• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

    NFL Playoffs

    123 ... 8910 Next Last»
    andarmac99
    CASTORTROY
    ActionMagnet
    FadeOnly
    PrimeTimeBoys
    ...
    Participants:
    Search model icon
    Views: 28693
    Posts: 240
    123 ... 8910 Next Last»
     
    andarmac99
    andarmac99
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2007
    Posts: 16954
    Posted: Jan. 4, 2012 - 9:22 PM ET #1

    No sugarcoating the fact I was absolutely terrible this year. I thought it was going to be a big year, went 10-4 in preseason and 6-3 on win totals but my god was I bad in the regular season, not just my first losing NFL season posting on this website but I was HAMMERED. I'll have to go add it up but guess I was at least 20 games under on posted plays. I should probably be staying away but it's the playoffs so what the hell. As I said down the stretch: I encourage fading. I'm free money!


    Denver +9 (-115)

    I think we have a classic case of “Play on” vs “Play Against” elements here. Most pundits and casual fans will look at this game after seeing the past couple of weeks and will wonder how the hell do the Broncos have a chance. I think those people are missing the other side of the equation and the fact that the Steelers stink.

    I realize the Steelers have all the numbers and experience but I am not impressed with this team one bit. They were money burners this season as they were overrated from Week 1. On the road they were absolutely terrible going 2-6 ATS and winning one road game all year but more than 7 points and that was by 12 against a Zona team that started 1-6. Pittsburgh has averaged 15.6 points on the road this year and scored more than 13 points just three times in eight road games. Ben has also been terrible on the road going for 7.46 YPA, 7 TD, 10 INT with a 77.6 QB rating, he’s also been dumped 25 times on the road.  When you compare those numbers to Tebow at 6.40 YPA, 12 TD, 6 INT and a 72.9 QB rating you can see in this particular setting there isn’t a huge difference. I don’t make too much of Mendenhall being out but it probably will have an effect playing an unproven backup. Pittsburgh’s o-line is once again very shaky and in one of the loudest stadiums in the league I think they could be a liability especially with a banged up Roethlisberger who is basically playing on one leg. This should help mitigate Pittsburgh’s vertical passing game which is the only thing they do well offensively.

    The numbers will show that Pittsburgh still has a top notch defense but I beg to differ. If you dig deeper you will see this unit is nowhere near as good as they have traditionally been especially upfront. Pittsburgh gave up 4.0 yards per rush this year which is unheard of for them. They were 19th in 3rd down defense, 28th in negative pass plays, and 19th in the defensive hog index after finishing 1st last season. They also fell from 1st to 17th in sacks. You can argue injuries played a part but they will play a part here too. Woodley has played about 15 snaps in the past 7 weeks and is nowhere near 100% with a bad hammy. The thin air and low oxygen
    will not be good for him here. Clark is also out and it will be a big loss, he has played 99% of the defensive snaps this year and when Polamalu is crowding the line I expect Denver to take some shots.  I also think Denver can wear down this defensive front and the thin air may actually play a role. Most of these guys up front are in their 30’s and if the Broncos pound away they could run out of gas.

    Situationally it is a nice spot for Denver. No one thinks they have a chance. This team was very good as a dog. The last two weeks they were favored and the pressure was on but this is a completely different situation. This is very similar to the Saints/Seahawks game last year where a very overrated favorite came in and was expected to trounce a bad team. However the Saints were exposed and the Seahawks played carefree and with nothing to lose. Brian Dawkins reportedly gave this team a rousing speech on Monday. I saw the presser today and Tebow was exuding energy.  John Elway on how the Broncos played tight the last two weeks with so much on the
    line: “That’s human nature, especially when you’re young, to become more cautious.” Not anywhere close to the same situation this time. Elway on Tebow: “He’s obviously upset with last week. He’s already got an edge to him, so he’s ready to go. I like seeing the edge. Oh, yeah. I actually love it. I have full confidence he’ll bounce back and have a good week.” This is the NFL where anybody can beat anybody. Just when a team looks like they have no chance they usually come motivated and play with nothing to lose and get overlooked by the favorite. This Pittsburgh team is garbage. If they survive this week they will get slaughtered by the Ravens or Patriots next week.


    I like the card a fair bit. Will post other plays when I find time to throw down some thoughts.

    GL.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    To remove first post, remove entire topic.
    No sugarcoating the fact I was absolutely terrible this year. I thought it was going to be a big year, went 10-4 in preseason and 6-3 on win totals but my god was I bad in the regular season, not just my first losing NFL season posting on this website but I was HAMMERED. I'll have to go add it up but guess I was at least 20 games under on posted plays. I should probably be staying away but it's the playoffs so what the hell. As I said down the stretch: I encourage fading. I'm free money!


    Denver +9 (-115)

    I think we have a classic case of “Play on” vs “Play Against” elements here. Most pundits and casual fans will look at this game after seeing the past couple of weeks and will wonder how the hell do the Broncos have a chance. I think those people are missing the other side of the equation and the fact that the Steelers stink.

