Bro you gotta be more flexible in this league, it’s more week to week than ever.. very few teams ever stop trying except the clown Dolphins the first half ( which deservedly so will cost them their season)
I’ll give it to you, you’re probably the best Monday morning QB on the forums. If you have some thoughts to share, please do so BEFORE the result is in hand.
3
Quote Originally Posted by Hoyasaxa:
Bro you gotta be more flexible in this league, it’s more week to week than ever.. very few teams ever stop trying except the clown Dolphins the first half ( which deservedly so will cost them their season)
I’ll give it to you, you’re probably the best Monday morning QB on the forums. If you have some thoughts to share, please do so BEFORE the result is in hand.
[Quote: I’ll give it to you, you’re probably the best Monday morning QB on the forums. If you have some thoughts to share, please do so BEFORE the result is in hand.[/Quote]
1
[Quote: I’ll give it to you, you’re probably the best Monday morning QB on the forums. If you have some thoughts to share, please do so BEFORE the result is in hand.[/Quote]
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw: Quote Originally Posted by lmb4321: @theclaw Like the plays but on Jags with Lucky Luciano....bol on Sunday... Understandable the Colts are shaky at this time but when the BF comes calling I will always play it. If I lose I'll fade Jags again next week.............. Even against the Jets?
Yep, great spot to fade Jags ...........
1
Quote Originally Posted by kimoinsd808:
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw: Quote Originally Posted by lmb4321: @theclaw Like the plays but on Jags with Lucky Luciano....bol on Sunday... Understandable the Colts are shaky at this time but when the BF comes calling I will always play it. If I lose I'll fade Jags again next week.............. Even against the Jets?
Bro you gotta be more flexible in this league, it’s more week to week than ever.. very few teams ever stop trying except the clown Dolphins the first half ( which deservedly so will cost them their season)
0
Quote Originally Posted by Hoyasaxa:
Bro you gotta be more flexible in this league, it’s more week to week than ever.. very few teams ever stop trying except the clown Dolphins the first half ( which deservedly so will cost them their season)
Quote Originally Posted by Hoyasaxa: Bro you gotta be more flexible in this league, it’s more week to week than ever.. very few teams ever stop trying except the clown Dolphins the first half ( which deservedly so will cost them their season) I’ll give it to you, you’re probably the best Monday morning QB on the forums. If you have some thoughts to share, please do so BEFORE the result is in hand.
0
Quote Originally Posted by incognegro:
Quote Originally Posted by Hoyasaxa: Bro you gotta be more flexible in this league, it’s more week to week than ever.. very few teams ever stop trying except the clown Dolphins the first half ( which deservedly so will cost them their season) I’ll give it to you, you’re probably the best Monday morning QB on the forums. If you have some thoughts to share, please do so BEFORE the result is in hand.
[Quote: I’ll give it to you, you’re probably the best Monday morning QB on the forums. If you have some thoughts to share, please do so BEFORE the result is in hand.
0
Quote Originally Posted by SourSausage:
[Quote: I’ll give it to you, you’re probably the best Monday morning QB on the forums. If you have some thoughts to share, please do so BEFORE the result is in hand.
Got to hand it to the Bears, they did hang in there very tough till the end.
I did have confidence Packers would stop them at the end.
At the end of the day it was the weak-point of the Bears offense that cost them the game, the QB and the passing game.
But Caleb made some incredible plays putting Bears in position. I was a bit surprised by that.
The question is, will this game losing a close 1 score game be the start of the Bears regression back to not getting so lucky in these situations ?
If Bears continue winning these close 1 score games and winning a number of games they will be coming into next season with many regression indicators to fade them next year.
Similar to Wash this season and Texans the year before.
2
Got to hand it to the Bears, they did hang in there very tough till the end.
I did have confidence Packers would stop them at the end.
At the end of the day it was the weak-point of the Bears offense that cost them the game, the QB and the passing game.
But Caleb made some incredible plays putting Bears in position. I was a bit surprised by that.
The question is, will this game losing a close 1 score game be the start of the Bears regression back to not getting so lucky in these situations ?
