have to say when gb covers the spread.
Haha some people on here are funny man. Let's just let the game speak for its self. I'd rather just watch the game because some people on here are clueless. I'll be back late Monday night to see what Seattle backers have to say when gb covers the spread.
we shall await on you saying "bs call, bs refs, that wasn't a TD" but the fact is, nothing is ever ez money.
0
Haha some people on here are funny man. Let's just let the game speak for its self. I'd rather just watch the game because some people on here are clueless. I'll be back late Monday night to see what Seattle backers have to say when gb covers the spread.
we shall await on you saying "bs call, bs refs, that wasn't a TD" but the fact is, nothing is ever ez money.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.