    I realize the Steelers have all the numbers and experience but I am not impressed with this team one bit. They were money burners this season as they were overrated from Week 1. On the road they were absolutely terrible going 2-6 ATS and winning one road game all year but more than 7 points and that was by 12 against a Zona team that started 1-6. Pittsburgh has averaged 15.6 points on the road this year and scored more than 13 points just three times in eight road games. Ben has also been terrible on the road going for 7.46 YPA, 7 TD, 10 INT with a 77.6 QB rating, he’s also been dumped 25 times on the road.  When you compare those numbers to Tebow at 6.40 YPA, 12 TD, 6 INT and a 72.9 QB rating you can see in this particular setting there isn’t a huge difference. I don’t make too much of Mendenhall being out but it probably will have an effect playing an unproven backup. Pittsburgh’s o-line is once again very shaky and in one of the loudest stadiums in the league I think they could be a liability especially with a banged up Roethlisberger who is basically playing on one leg. This should help mitigate Pittsburgh’s vertical passing game which is the only thing they do well offensively.

    The numbers will show that Pittsburgh still has a top notch defense but I beg to differ. If you dig deeper you will see this unit is nowhere near as good as they have traditionally been especially upfront. Pittsburgh gave up 4.0 yards per rush this year which is unheard of for them. They were 19th in 3rd down defense, 28th in negative pass plays, and 19th in the defensive hog index after finishing 1st last season. They also fell from 1st to 17th in sacks. You can argue injuries played a part but they will play a part here too. Woodley has played about 15 snaps in the past 7 weeks and is nowhere near 100% with a bad hammy. The thin air and low oxygen
    will not be good for him here. Clark is also out and it will be a big loss, he has played 99% of the defensive snaps this year and when Polamalu is crowding the line I expect Denver to take some shots.  I also think Denver can wear down this defensive front and the thin air may actually play a role. Most of these guys up front are in their 30’s and if the Broncos pound away they could run out of gas.

    Situationally it is a nice spot for Denver. No one thinks they have a chance. This team was very good as a dog. The last two weeks they were favored and the pressure was on but this is a completely different situation. This is very similar to the Saints/Seahawks game last year where a very overrated favorite came in and was expected to trounce a bad team. However the Saints were exposed and the Seahawks played carefree and with nothing to lose. Brian Dawkins reportedly gave this team a rousing speech on Monday. I saw the presser today and Tebow was exuding energy.  John Elway on how the Broncos played tight the last two weeks with so much on the
    line: “That’s human nature, especially when you’re young, to become more cautious.” Not anywhere close to the same situation this time. Elway on Tebow: “He’s obviously upset with last week. He’s already got an edge to him, so he’s ready to go. I like seeing the edge. Oh, yeah. I actually love it. I have full confidence he’ll bounce back and have a good week.” This is the NFL where anybody can beat anybody. Just when a team looks like they have no chance they usually come motivated and play with nothing to lose and get overlooked by the favorite. This Pittsburgh team is garbage. If they survive this week they will get slaughtered by the Ravens or Patriots next week.


    I like the card a fair bit. Will post other plays when I find time to throw down some thoughts.

    GL.
     
    CASTORTROY
    CASTORTROY
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2004
    Posts: 2110
    Posted: Jan. 4, 2012 - 9:38 PM ET #2

    Well said my man! I see a great post-season in your future with that type of in-sight!
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Well said my man! I see a great post-season in your future with that type of in-sight!
     
    ActionMagnet
    ActionMagnet
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2010
    Posts: 9704
    Posted: Jan. 4, 2012 - 9:50 PM ET #3

    Glad to see you posting Andy. Good luck with your play. I totally disagree.  Von Miller used to be the engine of that defense but he hasn't been the same since the injury and the rook has worn down from the long season. If you think KC had Tebow confused wait til Dick Lebeau schemes on Tebow.. Do you have any idea how Terrible the Denver receivers are ? Possibly the worst group in the NFL.Pitt will score early and quick. Wallace and Brown will make the big plays , those guys will score touchdowns. You're a few weeks to late for the Tebow ship. It hit an ice berg 3 weeks ago. The ship be sinking.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Glad to see you posting Andy. Good luck with your play. I totally disagree.  Von Miller used to be the engine of that defense but he hasn't been the same since the injury and the rook has worn down from the long season. If you think KC had Tebow confused wait til Dick Lebeau schemes on Tebow.. Do you have any idea how Terrible the Denver receivers are ? Possibly the worst group in the NFL.Pitt will score early and quick. Wallace and Brown will make the big plays , those guys will score touchdowns. You're a few weeks to late for the Tebow ship. It hit an ice berg 3 weeks ago. The ship be sinking.
     
    FadeOnly
    FadeOnly
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2008
    Posts: 16675
    Posted: Jan. 4, 2012 - 9:51 PM ET #4

    Quote Originally Posted by andarmac99:

     

    I think those people are missing the other side of the equation and the fact that the Steelers stink.



    This Pittsburgh team is garbage. If they survive this week they will get slaughtered by the Ravens or Patriots next week.




    Very harsh words from a capper I typically respect.  If they cost you money during the season then I'm sorry for your losses but to 'play against' them in the post season as a form of trying to recoup what they took from you, well that just isn't smart.  I know you didn't state that but that's how it reads.  I'm not saying you have a loser here but this Steelers team is accustomed to playing road playoff games, this is not new for them.  Who this is very new for is Tim Tebow and the often talked about Denver defense.  If the Steelers are "garbage" what does that make the Broncos?  

    Good luck, 99.  
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by andarmac99:

     

    I think those people are missing the other side of the equation and the fact that the Steelers stink.



