All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

Ive created a football program that ive tested and want to share

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 217735
Posts: 683
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 4050
Posted: #401
Quote Originally Posted by AFNfootballnerd:

Quinnsky the numbers matchup for Jets Titans are all negative in every category...there's nothing that stands out for a wager

need to listen my own advise...it's just the degenerate in me I can't help it...
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 4050
Posted: #402
Week16 a lot of low line spreads but certain games I'm not touching like giants laying an egg last week and joe flacco? credit to cappers trying to cap that giants and ravens this week 

Picks....

Lions +4
Bengals +4
Saints +3 (large)
Seahawks PK (large)

Nearing the end of season so I like to up my wagers on confident picks based off the program numbers 


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 1244
Posted: #403
GL A.F.N.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 595
Posted: #404
whats the programs record?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 4842
Posted: #405


agree on Lions and Saints!!!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 249
Posted: #406
Can you give us the percentages if it's not too much trouble?  Thanks
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 249
Posted: #407
I'm shocked that it picked the Lions to cover against Atlanta.  If I remember correct the system does not take into account injuries because Nick Fairley was placed on IR and Broyles is also injured and Titus Young has been kicked off the team.  Let me know if it accounts for injuries?  Thanks

Bengals
Saints
Seahawks
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 24
Posted: #408
Quote Originally Posted by JAl239:

I'm shocked that it picked the Lions to cover against Atlanta.  If I remember correct the system does not take into account injuries because Nick Fairley was placed on IR and Broyles is also injured and Titus Young has been kicked off the team.  Let me know if it accounts for injuries?  Thanks

Bengals
Saints
Seahawks




Just do a 4 team round robin . I have doing that the last month $$$
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 4050
Posted: #409
Quote Originally Posted by JAl239:

I'm shocked that it picked the Lions to cover against Atlanta.  If I remember correct the system does not take into account injuries because Nick Fairley was placed on IR and Broyles is also injured and Titus Young has been kicked off the team.  Let me know if it accounts for injuries?  Thanks

Bengals
Saints
Seahawks
 

Yes the program does take in account injuries which is why the Detroit offense numbers have dropped prior to the numbers they had on thanksgiving...Lions have better percentage numbers on offense but a decent defense...I will always wager on a home dog that has a higher offense percentage...plus a game on a Saturday isn't natural and I'm capping this game like a bowl game at home for the lions...
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 16
Posted: #410
Quote Originally Posted by AFNfootballnerd:


need to listen my own advise...it's just the degenerate in me I can't help it...

 

AFN---Your not alone.......I was on the Jets also....Merry Christmas and Happy New Year. I look forward to reading your thread. Keep up the great work.

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 15772
Posted: #411
Seabirds?
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 15813
Posted: #412
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 4050
Posted: #413
Quote Originally Posted by Crashdavis565:

Seabirds?
Both teams have the same numbers On defense and offense...But the niners are ranked 31 just consistency Seahawks ranked 13...Giants are ranked 32 the worst in the league and they crashed and burned last week...I expect to see the same from the niners this week ranked 31 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 566
Posted: #414
HOW CAN YOU BE RANKED 31ST IN CONSISTENCY WITH A 10-3-1 RECORD?
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 6422
Posted: #415
Quote Originally Posted by forkball:

HOW CAN YOU BE RANKED 31ST IN CONSISTENCY WITH A 10-3-1 RECORD?

it's a legitimate question. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 4050
Posted: #416
Lost to Minnesota...can't beat the rams and put up only 3 points against the giants game in San fran? But can go in New England and get a win?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 46395
Posted: #417
Post Deleted
The lion and the tiger may be more powerful, but the wolf doesn't perform in the circus.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 4050
Posted: #418
To make it sweet and short..niners have been led by 2 different QB's for the season...kaepernick goes into New England and wins and now he has to go to Seattle and win...and in a close pickem game numbers wise I'm not backing Akers where this game is key for field goals...
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 566
Posted: #419

Quote Originally Posted by AFNfootballnerd:

To make it sweet and short..niners have been led by 2 different QB's for the season...kaepernick goes into New England and wins and now he has to go to Seattle and win...and in a close pickem game numbers wise I'm not backing Akers where this game is key for field goals...

STILL THINK 31ST IS A FAR CRY REGARDLESS OF AKERS.  NOT TO MANY TEAMS OUT THERE HAVE 10 WINS AT THIS POINT AND YET THEY ARE ALMOST LAST IN CONSISTENCY?  I'D SAY THEY HAVE BEEN PRETTY CONSISTENT RELATIVELY SPEAKING JUST ASK THE RAMS, CARDINALS, JETS, BILLS, BEARS, LIONS, ETC ETC ETC.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 4050
Posted: #420
Consistency is confusing when comparing to actual wins and losses...but I'm glad it records consistency as it made me look at the niners past games of the entire season...I'm not forgetting they lost to ponder...can't beat the Rams..and only put up 3 points against giants...I took SF ML last week cuz of the program numbers and I'm sticking to the program numbers for Seattle...BOL
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 32
Posted: #421
bump for Sunday
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 4417
Posted: #422
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 4050
Posted: #423
Quote Originally Posted by sivotco7:

bump for Sunday
 

Merry Christmas covers! program was accurate as Detroit had 555 yards but managed to lose as usual...if I was told a home dog was getting 555 yards I would take it but it was the Lions 

Lets roll for Sunday 
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 19509
Posted: #424

Might lose a couple today.

 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 4050
Posted: #425
Quote Originally Posted by BigUnit:

Might lose a couple today.


  Saints  Bengals  let's go SeahawksSeahawks

All Forums | NFL Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.