Titans +10 (-114) over Jags --- 1.14 units to win 1 unit
My new BF II fade on the Jags off 2 big blowout wins
Vikings +3.5 (-115) over Packers --- 1.15 units to win 1 unit
BF fade on Packers off a big blowout win over the Pats.
Line appears to be moving against both plays. I see 9.5's out there but juiced at -105 so +10 at -115 is still available.
Vikes at -3 easily available, I'd take that as well but always trying to get best line if possible without laying ridiculous high juice.
You could wait it out depending what happens to night but if Vikes look good line could drop.
3 is too big a number to pass it up. Possible it goes up as well if Vikings get plow-under by Bills looking ahead to the big show-down with Packers.
There was also a BF play on Ravens off a big loss but they play the Chargers who lost big as well and will be a BF play on team as well.
Which means we back the loser of the loser bowl.
Think about that people, how low will this team appear ? We will be buying at the teams lowest most humiliating point , not very likely many will want anything to do with backing this loser.
I'd likely side a little more with Ravens winning and covering this game.
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Titans +10 (-114) over Jags --- 1.14 units to win 1 unit
My new BF II fade on the Jags off 2 big blowout wins
Vikings +3.5 (-115) over Packers --- 1.15 units to win 1 unit
BF fade on Packers off a big blowout win over the Pats.
Line appears to be moving against both plays. I see 9.5's out there but juiced at -105 so +10 at -115 is still available.
Vikes at -3 easily available, I'd take that as well but always trying to get best line if possible without laying ridiculous high juice.
You could wait it out depending what happens to night but if Vikes look good line could drop.
3 is too big a number to pass it up. Possible it goes up as well if Vikings get plow-under by Bills looking ahead to the big show-down with Packers.
There was also a BF play on Ravens off a big loss but they play the Chargers who lost big as well and will be a BF play on team as well.
Which means we back the loser of the loser bowl.
Think about that people, how low will this team appear ? We will be buying at the teams lowest most humiliating point , not very likely many will want anything to do with backing this loser.
I'd likely side a little more with Ravens winning and covering this game.
Think about that people, how low will this team appear ? We will be buying at the teams lowest most humiliating point , not very likely many will want anything to do with backing this loser. I'd likely side a little more with Ravens winning and covering this game.
You're speaking my language. Betting is like stock trading and these losers will be winners once the last person jumps off the ship.
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw:
Think about that people, how low will this team appear ? We will be buying at the teams lowest most humiliating point , not very likely many will want anything to do with backing this loser. I'd likely side a little more with Ravens winning and covering this game.
You're speaking my language. Betting is like stock trading and these losers will be winners once the last person jumps off the ship.
Haven't you heard about the new kid on the block acquired from the raiders?
@theclaw
Yep! Another play I have done well with and that's to play on a dog that won the previous week (Packers +3.5 win outright against the Patriots) whom become favorites the following week in packers -3.5
Good luck this week Claw
When I win Money it's my money and NOT house money
@incognegro
Haven't you heard about the new kid on the block acquired from the raiders?
@theclaw
Yep! Another play I have done well with and that's to play on a dog that won the previous week (Packers +3.5 win outright against the Patriots) whom become favorites the following week in packers -3.5
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw: Think about that people, how low will this team appear ? We will be buying at the teams lowest most humiliating point , not very likely many will want anything to do with backing this loser. I'd likely side a little more with Ravens winning and covering this game. You're speaking my language. Betting is like stock trading and these losers will be winners once the last person jumps off the ship.
Exactly..........
Quote Originally Posted by BigNiner:
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw: Think about that people, how low will this team appear ? We will be buying at the teams lowest most humiliating point , not very likely many will want anything to do with backing this loser. I'd likely side a little more with Ravens winning and covering this game. You're speaking my language. Betting is like stock trading and these losers will be winners once the last person jumps off the ship.
@theclaw Late to the party sir Got 10-119.. PS--colts was rhe only bet last week SU n ATS...but donno why i have a sour taste in my mouth...it didnt seem like a premium pick at no point of time ...... BTW...TEN is the first 3 unit bet this season
Quote Originally Posted by JackDragonJack:
@theclaw Late to the party sir Got 10-119.. PS--colts was rhe only bet last week SU n ATS...but donno why i have a sour taste in my mouth...it didnt seem like a premium pick at no point of time ...... BTW...TEN is the first 3 unit bet this season
@incognegro Haven't you heard about the new kid on the block acquired from the raiders? @theclaw Yep! Another play I have done well with and that's to play on a dog that won the previous week (Packers +3.5 win outright against the Patriots) whom become favorites the following week in packers -3.5 Good luck this week Claw
Interesting angle ..............
Quote Originally Posted by justliketoplay:
@incognegro Haven't you heard about the new kid on the block acquired from the raiders? @theclaw Yep! Another play I have done well with and that's to play on a dog that won the previous week (Packers +3.5 win outright against the Patriots) whom become favorites the following week in packers -3.5 Good luck this week Claw