    This Pittsburgh team is garbage. If they survive this week they will get slaughtered by the Ravens or Patriots next week.




    Very harsh words from a capper I typically respect.  If they cost you money during the season then I'm sorry for your losses but to 'play against' them in the post season as a form of trying to recoup what they took from you, well that just isn't smart.  I know you didn't state that but that's how it reads.  I'm not saying you have a loser here but this Steelers team is accustomed to playing road playoff games, this is not new for them.  Who this is very new for is Tim Tebow and the often talked about Denver defense.  If the Steelers are "garbage" what does that make the Broncos?  

    Good luck, 99.  
     
    ActionMagnet
    ActionMagnet
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2010
    Posts: 9704
    Posted: Jan. 4, 2012 - 9:56 PM ET #5

    Fadeonly-  fade Andy and cash in buddy. He seems to forget that Pitt destroyed the Patriots and shut that offense down yet he thinks Tebow who completes any where from 5-8 passes per game is going to come out and bring it Many ppl who are on Denver took Pitt vs SF a few weeks ago so they're upset. Final score 28-7
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Fadeonly-  fade Andy and cash in buddy. He seems to forget that Pitt destroyed the Patriots and shut that offense down yet he thinks Tebow who completes any where from 5-8 passes per game is going to come out and bring it Many ppl who are on Denver took Pitt vs SF a few weeks ago so they're upset. Final score 28-7
     
    PrimeTimeBoys
    PrimeTimeBoys
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2007
    Posts: 13343
    Posted: Jan. 4, 2012 - 10:10 PM ET #6

    Quote Originally Posted by ActionMagnet:

    Fadeonly-  fade Andy and cash in buddy. He seems to forget that Pitt destroyed the Patriots and shut that offense down yet he thinks Tebow who completes any where from 5-8 passes per game is going to come out and bring it Many ppl who are on Denver took Pitt vs SF a few weeks ago so they're upset. Final score 28-7


    I hope the Steelers do win bit dont cover............I want to see Steelers go into New England & play the offensive juggernaut of Brady & company, he will light up the limping Ben..............
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by ActionMagnet:

    Fadeonly-  fade Andy and cash in buddy. He seems to forget that Pitt destroyed the Patriots and shut that offense down yet he thinks Tebow who completes any where from 5-8 passes per game is going to come out and bring it Many ppl who are on Denver took Pitt vs SF a few weeks ago so they're upset. Final score 28-7


    I hope the Steelers do win bit dont cover............I want to see Steelers go into New England & play the offensive juggernaut of Brady & company, he will light up the limping Ben..............
     
    andarmac99
    andarmac99
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2007
    Posts: 16954
    Posted: Jan. 4, 2012 - 10:50 PM ET #7

    Quote Originally Posted by ActionMagnet:

    Glad to see you posting Andy. Good luck with your play. I totally disagree.  Von Miller used to be the engine of that defense but he hasn't been the same since the injury and the rook has worn down from the long season. If you think KC had Tebow confused wait til Dick Lebeau schemes on Tebow.. Do you have any idea how Terrible the Denver receivers are ? Possibly the worst group in the NFL.Pitt will score early and quick. Wallace and Brown will make the big plays , those guys will score touchdowns. You're a few weeks to late for the Tebow ship. It hit an ice berg 3 weeks ago. The ship be sinking.


    Good point about Von Miller. I'm not so sure it was the rookie wall but he has struggled and was actually benched last week for poor play. He's struggled to get off blocks playing with a cast on his hand. I think the benching was a wake up call and he'll play well this week.

    Wallace and Brown definitely a big concern but Brown has not scored a TD on the road all season and Wallace has disappeared. He has not scored since Week 13, has not caught more than 6 passes since Week 8, and hasn't had more than 82 yards in a game since Week 7.


    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by ActionMagnet:

    Glad to see you posting Andy. Good luck with your play. I totally disagree.  Von Miller used to be the engine of that defense but he hasn't been the same since the injury and the rook has worn down from the long season. If you think KC had Tebow confused wait til Dick Lebeau schemes on Tebow.. Do you have any idea how Terrible the Denver receivers are ? Possibly the worst group in the NFL.Pitt will score early and quick. Wallace and Brown will make the big plays , those guys will score touchdowns. You're a few weeks to late for the Tebow ship. It hit an ice berg 3 weeks ago. The ship be sinking.


    Good point about Von Miller. I'm not so sure it was the rookie wall but he has struggled and was actually benched last week for poor play. He's struggled to get off blocks playing with a cast on his hand. I think the benching was a wake up call and he'll play well this week.

    Wallace and Brown definitely a big concern but Brown has not scored a TD on the road all season and Wallace has disappeared. He has not scored since Week 13, has not caught more than 6 passes since Week 8, and hasn't had more than 82 yards in a game since Week 7.


     
    andarmac99
    andarmac99
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2007
    Posts: 16954
    Posted: Jan. 4, 2012 - 10:57 PM ET #8

    Quote Originally Posted by FadeOnly:



    Very harsh words from a capper I typically respect.  If they cost you money during the season then I'm sorry for your losses but to 'play against' them in the post season as a form of trying to recoup what they took from you, well that just isn't smart.  I know you didn't state that but that's how it reads.  I'm not saying you have a loser here but this Steelers team is accustomed to playing road playoff games, this is not new for them.  Who this is very new for is Tim Tebow and the often talked about Denver defense.  If the Steelers are "garbage" what does that make the Broncos?  