If Bears continue winning these close 1 score games and winning a number of games they will be coming into next season with many regression indicators to fade them next year.
Similar to Wash this season and Texans the year before.
Got to hand it to the Bears, they did hang in there very tough till the end. I did have confidence Packers would stop them at the end. At the end of the day it was the weak-point of the Bears offense that cost them the game, the QB and the passing game. But Caleb made some incredible plays putting Bears in position. I was a bit surprised by that. The question is, will this game losing a close 1 score game be the start of the Bears regression back to not getting so lucky in these situations ? If Bears continue winning these close 1 score games and winning a number of games they will be coming into next season with many regression indicators to fade them next year. Similar to Wash this season and Texans the year before.
Caleb Williams' completion percentage is a dreadful 57.8%; that is certainly fade material in a playoff game (hopefully as a juicy home favorite).
0
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw:
Got to hand it to the Bears, they did hang in there very tough till the end. I did have confidence Packers would stop them at the end. At the end of the day it was the weak-point of the Bears offense that cost them the game, the QB and the passing game. But Caleb made some incredible plays putting Bears in position. I was a bit surprised by that. The question is, will this game losing a close 1 score game be the start of the Bears regression back to not getting so lucky in these situations ? If Bears continue winning these close 1 score games and winning a number of games they will be coming into next season with many regression indicators to fade them next year. Similar to Wash this season and Texans the year before.
Caleb Williams' completion percentage is a dreadful 57.8%; that is certainly fade material in a playoff game (hopefully as a juicy home favorite).
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw: Got to hand it to the Bears, they did hang in there very tough till the end. I did have confidence Packers would stop them at the end. At the end of the day it was the weak-point of the Bears offense that cost them the game, the QB and the passing game. But Caleb made some incredible plays putting Bears in position. I was a bit surprised by that. The question is, will this game losing a close 1 score game be the start of the Bears regression back to not getting so lucky in these situations ? If Bears continue winning these close 1 score games and winning a number of games they will be coming into next season with many regression indicators to fade them next year. Similar to Wash this season and Texans the year before. Caleb Williams' completion percentage is a dreadful 57.8%; that is certainly fade material in a playoff game (hopefully as a juicy home favorite).
TC, I should have also highlighted this cogent point in my previous post. Sorry about that omission.
0
Quote Originally Posted by DogbiteWilliams:
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw: Got to hand it to the Bears, they did hang in there very tough till the end. I did have confidence Packers would stop them at the end. At the end of the day it was the weak-point of the Bears offense that cost them the game, the QB and the passing game. But Caleb made some incredible plays putting Bears in position. I was a bit surprised by that. The question is, will this game losing a close 1 score game be the start of the Bears regression back to not getting so lucky in these situations ? If Bears continue winning these close 1 score games and winning a number of games they will be coming into next season with many regression indicators to fade them next year. Similar to Wash this season and Texans the year before. Caleb Williams' completion percentage is a dreadful 57.8%; that is certainly fade material in a playoff game (hopefully as a juicy home favorite).
TC, I should have also highlighted this cogent point in my previous post. Sorry about that omission.
Got to hand it to the Bears, they did hang in there very tough till the end. I did have confidence Packers would stop them at the end. At the end of the day it was the weak-point of the Bears offense that cost them the game, the QB and the passing game. But Caleb made some incredible plays putting Bears in position. I was a bit surprised by that. The question is, will this game losing a close 1 score game be the start of the Bears regression back to not getting so lucky in these situations ? If Bears continue winning these close 1 score games and winning a number of games they will be coming into next season with many regression indicators to fade them next year. Similar to Wash this season and Texans the year before.
I think that a fair assessment of what you are asking here would be this:
If the Bears won all those close 1 score games to poor quality opponents, then I could see them losing close 1 score games to quality opponents.
That Packers game was a prime example. That Philly domination game isn't aging so well now, as the Eagles could be spinning out of control.
I also agree about Caleb. You can't hide his completion % and inaccurate throws. Eventhouh the kid makes jaw dropping throws and plays each week as well. Even Ben Johnson said it in a press conference a couple of weeks ago. Something to the tune of "we are winning in spite of our qb play, not because of it".