    Good luck, 99.  


    Maybe the words are a bit harsh but I really don't think much of this group. Pittsburgh was one of the few teams I actually had a good read on this season. I faded them against the Ravens and Texans and bet on them against the Seahawks and Patriots (though I did tease them in the Pats game in a teaser which ultimately lost). Perhaps I should have said "highly overrated' instead.

    I'm not sure Pittsburgh is accustomed to playing road playoff games though, they haven't played one in 6 years. Always tough backing a rookie QB in a playoff game but I think it's a big help that he really has no pressure on him here, most are expecting him to take a big dump.

    GL. Though if you are on Pittsburgh you won't need it with the way I've been this year.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by FadeOnly:



    Very harsh words from a capper I typically respect.  If they cost you money during the season then I'm sorry for your losses but to 'play against' them in the post season as a form of trying to recoup what they took from you, well that just isn't smart.  I know you didn't state that but that's how it reads.  I'm not saying you have a loser here but this Steelers team is accustomed to playing road playoff games, this is not new for them.  Who this is very new for is Tim Tebow and the often talked about Denver defense.  If the Steelers are "garbage" what does that make the Broncos?  

    Good luck, 99.  


    Maybe the words are a bit harsh but I really don't think much of this group. Pittsburgh was one of the few teams I actually had a good read on this season. I faded them against the Ravens and Texans and bet on them against the Seahawks and Patriots (though I did tease them in the Pats game in a teaser which ultimately lost). Perhaps I should have said "highly overrated' instead.

    I'm not sure Pittsburgh is accustomed to playing road playoff games though, they haven't played one in 6 years. Always tough backing a rookie QB in a playoff game but I think it's a big help that he really has no pressure on him here, most are expecting him to take a big dump.

    GL. Though if you are on Pittsburgh you won't need it with the way I've been this year.
     
    nepatriots_12
    nepatriots_12
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2008
    Posts: 2304
    Posted: Jan. 4, 2012 - 11:03 PM ET #9

    Wooooo Andy is back! And with a bang! Love the play buddy, great writeup. I will be on the Broncs ML also.

    My favorite play of the week is the Falcons +3 and ML though...any thoughts on that game?

    And leans for the other 2 also?

    Great to see u back again...let's hope for a big playoff run!


    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Wooooo Andy is back! And with a bang! Love the play buddy, great writeup. I will be on the Broncs ML also.

    My favorite play of the week is the Falcons +3 and ML though...any thoughts on that game?

    And leans for the other 2 also?

    Great to see u back again...let's hope for a big playoff run!


     
    andarmac99
    andarmac99
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2007
    Posts: 16954
    Posted: Jan. 4, 2012 - 11:05 PM ET #10

    Quote Originally Posted by ActionMagnet:

    Fadeonly-  fade Andy and cash in buddy. He seems to forget that Pitt destroyed the Patriots and shut that offense down yet he thinks Tebow who completes any where from 5-8 passes per game is going to come out and bring it Many ppl who are on Denver took Pitt vs SF a few weeks ago so they're upset. Final score 28-7


    I've been encouraging people to fade me in the NFL for weeks. I hope more do the same this week they will probably cash in.

    That Patriots game was the lone win I was impressed with from the Steelers this year although that was a major statement game for them and I said it at the time. I foolishly teased them instead of just taking the points & ML. I think we saw the real Steelers the very next week when Joe Flacco marched it right down their throats for a 92 yard GW TD drive in the 4th quarter at home on SNF. Big red flag for me there.

    The thing you're forgetting is Denver doesn't even have to put up 20+ points. Pittsburgh has scored more than 13 points just three times on the road all year. Now they are being asked to win by double digits on the road in a playoff game? I don't buy it. If Denver gets 10 points the Steelers need 20 to cover. Can they get 20? Baltimore will manhandle this team and something tells me the Patriots are going to make a statement against whoever they play next week. If Pittsburgh goes there it will also be a big revenge game and Belichick is lights out in those spots.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by ActionMagnet:

    Fadeonly-  fade Andy and cash in buddy. He seems to forget that Pitt destroyed the Patriots and shut that offense down yet he thinks Tebow who completes any where from 5-8 passes per game is going to come out and bring it Many ppl who are on Denver took Pitt vs SF a few weeks ago so they're upset. Final score 28-7


    I've been encouraging people to fade me in the NFL for weeks. I hope more do the same this week they will probably cash in.

    That Patriots game was the lone win I was impressed with from the Steelers this year although that was a major statement game for them and I said it at the time. I foolishly teased them instead of just taking the points & ML. I think we saw the real Steelers the very next week when Joe Flacco marched it right down their throats for a 92 yard GW TD drive in the 4th quarter at home on SNF. Big red flag for me there.

    The thing you're forgetting is Denver doesn't even have to put up 20+ points. Pittsburgh has scored more than 13 points just three times on the road all year. Now they are being asked to win by double digits on the road in a playoff game? I don't buy it. If Denver gets 10 points the Steelers need 20 to cover. Can they get 20? Baltimore will manhandle this team and something tells me the Patriots are going to make a statement against whoever they play next week. If Pittsburgh goes there it will also be a big revenge game and Belichick is lights out in those spots.
     
    andarmac99
    andarmac99
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2007
    Posts: 16954
    Posted: Jan. 4, 2012 - 11:15 PM ET #11

    Quote Originally Posted by nepatriots_12:

    Wooooo Andy is back! And with a bang! Love the play buddy, great writeup. I will be on the Broncs ML also.

    My favorite play of the week is the Falcons +3 and ML though...any thoughts on that game?

    And leans for the other 2 also?

    Great to see u back again...let's hope for a big playoff run!




    Good to see you buddy.

    When the matchups were first set I loved the Falcons. But the more I look at this game the more I think my money will be on the Giants despite their inconsistencies. They are a much different team when healthy, just waiting to see if Ballard is good to go. This team is battle tested too and I love that this time of year. They could have quit on numerous occasions this year but battled their way back and showed tremendous fight against a monster schedule. I haven't really looked hard at the other two games yet but I am leaning Houston.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by nepatriots_12:

    Wooooo Andy is back! And with a bang! Love the play buddy, great writeup. I will be on the Broncs ML also.

    My favorite play of the week is the Falcons +3 and ML though...any thoughts on that game?

    And leans for the other 2 also?

    Great to see u back again...let's hope for a big playoff run!




    Good to see you buddy.

    When the matchups were first set I loved the Falcons. But the more I look at this game the more I think my money will be on the Giants despite their inconsistencies. They are a much different team when healthy, just waiting to see if Ballard is good to go. This team is battle tested too and I love that this time of year. They could have quit on numerous occasions this year but battled their way back and showed tremendous fight against a monster schedule. I haven't really looked hard at the other two games yet but I am leaning Houston.
     
    nepatriots_12
    nepatriots_12
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2008
    Posts: 2304
    Posted: Jan. 4, 2012 - 11:24 PM ET #12

    Fair enough...I had a long talk with MTBaker about the Falcons game...and we both agreed it was one of our biggest plays of the year. Check his writeup and see what you think.

    Also, will you be playing the Broncos ML also? I think there's great value there and if it's a tight game, I think "Tebow magic" will pull it out at the end.

    Any teams that stick out to you as going all the way? Like the Packers last year? I hope my Pats win it but I think they lose a close one to the Ravens in the Conference Finals...I think their D steps up in the playoffs but something just seems a bit off with them this year with all their slow starts and come from behind wins. In the NFC, of course there's the Saints...but everyone and their moms is lining up to bet them and even beat the Packers. I have a hard time seeing them winning back to back road games in SF and then GB. I wouldn't be surprised if the Packers went to the Bowl again.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Fair enough...I had a long talk with MTBaker about the Falcons game...and we both agreed it was one of our biggest plays of the year. Check his writeup and see what you think.

    Also, will you be playing the Broncos ML also? I think there's great value there and if it's a tight game, I think "Tebow magic" will pull it out at the end.

    Any teams that stick out to you as going all the way? Like the Packers last year? I hope my Pats win it but I think they lose a close one to the Ravens in the Conference Finals...I think their D steps up in the playoffs but something just seems a bit off with them this year with all their slow starts and come from behind wins. In the NFC, of course there's the Saints...but everyone and their moms is lining up to bet them and even beat the Packers. I have a hard time seeing them winning back to back road games in SF and then GB. I wouldn't be surprised if the Packers went to the Bowl again.
     
    James_Dean
    James_Dean
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2006
    Posts: 1976
    Posted: Jan. 4, 2012 - 11:28 PM ET #13

    Nice write-up buddy.  Good to see you back around.  I'll probably be with you.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Nice write-up buddy.  Good to see you back around.  I'll probably be with you.
     
    pjrez
    pjrez
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 4044
    Posted: Jan. 5, 2012 - 1:17 AM ET #14

    Good luck
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Good luck
     
    BigNiner
    BigNiner
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2002
    Posts: 8230
    Posted: Jan. 5, 2012 - 1:28 AM ET #15

    Quote Originally Posted by andarmac99:

    No sugarcoating the fact I was absolutely terrible this year. I thought it was going to be a big year, went 10-4 in preseason and 6-3 on win totals but my god was I bad in the regular season, not just my first losing NFL season posting on this website but I was HAMMERED. I'll have to go add it up but guess I was at least 20 games under on posted plays. I should probably be staying away but it's the playoffs so what the hell. As I said down the stretch: I encourage fading. I'm free money!


    Denver +9 (-115)

    I think we have a classic case of “Play on” vs “Play Against” elements here. Most pundits and casual fans will look at this game after seeing the past couple of weeks and will wonder how the hell do the Broncos have a chance. I think those people are missing the other side of the equation and the fact that the Steelers stink.

    I realize the Steelers have all the numbers and experience but I am not impressed with this team one bit. They were money burners this season as they were overrated from Week 1. On the road they were absolutely terrible going 2-6 ATS and winning one road game all year but more than 7 points and that was by 12 against a Zona team that started 1-6. Pittsburgh has averaged 15.6 points on the road this year and scored more than 13 points just three times in eight road games. Ben has also been terrible on the road going for 7.46 YPA, 7 TD, 10 INT with a 77.6 QB rating, he’s also been dumped 25 times on the road.  When you compare those numbers to Tebow at 6.40 YPA, 12 TD, 6 INT and a 72.9 QB rating you can see in this particular setting there isn’t a huge difference. I don’t make too much of Mendenhall being out but it probably will have an effect playing an unproven backup. Pittsburgh’s o-line is once again very shaky and in one of the loudest stadiums in the league I think they could be a liability especially with a banged up Roethlisberger who is basically playing on one leg. This should help mitigate Pittsburgh’s vertical passing game which is the only thing they do well offensively.