The Bears are a very well rounded and coached team. I don't see them getting blown out, or blowing out teams in the near future.
1
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw:
Got to hand it to the Bears, they did hang in there very tough till the end. I did have confidence Packers would stop them at the end. At the end of the day it was the weak-point of the Bears offense that cost them the game, the QB and the passing game. But Caleb made some incredible plays putting Bears in position. I was a bit surprised by that. The question is, will this game losing a close 1 score game be the start of the Bears regression back to not getting so lucky in these situations ? If Bears continue winning these close 1 score games and winning a number of games they will be coming into next season with many regression indicators to fade them next year. Similar to Wash this season and Texans the year before.
I think that a fair assessment of what you are asking here would be this:
If the Bears won all those close 1 score games to poor quality opponents, then I could see them losing close 1 score games to quality opponents.
That Packers game was a prime example. That Philly domination game isn't aging so well now, as the Eagles could be spinning out of control.
I also agree about Caleb. You can't hide his completion % and inaccurate throws. Eventhouh the kid makes jaw dropping throws and plays each week as well. Even Ben Johnson said it in a press conference a couple of weeks ago. Something to the tune of "we are winning in spite of our qb play, not because of it".
The Bears are a very well rounded and coached team. I don't see them getting blown out, or blowing out teams in the near future.
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw: Got to hand it to the Bears, they did hang in there very tough till the end. I did have confidence Packers would stop them at the end. At the end of the day it was the weak-point of the Bears offense that cost them the game, the QB and the passing game. But Caleb made some incredible plays putting Bears in position. I was a bit surprised by that. The question is, will this game losing a close 1 score game be the start of the Bears regression back to not getting so lucky in these situations ? If Bears continue winning these close 1 score games and winning a number of games they will be coming into next season with many regression indicators to fade them next year. Similar to Wash this season and Texans the year before. Caleb Williams' completion percentage is a dreadful 57.8%; that is certainly fade material in a playoff game (hopefully as a juicy home favorite).
And his QBPR is below average.................
1
Quote Originally Posted by DogbiteWilliams:
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw: Got to hand it to the Bears, they did hang in there very tough till the end. I did have confidence Packers would stop them at the end. At the end of the day it was the weak-point of the Bears offense that cost them the game, the QB and the passing game. But Caleb made some incredible plays putting Bears in position. I was a bit surprised by that. The question is, will this game losing a close 1 score game be the start of the Bears regression back to not getting so lucky in these situations ? If Bears continue winning these close 1 score games and winning a number of games they will be coming into next season with many regression indicators to fade them next year. Similar to Wash this season and Texans the year before. Caleb Williams' completion percentage is a dreadful 57.8%; that is certainly fade material in a playoff game (hopefully as a juicy home favorite).
Quote Originally Posted by DogbiteWilliams: Quote Originally Posted by theclaw: Got to hand it to the Bears, they did hang in there very tough till the end. I did have confidence Packers would stop them at the end. At the end of the day it was the weak-point of the Bears offense that cost them the game, the QB and the passing game. But Caleb made some incredible plays putting Bears in position. I was a bit surprised by that. The question is, will this game losing a close 1 score game be the start of the Bears regression back to not getting so lucky in these situations ? If Bears continue winning these close 1 score games and winning a number of games they will be coming into next season with many regression indicators to fade them next year. Similar to Wash this season and Texans the year before. Caleb Williams' completion percentage is a dreadful 57.8%; that is certainly fade material in a playoff game (hopefully as a juicy home favorite). TC, I should have also highlighted this cogent point in my previous post. Sorry about that omission.
No worries dog .............