    The numbers will show that Pittsburgh still has a top notch defense but I beg to differ. If you dig deeper you will see this unit is nowhere near as good as they have traditionally been especially upfront. Pittsburgh gave up 4.0 yards per rush this year which is unheard of for them. They were 19th in 3rd down defense, 28th in negative pass plays, and 19th in the defensive hog index after finishing 1st last season. They also fell from 1st to 17th in sacks. You can argue injuries played a part but they will play a part here too. Woodley has played about 15 snaps in the past 7 weeks and is nowhere near 100% with a bad hammy. The thin air and low oxygen
    will not be good for him here. Clark is also out and it will be a big loss, he has played 99% of the defensive snaps this year and when Polamalu is crowding the line I expect Denver to take some shots.  I also think Denver can wear down this defensive front and the thin air may actually play a role. Most of these guys up front are in their 30’s and if the Broncos pound away they could run out of gas.

    Situationally it is a nice spot for Denver. No one thinks they have a chance. This team was very good as a dog. The last two weeks they were favored and the pressure was on but this is a completely different situation. This is very similar to the Saints/Seahawks game last year where a very overrated favorite came in and was expected to trounce a bad team. However the Saints were exposed and the Seahawks played carefree and with nothing to lose. Brian Dawkins reportedly gave this team a rousing speech on Monday. I saw the presser today and Tebow was exuding energy.  John Elway on how the Broncos played tight the last two weeks with so much on the
    line: “That’s human nature, especially when you’re young, to become more cautious.” Not anywhere close to the same situation this time. Elway on Tebow: “He’s obviously upset with last week. He’s already got an edge to him, so he’s ready to go. I like seeing the edge. Oh, yeah. I actually love it. I have full confidence he’ll bounce back and have a good week.” This is the NFL where anybody can beat anybody. Just when a team looks like they have no chance they usually come motivated and play with nothing to lose and get overlooked by the favorite. This Pittsburgh team is garbage. If they survive this week they will get slaughtered by the Ravens or Patriots next week.


    I like the card a fair bit. Will post other plays when I find time to throw down some thoughts.

    GL.

    Holy shit bro. Missed your post before I made mine. You are reading my mind brother. One of the best writeups I've seen all year. Everything I wanted to add later you already said and stated perfectly. Well done my friend

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by andarmac99:

    No sugarcoating the fact I was absolutely terrible this year. I thought it was going to be a big year, went 10-4 in preseason and 6-3 on win totals but my god was I bad in the regular season, not just my first losing NFL season posting on this website but I was HAMMERED. I'll have to go add it up but guess I was at least 20 games under on posted plays. I should probably be staying away but it's the playoffs so what the hell. As I said down the stretch: I encourage fading. I'm free money!


    Denver +9 (-115)

    I think we have a classic case of “Play on” vs “Play Against” elements here. Most pundits and casual fans will look at this game after seeing the past couple of weeks and will wonder how the hell do the Broncos have a chance. I think those people are missing the other side of the equation and the fact that the Steelers stink.

    I realize the Steelers have all the numbers and experience but I am not impressed with this team one bit. They were money burners this season as they were overrated from Week 1. On the road they were absolutely terrible going 2-6 ATS and winning one road game all year but more than 7 points and that was by 12 against a Zona team that started 1-6. Pittsburgh has averaged 15.6 points on the road this year and scored more than 13 points just three times in eight road games. Ben has also been terrible on the road going for 7.46 YPA, 7 TD, 10 INT with a 77.6 QB rating, he’s also been dumped 25 times on the road.  When you compare those numbers to Tebow at 6.40 YPA, 12 TD, 6 INT and a 72.9 QB rating you can see in this particular setting there isn’t a huge difference. I don’t make too much of Mendenhall being out but it probably will have an effect playing an unproven backup. Pittsburgh’s o-line is once again very shaky and in one of the loudest stadiums in the league I think they could be a liability especially with a banged up Roethlisberger who is basically playing on one leg. This should help mitigate Pittsburgh’s vertical passing game which is the only thing they do well offensively.

    The numbers will show that Pittsburgh still has a top notch defense but I beg to differ. If you dig deeper you will see this unit is nowhere near as good as they have traditionally been especially upfront. Pittsburgh gave up 4.0 yards per rush this year which is unheard of for them. They were 19th in 3rd down defense, 28th in negative pass plays, and 19th in the defensive hog index after finishing 1st last season. They also fell from 1st to 17th in sacks. You can argue injuries played a part but they will play a part here too. Woodley has played about 15 snaps in the past 7 weeks and is nowhere near 100% with a bad hammy. The thin air and low oxygen
    will not be good for him here. Clark is also out and it will be a big loss, he has played 99% of the defensive snaps this year and when Polamalu is crowding the line I expect Denver to take some shots.  I also think Denver can wear down this defensive front and the thin air may actually play a role. Most of these guys up front are in their 30’s and if the Broncos pound away they could run out of gas.

    Situationally it is a nice spot for Denver. No one thinks they have a chance. This team was very good as a dog. The last two weeks they were favored and the pressure was on but this is a completely different situation. This is very similar to the Saints/Seahawks game last year where a very overrated favorite came in and was expected to trounce a bad team. However the Saints were exposed and the Seahawks played carefree and with nothing to lose. Brian Dawkins reportedly gave this team a rousing speech on Monday. I saw the presser today and Tebow was exuding energy.  John Elway on how the Broncos played tight the last two weeks with so much on the
    line: “That’s human nature, especially when you’re young, to become more cautious.” Not anywhere close to the same situation this time. Elway on Tebow: “He’s obviously upset with last week. He’s already got an edge to him, so he’s ready to go. I like seeing the edge. Oh, yeah. I actually love it. I have full confidence he’ll bounce back and have a good week.” This is the NFL where anybody can beat anybody. Just when a team looks like they have no chance they usually come motivated and play with nothing to lose and get overlooked by the favorite. This Pittsburgh team is garbage. If they survive this week they will get slaughtered by the Ravens or Patriots next week.


    I like the card a fair bit. Will post other plays when I find time to throw down some thoughts.

    GL.

    Holy shit bro. Missed your post before I made mine. You are reading my mind brother. One of the best writeups I've seen all year. Everything I wanted to add later you already said and stated perfectly. Well done my friend

     
    metalbill
    metalbill
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2008
    Posts: 3310
    Posted: Jan. 5, 2012 - 1:29 AM ET #16

    keep your chin up, this was my worst year in the nfl as well. not like that will make you feel any better. you have your rsi/ pick history up for the world to see. i don't care how bad your year was, i have respect for that. i'm not 100% on your pick, but i wouldn't call you crazy for taking denver at 9. steelers are banged up, they just wanna win and go home. bol 2 ya man.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    keep your chin up, this was my worst year in the nfl as well. not like that will make you feel any better. you have your rsi/ pick history up for the world to see. i don't care how bad your year was, i have respect for that. i'm not 100% on your pick, but i wouldn't call you crazy for taking denver at 9. steelers are banged up, they just wanna win and go home. bol 2 ya man.
     
    Skipster
    Skipster
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2007
    Posts: 6422
    Posted: Jan. 5, 2012 - 1:38 AM ET #17

    It's either Tebow or no play for me and I've been fading the guy for a month now. 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    It's either Tebow or no play for me and I've been fading the guy for a month now. 
     
    mtbaker
    mtbaker
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2010
    Posts: 10063
    Posted: Jan. 5, 2012 - 2:13 AM ET #18

    Quote Originally Posted by andarmac99:



    Good to see you buddy.

    When the matchups were first set I loved the Falcons. But the more I look at this game the more I think my money will be on the Giants despite their inconsistencies. They are a much different team when healthy, just waiting to see if Ballard is good to go. This team is battle tested too and I love that this time of year. They could have quit on numerous occasions this year but battled their way back and showed tremendous fight against a monster schedule. I haven't really looked hard at the other two games yet but I am leaning Houston.

    You could say the exact same thing about the Steelers but you obviously dug deeper into and found a better play on the game. 

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by andarmac99:



    Good to see you buddy.

    When the matchups were first set I loved the Falcons. But the more I look at this game the more I think my money will be on the Giants despite their inconsistencies. They are a much different team when healthy, just waiting to see if Ballard is good to go. This team is battle tested too and I love that this time of year. They could have quit on numerous occasions this year but battled their way back and showed tremendous fight against a monster schedule. I haven't really looked hard at the other two games yet but I am leaning Houston.

    You could say the exact same thing about the Steelers but you obviously dug deeper into and found a better play on the game. 

     
    SettleDownSpaz
    SettleDownSpaz
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2004
    Posts: 17360
    Posted: Jan. 5, 2012 - 9:17 AM ET #19

    Mac - we share the same thoughts on this.  Great writeup as always. I'll be expecting a nibbling on that ML
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Mac - we share the same thoughts on this.  Great writeup as always. I'll be expecting a nibbling on that ML
     
    cambyspree99
    cambyspree99
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2009
    Posts: 12262
    Posted: Jan. 5, 2012 - 11:45 AM ET #20

    BALLARD IS PLAYING AND GIANTS WILL WIN BY 10
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    BALLARD IS PLAYING AND GIANTS WILL WIN BY 10
     
    keepitstrict
    keepitstrict
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2009
    Posts: 11114
    Posted: Jan. 5, 2012 - 12:01 PM ET #21

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
     
    andarmac99
    andarmac99
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2007
    Posts: 16954
    Posted: Jan. 5, 2012 - 3:39 PM ET #22

    Houston -3

    It's been a nice year for the Bengals but I think this team overachieved. They did finish with a winning record but they were just +3 in yards per game and were actually even in net yards per play. The schedule did get tougher down the stretch but this team seemed to hit a bit of a wall as they covered just one spread in their final eight games. Their run defense has also been leaking oil. They lost defenisve tackle Pat Sims for the final five games of the year and since then they have given up 131 rushing yards per game at 4.85 per clip. Andy Dalton has had a very impressive rookie season but he's faced 6 top level defenses this year (PIT twice, BAL twice, HOU, and SF) and in those games he's completed 51.7% of his passes for 6.17 YPA with 5 TD, 7 INT and a 64.8 QB rating.