1
Quote Originally Posted by DogbiteWilliams:
Quote Originally Posted by DogbiteWilliams: Quote Originally Posted by theclaw: Got to hand it to the Bears, they did hang in there very tough till the end. I did have confidence Packers would stop them at the end. At the end of the day it was the weak-point of the Bears offense that cost them the game, the QB and the passing game. But Caleb made some incredible plays putting Bears in position. I was a bit surprised by that. The question is, will this game losing a close 1 score game be the start of the Bears regression back to not getting so lucky in these situations ? If Bears continue winning these close 1 score games and winning a number of games they will be coming into next season with many regression indicators to fade them next year. Similar to Wash this season and Texans the year before. Caleb Williams' completion percentage is a dreadful 57.8%; that is certainly fade material in a playoff game (hopefully as a juicy home favorite). TC, I should have also highlighted this cogent point in my previous post. Sorry about that omission.
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw: Got to hand it to the Bears, they did hang in there very tough till the end. I did have confidence Packers would stop them at the end. At the end of the day it was the weak-point of the Bears offense that cost them the game, the QB and the passing game. But Caleb made some incredible plays putting Bears in position. I was a bit surprised by that. The question is, will this game losing a close 1 score game be the start of the Bears regression back to not getting so lucky in these situations ? If Bears continue winning these close 1 score games and winning a number of games they will be coming into next season with many regression indicators to fade them next year. Similar to Wash this season and Texans the year before. I think that a fair assessment of what you are asking here would be this: If the Bears won all those close 1 score games to poor quality opponents, then I could see them losing close 1 score games to quality opponents. That Packers game was a prime example. That Philly domination game isn't aging so well now, as the Eagles could be spinning out of control. I also agree about Caleb. You can't hide his completion % and inaccurate throws. Eventhouh the kid makes jaw dropping throws and plays each week as well. Even Ben Johnson said it in a press conference a couple of weeks ago. Something to the tune of "we are winning in spite of our qb play, not because of it". The Bears are a very well rounded and coached team. I don't see them getting blown out, or blowing out teams in the near future.
I noticed Bears got their run game goung around week 5 or 6 when they gained like 145 yards.
Since then the gained over 200 yards 3 times and well over 200 yards in a couple of those.
They did gain under a 100 I think twice but just a few yards under 100.
138 VS Packers.
I believe it was the Bears last TD they ran the ball down the Packers throat and Pack could not stop them. Even in that last drive they ran the ball well.
Since that week 5 or 6 game they gained 145 looks like they may have developed an identity, they weren't doing that prior to that game.
I'll run the numbers on PR II from that point and see how they rate. They did have some very strong weekly ratings in that period of time.
0
Quote Originally Posted by undermysac:
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw: Got to hand it to the Bears, they did hang in there very tough till the end. I did have confidence Packers would stop them at the end. At the end of the day it was the weak-point of the Bears offense that cost them the game, the QB and the passing game. But Caleb made some incredible plays putting Bears in position. I was a bit surprised by that. The question is, will this game losing a close 1 score game be the start of the Bears regression back to not getting so lucky in these situations ? If Bears continue winning these close 1 score games and winning a number of games they will be coming into next season with many regression indicators to fade them next year. Similar to Wash this season and Texans the year before. I think that a fair assessment of what you are asking here would be this: If the Bears won all those close 1 score games to poor quality opponents, then I could see them losing close 1 score games to quality opponents. That Packers game was a prime example. That Philly domination game isn't aging so well now, as the Eagles could be spinning out of control. I also agree about Caleb. You can't hide his completion % and inaccurate throws. Eventhouh the kid makes jaw dropping throws and plays each week as well. Even Ben Johnson said it in a press conference a couple of weeks ago. Something to the tune of "we are winning in spite of our qb play, not because of it". The Bears are a very well rounded and coached team. I don't see them getting blown out, or blowing out teams in the near future.
I noticed Bears got their run game goung around week 5 or 6 when they gained like 145 yards.
Since then the gained over 200 yards 3 times and well over 200 yards in a couple of those.
They did gain under a 100 I think twice but just a few yards under 100.
138 VS Packers.
I believe it was the Bears last TD they ran the ball down the Packers throat and Pack could not stop them. Even in that last drive they ran the ball well.
Since that week 5 or 6 game they gained 145 looks like they may have developed an identity, they weren't doing that prior to that game.
I'll run the numbers on PR II from that point and see how they rate. They did have some very strong weekly ratings in that period of time.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