    The Texans obviously finished horribly although losing Wade Phillips for a couple of games coupled with clinching the division and maybe losing a little spark certainly played a part. I have no argument for the Texans schedule as they really didn't play too many tough teams. It could be said though that this Bengals team in their current state in a road playoff game isn't really a dominate team either. Yates is a concern although this isn't a game where he'll be asked to throw a lot as it is unlikely the Bengals jump out to a big lead, they just aren't that type of team. The Texans run game is dominate and they have a great defense going against a rookie QB who has struggled against these types of defenses. On paper I think it is a very nice matchup for the Texans and that seemed to play itself out when these teams played a few weeks ago. Houston did need to come from behind to win that game but they were +9 in 1st downs, +137 in yards, +3.30 minutes TOP, and still won despite being -2 in turnovers.

    I also like the spot for Houston. This team has waited forever for a home playoff game and I expect this crowd to be absolutely nuts and the Texans to be exceptionally fired up. This could cause problems for a young Bengals offense especially because the Texans pass rush which is very good may feed off the crowd.


    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Houston -3

    It's been a nice year for the Bengals but I think this team overachieved. They did finish with a winning record but they were just +3 in yards per game and were actually even in net yards per play. The schedule did get tougher down the stretch but this team seemed to hit a bit of a wall as they covered just one spread in their final eight games. Their run defense has also been leaking oil. They lost defenisve tackle Pat Sims for the final five games of the year and since then they have given up 131 rushing yards per game at 4.85 per clip. Andy Dalton has had a very impressive rookie season but he's faced 6 top level defenses this year (PIT twice, BAL twice, HOU, and SF) and in those games he's completed 51.7% of his passes for 6.17 YPA with 5 TD, 7 INT and a 64.8 QB rating.

    The Texans obviously finished horribly although losing Wade Phillips for a couple of games coupled with clinching the division and maybe losing a little spark certainly played a part. I have no argument for the Texans schedule as they really didn't play too many tough teams. It could be said though that this Bengals team in their current state in a road playoff game isn't really a dominate team either. Yates is a concern although this isn't a game where he'll be asked to throw a lot as it is unlikely the Bengals jump out to a big lead, they just aren't that type of team. The Texans run game is dominate and they have a great defense going against a rookie QB who has struggled against these types of defenses. On paper I think it is a very nice matchup for the Texans and that seemed to play itself out when these teams played a few weeks ago. Houston did need to come from behind to win that game but they were +9 in 1st downs, +137 in yards, +3.30 minutes TOP, and still won despite being -2 in turnovers.

    I also like the spot for Houston. This team has waited forever for a home playoff game and I expect this crowd to be absolutely nuts and the Texans to be exceptionally fired up. This could cause problems for a young Bengals offense especially because the Texans pass rush which is very good may feed off the crowd.


     
    andarmac99
    andarmac99
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2007
    Posts: 16954
    Posted: Jan. 5, 2012 - 3:44 PM ET #23

    ^^^^^ I forgot to add that the Texans have been very resilient all season. They have lost just about every important player for stretches this year (and in some cases the whole year) but they have called on the next man up and have responded well. I know it could be argued that they could be deflated after losing three straight and really looking like they have no shot to win the Super Bowl but I think they step up and respond after three straight defeats and give the city it's first playoff win in a very long time.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    ^^^^^ I forgot to add that the Texans have been very resilient all season. They have lost just about every important player for stretches this year (and in some cases the whole year) but they have called on the next man up and have responded well. I know it could be argued that they could be deflated after losing three straight and really looking like they have no shot to win the Super Bowl but I think they step up and respond after three straight defeats and give the city it's first playoff win in a very long time.
     
    phark
    phark
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2002
    Posts: 5187
    Posted: Jan. 5, 2012 - 3:44 PM ET #24

    Solid write ups Dude...Like the plays so far.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Solid write ups Dude...Like the plays so far.

     
     
    WilliamMunny
    WilliamMunny
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2005
    Posts: 4244
    Posted: Jan. 5, 2012 - 4:59 PM ET #25

    Pitt O is a disaster so taking the points is the wise move. Pitt O has avg 13 pts per last 4. If Ben plays the whole game its an easy cover. I honestly think a healthy Batch is a better option for Pitt. i think the under is an even better play. Like Hou also GL
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Pitt O is a disaster so taking the points is the wise move. Pitt O has avg 13 pts per last 4. If Ben plays the whole game its an easy cover. I honestly think a healthy Batch is a better option for Pitt. i think the under is an even better play. Like Hou also GL
    All Forums | NFL Betting Forum
    123 ... 8910 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 445,783 Covers arrow
    • Tuesday 09/08/2026 977 Covers arrow
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 253,244 Covers arrow
    • Couple thoughts 3,952 Covers arrow
    • 9/8 POD 🔥🔥???? 3,447 Covers arrow
    • Tuesday 2,830 Covers arrow
    • Breathtaking ....truly 20,479 Covers arrow
    • We have picked a terrible time to have the stupidest president ever 26,699 Covers arrow
    • Obviously the true face of the republican party 30,558 Covers arrow
    • PART DEUX 215 Covers arrow

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.